Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 03:08 AM
  #1  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member

many of you requested pictures of this when i got it so here's some pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member , lightweight does not even begin to describe it . the powdercoat was very nice and this thing can't possibly weigh more than 20-30lbs.the main thing for me here was the fact i did not have to notch the old k-member and it just looks soooo tricky! i'm pretty sure i'm gonna have to buy front lowering springs due to the weight of this and the LS1 so my convertible doesn't look like a 4X4 a mile high in the air! close in design to the 4th gen BMR k-member , i like it.
Attached Thumbnails pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member-kmember11.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 03:09 AM
  #2  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
another view, i had to add my LS1/T56 as a background in the first one
Attached Thumbnails pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member-kmember22.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 03:10 AM
  #3  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
and one final pic so our beloved moderators don't yell at me(joking guys , JOKING!!!)
Attached Thumbnails pics of the Hawk's LS1 k-member-kmember33.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
paul_huryk's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 10
From: Ahead of you...
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Very interesting - any idea in the weight difference between that and the stock one?

I was thinking of how much weight you are pulling off the front end - 150lbs for the motor and maybe another 50lbs for the new member and suspension.... sweet
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 11:28 AM
  #5  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Nice, It looks really good

Are you going to be running the tubular a-arms as well?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
yup , i gotta have the tubular A-arms as well, i heard claims up to 200 lbs. weight reduction , i'm really not sure how it will be. the LS1 is about 100 lbs lighter than a cast iron small block so the car should definitely be a lot lighter.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #7  
Ace's Avatar
Ace
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 384
Likes: 2
From: Canada
Car: 92 quasar gta
Engine: Nothing
Transmission: Nothing
Axle/Gears: 4.11s
:hail:

reminds me of something i gotta order pretty quick

hope it works with long tubes...

anychance you could bolt it up to the engine and take some pics id really love to see what kinda clearance it adds
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #8  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
i'll do that this weekend
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #9  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Originally posted by badjuju342
yup , i gotta have the tubular A-arms as well, i heard claims up to 200 lbs. weight reduction , i'm really not sure how it will be. the LS1 is about 100 lbs lighter than a cast iron small block so the car should definitely be a lot lighter.
It's over 100lbs lighter.....

Post those pics of the k-member on the engine, be interested to see if you have clearance for long tube headers after installing that k-member......

How long was the wait, or was it delievered right away?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 12:49 PM
  #10  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
he didn't have it in stock in the red but i stil got it in about 3 weeks from ordering it and this was with me mailing a money order so it was reasonably quick.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #11  
Rembrandt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
the LS1 is really that much lighter?

you mean 100lb less compared to an iron block, head, intake, exhaust manifold small block?

I know it has a plastic intake and it is all aluminum, but it has that deep skirted cross bolted bottom end, then those "pushrod box" things in the valley.

a Bowtie aluminum SB (just the block) is only about 80-90 lb lighter than an iron "equivalent," and that's when it isn't an extra-thick heavy duty one.

did you weigh them? both with accessories/whatnot?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #12  
89FormulaLS2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Lyndonville, VT
Car: 89 Firebird Formula
Engine: Custom Forged 402ci LS2 w/STS Turbo
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
I haven't weighed mine, but the LS1 is supposed to be MUCH lighter than the Gen I Small Blocks or the LT1s.


I've got the Hawk's K-member as well, although I got it in black. I ordered it right off the website, had it show up about a week and a half later.

We'll be taking the stock k-member out of mine in the next week or two. I'll weigh up that one against the Hawks and report back on the difference.

What are the benefits and drawbacks to using the tubular A-arms on a daily driver?

I'm hoping LTs will work as well - getting a set of PaceSetters, so we'll find out soon.................
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #13  
Knyghtmare's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
From: Hartland, WI
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: 2000 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E SS3600
Hmmm... Yes I am very curious as to if the Long Tubes will have clearance now... but I am also wondering about any strength issues it might had with reducing the strength on the right of the car... Obviously a STB would be needed, but even after that how would it be for strength...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #14  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Knyghtmare
Hmmm... Yes I am very curious as to if the Long Tubes will have clearance now... but I am also wondering about any strength issues it might had with reducing the strength on the right of the car... Obviously a STB would be needed, but even after that how would it be for strength...
I've contacted Bruce on this very issue since i want headers for the car and refuse to put shorties on it.....

I haven't had a chance to speak with him personally due to the fact i'm not back home and been really busy, but once i talk with him, I'll get back to you guys....

It's really hard to find people that are running tubular k-members, yet still use their car as a daily driver......
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 07:37 PM
  #15  
89FormulaLS2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Lyndonville, VT
Car: 89 Firebird Formula
Engine: Custom Forged 402ci LS2 w/STS Turbo
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
Bruce told me that he has the tubular k-member in his own car, and it's a daily driver. Although I'm not sure how many potholes they have down there?!

One of the guys at Texas-Speed&Performance told me he's got a friend who did a 3rd gen conversion with a tubular k-member made by Spohn, made some Long Tubes fit, and just re-inforced the k-member with a steel plate.

I'm not counting on anything until I actually get the k-member put into the car, though. We'll see what happens.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #16  
Rembrandt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Every time I read about a tubular K-member I hear about how it might hold up.

