355 stroke to 383 or not
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
355 stroke to 383 or not
Well talked to my builder today and got a price to swap the top end and check the motor and put the 1.6 rocker on it. With the AFR 195 comp port heads and installing the 1.6 rockers I should be at 450 at the crank. We talked about stroking it for hp wise ans he has made up to 525 on a carb setup for the street.So with the super ram and AFR comp port heads I shoukd be right around 500 crank. He recommended the Scat 9000 series crank kit. Said he has never had a motor come backwith this setup. I believe him as they have been in buisness for many years and are well respected in my area.So is it worth the upgrade or not? Im so on the fence with this. I know the trick flows have to go, they are holding me back, but is it worth the cost to stroke it. With that come complete teardown and rebuild. Well would like opinions from other who have been on the fence with this. Thanka
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
For that hp range save the money on comp ports and get the regular street head. 383 will make more torque and wont have to rev as high to make power, and a superram likely will need ported extensively to support 500 hp. You can make big power with the 355 but it will be down on low to mid range power, thus requiring more gear and converter if auto trans. Superram will support peaks in the 5500-5800 range if ported well. That is enough rpm to make 350-400 whp depending on the cam. Thats near 425-500 crank
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Michigan!
Engine: Vortec 4200 Inline 6 PT70 Turbo..
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
Do iiiiiiiit. with more cam... 
Bigger cubes will tame any aggression that cam had in a 355. Smoother idle, power peak will be lower.
I would step it to a 230/236 or 236/242 type cam unless you building this for hours of city traffic idling.
Goodluck deciding! Hehe of course compression in the 11:1 range would be about right, not sure where the current pistons put you.

Bigger cubes will tame any aggression that cam had in a 355. Smoother idle, power peak will be lower.
I would step it to a 230/236 or 236/242 type cam unless you building this for hours of city traffic idling.
Goodluck deciding! Hehe of course compression in the 11:1 range would be about right, not sure where the current pistons put you.
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: BALT, MD
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: HRE 355
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.56
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
I second saving the money on the comp ported heads. Unless youre racing its a waste of money...besides the added cam you need to take advantage of them.
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
Most lt1 builds i have seen show about 20-30 lb ft more across the board with a 383 vs a 355 with same mods . Thats a pretty good chunk. My 383 picked up 20-25 lb ft with a dyno tune over my base street tune and i could feel the difference and saw better et/mph at the track. So you should feel the 383 difference over 355 when considering same heads/cam package
If you already have a good 355 bottom end i would stay with it. For what you are trying to accomplish, afr heads and porting the intake and a new cam will satisfy you. Lots of power left in those cubes
If you already have a good 355 bottom end i would stay with it. For what you are trying to accomplish, afr heads and porting the intake and a new cam will satisfy you. Lots of power left in those cubes
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, IL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
I second saving the money on the comp ported heads. Unless youre racing its a waste of money...besides the added cam you need to take advantage of them.
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
If you have the budget and the time, then get a 383. There's really no reason NOT to unless your seriously strapped for cash (like I was). If I hadn't gotten such a sick deal on my shortblock then I definitely would've done a 383 instead.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
For these cars they arent super heavy so dont really need raw torque. Tpi build will make 406 type torque but never match the hp of a good intake on a big inch sb.
Seems harder to find a good 400 block these days, and you lose the 1 pc rear main, smaller flex plate and cheap lt1 starters, roller cam, etc. All nice features. Unless you get an shp block for 1800 machined and blueprinted.
I wouldnt build a 400+ unless you were looking for low 11's to 10 sec car all motor. 383-355 can easily get mid high 11's without alot of work.
Its whatever you have the budget for. My 383 only made 370wtq and 392 whp on its last hoooot dyno pull. But in a 3450 lb car it was really an animal. How much torque do you need? Lol 1.55 60's not even trying hard
Seems harder to find a good 400 block these days, and you lose the 1 pc rear main, smaller flex plate and cheap lt1 starters, roller cam, etc. All nice features. Unless you get an shp block for 1800 machined and blueprinted.
I wouldnt build a 400+ unless you were looking for low 11's to 10 sec car all motor. 383-355 can easily get mid high 11's without alot of work.
Its whatever you have the budget for. My 383 only made 370wtq and 392 whp on its last hoooot dyno pull. But in a 3450 lb car it was really an animal. How much torque do you need? Lol 1.55 60's not even trying hard
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
I second saving the money on the comp ported heads. Unless youre racing its a waste of money...besides the added cam you need to take advantage of them.
