Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

this may be a dumb ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
bubbakutz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: Wall Township, NJ
Car: 1987 "1991 Z" Sport Coupe
Engine: LG4
Transmission: TH700R4
this may be a dumb ?

ok, dont laugh but not sure if this is a dumb question
is an 87 camaro's horsepower of 170 equal to todays 170 horsepower? or is todays faster?
thanks bub
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
Tom91Bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: T-56
I'm gonna say possibly yes and no. Hp is Hp but 170 is PEAK Hp so a new car can have 170 but if it has a flater Hp curve it will have a higher average Hp over the whole rev band which could make them faster if they have comparable weight and gearing.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
Rustydawg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton AB Canada
Car: 86 Firebird
Engine: 355 4 bbl
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.73 L/S
I may be off-base here, but it almost sounds like you're referring to the GROSS and NET horsepower ratings that changed the way the manufacturers listed the engine's output.

I think it was 1971 when they made the transition, but a 350 HP (gross) rating could be about the same as a 290 net HP rating.

Either way, I don't believe the rating system has changed since then, it is still run with the as-equipped air filter system, exhaust and all accessories driven.

Tom91Bird has a good point, 170 HP in a 2003 model could come with a bunch more useable torque than something built in '87.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 06:34 AM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'll agree that since the early '70's, 170 net HP is 170 net HP. Gross doesn't include any accessories (water pump, alternator); air cleaner and exhaust used was optional. Net has to have water pump and alternator driven by the engine, the exhaust system and air cleaner that will be used in the chassis into which the engine is goin.

The way an engine gets to 170 HP is an entirely different matter. A 305 cid V8 that produces 170 HP at 4200 RPMs will drive completely different than a 120 cid 4-cyl that produces 170 HP at 6200 RPMs.

Last edited by five7kid; Oct 19, 2002 at 01:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 08:43 PM
  #5  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Originally posted by Tom91Bird
I'm gonna say possibly yes and no. Hp is Hp but 170 is PEAK Hp so a new car can have 170 but if it has a flater Hp curve it will have a higher average Hp over the whole rev band which could make them faster if they have comparable weight and gearing.
DUDE!!!!!!! You are SOOO RIGHT!!!!!! :rockon: That's what I keep telling everyone, but they refuse to listen.

Average HP and average TQ are what matter, not peak HP and TQ. Peak HP is nice to talk about, but how you get there is much more important.

AJ
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rally Smith
TBI
10
Sep 14, 2015 06:59 PM
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM
elevario
Car Audio
1
Oct 2, 2001 06:49 PM
89PFB
Electronics
3
Apr 25, 2001 07:53 PM
AcSeb
Tech / General Engine
1
Oct 14, 2000 12:13 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.