4" Mufflex-Spintech Exhaust
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: Supercharged 383 TPI
Transmission: TH-700R4
4" Mufflex-Spintech Exhaust
I've been reading up on the Mufflex exhaust systems for our cars and I was wondering everyone's opinion on whether or not I should install one on my car. Currently i'm running a 3" 40-series Flowmaster single outlet dumped on the drivers side, 3" intermediate pipe, 1 3/4" SLP headers and 2 1/2" pipes to a Flowmaster Y. My motor has about 8.4 points of compression, heavily ported and polished L98 heads, ported Big Mouth Intake, Big Mouth Runners, ported plenum, 58mm TB, and a vortech blower pushing 12 psi of boost. I have a Lunati cam with LSA of 114 degrees, .465/.490 lift, 270/280 advertised duration, with 1.6 ratio rockers. I like the sound of Spintech and I was wondering if I have enough motor to use big 4" exhaust w/ 3" dual exits or if it would just be a waste of money. My car does sound unique due to the regular 40-series mounted in the stock location and dumped, but I really want to sound different and gain some horses if possible without going to duals. I feel I could lose some torque because my setup dynoed at approximately 550 ft/lbs and 445 hp at the rear wheels. It needs more tuning. I'm learning all the DIY computer stuff. I have yet to run it at the strip.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Just my opinion but if any car could use a 4 inch exhaust system it would be yours. I have not read good things about the Spintech or Flowmaster mufflers. I would option for either a Dynomax Ultra Flow or a Magnaflow or something along that line. Mufflex is a distributor for both.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
What are the bad things you've read about Spintech? Flowcrapper bad things I can understand
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Just what I have researched on the internet and dyno tests done my some. Some of these have gained ET and MPH by switching to a Magnaflow or Dynomax or another brand of straight through muffler. Allen
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Hi Blown383.
If you are talking to me absolutely not. I would do some research(google) and just don't take my opinion as mine is just one of many and I have not purchased my Mufflex 3.5" system yet so I have no first hand knowledge. You can always talk to Mufflex as they are a distributor for Dynomax and Magnaflow and other mufflers as well and get there opinion. Allen
If you are talking to me absolutely not. I would do some research(google) and just don't take my opinion as mine is just one of many and I have not purchased my Mufflex 3.5" system yet so I have no first hand knowledge. You can always talk to Mufflex as they are a distributor for Dynomax and Magnaflow and other mufflers as well and get there opinion. Allen
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1
From: Tigard, Oregon
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Spintech is a nice FlowmasterISH sound, but with less of the annoying raspy sounds. I like the soundclips that they have.
From muffler to muffler, the flowmaster flows horrible. The spintechs arent too great either, but it's not like you're going to lose 10hp out of the muffler... and if you're so concerned about THAT then put a cut-out right after the y-pipe and be happy with your 4" exhaust.
From muffler to muffler, the flowmaster flows horrible. The spintechs arent too great either, but it's not like you're going to lose 10hp out of the muffler... and if you're so concerned about THAT then put a cut-out right after the y-pipe and be happy with your 4" exhaust.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1
From: Tigard, Oregon
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
That's a great chart EvilCartman
It's great, too bad it doesnt put an open exhaust w/o muffler, or a straight-through design (like Loudmouth) flow numbers to use as a baseline to know how much it actually holds it back....
It's great, too bad it doesnt put an open exhaust w/o muffler, or a straight-through design (like Loudmouth) flow numbers to use as a baseline to know how much it actually holds it back.... Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Interesting mufflers Spintech chose to compare with. The Dynomax Turbo muffler is their old technology. They should have used something like the Dynomax Ultra Flow.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1
From: Tigard, Oregon
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 1989GTATransAm
Interesting mufflers Spintech chose to compare with. The Dynomax Turbo muffler is their old technology. They should have used something like the Dynomax Ultra Flow.
Interesting mufflers Spintech chose to compare with. The Dynomax Turbo muffler is their old technology. They should have used something like the Dynomax Ultra Flow.
Originally posted by EvilCartman
Heh, damn glad I saved this...
Heh, damn glad I saved this...
Save your propaganda for someone else, until you get real world experience. Too much BS thrown about by those who don't have a clue, which seems to be quite common around here.
Blown383 - The only downside to the system your looking at is weight. They're heavy! I've got a lot less motor than you do, and I lost no noticable low end torque. Power above 4000rpm definately increased. Do a search on the 4" Mufflex systems. I've posted in detail many times before of my results.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Blah blah blah blah you're spouting as much BS as the next guy. Why don't YOU come up with some real world graphs and charts. I'd be really interested in some dyno numbers and I'm sure a lot of other people would be too.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 1
From: Evansville,IN,USA
Car: 89' T/A, 00' Firehawk
Engine: 406 Roller
Transmission: TH700R4 w/2800 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
I'm kinda in the same boat. I am going to put my 406 in my other car and am going with single exhaust but don't know if I should go 3.5/4in or put a cutout on it and run mandrel bent 3 inch w/ a muff. My 406 ran 7.8's in the 1/8 with true duals 2.5 and turbo thrush muffs.
Originally posted by EvilCartman
Blah blah blah blah you're spouting as much BS as the next guy. Why don't YOU come up with some real world graphs and charts. I'd be really interested in some dyno numbers and I'm sure a lot of other people would be too.
Blah blah blah blah you're spouting as much BS as the next guy. Why don't YOU come up with some real world graphs and charts. I'd be really interested in some dyno numbers and I'm sure a lot of other people would be too.
Charts and graphs may look pretty to you, but personally I like real world results. I may not have a flow chart (which is irrelevent for exhaust scavenging, not flow), or a pretty graph for guys like you to ooh and aah at. But when I can only keep up with another car from a roll, and hours later, I can inch past him, that's good enough for me. Especially when the G-Tech (a VERY useful tuning tool) verifies my butt dyno.
In the end, its my word vs yours. Experience vs conjecture.
Again, I ask you, what does that chart have to do with a 4" 30 series Flowmaster?
Edit: I run FASTER than you N/A, with old tech iron heads, a smaller cam, CCQJet, etc etc, and am doing it with a 4" exhaust. I must be doing something right...
Last edited by Marc 85Z28; Apr 3, 2005 at 06:18 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Saw this chart on the Dynomax web site. Thought it might help those deciding on what size exhaust to use.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Originally posted by Marc 85Z28
Edit: I run FASTER than you N/A, with old tech iron heads, a smaller cam, CCQJet, etc etc, and am doing it with a 4" exhaust. I must be doing something right...
Edit: I run FASTER than you N/A, with old tech iron heads, a smaller cam, CCQJet, etc etc, and am doing it with a 4" exhaust. I must be doing something right...
You happen to have a good working combo. My exhaust sucks for the new engine and haven't gotten around to putting on either a 4 inch single or some sort of dual and getting rid of the Edelcrock headers. I will be sticking with Spintechs cause I know they work from what I've seen with cars around town. There's other factors why my car is running the times it is, zero serious tuning, needs a converter change, couple other small problems that have now been taken care of and lots of other little things that add up big. Going to the track in a couple weeks to see if they make a difference. When first building this engine I thought it would be in the 11's N/A but it sure as hell didn't turn out that way. Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
david068513
Camaros for Sale
0
Sep 18, 2015 10:36 AM





