350 or ls series
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
350 or ls series
I am new to the thirdgen scene, but what I can gather so far is the 350 is better than a 305 and 383 is better than the 350, but here is my idea, I want a 383 but I want an ls series, so can I stroke an ls1 to a 383 and I would also like to go with a carb so I can do away with f.i.., is it possible to stroke an ls to a 383 and could I put a carb on it? Sorry if these questions have already been asked, and if they have would some one send me a link, I'm new to 3rd gens (just got mine a week ago or so) and really don't wanna do things twice. Thanks in advance. 



Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series
The LSx is a different engine family, but there are stroker parts available.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series
would my best be to go with the 383 or jump straight to the ls and which would be the most painless swap for me, either way the car will be a beast, also plan on supercharging it, also are the blocks that much different, would it be a matter of swapping heads and crank?
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series
LSx is a completely different engine family, nothing is interchangeable with an SBC.
Most painless is the SBC. Most potential is the LSx.
Most painless is the SBC. Most potential is the LSx.
Trending Topics
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series
You can, but boring is a repair operation, not a performance enhancement.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series
I know you can bore a 350 over and stroke it and come out with a 383 do the same rules not apply to a ls engine.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series
The overbore isn't to increase displacement, it's to clean up the cylinder wall wear on a used block.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series
But it does increase displacement which equates to more power, or is it so miniscule that it's irrelevent.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 3
From: Sussex County, NJ
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 350 or ls series
Take the best of both worlds and go with a 400 small block lol. Large displacement doesn't need modern technology to reach the same power levels and can be achieved cheaper than a LSx swap.
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Black w/ blue/silver
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700R4 (obviously)
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt 2.77
Re: 350 or ls series
Check out the 5.3L LS motors. Theyre way way cheap right now and with a supercharger or turbo you can make any power you want up too and over 1000 horsepower on completely stock internals. However if stroker is the name of the game for you there are stroker kits, but there is no 383 LS motor that im aware of. You can get an LS2, LQ4, or LQ9 though, those are 6.0s and can stroke those out to 402s (at that point its the stock 4" bore with a 4" stroker crank), its a pretty popular option right now and quite a few companies are producing stroker cranks or entire rotating assemblies for that build. Thatd be the way to go if you had the money, however for a budget build its hard to beat the boosted 5.3s right now
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Batesville, AR
Car: 1990 Formula Firebird
Engine: 350 (5.7) TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 POSI
Re: 350 or ls series
If you have the money, build an LS motor. Easy affordable would be a 350.
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Black w/ blue/silver
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700R4 (obviously)
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt 2.77
Re: 350 or ls series
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: Carb'd LT1 w/ a Cam :)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 3.75 gears
Re: 350 or ls series
You can infact make a 383ci LS1 based motor, even with a carb on top. Lots of people have done it with decent results.
I don't personally recommend building an over-square engine, but to each their own.
I don't personally recommend building an over-square engine, but to each their own.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 350 or ls series
Or, if you have a more modest budget, slap a cam in a 6.0 ls and smoke most built SBC 400s.
Re: 350 or ls series
For me, LS is the way to go! I swapped in a LS1 in my 68 Corvette a few years ago. I won't touch a Gen I again. Pull it out and sell it on ebay.
I have a mild cam (216/220 W/ .560 lift 2800 stall) It puts down 350HP at the wheels. It runs 12.5 1/4 and gets over 20 mpg. You can't beat that. If you use the 6.0, with some reserch, you can make over 500HP easy. my next build will be the 6.0.
I have a mild cam (216/220 W/ .560 lift 2800 stall) It puts down 350HP at the wheels. It runs 12.5 1/4 and gets over 20 mpg. You can't beat that. If you use the 6.0, with some reserch, you can make over 500HP easy. my next build will be the 6.0.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: Carb'd LT1 w/ a Cam :)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 3.75 gears
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series
Bore-to-stroke ratio is something to be worried about when designing an engine, not when you're building it.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: 350 or ls series
As apeiron says, if you're designing an engine on a drawing board/cad program, you concern yourself with bore/stroke ratios for maximum efficiency in various areas and other concerns. But when it come sto hot rodders. If you got an LS1 and you want more cubes, you can't just make the bore bigger, so you stroke it...
Basically, a bigger bore is better than more stroke. But the only thing we can significantly change is stroke. And when it comes to power, more cubic inches are still better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM







