Fabrication Custom fabrication ideas and concepts ranging from body kits, interior work, driveline tech, and much more.

Info on subframe connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2004, 01:30 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
andys86ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 trans am
Engine: 300hp 355cu. inch
Transmission: 350 turbo with shift kit and ratchet shifter
Info on subframe connectors

Can anyone give me a decent diagram or maybe some measurments for some subframe connectors? I will be making my own but havent done it before. Should i use round or square tubing? Square or rectangular would be easier to fit the angles.
Old 02-01-2004, 02:16 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
seek007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87+
i'm searching the forums on this same exact subject and this is what i've come up with:

1) bust out the tape-measure and decide (after a bit of research) where the best and most applicale locations are to connect

2) figure out what design you feel like making, i really like ede's double rail idea, which i'll use, connect it about every foot would be great

3) now i'd suggest finding the best possible way to attach it, front to rear in a straight line is a start, but i believe a bit of branching wouldn't hurt

4) making your own is the cheapest way to go, and you have to weld in store bought anyway, a bit of extra welding and some creativity goes a long way, and you might end up with a stronger design

5) personally, i'm going to do this when the time comes, and i will make a 3 or 5 point STC as well, and a homemade wonderbar also, possible connect that to the sfc, who knows it's endless!

6) definitely a thanks to all the people who have a heads up on this application. here are some links to help:

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=189705
http://www.spohn.net//index.cfm?acti...d&contentid=10

honestly the majority of the threads in this section is where you need to look. i have compiled a group of pictures to assist my research better, hell it ain't gonna hurt, only help
Old 02-02-2004, 09:42 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Barry85Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Picture of Southside Machine Works Subframe Connector Kit. May help.
Attached Thumbnails Info on subframe connectors-subframe-1.jpg  
Old 02-06-2004, 09:03 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
andys86ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 trans am
Engine: 300hp 355cu. inch
Transmission: 350 turbo with shift kit and ratchet shifter
Thanks a million guy, you helped alot! keep em coming!
Old 02-07-2004, 12:15 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
f-crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
barry, where does the cross brace go?,, i have the SSM SFC's so could i add that bar in?
Old 02-07-2004, 02:41 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Barry85Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 3:73
The cross-brace goes under the back seat. The lift bars that weld to the rear axle bolt to the cross-brace. I don't know if the rest of the kit is available separately, but you could contact SSM and check. I bought the $449.99 kit, and it came with everything, including a bolt-in drive shaft loop!
Old 02-07-2004, 03:10 PM
  #7  
Member
 
z_power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Poland
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: a bunch of pieces
Transmission: still there - very stockish TH700
Originally posted by seek007
2) figure out what design you feel like making, i really like ede's double rail idea, which i'll use, connect it about every foot would be great
couldn't find any info 'bout ede's idea; could you post some links or any other info? Thanks i. a. Mike
Old 02-07-2004, 11:06 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
CamaroStud1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 107th and lower buckeye
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91z28 and 88 SC thats for sale,in the sig
Engine: 305 TPI soon 383 stroker or 327
Transmission: t-5
anyone got some good under car shots of their sfc's?
Old 02-08-2004, 05:15 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
92 zzz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Guess
Engine: Crazy 8
Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it
Here's a shot of my DS. My design was based on simplicty. They were easy to fab, easy to install, provide absolutely no interference to exhaust or ground clearance, and were remarkable effective. I had more pics, but I must have deleted them cause I could only find this one...
Attached Thumbnails Info on subframe connectors-sfc1.jpg  
Old 02-08-2004, 05:41 PM
  #10  
ede
TGO Supporter

 
ede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson County
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
all i did was run a "main rail " like most all SFCs from the rear forward. then ran secondary rail from the pad inboard from the lca forward mounting point forward and tied in with the main rail. ran a brace across both and tied into the trans tunnel and added a drive shaft loop. i looked at several catalogs to get an idea of what was being done, got under the car and thought about it. steel cost me 30-35 dollars for enough to do 2 cars. steels went up so i'd suspect it'd cost close to 45-50 dollars now. wasn't hard to do, any dumbass, even me, can do it.
Old 02-10-2004, 05:42 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
those ssm kits work wonders but are terrible for street cars. i had one on my 88 GTA and man what a horror... the bars that weld to the axel housing actually cracked my housing and ruined my rear end. they sit to close togeather under the car and have no flex like trailing arms do, they just move up and down. so if you hit a deep hole on one side of the car, the other side cant angle down and causes stress in the rear. hard to explain but if you picture it im sure youll get what im saying. DONT BUY THE KIT for your daily driver...PLEASE.


to answer the question on boxed or tubular for the frames, i would say go with the boxed design. more rigid design. they dont put up buildings with tubes ya know
Old 02-10-2004, 07:28 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
92 zzz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Guess
Engine: Crazy 8
Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it
Originally posted by Kontrax


to answer the question on boxed or tubular for the frames, i would say go with the boxed design. more rigid design. they dont put up buildings with tubes ya know
First of all I am not trying to start anything, I just figured this would be good info for anyone reading this. "Tubing" or "tubular" does not mean it is necessarily round. Tubing is a stuctural type of material, could be round, square, rectangular, triangular, octagonal, whatever...
Old 02-10-2004, 07:42 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
im talking about getting the BOXED ones or the ROUND ones, get the BOXED ones. all the frames ive seen, the tubular is round and the boxed is boxed...
Old 02-13-2004, 01:35 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Kontrax
those ssm kits work wonders but are terrible for street cars. i had one on my 88 GTA and man what a horror... the bars that weld to the axel housing actually cracked my housing and ruined my rear end. they sit to close togeather under the car and have no flex like trailing arms do, they just move up and down. so if you hit a deep hole on one side of the car, the other side cant angle down and causes stress in the rear. hard to explain but if you picture it im sure youll get what im saying. DONT BUY THE KIT for your daily driver...PLEASE.


to answer the question on boxed or tubular for the frames, i would say go with the boxed design. more rigid design. they dont put up buildings with tubes ya know

mine is mint on the street.....and it nearly eliminates body roll.....of course its welded to a moser 12 bolt housing too, not a stock 10 bolt, which im sure makes a big difference.

and for the person that asked before, the lift bar setup is only available as a kit from SSM with the subframes.

the yellow arrows all point to lift bar components, and the red ones are the LCA's.....this pic is with my old 10 bolt before i blew it up and swapped over the bars to the 12 bolt (took major surgery and careful resizing of the cutouts in the flanges to maintain the axle centerline)
Attached Thumbnails Info on subframe connectors-rearsuspension1.jpg  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:37 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
heres another.....wish i hadnt used undercoating on the subframes
Old 02-13-2004, 01:39 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
oops sorry
Attached Thumbnails Info on subframe connectors-ssmtracbarsinst.jpg  
Old 02-13-2004, 02:15 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
by the way, this is SSM's new website

http://www.ssmliftbars.com/
Old 02-13-2004, 04:00 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
good luck with it. its a poor design.
Old 02-13-2004, 04:36 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Kontrax
good luck with it. its a poor design.
ya it sucks *****.......i could ONLY manage a 1.66 short time with stock factory original 120K mile struts, shocks, and springs......and its been driven on the street for 3 years now, with absolutely NO problems....and i live in new england where pot hole are a way of life....no bent suspension parts, no broken anything.

so ya, it sucks pretty bad
Old 02-13-2004, 06:01 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
i also live in NE and mine broke right off. no need to get nasty about it.
Old 02-14-2004, 10:07 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
Thirim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 LT1
Transmission: T56
I recently made some SFC's.. since it was too expensive to ship them..
I used 2"x1" Rec tubing, 1/8" wall

drive side is straight, its the easy one..
pass side you need a coat hanger to get the little whopp de doo and then use a torch to bend the angles.. not a big deal just have to do a little at a time, so you don't go to far.. then cool it and test it....
the 2x1 will fit between the pinch weld and the rear Lower control arm bracket.. then up to front following that groove..
on each side I went straight out to the front subframe.. and gusseded it for support.. I primed and painted top, then welded in 3 spots.. (all on the frame, not the body) and then primed and painted. if you want I can dig up a picture..
Old 02-15-2004, 04:17 AM
  #22  
Member
 
