How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
SO, I am in the process of installing the Hawk's Ram Air Intake , doing the coolant line delete on the throttle body and with the K&N filters in there I feel that will be enough for the intake on my (New to me) 89 IROC.
Next I want to do exhaust. What I have in there right now looks to be mostly 2.5" stock stuff. What I would like is to step up to 3" full exhaust.
I am thinking a Magnaflow 16450 Y Pipe, MAYBE a high flow cat like a Walker 15043 (As I live in an area where my car does not require emissions), a Flowmaster 17234 to finish things up.
Cause what I have noticed on my 89 5.7 is that is really gasps for air at 4500 rpm... it wheezes... like it has trouble blowing past about 115 MPH as that is the power-band I am in at that speed(2.77 Rear End 700r4).
Now I don't want a drag car, I just want something that sounds sweet, keeps it MONSTER TORQUE (seriously, this car is super fun to tear *** around town in), sounds a bit throatier and maybe flows air bit better. But I wonder if the stock Manifolds are so restrictive that, even for my needs, such modifications are just "noise makers"?
Next I want to do exhaust. What I have in there right now looks to be mostly 2.5" stock stuff. What I would like is to step up to 3" full exhaust.
I am thinking a Magnaflow 16450 Y Pipe, MAYBE a high flow cat like a Walker 15043 (As I live in an area where my car does not require emissions), a Flowmaster 17234 to finish things up.
Cause what I have noticed on my 89 5.7 is that is really gasps for air at 4500 rpm... it wheezes... like it has trouble blowing past about 115 MPH as that is the power-band I am in at that speed(2.77 Rear End 700r4).
Now I don't want a drag car, I just want something that sounds sweet, keeps it MONSTER TORQUE (seriously, this car is super fun to tear *** around town in), sounds a bit throatier and maybe flows air bit better. But I wonder if the stock Manifolds are so restrictive that, even for my needs, such modifications are just "noise makers"?
Last edited by KanzlerBismarck; 02-18-2018 at 02:21 AM.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The worst part of the 89 L98 exhaust is pretty easily the factory Y-pipe. It's more like a T pipe, chalk full of crinkle crushed bends. Beyond that, the cat should be the nice 3" cat, with a nice mandrel bent 2.75" or 3" intermediate pipe back to the muffler and 2.25" pipes. That's assuming it's all stock stuff.
The cars that got royally screwed on the exhaust, were the 90-up cars without N10, the LG4 cars, L03s, etc. They all got the smaller outlet exhaust manifolds, 2.25" cat and intermediate pipe, etc.
You'll see more improvement from headers, than a cat-back. But then headers are more expensive and create more headaches too. Flowmasters will sound good, if you like the sound of Flowmasters, but it'll probably flow worse than the stock muffler. The 1/4" increase in diameter won't make that much difference really. It'll just seem impressive because it'll be louder.
The L98 manifolds really aren't that bad. Sure headers are better for performance, but are they worth the trade off? You don't ever hear people complaining about the stock manifolds rusting out, leaking, getting loose bolts, burning plug wires, making it impossible to change spark plugs, rubbing the steering shaft, blah blah blah.
The cars that got royally screwed on the exhaust, were the 90-up cars without N10, the LG4 cars, L03s, etc. They all got the smaller outlet exhaust manifolds, 2.25" cat and intermediate pipe, etc.
You'll see more improvement from headers, than a cat-back. But then headers are more expensive and create more headaches too. Flowmasters will sound good, if you like the sound of Flowmasters, but it'll probably flow worse than the stock muffler. The 1/4" increase in diameter won't make that much difference really. It'll just seem impressive because it'll be louder.
The L98 manifolds really aren't that bad. Sure headers are better for performance, but are they worth the trade off? You don't ever hear people complaining about the stock manifolds rusting out, leaking, getting loose bolts, burning plug wires, making it impossible to change spark plugs, rubbing the steering shaft, blah blah blah.
#3
Member
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Long tubes will give you some extra torque, Drew is correct though they are kind of a pain in our engine bays, definitely worth it if your going with a new exhaust. Long tubes with a 3" exhaust will be very nice for cruisin
if your thinking shorties, they are pretty close to stock manifolds so not much gain, personally I'd just port out the stock manifolds if your going that way.
LS swap it
if your thinking shorties, they are pretty close to stock manifolds so not much gain, personally I'd just port out the stock manifolds if your going that way.
LS swap it
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
How restrictive are they? They're not as good as headers but better than a lot of manifolds. If they're the right L98 manifolds then they have 2.25" outlets and they're not the reason that the L98 falls on its face at about 4600rpm, that's the TPI setup. That said, it should pull up to something in the 140's without much problem.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
So maybe a manifold port is in order along with a 3" and a cat delete.
Also, I work this old gas out of the tank she is getting more and more lively. Took her out on the highway today and she had little trouble going deep into the 100s.
I have to say, I have a 2nd gen 78 TA 400 4 Speed, driven tons of 4th Gens.. done a lot of 1st gen stuff with my buddies 69 DZ302. But for whatever reason, I like this IROC-Z the best. Seems to have a streetable powerband, get's off the line fast, zero issues making tire smoke, and really pushes hard out of turns.
And maybe I am crazy, but this is one of the best handling cars I have ever driven.
Also, I work this old gas out of the tank she is getting more and more lively. Took her out on the highway today and she had little trouble going deep into the 100s.
I have to say, I have a 2nd gen 78 TA 400 4 Speed, driven tons of 4th Gens.. done a lot of 1st gen stuff with my buddies 69 DZ302. But for whatever reason, I like this IROC-Z the best. Seems to have a streetable powerband, get's off the line fast, zero issues making tire smoke, and really pushes hard out of turns.
And maybe I am crazy, but this is one of the best handling cars I have ever driven.
The following users liked this post:
Eagle223usa (07-25-2019)
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,674
Likes: 0
Received 106 Likes
on
65 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
How restrictive are they? They're not as good as headers but better than a lot of manifolds. If they're the right L98 manifolds then they have 2.25" outlets and they're not the reason that the L98 falls on its face at about 4600rpm, that's the TPI setup. That said, it should pull up to something in the 140's without much problem.
#7
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Columbus
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 Formula, 72 Nova, 68 Chevelle
Engine: L98, mild 350, L79 327
Transmission: 700R4, M20, M20
Axle/Gears: 9b 327,10b 373, 12b 331
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The exhaust manifolds are terrible on these cars. I installed Dyno Dons on my 88 L98 and picked up 4 mph in 1/4 mile, no other changes on a 90 degree day.
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
TPI (L98/LB9) manifolds are definitely not terrible on these cars.
See my sig for results with factory TPI exhaust, except cat delete and Magnaflow muffler.
See my sig for results with factory TPI exhaust, except cat delete and Magnaflow muffler.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I remember feeling a seat of the pants improvement with shorty headers over my stock exhaust. Mainly it sounded better.
I did not get track times with it bone stock i dont think. It had the headers on with full catback upgrade and a converter and it went 13.63 at 97 on bias ply drag tires. I thought that was pretty good.
I did not get track times with it bone stock i dont think. It had the headers on with full catback upgrade and a converter and it went 13.63 at 97 on bias ply drag tires. I thought that was pretty good.
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; 02-22-2018 at 06:33 AM.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
As has been mentioned, your 4500 RPM restriction isn't the fault of exhaust manifolds, it's more likely due to the TPI system designed for 5.0 liter displacement. With that said, maybe your cat is clogged?
