350 or 455
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Frankfort, IN
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: V8 305 TPI 5.0L
Transmission: Auto
350 or 455
I am gonna do an engine swap this summer but I'm not sure if I want to put in a 350 with a supercharger or a 455 from an old buick. I need to know which is probally gonna be the cheapest and get the most power. The 455 will need to be rebuilt and of course all the stuff I'll have to do to the frame.
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 983
Likes: 55
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
This has been discussed before and subsequent arguments have ensued. Power output all depends on the combination of parts, its impossible just to say one or the other will make more power just by virtue of the engine type or size, especially when one may be supercharged. The bottom line is the 350 will be much, much easier to do, and way cheaper if its NA.
IMO a 455 would be a waste of money unless you are looking for an awe factor. So as to prevent a flame war, I will say again. This is my OPINION, not saying it is fact, dont care about bottom dollar. It comes down to, its gonna cost a whole hell of a lot more. That, and the fact that you can do just about anything with a 350 chevy, its just not worth it.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Given the fact that you want to build a supercharged 350 Chevy or a Buick 455, the cost argument is thrown out the window. Build a 350 to handle 7-10 PSI reliably, and then buy the supercharger (and the necessary upgrades to go along with it), and pretty soon you've spent quite a chunk. Buick motors aren't cheap to build, but considering torque figures in the 500 range stock its not really necessary to go too crazy with it. It will be more reliable than a blown 350 also.
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
The Buick engine will be more complicated to install, but if you go with a pre '74 engine with a stock rebuild, performance will be great at a lower cost than a supercharged 350. If you are good at fabrication and improvisation, the install of a 455 will not be too hard of a challenge.
Buick engines are very expensive to build high performance, but as stated previously, they put out great power in stock form, and are quite reliable as long as you modify the oiling system.
Buick engines are very expensive to build high performance, but as stated previously, they put out great power in stock form, and are quite reliable as long as you modify the oiling system.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
BTW, if you don't already have the Buick motor, you might consider a Pontiac 455 or even a Cadillac 500.
The Pontiac 455 is much cheaper to build than the Buick,parts availability is better, the mounts and headers are available (Chief Many Horses), and power levels are similar. Plus, they're equally easy to find in a salvage yard (at least here in GA; Pull-A-Part gets about $100 for a longblock). Thats the route I'm taking on my 87 TA.
The Caddy swap is a little tougher (you can get a semi-universal mount kit from Maximum torque Specialties, along with a header "kit"...Cad flanges, some u-bends, and a set of BBC headers), but definitely worthwhile. A stock 1970 Eldorado 500 was rated at 375hp and 500 torque, and with a few goodies from MTS you can bump that number to 500/500 (or more). They're very high quality high nickel blocks with beefy mains and stout nodular cranks, the heads flow pretty well as is, and once you go to an aluminum intake you're down in SBC (iron head) weight territory. Its relatively compact as far as big blocks go too. The only real downside to these motors is the stock rocker setup, and thats easily (and relatively cheaply) fixed. I'm currently building a 500 to go into a 1990 Chevy 3500 dually, but I'm thinking about putting one in my 85 TA as a sleeper.
The Pontiac 455 is much cheaper to build than the Buick,parts availability is better, the mounts and headers are available (Chief Many Horses), and power levels are similar. Plus, they're equally easy to find in a salvage yard (at least here in GA; Pull-A-Part gets about $100 for a longblock). Thats the route I'm taking on my 87 TA.
The Caddy swap is a little tougher (you can get a semi-universal mount kit from Maximum torque Specialties, along with a header "kit"...Cad flanges, some u-bends, and a set of BBC headers), but definitely worthwhile. A stock 1970 Eldorado 500 was rated at 375hp and 500 torque, and with a few goodies from MTS you can bump that number to 500/500 (or more). They're very high quality high nickel blocks with beefy mains and stout nodular cranks, the heads flow pretty well as is, and once you go to an aluminum intake you're down in SBC (iron head) weight territory. Its relatively compact as far as big blocks go too. The only real downside to these motors is the stock rocker setup, and thats easily (and relatively cheaply) fixed. I'm currently building a 500 to go into a 1990 Chevy 3500 dually, but I'm thinking about putting one in my 85 TA as a sleeper.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Not really. It's not like people are doing it right and left, and taking pics and posting them, and writing it up for posterity or whatever.
