To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Moncton NB
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"(Moser),4:11s,locker,31splin
To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
I am planning on redoing the duels on my car this winter and am unsure if I want to add an X-Pipe or not. I know it is going to take some work, but I am also planning on fabiing a new trans cross member so I can tuck the pipe up into the tunnel a bit better, and also move the torque arm out of the way.
The big question is it worth it or not, I know it helps with scavaging and all, but how much differance an I going to see from true duels with no cross over.
The big question is it worth it or not, I know it helps with scavaging and all, but how much differance an I going to see from true duels with no cross over.
Supreme Member




Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 33
From: Washington State
Car: 1983 BB 1995 Z28 Camaro's
Engine: 454-350
Transmission: TH350-4l60e
Axle/Gears: 373 posi-Stock
Re: To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
I am no expert and I am in the same phase of building my new exhaust. I plan on using an X-pipe and running into two 3"x3' mufflers. I have heard it is very good to use the X-pipe.
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 202
Likes: 1
From: williamstown,NJ
Car: 95 9C1,99 Sierra,90Sierra,00 sierra
Engine: TBI350,LM7,LT1,Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4,4L60e,4L60e,4L80e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,14bolt,3:42,3:73,3:08,3:73.
Re: To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
xpipes are said to better for performance,but the hpipe sounds smoother and better IMO.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 28
From: Las Vegas
Car: '88 Trans Am
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: Slushbox
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
There seems to be some misconceptions about H pipe vs Xpipe vs straight pipes......
straight pipes old school technology it has no balancing for exhaust flow..
H pipe was designed by for to compensate for crappy exhaust, which helped balance the exhaust flow.Lightly changes the sound in the process.
X pipe was designed to help scavenge exhaust flow essencially making a the exhaust pull exhaust from one side to the other causing a balancing affect. this will change the sound of the exhaust note and from what i have seen makes the exhaust note a little more crisp, removes a lot of the droaning sound along with increasing the TQ just a bit.
straight pipes old school technology it has no balancing for exhaust flow..
H pipe was designed by for to compensate for crappy exhaust, which helped balance the exhaust flow.Lightly changes the sound in the process.
X pipe was designed to help scavenge exhaust flow essencially making a the exhaust pull exhaust from one side to the other causing a balancing affect. this will change the sound of the exhaust note and from what i have seen makes the exhaust note a little more crisp, removes a lot of the droaning sound along with increasing the TQ just a bit.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 5
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
i had an X pipe on the 71 Nova i used to have.. the engine was a 355 with vortec heads, GMPP HOT cam with matching 1.6 roller rocker arms, and an Edelbrock performer vortec intake with quadrajet intake. that was backed by a T10 4 speed manual with 3.70 gears. the exhaust was Hedman headers with a Flowmaster kit after that had a crossflow muffler behind the rear axle... it sounded good with the H pipe that Flowmaster put in their system for the first 2 years i had that car together, but it totally changed the attitude of the car when i swapped in a Hedman X pipe kit.. it was more mellow at idle and quieter at part throttle cruise with no drone at all at highway speeds.. but the real fun came when i wanted to play- the X pipe made the car just absolutely mean sounding above about 3500rpm and the noise it made at 7200 rpm under power could only be described as bone chilling.. not only that, but throttle response and torque was better off idle and i gained a couple of miles per gallon.. in other words, it was better in every way with the X pipe than it was the H pipe.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Moncton NB
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"(Moser),4:11s,locker,31splin
Re: To X-Pipe Or not to X-pipe
i had an X pipe on the 71 Nova i used to have.. the engine was a 355 with vortec heads, GMPP HOT cam with matching 1.6 roller rocker arms, and an Edelbrock performer vortec intake with quadrajet intake. that was backed by a T10 4 speed manual with 3.70 gears. the exhaust was Hedman headers with a Flowmaster kit after that had a crossflow muffler behind the rear axle... it sounded good with the H pipe that Flowmaster put in their system for the first 2 years i had that car together, but it totally changed the attitude of the car when i swapped in a Hedman X pipe kit.. it was more mellow at idle and quieter at part throttle cruise with no drone at all at highway speeds.. but the real fun came when i wanted to play- the X pipe made the car just absolutely mean sounding above about 3500rpm and the noise it made at 7200 rpm under power could only be described as bone chilling.. not only that, but throttle response and torque was better off idle and i gained a couple of miles per gallon.. in other words, it was better in every way with the X pipe than it was the H pipe.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151845714645484
Last edited by Dels383TA; Jul 23, 2012 at 10:38 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 5
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






