Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

350 or ls series

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #1  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
350 or ls series

I am new to the thirdgen scene, but what I can gather so far is the 350 is better than a 305 and 383 is better than the 350, but here is my idea, I want a 383 but I want an ls series, so can I stroke an ls1 to a 383 and I would also like to go with a carb so I can do away with f.i.., is it possible to stroke an ls to a 383 and could I put a carb on it? Sorry if these questions have already been asked, and if they have would some one send me a link, I'm new to 3rd gens (just got mine a week ago or so) and really don't wanna do things twice. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:30 PM
  #2  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

The LSx is a different engine family, but there are stroker parts available.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #3  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series

can I carb?
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:39 PM
  #4  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

You can if you jump through a few hoops for the ignition.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:50 PM
  #5  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series

would my best be to go with the 383 or jump straight to the ls and which would be the most painless swap for me, either way the car will be a beast, also plan on supercharging it, also are the blocks that much different, would it be a matter of swapping heads and crank?
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #6  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

LSx is a completely different engine family, nothing is interchangeable with an SBC.

Most painless is the SBC. Most potential is the LSx.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #7  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series

I know you said I could stroke the ls can I bore it over also
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 03:13 PM
  #8  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

You can, but boring is a repair operation, not a performance enhancement.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 03:17 PM
  #9  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series

I know you can bore a 350 over and stroke it and come out with a 383 do the same rules not apply to a ls engine.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 03:23 PM
  #10  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

The overbore isn't to increase displacement, it's to clean up the cylinder wall wear on a used block.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 03:30 PM
  #11  
jmcmillanjr.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 1991 T/A GTA, 1991 T/A
Engine: 350 and 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 350 or ls series

But it does increase displacement which equates to more power, or is it so miniscule that it's irrelevent.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 04:09 PM
  #12  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

Irrelevant, the increase in displacement is tiny.
Reply
Old May 19, 2012 | 09:58 PM
  #13  
zraffz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 3
From: Sussex County, NJ
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 350 or ls series

Take the best of both worlds and go with a 400 small block lol. Large displacement doesn't need modern technology to reach the same power levels and can be achieved cheaper than a LSx swap.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 03:24 AM
  #14  
Vega's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Black w/ blue/silver
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700R4 (obviously)
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt 2.77
Re: 350 or ls series

Check out the 5.3L LS motors. Theyre way way cheap right now and with a supercharger or turbo you can make any power you want up too and over 1000 horsepower on completely stock internals. However if stroker is the name of the game for you there are stroker kits, but there is no 383 LS motor that im aware of. You can get an LS2, LQ4, or LQ9 though, those are 6.0s and can stroke those out to 402s (at that point its the stock 4" bore with a 4" stroker crank), its a pretty popular option right now and quite a few companies are producing stroker cranks or entire rotating assemblies for that build. Thatd be the way to go if you had the money, however for a budget build its hard to beat the boosted 5.3s right now
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 03:32 AM
  #15  
Andrew James's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Batesville, AR
Car: 1990 Formula Firebird
Engine: 350 (5.7) TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 POSI
Re: 350 or ls series

If you have the money, build an LS motor. Easy affordable would be a 350.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 03:48 AM
  #16  
Vega's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Black w/ blue/silver
Engine: L98 5.7
Transmission: 700R4 (obviously)
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt 2.77
Re: 350 or ls series

Originally Posted by Andrew James
If you have the money, build an LS motor. Easy affordable would be a 350.
True story. Also dont get caught up in internet talk about drag times and whats fast and whats not. Most people would be scared to drive even a 12 second car all out on the streets. You dont have to be the king of power to have fun
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 12:11 AM
  #17  
Z28 MeTaL HeAd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: Carb'd LT1 w/ a Cam :)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 3.75 gears
Re: 350 or ls series

You can infact make a 383ci LS1 based motor, even with a carb on top. Lots of people have done it with decent results.

I don't personally recommend building an over-square engine, but to each their own.
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 01:02 AM
  #18  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
I don't personally recommend building an over-square engine, but to each their own.
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 07:46 AM
  #19  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 350 or ls series

Originally Posted by zraffz
Take the best of both worlds and go with a 400 small block lol. Large displacement doesn't need modern technology to reach the same power levels and can be achieved cheaper than a LSx swap.
no matter what you do to an SBC, you can do it to an LS with better results. Stroke a 6.0 for 400+ cubic inches and build more power than a similar 400 SBC, with better drivability.

Or, if you have a more modest budget, slap a cam in a 6.0 ls and smoke most built SBC 400s.
Reply
Old May 27, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #20  
Boudin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Re: 350 or ls series

For me, LS is the way to go! I swapped in a LS1 in my 68 Corvette a few years ago. I won't touch a Gen I again. Pull it out and sell it on ebay.
I have a mild cam (216/220 W/ .560 lift 2800 stall) It puts down 350HP at the wheels. It runs 12.5 1/4 and gets over 20 mpg. You can't beat that. If you use the 6.0, with some reserch, you can make over 500HP easy. my next build will be the 6.0.
Reply
Old May 28, 2012 | 05:58 AM
  #21  
Z28 MeTaL HeAd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: Carb'd LT1 w/ a Cam :)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 3.75 gears
Re: 350 or ls series

Originally Posted by Apeiron
Sorry, i totally meant UNDERsquare, lol...

I would never personally build an undersquare engine like a 383 LS1 would be.


Undersquare means the size of the cylinder bores are smaller then the stroke of the crankshaft.
Reply
Old May 28, 2012 | 07:07 AM
  #22  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

Bore-to-stroke ratio is something to be worried about when designing an engine, not when you're building it.
Reply
Old May 28, 2012 | 07:30 AM
  #23  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: 350 or ls series

Originally Posted by Z28 MeTaL HeAd
Undersquare means the size of the cylinder bores are smaller then the stroke of the crankshaft.
If you're stroking an engine it's because going to a bigger bore isn't practical or applicable. In the case of an LS1 the max overbore is something like .007" or so. All you can do is stroke it.

As apeiron says, if you're designing an engine on a drawing board/cad program, you concern yourself with bore/stroke ratios for maximum efficiency in various areas and other concerns. But when it come sto hot rodders. If you got an LS1 and you want more cubes, you can't just make the bore bigger, so you stroke it...

Basically, a bigger bore is better than more stroke. But the only thing we can significantly change is stroke. And when it comes to power, more cubic inches are still better.
Reply
Old May 28, 2012 | 07:53 AM
  #24  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 350 or ls series

And for what it's worth a 383 LS1 is square, not undersquare.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
buffaloman
Firebirds Wanted
1
Sep 7, 2015 09:47 AM
buffaloman
Camaros Wanted
2
Sep 7, 2015 09:46 AM
Formula_88AE
Engine Swap
1
Sep 3, 2015 01:47 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.