All who have swapped to a 400....
All who have swapped to a 400....
I am getting ready to put a 400 block in the machine shop to make sure it's good. If it is, it's gonna get built. I am curious as to anything I might need to know when swapping to a 406 from the 350. I am going with my HSR setup on it, so it will be fuel injected. However I've heard that these motors are very hard to keep cool. Anyone have troubles with this? I know the 700R4 will bolt up, however I believe I'm gonna build a turbo 350 for it. Also, can you use the MAF sensor if you have it modified? Or will it hold the hp...? If anyone has done this swap, any advice or anything I might need to know for this, please let me know. Thanks in advance.
Last edited by BadBowtie88; Jan 28, 2004 at 09:01 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
hold the hp
I had a 400 in my 83 car for a short while. I ran it with the stock L69 cooling system except for a Stewart water pump and a later-model radiator. I never really had any overheating problems with it. Of course if I had left it in there longer maybe I eventually might; it was only in there for about 12 years and 140,000 miles as my daily driver. I did however leave the A/C intact, and ran it pretty much continuously for 8 months out of the year, since I lived in the South at the time.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
other then the external balance flexplate, the dampener and possibly a new starter if the flexplate is a diff size... its no diffrent externally... so you dont need anything special there.
if you put the steam holes in the head (also no big deal) it wont overheat.... my 400 stayed cool all year long, and i also was in the south in high90* summer.....
if you put the steam holes in the head (also no big deal) it wont overheat.... my 400 stayed cool all year long, and i also was in the south in high90* summer.....
Originally posted by RB83L69
What is this "hold"? A MAF counts air molecules, so the ECM knows how many fuel molecules to add to the air. It doesn't "hold" anything.
I had a 400 in my 83 car for a short while. I ran it with the stock L69 cooling system except for a Stewart water pump and a later-model radiator. I never really had any overheating problems with it. Of course if I had left it in there longer maybe I eventually might; it was only in there for about 12 years and 140,000 miles as my daily driver. I did however leave the A/C intact, and ran it pretty much continuously for 8 months out of the year, since I lived in the South at the time.
What is this "hold"? A MAF counts air molecules, so the ECM knows how many fuel molecules to add to the air. It doesn't "hold" anything.
I had a 400 in my 83 car for a short while. I ran it with the stock L69 cooling system except for a Stewart water pump and a later-model radiator. I never really had any overheating problems with it. Of course if I had left it in there longer maybe I eventually might; it was only in there for about 12 years and 140,000 miles as my daily driver. I did however leave the A/C intact, and ran it pretty much continuously for 8 months out of the year, since I lived in the South at the time.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by conlinj
Ummmm the MAF doesn't count anything, it measures the volume of incoming air by heating a wire and measuring the change in temp of the wire and converting that to volts and sending it to the ECU
Ummmm the MAF doesn't count anything, it measures the volume of incoming air by heating a wire and measuring the change in temp of the wire and converting that to volts and sending it to the ECU
and that MASS is the molucules hes talking about.
just like the coolent sensor doesnt tell me engine coolent temp... it just changes the resistance of some thermocouple depending on the tempature of the coolent its in...
One of the guys I race with has a 400 block, runs all day at Pocono with no overheating issues.
As was said, you need steam holes machined into your heads and most shops know exactly how and where they go.
As was said, you need steam holes machined into your heads and most shops know exactly how and where they go.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Car: '91 Firebird
Engine: 408 SBC
Transmission: T5
The 400 SBC is externally balanced, so you will need an aftermarket flexplate or you can have the one from your 350 "unbalanced" to work on the 400.
You will need a starter that fits the staggered bolt pattern of the 400. The one from your 350 will not work as the bolt pattern is in a straight line on a 350.
As the others have mentioned, get the cylinder heads drilled for steam holes and you shouldn't have any overheating problems. I took my radiator in and had an extra row added, it is now a 3 core radiator. This might not be necessary, but it's nice insurance.
You will need a starter that fits the staggered bolt pattern of the 400. The one from your 350 will not work as the bolt pattern is in a straight line on a 350.
As the others have mentioned, get the cylinder heads drilled for steam holes and you shouldn't have any overheating problems. I took my radiator in and had an extra row added, it is now a 3 core radiator. This might not be necessary, but it's nice insurance.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Buy a new rad, for your new motor. Even a stock replacement one with plastic tanks and aluminum core.
Get a new water pump too.