#12
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 RS/89 Formula
Engine: 305 TBI/350 TPI
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73/3.08
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
This issue is on the intake side with these cars. Ditch the TPI intake manifold for a Holley Stealth Ram.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Well, actually since I have filled her with new gas she is running a lot better. Took her out on the highway and she had little trouble getting deeper into the hundreds. My goals would be something like 300-350 HP at the crank.. but still keeping that instant torque curve our cars possess. Is this possible with the stock manifolds?
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
At least the ones I have dealt with. Granted I have not seen these "Dyno Don" headers. They seem to be custom for our cars.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
To me headers make the plug changes easier on these cars if anything.
Last edited by Fast355; 02-20-2018 at 09:35 PM.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,418
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I tried to run TPI manifolds on my last build just for making plugs easier to get to and simplicity. Wound up changing to headers and then my starter wouldn't act right and yes burnt wires and headache changing plugs but I know it made way more power. My next build I haven't decided yet. Its going to be a mild 350 and I have the TPI manifolds and some Hooker Headers I just haven't made up my mind yet. Drawbacks to either one.
#21
Member
iTrader: (11)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
You can't be serious ??
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
Last edited by Ty92Z; 02-21-2018 at 09:11 AM.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
You can't be serious ??
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
#23
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Jackson, New Jersey
Posts: 108
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 TPI (Deleted Cats)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Original 3.27
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I was talking to one of the guys at my local car show, he has a mildly built tpi. He says that going to headers sucks and that stock manifolds are perfectly fine.
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Just talking off the top of my head, but I remember reading some flow numbers on the N10 exhaust. The N10 roughly added as much flow to the single cat 2.25" manifold exhaust as taking a non N10 and adding headers.
I realize we are talking about stock flow demands and that YMMV.
I realize we are talking about stock flow demands and that YMMV.
#26
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
My SLP headers make it super easy to change plugs. Definitely easier than manifolds, although....no AIR either. -and I'm a lot more experienced now. Haven't had manifolds in awhile, lol.
My feeling is that if you're not planning on keeping it stock, headers and a catback are pretty much a given. IMO anyway.
My feeling is that if you're not planning on keeping it stock, headers and a catback are pretty much a given. IMO anyway.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Personally I consider changing plugs on a 3rd Gen with TPI manifolds about as difficult as falling out of bed. I wish all my vehicles were so easy!
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Sorry, you are the one that referenced it being easier on 50 odd vehicle. I was only stating my experience.
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Just personal opinon here, but I would have to say your GMT400 truck would be about 10x easier and quicker than any third gen, especially with the truck manifolds. I can change the plugs in my 1999 Tahoe in less than 10 minutes. After I lift the Express van and pull both front wheels, the plugs are remarkably easy to access. I change the first 3 on each bank from the wheel well and the rear plugs in both banks from underneath. With stock manifolds the rear 2 plugs were practically impossible to get to which is why I ran it with single cat type LT1 manifolds for several years. Wish GM engineers had thought to use the LT1 manifolds on the Express chassis from the factory. Made spark plug access so much easier. Engine also ran much better with the LT1 manifolds than it did with the truck style log manifolds.
Last edited by Fast355; 02-21-2018 at 01:15 PM.
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
yeah, that truck is a contender for the easiest, when it had stock manifolds.
We're arguing here about what's easiest: drinking a beer or a glass of water. both pretty damn easy!
We're arguing here about what's easiest: drinking a beer or a glass of water. both pretty damn easy!
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Maybe my hands are just too damn big but I always hated changing the plugs on any small block with those manifolds. B, F or G body always sucked to me.
#33
Member
iTrader: (11)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The OP mentioned difficult plug changes with headers, he also spoke of Dyno Dons headers. I offered a pic of two sets of quality headers to aid in his decision. My statement was relative to that. I don’t think plug changes with a set of quality headers on this vehicle is going to be any more difficult than with factory manifolds. He can go whatever direction he chooses, but at least he has some type of visual reference.
#35
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Well! Looks like I got some decisions to make. I think I will enjoy her a bit more as she sits and decide what I want.