There's somebody that posts on this site that is evidently a Buick V8 guy, maybe knows those motors and what parts to look for and how to make them work; he's working on one, and posted pics of where he was modifying his firewall to accept one. It's in this forum somewhere. If you do a search on "Buick" and "firewall", you might be able to find it. I have no clue what he was going to do about exhaust though. That seems like it would be the biggest hurdle to overcome. That, and the extreme rarity of anything resembling performance parts for them, since basically they're virtually all just luxo-barge motors. You'd be likely to end up with one of those huge, heavy, expensive, elaborate, time-consuming projects where at the end, you discover you could have gone faster for a quarter the money and a tenth the time with a Chevy 350, and that nobody else really cares about any kind of "wow" factor for it being unusual.
There's somebody that posts on this site that is evidently a Buick V8 guy, maybe knows those motors and what parts to look for and how to make them work; he's working on one, and posted pics of where he was modifying his firewall to accept one. It's in this forum somewhere. If you do a search on "Buick" and "firewall", you might be able to find it. I have no clue what he was going to do about exhaust though. That seems like it would be the biggest hurdle to overcome. That, and the extreme rarity of anything resembling performance parts for them, since basically they're virtually all just luxo-barge motors. You'd be likely to end up with one of those huge, heavy, expensive, elaborate, time-consuming projects where at the end, you discover you could have gone faster for a quarter the money and a tenth the time with a Chevy 350, and that nobody else really cares about any kind of "wow" factor for it being unusual.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Sometimes it is; on the other hand, sometimes some of us have to be careful that the only "wow factor" we get is "wow, I just spent how much? and this thing only runs 16s and can't make it to and from work one time without something falling apart and it uses fuel in the gallons per mile?"
It's all in what you really want, what you have to spend to get there, and how likely the path you choose is, to actually lead to what you want.
Speaking strictly for myself, there's no "wow factor" whatsoever in walking up to a car and seeing a transplant, just for the sake of it being a transplant. I'm not a Buick or Olds or Pontiac (or even Chevrolet) partisan, so I don't get off on seeing "my favorite brand" of motor in whatever car it didn't come in. For me, the "wow factor" is in seeing one that is fast, reliable, inexpensive to put together, handles good, etc. etc.; without any one of those factors destroying any of the others. To each his own though. But IMHO, putting some smogger 180 HP 70s monster cast iron blibbet into one of these cars only gets the "wow factor" of "wow, I can't believe somebody would bother to do that to their car".
And, most importantly, for someone who just has some old car with a big motor that needs to be rebuilt and thinks that rebuilding that and swapping into some other car with a motor that needs to be rebuilt is cheaper than putting the right kind of motor into it, it's really bad advice. You gotta make sure of what the questioner's real motive for asking the question is. Somebody that says "I got this free 1949 Hupmobile V7 and my car needs a motor, what do I have to do to stick it in my Camaro" is going to spend vastly more than he thinks on that "free" motor, and he's probably going to be gravely disappointed at the end of it all, if he carries it through to completion. That's very different from a guy that's had some kind of car for years, has an accumulation of parts, knows them inside and out, knows where to get stuff, knows what fits, etc. etc., going and swapping his brand of motor into a foreign body.
It's all in what you really want, what you have to spend to get there, and how likely the path you choose is, to actually lead to what you want.Speaking strictly for myself, there's no "wow factor" whatsoever in walking up to a car and seeing a transplant, just for the sake of it being a transplant. I'm not a Buick or Olds or Pontiac (or even Chevrolet) partisan, so I don't get off on seeing "my favorite brand" of motor in whatever car it didn't come in. For me, the "wow factor" is in seeing one that is fast, reliable, inexpensive to put together, handles good, etc. etc.; without any one of those factors destroying any of the others. To each his own though. But IMHO, putting some smogger 180 HP 70s monster cast iron blibbet into one of these cars only gets the "wow factor" of "wow, I can't believe somebody would bother to do that to their car".