If I were to get one I'd probably add triangle gussets at all the pipe intersections and be done with it.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #17  
badjuju342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
Car: '89 rs convertible
Engine: ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
somehow , i really don't think Hawk's would sell you something that is dangerous for street use and tell you it's ok for that.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #18  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
You do realize all most all performance parts are labeled "Track only" so they don't sued right? I believe the issue of a tubular Kmember and daily driver was discussed in the suspension and chassis board. I believe the outcome is its not a good idea to run it with pot holes as they will eventually bend the A-arms.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #19  
Rembrandt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
somehow , i really don't think Hawk's would sell you something that is dangerous for street use and tell you it's ok for that.
I don't think they would either. But I don't think they did a 15,000 mile road test either. They, like probably most fabricators, judged the stress and made a pipe a little bigger than necessary to be on the safe side.

I'm not trying to knock anyone's craftmanship here or degrade their credibility, just asking questions and not getting conclusive answers.

When you are fabricating a whole new part, you have the freedom to make a quality design, weld, and pipe, that can be stronger and lighter, vastly superior to the factory compromise.

I can't wait for Spohn's K-member.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 11:00 AM
  #20  
Dr G's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Rembrandt
.......I can't wait for Spohn's K-member.
Me neither, but waiting for it has taken an eternity thus far! I'm beginning to wonder if they have canned the idea. However, last time I spoke to him he said it was just that they had been so busy manufacturing there torque arms etc that they hadn't had enough time to devote to future product development.

Much the same story as the Spohn Strut Tower brace that a lot of people have been waiting for.

I'm sure the products will be fantastic quality if and when they do arrive. And Steve Spohn will no doubt make sure it IS strong enough for daily driver duty despite the obligatory disclaimer of 'for racing use only'.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #21  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
If spohn makes one, i'll definately get it, im impressed by his torque arm and wonder bar.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #22  
89rsragtop's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 412
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, N.Y.
Car: blue
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
I keep hearing about the worry of breaking the tube K member. Does anyone really know someone that broke one?? I mean seen the damaged part. Not just some horror story.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 01:08 PM
  #23  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I think V6sixtoy (dean) bent his A Arms. No one that I know of has broken the K-member, but the A-Arms are usually the weakest design flaw.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #24  
hawksthirdgen's Avatar
Premium Sponsor
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 559
Likes: 49
Hey guys,
to help clear this up I run this same Kmember on my 10 second LS third genI drive my car on the street I see both sides of the story,Technically they are for off road use only but I drive mine on the street and have had NO problems. This is what we tell all our customers so it is left totally up to the customer.Keep in mind we also offer motor mount kits and well as modified factory kmemebers that have already been notched if anyone has any questions feel free to call me at the shop.
Thanks,Bruce
www.hawksthirdgenparts.com
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #25  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Nice to know you get on here to provide info Bruce! . That is one thing that will set you apart from the competition.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 12:34 PM
  #26  
hitman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Car: 1992 25th Ann. Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI - Stock
Transmission: th700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
not to be an ***

but who would buy a 3rd gen Fbody, intall the tubular K-member to fit an LS-1 engine and then take it off road?? As mentioned previous.. I assuem the "off-road use only" is just a disclaimer. If it was strong enough for "off-road" use, then it should be more than strong enough for daily driving. Most of us avoid a pothole like the plague just because of the stiff suspension natually assocaiated with a performance vehicle.

just my $0.02
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #27  
123jon321's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Kenner, La
Car: '86 iroc
Engine: lb9 305
Transmission: 700r4
I always thought " off-road use only" just meant that it wasn't street legal or as you say just a disclaimer.....
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #28  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Re: not to be an ***

Originally posted by hitman
but who would buy a 3rd gen Fbody, intall the tubular K-member to fit an LS-1 engine and then take it off road?? As mentioned previous.. I assuem the "off-road use only" is just a disclaimer. If it was strong enough for "off-road" use, then it should be more than strong enough for daily driving. Most of us avoid a pothole like the plague just because of the stiff suspension natually assocaiated with a performance vehicle.

just my $0.02
Well usually when you have an off road or track only vehicle, its only used 2-6 hours at a time maybe once a week at the most. That is where they get it at. But yes, it is mostly a disclaimer to help them as far as warranties and law suits.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #29  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Re: not to be an ***

Originally posted by hitman
but who would buy a 3rd gen Fbody, intall the tubular K-member to fit an LS-1 engine and then take it off road?? As mentioned previous.. I assuem the "off-road use only" is just a disclaimer. If it was strong enough for "off-road" use, then it should be more than strong enough for daily driving. Most of us avoid a pothole like the plague just because of the stiff suspension natually assocaiated with a performance vehicle.

just my $0.02
Hahahahaha
no "off road use only" does not mean "offroading" guy.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 11:54 PM
  #30  
89FormulaLS2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Lyndonville, VT
Car: 89 Firebird Formula
Engine: Custom Forged 402ci LS2 w/STS Turbo
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
LOL, that's right. "Offroad" does NOT = a 4X4, it just means for drag strip or race track use.

As to the pot holes, you can avoid 'em all you want, but if you come to some of the northern states, you're gonna run into some sooner or later; Winter, road salt, frost heaves, etc. all mean a bunch of really bad roads all spring and half the summer.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bohemian
History / Originality
24
Aug 15, 2017 05:11 PM
dbrochard
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
Sep 19, 2015 08:13 PM
dmtz956
LSX and LTX Parts
1
Sep 7, 2015 10:16 PM
dmtz956
LSX and LTX Parts
2
Sep 6, 2015 04:45 PM
buckshot63
Interior Parts Wanted
1
Sep 3, 2015 08:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 AM.