THE BIG ?, true dual or cat-back
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh, PA
Car: 84 Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 4bbl HO
Transmission: 700-R4, 3.73 rear
THE BIG ?, true dual or cat-back
OK i'm sure this is something many people have an opinion on so here it goes.
this custom exhaust place in pittsburgh kicks *** (they do a lot of the Hollywood knights cars in pittsburgh, if u've ever heard of them www.hwknights.com ), they can put true dual stainless steel exhaust on, it includes thorly (sp) headers, 2 high flow cats and 2 high flow mufflers. or i can buy the thorly (sp) headers, with a good y-pipe and custom cat-back system or buy a cat-back (soo many to choose from) and i know that true dual don't really benefit u unless u have over 350-400 hp or have a big block, and i don't plan on going to that kind of power, and both setups cost about the same about a $1,000+. with true dual technically u r running 4 cylinders each pipe and the sound from both come out the back, so would a H-pipe be something to get for true duals?
P.S. how can i get a good sound recording of my car and where would i place the mic?
this custom exhaust place in pittsburgh kicks *** (they do a lot of the Hollywood knights cars in pittsburgh, if u've ever heard of them www.hwknights.com ), they can put true dual stainless steel exhaust on, it includes thorly (sp) headers, 2 high flow cats and 2 high flow mufflers. or i can buy the thorly (sp) headers, with a good y-pipe and custom cat-back system or buy a cat-back (soo many to choose from) and i know that true dual don't really benefit u unless u have over 350-400 hp or have a big block, and i don't plan on going to that kind of power, and both setups cost about the same about a $1,000+. with true dual technically u r running 4 cylinders each pipe and the sound from both come out the back, so would a H-pipe be something to get for true duals?
P.S. how can i get a good sound recording of my car and where would i place the mic?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh, PA
Car: 84 Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 4bbl HO
Transmission: 700-R4, 3.73 rear
come on people
no offense guys but from what I've been seeing this forum is all about bragging and what cat-back is better. i know i know... "search for true duals, it's a very popular topic" well i have and I'd have to say out of about 50 topics (with a search of "true duals") none of them talked about what is better, true duals or cat-back. and BELIEVE ME i found some great info on true duals and only true duals. all i put this this post up for was to see if anybody has had the "example" slp headers with high flow cats and hooker cat-back setup and a true dual setup to see what setup they like better and if one is louder than the other. that's it, that's all i wanted but i doubt I'll get that. but i got a lot of info from post made months ago so it wasn't a loss of anykind, hope to reply to or make posts that give poeple good info.
Thanks,
Chio
Thanks,
Chio
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Windsor,Ontario, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro Z 28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
well ive been told that it is hard, not impossible though to fit 2 mufflers and 2 cats under a 3rd gen,, i am interested in going dual but where do the cats go and the mufflers? If anyone has some diagrams of this id like to see them.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
I can't remember for the life of me who it was but in one of the threads I was reading some guy showed the diagram of his setup for true-dual. the way it ran is actually both piped ran along the passener side (almost like cutting the stock pipe in 2), having the cats one after the other so they weren't next to each other and could fit, then both of the mufflers were the same under the trunk. Instead of 1 pipe on either side of the car, both pipes came out the back left side. Thats all I can remember. If I remember who it was, I'll make sure to post it....
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Helsinki, Finland
Car: Camaro
Engine: Gas
Transmission: Automatic
It was Willie. If you search by his name, you will find a ton of posts, and in his sig there's a link to his homepage. He has many pics of his system (true dual, dual cat's no ground clearance problems).
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 5
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
Re: come on people
....all i put this this post up for was to see if anybody has had the "example" slp headers with high flow cats and hooker cat-back setup and a true dual setup to see what setup they like better and if one is louder than the other.
Well, my setup is close. It was:
1-3/4" SLP headers
Dual cats
Custom made 3" cat back with an 80-series Flowmaster
Chromed 1994 Z28 tips
Now, it's:
1-3/4" SLP headers
Dual cats
Custom 2-1/2" duals routed the same as stock (passenger side and over the axle)
Two polished 1969 Z28 chambered mufflers positioned in the stock muffler location
Chromed 1994 Z28 tips
Is my new setup better? If you mean sound, it's definitely louder. I can attribute this to the change in mufflers, not necessarily the change from a single 3-inch to a pair of 2-1/2 inch pipes. If you mean performance, I don't know as I've never run the car at the track with the true duals. Even when I eventually do, it won't be a realistic comparison from my previous track times because I've changed a number of other things.
Well, my setup is close. It was:
1-3/4" SLP headers
Dual cats
Custom made 3" cat back with an 80-series Flowmaster
Chromed 1994 Z28 tips
Now, it's:
1-3/4" SLP headers
Dual cats
Custom 2-1/2" duals routed the same as stock (passenger side and over the axle)
Two polished 1969 Z28 chambered mufflers positioned in the stock muffler location
Chromed 1994 Z28 tips
Is my new setup better? If you mean sound, it's definitely louder. I can attribute this to the change in mufflers, not necessarily the change from a single 3-inch to a pair of 2-1/2 inch pipes. If you mean performance, I don't know as I've never run the car at the track with the true duals. Even when I eventually do, it won't be a realistic comparison from my previous track times because I've changed a number of other things.