And, most importantly, for someone who just has some old car with a big motor that needs to be rebuilt and thinks that rebuilding that and swapping into some other car with a motor that needs to be rebuilt is cheaper than putting the right kind of motor into it, it's really bad advice. You gotta make sure of what the questioner's real motive for asking the question is. Somebody that says "I got this free 1949 Hupmobile V7 and my car needs a motor, what do I have to do to stick it in my Camaro" is going to spend vastly more than he thinks on that "free" motor, and he's probably going to be gravely disappointed at the end of it all, if he carries it through to completion. That's very different from a guy that's had some kind of car for years, has an accumulation of parts, knows them inside and out, knows where to get stuff, knows what fits, etc. etc., going and swapping his brand of motor into a foreign body.
Last edited by RB83L69; May 3, 2004 at 11:28 AM.
Originally posted by RB83L69
You'd be likely to end up with one of those huge, heavy, expensive, elaborate, time-consuming projects where at the end, you discover you could have gone faster for a quarter the money and a tenth the time with a Chevy 350, and that nobody else really cares about any kind of "wow" factor for it being unusual.
You'd be likely to end up with one of those huge, heavy, expensive, elaborate, time-consuming projects where at the end, you discover you could have gone faster for a quarter the money and a tenth the time with a Chevy 350, and that nobody else really cares about any kind of "wow" factor for it being unusual.
EDIT: Ok so I actually looked on the internet and it seems the Buick 455 is ~600-610 lbs. So with an aluminum intake you'd be close to an SBC. Still not bad for 455 ci.
Last edited by Mike92RS; May 3, 2004 at 01:41 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
The buick 455 is lighter than the other big blocks.. but hot rod magazine made a comparison on build ups regarding
olds, buick, poncho 455, chevy 454 ..
the buick costed 2000$ more than the others .. (7500$)
Tho, the buick did make more power than the others..
but roughly 20 hp isnt worth the extra expense ...
(and its as light as a SBC WITH aluminum heads & intake)
HOTROD ENGINES Winter 2002.
olds, buick, poncho 455, chevy 454 ..
the buick costed 2000$ more than the others .. (7500$)
Tho, the buick did make more power than the others..
but roughly 20 hp isnt worth the extra expense ...
(and its as light as a SBC WITH aluminum heads & intake)
HOTROD ENGINES Winter 2002.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Somebody that says "I got this free 1949 Hupmobile V7 and my car needs a motor,
My old JHS shop teacher had the worlds largest collection of hupmobiles. He had 5 i think, worth mulit-millions of $'s. He lives in Boise ID.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
No, I think hes trying to say that a SBC is the easiest/cheapest moderate performance solution, and in that hes right. Still though, even if you only built the 455 to stock stage 1 specs (and you could build it much better with todays cam technology), you'd have a MUCH stronger engine than you would have for the same $ spent on a small block Chevy. The 70 Buick GS 455 was one of the fastest of the regular production musclecars, and they were all loaded up with a bunch of heavy, power robbing accessories, yet they still ran right with stripped down big block Chevies and Hemi mopars. Sure, if you're trying to build a 600+ hp 455, you're going to spend some cash. But how much cash would you spend to get 500lb/ft of torque out of a small block Chevy? You could get that out of a 455 for less than the cost of a good stroker rotating assembly for the SBC.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, HI
Car: 1978 Caprice/Impala
Engine: 472 Caddy
Transmission: TH400
I don't know what kind of power numbers you're looking for, but a junkyard Caddy 500 will take a hefty nitrous shot over and over. Lots of people report 200 shots going down smooth, but I think 150 is the accepted "safe" value, and that's on an otherwise stock motor. Just don't rev above 5k.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by guy1138
I don't know what kind of power numbers you're looking for, but a junkyard Caddy 500 will take a hefty nitrous shot over and over. Lots of people report 200 shots going down smooth, but I think 150 is the accepted "safe" value, and that's on an otherwise stock motor. Just don't rev above 5k.
I don't know what kind of power numbers you're looking for, but a junkyard Caddy 500 will take a hefty nitrous shot over and over. Lots of people report 200 shots going down smooth, but I think 150 is the accepted "safe" value, and that's on an otherwise stock motor. Just don't rev above 5k.
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
My opinion is to go with the Buick and a set of 3:42 gears, unless you're looking for the look of a supercharger. Use '70 - '72 heads, 9 - 10:1 compression and a high volume oil pump (be sure to inspect the original timing cover for wear as it forms the oil pump housing).