I may suck it up and do the Dyno Dons.. then just do my tune up at the same time. I probably put about 5000 miles a year on this car so it will be awhile before I go back into it.
I may suck it up and do the Dyno Dons.. then just do my tune up at the same time. I probably put about 5000 miles a year on this car so it will be awhile before I go back into it.
#36
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
No idea how good they actually are, they're probably the only header/exhaust that I haven't seen on one of these cars in person
I remember feeling a seat of the pants improvement with shorty headers over my stock exhaust. Mainly it sounded better.
I did not get track times with it bone stock i dont think. It had the headers on with full catback upgrade and a converter and it went 13.73 at 97 on bias ply drag tires. I thought that was pretty good.
I did not get track times with it bone stock i dont think. It had the headers on with full catback upgrade and a converter and it went 13.73 at 97 on bias ply drag tires. I thought that was pretty good.
Well, actually since I have filled her with new gas she is running a lot better. Took her out on the highway and she had little trouble getting deeper into the hundreds. My goals would be something like 300-350 HP at the crank.. but still keeping that instant torque curve our cars possess. Is this possible with the stock manifolds?
You can't be serious ??
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
I can't imagine an easier plug change than with stock manifolds. I've never seen ANY header on any of the 50-odd vehicles I've changed plugs in being any easier!
It doesn't get any easier! Seriously, if changing plugs with TPI manifolds is hard for you, you need to get another hobby!
Someone with small hands should be able to do all the plugs with the stock manifolds easy, but it can get challenging for someone with big hands, ESPECIALLY if the air tubes are still connected. I have a combination of extensions that I can fish out under the master cylinder and through the hood hinge area to get the rearmost plugs with stock manifolds. I have big hands and there's almost no chance of me touching a few of them. With the air tubes plulled it gets a lot easier, then the only really bad part is the back plugs on the driver's side and getting around the brake lines.
Some headers get in the way of the rearmost plugs on some setups, but the typical 3/4 length Headman or Hooker header you can even see all the plugs from up top without even looking hard. Getting them out is cake if you have a good selection of tools, but I could see someone with just a socket set thinking they were impossible. I use a combination of pass through sockets and a regular plug socket and can do all 8 in about 10 minutes.
Again, big vs little hands. If you have big hands the stock manifolds are literally impossible. When I first bought my '97 I got it in the garage the first day, opened the hood and went "where the heck are the plugs?" reached down between the fender and the exhaust manifold on the passenger side and promptly got stuck. Luckily a neighbor of mine drove by and stopped wanting to see my new car and ended up prying me out with a broom handle. Later when I put N2O on that car a friend of mine helped me swap the plugs, we worked out a system where I was under the car and he was over it and for half the plugs we could turn the wrench a fraction of a turn and pass it to the other one. It took us all night to swap the spark plugs and we both looked like we lost a fight with a whole herd of rabid cats, cut up everywhere.
Last edited by 83 Crossfire TA; 02-22-2018 at 07:25 AM.
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Apparently you never worked on that 97 with headers. Doesnt matter what size hands you have its a several hr job. Repair shop tech book even calls for 3-4 hrs
Thats about what my stock ls1 auto car ran. I have my doubts a stock L98 will do that. Especially at my track
managed to run a 13.48 with a stock '87 L98 formula that only had an SLP cold air and cat back on it (in othe
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I witnessed a 305 TPI G-92 5spd car run 13.9s multiple times at Dallas Dragway when it was still open. STOCK save for timing/fuel pressure tweaks, K&N drop-ins, and some stickier rubber. It was in practically ZERO DA but it did it none the less. I ran in -800 DA one night there in my Ram and I am sure that car would have run even better in those conditions. The Houston guys in winter have even better air than we do at HRP.
Last edited by Fast355; 02-22-2018 at 09:15 AM.