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
true dual exhaust
I believe true true dual helps out a lot, but like someone said only when your are running about 350+ HP. I has the true dual setup on my camaro and let me tell you it sounds like a monster! From each header (or collector) i am running stainless steel piping underneath both sides of the car with the tips sticking out of the side of the car (right behind both doors or infront of the tires) it looks really sweet and sounds nice also. Im running true dual exhaust with no cats and on each side i have a 1 chamber muffler to give it that aggresive tone, and believe me it does! Anyways i took some pictures of it but i havent got the camera delveloped but when i do i will post it up and so you guys.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
No, it wasn't Willie, whomever it was had a black camaro, but I must say, Willie, that is one AWESOME setup you got there. Gonna be sending you a pm, got a question or 2 to ask ya...
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: kansas
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
just something to remember....if this muffler shop uses press bends, even dual 3" pipes will flow worse than a single 3" mandrel-bent catback. if you doubt thats true, heres how i calculated it. dual 2.25" pipes = single 3" pipe. dynomax advertises that 30% of the diameter of the pipe is lost through their muffler bend. obviously that % will vary, but i doubt it would be any less than that. anyway 30% of 3" is approximately 2" or 2.1" to be exact. so, it is like running dual 2" vs single 3". and since 2" is less than 2.25", it will flow worse running press-bent dual 3" than it would a mandrel-bent single 3" assuming you have a quality y-pipe. so what im saying is....use mandrel bends
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 5
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
I should have included this sooner. Here's a audio/video clip:
http://www.iroc-zpostforum.com/MemberWillie.htm
Willie
http://www.iroc-zpostforum.com/MemberWillie.htm
Willie
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: san antonio tx usa
Car: 84z28
Engine: chevy 388
Transmission: 700r4
it was probley me i had the dual exhaust on my car but just changed to a 4" heres a new pic forget about the date i just took it today but you can still see my old setup at .
http://darcom.org
http://darcom.org
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
YEP!! It was DARCOM alright!!....
Question, I was thinking about doing dual pipes too, but I wanted to do side exiting...would that be a lot easier and a lot less bends? Or would it be just as difficult as pushing them out the back?
Question, I was thinking about doing dual pipes too, but I wanted to do side exiting...would that be a lot easier and a lot less bends? Or would it be just as difficult as pushing them out the back?
That depends on if you want ground clearance. If you go out the side, you probably wont have much. I only have one bend in each side of my exhaust which are hedman s extensions, but I have long tubes. I have about 5" clearance and dont srape on anything(had the clamps drag on my friends driveway before I had it welded so its close though. I have turndowns at the rear. I would like to continue out the back, but There is no one locally that does mandrel bends so it will be a while. Also if you plan to fit mufflers and or cats I would consider stock routing like willie's or something. I have bullet mufflers and they fit fine, but they are small.
Ben
Ben
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: san antonio tx usa
Car: 84z28
Engine: chevy 388
Transmission: 700r4
well i just got it , it was a custom job had to work around the spohn stuff. it feels the same to me but the resions i changed it
was 1. the new spohn stuff i got did not clear it 2. theres a weight
differance between having two pipes and two mufflers 3. this exhaust does not get as hot neer the fuel tank causing my tank to purge from the excess heat 4 the pipes were getting old and had a few dents from speed bumps and stuff.
oh and its sounds alot better and louder.
heres a new pic of my y pipe
was 1. the new spohn stuff i got did not clear it 2. theres a weight
differance between having two pipes and two mufflers 3. this exhaust does not get as hot neer the fuel tank causing my tank to purge from the excess heat 4 the pipes were getting old and had a few dents from speed bumps and stuff.
oh and its sounds alot better and louder.
heres a new pic of my y pipe
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Windsor,Ontario, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro Z 28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
is there anyone on here who hasnt had to modify their undercarriage and install spiffy new parts? Wonderin if anyone has a decent dual setup without moddin anyhting. I mean i dont wanna notch my frame or buy new linkage and stuff?
I do and I didnt have to modify anything. I may end up haveing to do some modifications in the future if I get an aftermarket crossmember and torque arm though. I have about 5" clearance. I dont really hit on anything.
Ben
Ben
I suppose it could. You would have to fabricate a pipe to run down from the header and turn toward the back of the car on each side. After that I ran it straight back down the driveshaft tunnel on each side, but I have turndowns at the rear end.
Ben
Ben
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh, PA
Car: 84 Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 4bbl HO
Transmission: 700-R4, 3.73 rear
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: waukesha,WI
Car: Black 89 Formula
Engine: ??????????
Transmission: ??????????
just looked at spohn's web site man i love those sub frame connectors they must be the best ever!!!!!!:hail: :hail: :hail: :hail: :hail: :hail: :hail: :hail:
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Darcom - how much did it cost to notch your sub-frame and do the rest of the exhaust? Do you have any pics of the C - notches without the exhaust in the way?
Thanks,
Mike (1bad91Z)
Thanks,
Mike (1bad91Z)
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: san antonio tx usa
Car: 84z28
Engine: chevy 388
Transmission: 700r4
i had all the work done for $700. .
3 inch y pipe and 4 pipe cut and cut and welded from scratch
notch the sub frame and welded support.
plus muffler for $110. i thank from summit
the only reason i notched the frame was becouse i did not want to modify the spohn trans bracket even though i had to, to run pipe under the safty loop.
3 inch y pipe and 4 pipe cut and cut and welded from scratch
notch the sub frame and welded support.
plus muffler for $110. i thank from summit
the only reason i notched the frame was becouse i did not want to modify the spohn trans bracket even though i had to, to run pipe under the safty loop.
Last edited by DARCOM; Oct 2, 2003 at 12:33 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chevykid810
Firebirds for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:57 PM
david068513
Camaros for Sale
0
Sep 18, 2015 10:36 AM