Prepare the body for the torque and set up the rear suspension for traction. I have a '73 Bird with a 455 stage II Buick (bored and stroked to 492) that runs 10 flats and gets 17 mpg. I sure don't complain, never had to adjust anything on it except the carb once in a while at the track.
Prepare the body for the torque and set up the rear suspension for traction. I have a '73 Bird with a 455 stage II Buick (bored and stroked to 492) that runs 10 flats and gets 17 mpg. I sure don't complain, never had to adjust anything on it except the carb once in a while at the track.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Lonestar
My opinion is to go with the Buick and a set of 3:42 gears, unless you're looking for the look of a supercharger. Use '70 - '72 heads, 9 - 10:1 compression and a high volume oil pump (be sure to inspect the original timing cover for wear as it forms the oil pump housing).
Prepare the body for the torque and set up the rear suspension for traction. I have a '73 Bird with a 455 stage II Buick (bored and stroked to 492) that runs 10 flats and gets 17 mpg. I sure don't complain, never had to adjust anything on it except the carb once in a while at the track.
My opinion is to go with the Buick and a set of 3:42 gears, unless you're looking for the look of a supercharger. Use '70 - '72 heads, 9 - 10:1 compression and a high volume oil pump (be sure to inspect the original timing cover for wear as it forms the oil pump housing).
Prepare the body for the torque and set up the rear suspension for traction. I have a '73 Bird with a 455 stage II Buick (bored and stroked to 492) that runs 10 flats and gets 17 mpg. I sure don't complain, never had to adjust anything on it except the carb once in a while at the track.
lol...are you runnin a 6 speed tranny or something i just dont find it possible to get that mileage and those numbers ... Well, I had an uncle that had an old firebird around that age, and it had a 455 in it. it was one of the Super Duties, and it got around 14 stock, with no mods, and it sure as hell wasnt a 10 second car. Sounds a little too good to be true
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
It is a Stage I out of a '70 GSX with the Stage II heads (reworked for max flow). Kenne-Bell stroker kit putting it up to 492 ci, Edelobrock intake (not manufactured for quite some time now). 10.5:1 cr, custom grind solid lifter cam (my own specs), Holley 850 dual feed double pumper w/mech. secondaries, custom 3.25" headers and exhaust through glasspacks, 2200 stall converter.
Suspension is a custom 4-link, full tube chassis, body stripped of any excess weight.
This is obviously a little more extreme than a stocker, but the Buick 455 in a 3500 to 4000 pound car seems to do extremely well with the 3.42 gears as they put the engine in it's torque curve and keep it there. There are guys running 12's with mildly cammed 455's in 4000 lb cars at the track all the time. A buddy of mine put a stock 455 in his girlfriends Regal (this was a junkyard motor as he works there), this thing was quicker in the 1/4 than his built to the hilt sb 400 in his Monte!! He was po'd so he built a 454 for his Monte.
Thing is, a performance engine does not have to be a gas guzzler, performance comes from efficiency - the more efficient, the more power. You can stick every name brand high performance part there is into an engine, but if they are not matched properly, you'll get beat by stockers and get bad mpg's to boot. 17 mpg is not an unobtainable number if you do your homework and use your head, and of course, this number is during sane driving not in the throttle all the time.
Suspension is a custom 4-link, full tube chassis, body stripped of any excess weight.
This is obviously a little more extreme than a stocker, but the Buick 455 in a 3500 to 4000 pound car seems to do extremely well with the 3.42 gears as they put the engine in it's torque curve and keep it there. There are guys running 12's with mildly cammed 455's in 4000 lb cars at the track all the time. A buddy of mine put a stock 455 in his girlfriends Regal (this was a junkyard motor as he works there), this thing was quicker in the 1/4 than his built to the hilt sb 400 in his Monte!! He was po'd so he built a 454 for his Monte.
Thing is, a performance engine does not have to be a gas guzzler, performance comes from efficiency - the more efficient, the more power. You can stick every name brand high performance part there is into an engine, but if they are not matched properly, you'll get beat by stockers and get bad mpg's to boot. 17 mpg is not an unobtainable number if you do your homework and use your head, and of course, this number is during sane driving not in the throttle all the time.
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 983
Likes: 55
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
A buddy of mine put a stock 455 in his girlfriends Regal (this was a junkyard motor as he works there), this thing was quicker in the 1/4 than his built to the hilt sb 400 in his Monte!!