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I witnessed a 305 TPI G-92 5spd car run 13.9s multiple times at Dallas Dragway when it was still open. STOCK save for timing/fuel pressure tweaks, K&N drop-ins, and some stickier rubber. It was in practically ZERO DA but it did it none the less. I ran in -800 DA one night there in my Ram and I am sure that car would have run even better in those conditions. The Houston guys in winter have even better air than we do at HRP.
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I witnessed a 305 TPI G-92 5spd car run 13.9s multiple times at Dallas Dragway when it was still open. STOCK save for timing/fuel pressure tweaks, K&N drop-ins, and some stickier rubber. It was in practically ZERO DA but it did it none the less. I ran in -800 DA one night there in my Ram and I am sure that car would have run even better in those conditions. The Houston guys in winter have even better air than we do at HRP.
I raced my trans am in texas in winter, ran 12.11 at 112, gutted. 12.27-12.31 at 110 i think with interior. Best it did up here in pa in winter was 12.52 at 108 and thats with some extra tuning
Last edited by Orr89RocZ; 02-22-2018 at 09:42 AM.
#42
Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I spent a looot of time reading before pulling the trigger and came down to Dyno Dons or Hooker 2055s, both were so universally acclaimed on here. Ultimately went with the 2055s as they came with the Y-pipe. After ordering the ceramics I actually found a ceramic thermal displacement coating place across town so maybe I'd get the cheaper 2055s(+an errand on delivery) to save a bit of $ if I could do it over again. But at the time just confirmed fitment with the 93441 Magnaflow 3" hi-flo cat and Magnaflow 62866 street series catback exhaust with 3.5" tips and that was that. (Obv if you're in no rush you could just keep an eye out for w/e used or NIB etc as I'm sure there are other combos that would work great.)
There's plenty of threads on copper gaskets and locking bolts if you're worried about the headers-loosening issue. Same goes for insulation jackets or better spark plug wires and perhaps the three-wire heated O2 sensor.
If you're doing Hawks ram air and filters up front the »full« exhaust is a no-brainer IMO. Just my two pfennigs. We have the same car BTW
There's plenty of threads on copper gaskets and locking bolts if you're worried about the headers-loosening issue. Same goes for insulation jackets or better spark plug wires and perhaps the three-wire heated O2 sensor.
If you're doing Hawks ram air and filters up front the »full« exhaust is a no-brainer IMO. Just my two pfennigs. We have the same car BTW
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Well driven 5 spd in the south low da is one thing... but a stock auto converter 1.95-2.1 60 ft type stuff running 13.48 is a stretch imo. I had to run 1.75 60 ft in a 2800 stall to go 13.63 with headers catback timing mods in a full weight high option L98 but we are alittle higher in DA, 2000 ft or so
I raced my trans am in texas in winter, ran 12.11 at 112, gutted. 12.27-12.31 at 110 i think with interior. Best it did up here in pa in winter was 12.52 at 108 and thats with some extra tuning
I raced my trans am in texas in winter, ran 12.11 at 112, gutted. 12.27-12.31 at 110 i think with interior. Best it did up here in pa in winter was 12.52 at 108 and thats with some extra tuning
Date November 16, 2001
Track Capitol Raceway, Friday Night TnT
Temperature 70
Pressure 30.09
Humidity 59
Gas 1/4 Tank
Notes Weird for November, spent the whole night outside in a T-shirt and was comfortable. Ran Greg W's BFG DR 275 50 15's at 32 till I spun them. Also had Firebird 15x7's on the front with stock size tires (10# or so lighter). New radio, CD's make the car go faster ;-) no 1/8 mph today
Pass 9
Lane 1
Reaction 1.2019
60ft. 1.8969
330ft. 5.5631
1/8 Mile ET 8.6595
1/8 Mile Speed
1000ft. 11.3356
1/4 Mile ET 13.4775
1/4 Mile Speed 99.9989
Notes: Converter clutch jumpered ALDL still locked. Tires 22psi. Cooled off for about 10 minutes, my seat adjuster let go when I hit the brakes coming to the staging lights and accidently lit up the lights. Didn't go till I pulled the seat back.