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
As for stroking...i wouldnt waste the efforr or money. If you want torque buy a 406 or 421. I dont think youll be as impressed as you think.
I agree the 355 is lower on torque, but is it worth it all for 20 lbs of torque?
Good luck!!
Keep the responses comming. Thank you
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
What power or et/traps does it turn as it sat with lpe 219 and trickflows?
Afr street 195's and ported ram could easily gain 50+ hp on same cam.
Afr street 195's and ported ram could easily gain 50+ hp on same cam.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
AFR 195 ---- Twisted wedge 180cc ---- AFR 195 Comp ported
.100
.200 145/119 -- 144/112 -- 151/125
.300 201/166 -- 187/150 -- 211/172
.400 274/197 -- 226/180 -- 260/207
.500 275/213 -- 229/196 -- 293/224
.550 280/218 -- .600 238/206 -- .550 304/229
---- -------------- -----.600 308/233
Opinions? Thanks for the sponses ORR
Last edited by IROCZ1989; Feb 4, 2013 at 05:28 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
Depends on budget. 1.6's and afr 195 street heads on that combo is gonna go much faster. 112 is good with old combo, better than i expected. I dont see how you cant go 116 with new heads same cam with 1.6 rockers. Its gonna be stout with ported intake. Reallly need that intake ported to gain the most out of those heads
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
From what I have been reading and researching it seems like the base is the pinch point in the system. Let me know if Im off here but from what Ive gathered the super ram runners out of the box will flow around 290 cfm. The base on the other hand is around 230-240cfm unported. So If I can get the base around 260-275 I should be good. 25 -35 cfm I think is doable since there is plenty of meat in these out of the box. I ported one about 8 years ago for an 88 corvette, and it was a task to say the least. On a bone stock vette If i remember went 13.4-13.6 @ 98-99 mph. Not bad I thought, but I spent hours on it. It had no tune either just stock chip. Guy who drove it first time to track clicked off those ets.. I have someone now who can do the port work for me for a resonable price .
So here is what Im thinking now. If bottom end needs attention, ill use that cola crank and get some 6 inch rods and new .40 over pistons, builder said he would need to clean it up some. If everything checks out Ill run the 1.6 and keep the cam. I know a few here have said the streets version are fine, . Since AFR said I could go with the Comp version, what is the diff and why would I use one over the other? They are about 12-24 more cfm in the same ranges with the 195cc comp version vs the street.The cam will be .560/.560 with the 1.6 rocker so in that area there is about a 24cfm diff between the two on the intake and about 10-11 cfm on exhaust.
So here is what Im thinking now. If bottom end needs attention, ill use that cola crank and get some 6 inch rods and new .40 over pistons, builder said he would need to clean it up some. If everything checks out Ill run the 1.6 and keep the cam. I know a few here have said the streets version are fine, . Since AFR said I could go with the Comp version, what is the diff and why would I use one over the other? They are about 12-24 more cfm in the same ranges with the 195cc comp version vs the street.The cam will be .560/.560 with the 1.6 rocker so in that area there is about a 24cfm diff between the two on the intake and about 10-11 cfm on exhaust.
Last edited by IROCZ1989; Feb 4, 2013 at 07:27 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
Comp port is only about 10-15 hp better on most applications but 600 bucks more. So its not really worth it. Its only considered worth it if you were building an all out race ap where you need the last bit of cfm and use an aggressive cam to get every last bit of hp out of it. I dont think you will tap into that extra hp potential until 575-600 hp and it would take well built setup to extract that power.
Id save the 600 and put it towards cam lifters and rockers...
Id save the 600 and put it towards cam lifters and rockers...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
Orr, Im most likly going to resuse all the valvetrain as it does not have many miles on it, but we will see as the machine shop will check wear. Cheapest price on the comp ports I see is around 1900 shipped. The street ports I have not looked into. Only thing about these heads I just found out, you cannot use self aligning rockers like the old style afrs, seems with the new 8mm valves you have to use guideplates and old style rockers. Im going to try to get this motor up to the shop on Sat and go from there. I will recoup some money on these trick flows and the gold crane 1.5s there in good shape, but already looking into porting them and even Total Engine Flow , who actually at one time hae a program for these dont do them anymore. On a mild build these would be a nice upgrade. Im sure they will make 375 +crank hp easy on a street 350. Any opinions on the lower manifold? Thanks
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 355 stroke to 383 or not
For this performance build i wouldn't use self aligning rockers anyway. Street ports can be had for 1260-1440 depending where you look and who is selling. Couple guys on here had or still have connections to afr dealer prices
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM