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
Although it is difficult to get a feel of other's projects and experience on a msg board, you must know that my buddy is an extremely experienced engine builder, drag and stock car racer. He knows his stuff. The thing is, those 455's were designed to motivated those huge boat anchors (commonly known as the Road Fleets). It is difficult to get as much load moving torque out of a small block than one of these monsters.
If you still have your doubts, try stuffing a bone stock pre '73 455 buick in any car you would like (around 3500 lbs) with 3.42 gears and see for yourself.
If you still have your doubts, try stuffing a bone stock pre '73 455 buick in any car you would like (around 3500 lbs) with 3.42 gears and see for yourself.
I'm not debating the time at all, I agree, those 455's (be they buick olds or pontiac) arent much to fool around with. I've seen em stomp the hell out of well built cars in thier stock form. I'm hoping to find me a 69-71 cutlass 442 soon, and you can bet its gonna have a 455 in it too. I was just saying that the 17mpg seems a little high for a motor like that. Does it have an OD tranny?
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
Just one TH-350 after another (never could handle the engine). I must admit I was pleasantly surprised by the mpg's, I figure I must have matched the parts quite well. If you get the right stuff together in the right way, you CAN get good mpg's as well as power. Of course, you do need to keep your foot out of the throttle!!!
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
Back to the topic, if you want to fit a 455 Buick in, get everything out of the engine compartment first. Then you bolt the trans to the engine and put the motor mounts on the engine (both the frame and block mounts), put your exhaust manifolds on, then slide the assembly into the bay. Now you go under the car, and mount the trans to the crossmember properly. Then check engine alignment and clearances. When you get everything straight, you can now mark on the frame where your mounts need to be located. Now take everything out and either weld or bolt the mounts to the frame.
Then start putting it all together, exhaust may be tricky, but it'll work.
Then start putting it all together, exhaust may be tricky, but it'll work.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Lonestar
full tube chassis, body stripped of any excess weight.
full tube chassis, body stripped of any excess weight.
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 983
Likes: 55
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
The thing is, those 455's were designed to motivated those huge boat anchors (commonly known as the Road Fleets). It is difficult to get as much load moving torque out of a small block than one of these monsters.
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 327
Transmission: TH350
Originally posted by formularpm
Thats a pretty blanket statement. A budget 350+ cid smallblock with some cheap TRW forgings, Vortecs, and some nitrous wouldnt be difficult at all and could be built very cheap.
Thats a pretty blanket statement. A budget 350+ cid smallblock with some cheap TRW forgings, Vortecs, and some nitrous wouldnt be difficult at all and could be built very cheap.
This topic is about the comparison of a supercharged 350 and a n/a 455. The 455 will win hands down on reliability and efficiency every time.
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 983
Likes: 55
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Well, of course you can take any engine, shove it full of nitrous and turbo, and make it scream. Just look at the bazillions of "Fast and the Furious" wannabe's. You go and take your 350 with nitrous, and I will take a 455 with nitrous and we'll stick them into identical cars, and see what happens.
Who said anything about a turbo? Why are you comparing a smallblock to a Civic engine? I was simply responding to your statement that it was difficult to get 'as much load moving torque' out of a smallblock. I dont agree. I dont think anything is difficult when it comes to smallblocks. I believe what Lonestar was trying to say is that the 455 makes so much more torque that a small block really has to be built to make the same. I agree with you, its not hard to do very much with a small block, but Ido think that a 455 will outperform it. A small block would have a hard time matching the torque of a built 455 and still having as much horsepower. IF oyu look at things as torque gets your off the line, and horsepower wins the race in upper RPM's. Even with nitrous, youre not going to get the off the line torque of the 455.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
yeah the off the line torque is awsome with a 455 but you will also have to do some upgrading to your suspension to support that block on your front end not to mention the rearend is going to need to be reworked either way if you go with a 350 built or a 455 so no matter which way you go the money is gonna have to be there but if it were me id go with the 350 just because of the ease of installation and availabilty of parts and not to mention the price of hipo parts for a 455 arent the cheapest inthe world..lol...but the 350 has a wide variety of parts for a better price if you build the 455 just over stock you could have built a stronger 350 for the same price ....if you take a 350 and have the block notched and buy a 383 kit for it you can make just as much torque as that 455 will and it will be a lighter platform with less mods having to be done to the suspension in the front and alot less fabrication to get the engine in there in my opinion if it were me id build a good stout 383 and run with the big dogs all day long..