Last edited by 83 Crossfire TA; 02-23-2018 at 09:53 AM.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,418
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Ive never seen a stock L98 break into 13s myself. I mean headers, gear change .. that gets you there easy but then its not stock is it. Sure never seen a stock 305 break 13s but I'm sure a 5spd TPI could get close..
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The stick makes a huge difference. The stock L98/6 speed Corvettes ran in the 13.5-13.7s range at 100-102 mph. The 700r4 Vettes ran in the low14/high 13 range with a 2.59 rear gear. Not exactly a F-car but shows a L98 is no slouch either.
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,418
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Those aluminum head L98s weren't the same. But an iron head L98 F car with a 6spd would have turned 13 sec timeslips I imagine. They should have went with the prototype in 92.
Last edited by dmccain; 02-24-2018 at 02:41 PM.
#47
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,970
Received 379 Likes
on
323 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The L98 aluminum head motors were not that different. They don't really flow any better but did increase the compression ratio about 1/2 point. IIRC they were rated around 245-250 HP. I can say from experience though, 1.6 roller rockers, long tube headers and a full exhaust makes them run very well though.
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
The early aluminum head motors had slightly better intake port flow, significantly worse exhaust ports but had some cute little 1.5" tubular headers which actually worked ok and a decent exhaust. I'm not sure if they actually made more power or just were rated higher. The later C4's had EXACTLY the same LT1 that the F-bodies had the HP ratings climbed from the standard f-body, SS/WS6 and then Corvette (GM claimed better exhaust and air filter assembly) but there didn't seem to be any real difference on a dyno.
#49
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '89 Iroc 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: G80 Posi/LS & GH3 2.77
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
I spent a looot of time reading before pulling the trigger and came down to Dyno Dons or Hooker 2055s, both were so universally acclaimed on here. Ultimately went with the 2055s as they came with the Y-pipe. After ordering the ceramics I actually found a ceramic thermal displacement coating place across town so maybe I'd get the cheaper 2055s(+an errand on delivery) to save a bit of $ if I could do it over again. But at the time just confirmed fitment with the 93441 Magnaflow 3" hi-flo cat and Magnaflow 62866 street series catback exhaust with 3.5" tips and that was that. (Obv if you're in no rush you could just keep an eye out for w/e used or NIB etc as I'm sure there are other combos that would work great.)
There's plenty of threads on copper gaskets and locking bolts if you're worried about the headers-loosening issue. Same goes for insulation jackets or better spark plug wires and perhaps the three-wire heated O2 sensor.
If you're doing Hawks ram air and filters up front the »full« exhaust is a no-brainer IMO. Just my two pfennigs. We have the same car BTW
There's plenty of threads on copper gaskets and locking bolts if you're worried about the headers-loosening issue. Same goes for insulation jackets or better spark plug wires and perhaps the three-wire heated O2 sensor.
If you're doing Hawks ram air and filters up front the »full« exhaust is a no-brainer IMO. Just my two pfennigs. We have the same car BTW
The other thing I was thinking of was maybe just... tossing a electric exhaust by-pass. Would this be the better option? Maybe fixing the shitty y-pipe and tossing in an exhaust by-pass between it and the cat?
Then I get my relatively light exhaust note for the neighborhood, and then can open it up at will for "monster mode".
#50
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: How restrictive are L98 manifolds?
Wow, it's 2018, I can't believe you can still find an L98 with stock manifolds, let alone have a whole entire thread with members still arguing about them lol. I'm only kidding. Dyno Don for the win, order them and be done with it. With how fast luxury cars are today, I suspect you will be moddng your L98 faster than you think, so make the right choice now and be ahead of the game for when the engine mods come. I give it a few weeks after being beat by a new Honda Civic...
- Rob
- Rob