I scooped up a nice factory oil cooler from a pickup truck
for my 400. Cost =$0 a gimmie.
Get a new water pump too.
I scooped up a nice factory oil cooler from a pickup truck
for my 400. Cost =$0 a gimmie.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by wingnut
The 400 SBC is externally balanced, so you will need an aftermarket flexplate or you can have the one from your 350 "unbalanced" to work on the 400.
You will need a starter that fits the staggered bolt pattern of the 400. The one from your 350 will not work as the bolt pattern is in a straight line on a 350.
The 400 SBC is externally balanced, so you will need an aftermarket flexplate or you can have the one from your 350 "unbalanced" to work on the 400.
You will need a starter that fits the staggered bolt pattern of the 400. The one from your 350 will not work as the bolt pattern is in a straight line on a 350.
and some 400s (like mine) can use a starter that has the bolts go straight across.... im running a summit ministarter like that right now.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Re: All who have swapped to a 400....
Originally posted by BadBowtie88
Also, can you use the MAF sensor if you have it modified? Or will it hold the hp...? If anyone has done this swap, any advice or anything I might need to know for this, please let me know. Thanks in advance.
Also, can you use the MAF sensor if you have it modified? Or will it hold the hp...? If anyone has done this swap, any advice or anything I might need to know for this, please let me know. Thanks in advance.
Re: Re: All who have swapped to a 400....
Originally posted by wesilva
I believe what you are talking about is the MAF sensor, even with the screens removed, is supposed to be good for only 300 rwhp. If I'm not mistaken, the flow is only good for 670 cfm. A well built 400 will easily exceed that rwhp.
I believe what you are talking about is the MAF sensor, even with the screens removed, is supposed to be good for only 300 rwhp. If I'm not mistaken, the flow is only good for 670 cfm. A well built 400 will easily exceed that rwhp.
I do appreciate all the replies. I didn't think there would be much difference other than it being externally balanced, which I knew. I had planned on buying a bigger radiator as well, just to make sure, plus I already have my dual fans wired together with a fan switch. Thanks again, and anyone who has anymore info on the MAF situation, please let me know
Last edited by BadBowtie88; Jan 29, 2004 at 05:19 PM.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Originally posted by madmax
The MAF setup will support alot more than 300hp. I'd be more worried about the intake manifold its attached to.
The MAF setup will support alot more than 300hp. I'd be more worried about the intake manifold its attached to.
Will the MAF support 300 rear wheel horsepower or about 385 at the crank? Every publication that I have picked up about Mass Air Flow systems always sees this as the weakest link to big horsepower...especially because of the fact the aftermarket has chosen to not to support the L98 TPI in this area.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
The MAF will flow somewhat more than that.
The problem is the combination of that MAF and the ECM it goes with. The 2 things together cannot measure more than 255 g/sec of air. That's about 300ish HP. But, that's not entirely relevant, because the ECM doesn't use the MAF mesaurement at WOT anyway.
For those of you who didn't do well in high school chemistry, there's a number called Avogadro's Number. It's about 6.022 x 10^23. It is the number of molecules contained in a mass of any material that is the same number of grams as the atomic weight of the atoms of the material. In the case of air, which is about 80% nitrogen with an atomic weight of 14 and about 20% oxygen with an atomic weight of 16, that gives an average atomic weight for air of about 14.4. In other words, 14.4 grams of air contains about one Avogadro's Number of atoms. So, 255 grams of air contains about 1.07 x 10^25 air atoms, about 20% of which (roughly 2.13 x 10^24) are oxygen. Since oxygen molecules are diatomic, that means that the MAF will accurately meter about 1.06 x 10^24 oxygen molecules per second.
So now that you know that, if you care to calculate the number of fuel molecules that can be burned by that much oxygen, you can easily determine the HP that the MAF can accrately meter, since each fuel molecule releases a certain specific amount of energy when burned. All you have to know is the heat content of the fuel (about 5.1 million BTU per barrel, for gasoline), the efficiency of your engine (roughly 35% for internal combustion engines like ours), and a whole bunch of conversion factors; and you can calculate nearly exactly how many HP you can get out of your motor before you max out the MAF.
However, since the MAF measurement is not used at WOT, it doesn't really matter how much it can meter under those conditions. All it has to do is to allow the ar to pass through it. The ECM simply injects a pre-programmed pulse width of fuel per distributor trigger signal, which you can set yourself in the PROM.
To my knowledge no one has ever observed a MAF "holding" HP. I'm not completely sure what that would look like; or what would happen if it decided to put it down; or how it would pick it up in the first place; or where it would store it. If anybody knows how it could do these things, please enlighten us.
The problem is the combination of that MAF and the ECM it goes with. The 2 things together cannot measure more than 255 g/sec of air. That's about 300ish HP. But, that's not entirely relevant, because the ECM doesn't use the MAF mesaurement at WOT anyway.
For those of you who didn't do well in high school chemistry, there's a number called Avogadro's Number. It's about 6.022 x 10^23. It is the number of molecules contained in a mass of any material that is the same number of grams as the atomic weight of the atoms of the material. In the case of air, which is about 80% nitrogen with an atomic weight of 14 and about 20% oxygen with an atomic weight of 16, that gives an average atomic weight for air of about 14.4. In other words, 14.4 grams of air contains about one Avogadro's Number of atoms. So, 255 grams of air contains about 1.07 x 10^25 air atoms, about 20% of which (roughly 2.13 x 10^24) are oxygen. Since oxygen molecules are diatomic, that means that the MAF will accurately meter about 1.06 x 10^24 oxygen molecules per second.
So now that you know that, if you care to calculate the number of fuel molecules that can be burned by that much oxygen, you can easily determine the HP that the MAF can accrately meter, since each fuel molecule releases a certain specific amount of energy when burned. All you have to know is the heat content of the fuel (about 5.1 million BTU per barrel, for gasoline), the efficiency of your engine (roughly 35% for internal combustion engines like ours), and a whole bunch of conversion factors; and you can calculate nearly exactly how many HP you can get out of your motor before you max out the MAF.
However, since the MAF measurement is not used at WOT, it doesn't really matter how much it can meter under those conditions. All it has to do is to allow the ar to pass through it. The ECM simply injects a pre-programmed pulse width of fuel per distributor trigger signal, which you can set yourself in the PROM.
To my knowledge no one has ever observed a MAF "holding" HP. I'm not completely sure what that would look like; or what would happen if it decided to put it down; or how it would pick it up in the first place; or where it would store it. If anybody knows how it could do these things, please enlighten us.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: The "D"
Car: A Portly 85 Z28
Engine: 4.530 X 4.250 BBC
Transmission: under rated for this application
Axle/Gears: also under rated
I had a 400 in my 85 z it ran about 140 in 85 degree weather, I followed lingerfelters modifications to the block and head gaskets. some of the 400`s had a extra coolant port that sits right in the middle of the deck betwwen the two middle cyl`s, In his small block mod book it shows how to make the mod if your block doesn`t have it, you drill the block to 5/8 on both sides and also the head gaskets. this mod puts cool water right between the two exausht ports in the middle of the head. I used a bolt on counter wieght from jegs with a 12 3/4 flywheel with my 400, the 85 had a two piece seal, so I ended up using the original 305 wheel with the 408. I`ll send you the scan of the page of the mod if you want.
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/487725
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/487725
Originally posted by RB83L69
To my knowledge no one has ever observed a MAF "holding" HP. I'm not completely sure what that would look like; or what would happen if it decided to put it down; or how it would pick it up in the first place; or where it would store it. If anybody knows how it could do these things, please enlighten us.
To my knowledge no one has ever observed a MAF "holding" HP. I'm not completely sure what that would look like; or what would happen if it decided to put it down; or how it would pick it up in the first place; or where it would store it. If anybody knows how it could do these things, please enlighten us.
Originally posted by BadBowtie88
Okay, I don't think that was really necessary was it? I was just using the term "holding". Forgive me for not being very proper, but everyone else seemed to understand what I was asking. Would "handle" the hp be a little better for you??
Okay, I don't think that was really necessary was it? I was just using the term "holding". Forgive me for not being very proper, but everyone else seemed to understand what I was asking. Would "handle" the hp be a little better for you??
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker
When you swapped to 400, did it make the car guzzle much more gas, if youre otherparts such as heads intake exhaust stayed the same?
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Gas mileage is comprised of many factors but the biggest is RPM. Motors are just big pumps and the less you pump, the more gas you save. A 302 obviously has a smaller displacement than a 400 but if the 302 is turning a 4:11 rear gear and the 400 is turning a 3:00 rear gear, the 400 will get better MPG's considering they both have the same transmission. EFI, tuned properly, will get better MPG's than a carb but still needs an overdrive or low numerical gears to get the best MPG's, if that's your goal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM