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by formularpm
Thats a pretty blanket statement. A budget 350+ cid smallblock with some cheap TRW forgings, Vortecs, and some nitrous wouldnt be difficult at all and could be built very cheap.
Thats a pretty blanket statement. A budget 350+ cid smallblock with some cheap TRW forgings, Vortecs, and some nitrous wouldnt be difficult at all and could be built very cheap.
The thing most people don't realize about these engines is that because they make so much torque down low (often over 400lb/ft at 2000rpm), they don't have to rev in daily driving and can get very good mileage for their size, even without an overdrive. I wouldn't think 17mpg would be possible with a 10 second, non OD, carbureted anything with the same tune (unless its very light), but massive power (or mpg) gains are often possible with a jet change and little else.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
i would still if it were me build the 350 not with nitros thou just go all out on it and you will have a nice ride ......and i can see the plus sides to the 455 but i can also see alot of down sides to it too ...more fabrication , and suspension issues to deal with i would think..
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: Pontiac 455
Transmission: TH350
i can tell i am gonna get some slack from this. but here goes. i put a pontiac 455 into an 86 iroc. no fabrication. 1000$ for the parts to make it fit. and with 490 h.p. and 450 foot pounds of torque. it was well worth it. it helps that i like things to be different than the norm.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Kross4031
i can tell i am gonna get some slack from this. but here goes. i put a pontiac 455 into an 86 iroc. no fabrication. 1000$ for the parts to make it fit. and with 490 h.p. and 450 foot pounds of torque. it was well worth it. it helps that i like things to be different than the norm.
i can tell i am gonna get some slack from this. but here goes. i put a pontiac 455 into an 86 iroc. no fabrication. 1000$ for the parts to make it fit. and with 490 h.p. and 450 foot pounds of torque. it was well worth it. it helps that i like things to be different than the norm.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: Pontiac 455
Transmission: TH350
the motor mounts and headers are from chief many horses http://www.chiefmanyhorses.com/. the torque arm is from jeggs, mounts to the tunnel not the trans. all in all it was pretty easy, only because i threw a bunch of money at it. i haven't taken it to the track.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
awsome i bet that sucker will roast the tires too ...lol...sounds like a cool swap
just not for me with money bein a issue ive gotta be a little more conservative myself do you have any pics of the engine inthe car ?? id like to see what that bad boy looks like inthere
just not for me with money bein a issue ive gotta be a little more conservative myself do you have any pics of the engine inthe car ?? id like to see what that bad boy looks like inthere
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: Pontiac 455
Transmission: TH350
i dont have many pics. that's one thing i regret with doing this. i didn't stop to take the time to take pics. i will have some of the completed project soon. here is a pic of the motor. i'll get others eventually, when i get off my butt to do em .. lol.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
wow looks awsome man
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
hey when someone puts their own blood sweat and tears..lol..into any car to make it there own i look up to em because there building what they want and not what every one else thinks they should ......but it looks really nice id like to see some pics of it in the car ...i bet there isnt much clearance between that big boy and the car..lol...
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: Pontiac 455
Transmission: TH350
not much room at all... lol. now i have to tell ya. the car, well that doesn't look as nice ..lol. but it will in time. first thing's first. i'll get some pics soon.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
cool ...what kind of exhaust are you runnin on that ..and did you have to do any work to the front suspension to get it to hold it ??
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: Pontiac 455
Transmission: TH350
right now i am just runnin open headers. all i did was put some heavy duty springs in the front. the steering doesn't seem to be affected much. the brakes are going to have to be redone. the stopping power just isn't there. it rides nice but you can tell it's a little nose heavy. the back end is a little free on bumpy roads when the fuel take is not full. i put a 200lb chunk of steel in the rear cargo area and it help out dramatically. now i have to figure out exactly how and where to add the wieght.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
sounds like a journey of trial and error and thats always expected but sounds like your goin down the right road to gettin it right ...keep it up and keep us posted and when you get some pics of the engine in the car post em or send me a pm...thanks alot i really enjoy the sight of that big ol engine..lol...



