Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Flowmaster 40's vs. Open Pipes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #1  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Flowmaster 40's vs. Open Pipes

My friends Mustang is getting repoed due to his cosigner filing bankruptcy so we cut the pair of Flowmaster 40's off of it the other night. This along with putting the stock air box on it made the car gain a TON of power. Those mufflers were seriously bottlnecking that car. He had dual 2.5 inlet 40 series on his car which're the higher flowing ones. This is just to verify what several members have said on here, Flowmasters are NOT very high flowing mufflers. I had tried before to talk him into running a set of flow through mufflers but that's a moot point now.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2007 | 01:42 AM
  #2  
izcain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Port Angeles, Wa
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
After working at an exaust shop I will try to stay away from flowmasters for all exaust builds since they flow like crap!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
How did you verify that it "made the car gain a ton of power"?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:22 AM
  #4  
ws6gta89's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne,Fl
Car: 1989 TRANS AM GTA
Engine: 355 L98
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
loud=fast


dont you know that!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #5  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Exactly, track times or dyno numbers would be great. THAT would really let us know how "bad" they flow and give us some actual hard evidence.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #6  
luvofjah's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 20
From: PNW
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
And the "40" is 1 in a line of about 10 or so different mufflers...
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
I've been racing for years now and have a feel for what power is so don't patronize me and act like I'm an idiot. We had been running the snot out of the car all weekend and when we took the mufflers off low and behold it picked up bottom end torque and ran to the red line quicker. To top it off it will now rip tires going into second and chirp third consistantly. Oh but that must've been my ears deceiving me... because I'm some 16 year old tool. When you can NOTICE the car gained power by the butt dyno and see it in the tach and speedo, you're not fooling yourself into thinking the car is faster. The car gained ALOT of power throughout the power band. I guess i should've taken the car to the dyno and given you all scientific evidence instead of just verifying what alot of members already know about these mufflers, well even then people would probably come on here and argue that I was wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Originally Posted by 1991CamaroRslow
I've been racing for years now and have a feel for what power is so don't patronize me and act like I'm an idiot. We had been running the snot out of the car all weekend and when we took the mufflers off low and behold it picked up bottom end torque and ran to the red line quicker. To top it off it will now rip tires going into second and chirp third consistantly. Oh but that must've been my ears deceiving me... because I'm some 16 year old tool. When you can NOTICE the car gained power by the butt dyno and see it in the tach and speedo, you're not fooling yourself into thinking the car is faster. The car gained ALOT of power throughout the power band. I guess i should've taken the car to the dyno and given you all scientific evidence instead of just verifying what alot of members already know about these mufflers, well even then people would probably come on here and argue that I was wrong.
Without solid numbers, it could be argued that this is a classic example of the placebo effect. You anticipated picking up significant horsepower going into the "expiriment" which heavily biases the outcome. A couple simple 0-60 runs could have provided some tangible evidence.

I've personally seen some pretty decent dyno numbers using a 3" flowmaster exhaust system, enough so that I'm fairly confident that there would be less than 10 Hp to be gained going to straight pipes.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #9  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
^ Very true. I know someone with a 10 second fbody that runs dual 40 series. When he took them off and went to no mufflers, he gained NO mph in the 1/4 mile at all. So we all can say different things. I myself won't go around saying 40 series flow as well as having no mufflers, because everyone has their own experiences. Not to mention all the different 40 series out there.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #10  
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
We didn't take the mufflers off expecting a gain, we took them off because the car is unfortunately going back to the bank. It's a very basic 4.6, non PI heads, PI intake, and a CAI. The rest of the exhaust was dual 2 1/4 pipe ran to an X pipe and dual 2.5's out to the twin 40 series with dumps. The car gained power; if he was going to have it long enough I'de take it and see if it would run a better time, hell if I had a G tech I'de even use that but the car's going back Friday. I would say that it just changed the torque peak higher but the car revs faster throughout the RPM band. Maybe it's just this combo but I've heard on these boards more than once that Flowmasters don't flow that well, this seems to back that up; take it for what it's worth.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Camaro_383
Exhaust
4
Sep 11, 2015 11:28 PM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
89fast5oh
Exhaust
2
Sep 8, 2015 09:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.