jmd88iroc-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stoneville, N.C.
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r4/OD
I was thinking (which was my first mistake) if a man had access to a press brake, he could bend any thickness and shape he wanted to. The weight has to be taken into consideration,right?
Old 02-15-2004, 05:08 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Barry85Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Well, they're goin on the car.
Old 02-15-2004, 07:43 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Kontrax
i also live in NE and mine broke right off. no need to get nasty about it.
im just curious as to what makes it a poor design, seeing that it does exactly what its intended to do, and does it quite well
Old 02-15-2004, 07:46 AM
  #25  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Thirim
I recently made some SFC's.. since it was too expensive to ship them..
I used 2"x1" Rec tubing, 1/8" wall

drive side is straight, its the easy one..
pass side you need a coat hanger to get the little whopp de doo and then use a torch to bend the angles.. not a big deal just have to do a little at a time, so you don't go to far.. then cool it and test it....
the 2x1 will fit between the pinch weld and the rear Lower control arm bracket.. then up to front following that groove..
on each side I went straight out to the front subframe.. and gusseded it for support.. I primed and painted top, then welded in 3 spots.. (all on the frame, not the body) and then primed and painted. if you want I can dig up a picture..
a little easier way to do that if you were using rectangular tubing, would be to cut the angles out of the sstock and then just fold them in, and weld the seams.......would be very strong as well
Old 02-15-2004, 07:58 AM
  #26  
Senior Member

 
Thirim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 LT1
Transmission: T56
i considered that, cut a triangle out of rec tubing and fold and weld.. with the heat, it loks very professional.. (no one will know that I haven't the foggiest ) and it is still very strong, i mean 1/8" wall and 2 small bends.. If I had of cut the angles out, i probably would have totally screwed it up.. Though your right, would be better if you knew what you were doing..
Old 02-15-2004, 08:01 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Thirim
i considered that, cut a triangle out of rec tubing and fold and weld.. with the heat, it loks very professional.. (no one will know that I haven't the foggiest ) and it is still very strong, i mean 1/8" wall and 2 small bends.. If I had of cut the angles out, i probably would have totally screwed it up.. Though your right, would be better if you knew what you were doing..
nah its not that hard.....all you have to do is measure the angle, and then cut the opposite of the angle out of the stock in the first section, and then to do the same on the opposite side of the stock to make it back ot straight
Old 02-16-2004, 07:29 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
listen, i explained this already. the 2 arms that weld to the housing are to close togeather. you dont get any flex if you hit a deep hole or large object. if the axel dips down to oneside the other end goes up. but it goes up in an angle. thats what broke my welds free.


------------
| | | |


the stright line is the housing and the 2 bottom lines are the weld on arms. if the right arm goes down into a hole then the left arm goes stright up. the space between the housing and the arms is the weld. if the left arm is going stright up and welded to the housing, it doesnt give it enough flex if you hit a deep enough hole. youll break the weld or break the axel. im my case i broke the axel. like i said before, i had the kit years ago. it worked awesome untill i hit that pot hole and broke my housing.
Old 02-16-2004, 07:36 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Kontrax
listen, i explained this already. the 2 arms that weld to the housing are to close togeather. you dont get any flex if you hit a deep hole or large object. if the axel dips down to oneside the other end goes up. but it goes up in an angle. thats what broke my welds free.


------------
| | | |


the stright line is the housing and the 2 bottom lines are the weld on arms. if the right arm goes down into a hole then the left arm goes stright up. the space between the housing and the arms is the weld. if the left arm is going stright up and welded to the housing, it doesnt give it enough flex if you hit a deep enough hole. youll break the weld or break the axel. im my case i broke the axel. like i said before, i had the kit years ago. it worked awesome untill i hit that pot hole and broke my housing.
just like ladder bars.......mine hasnt broken or show any signs of fatigue with the old rear it had maybe 10,000miles on it

the new rear has probably 5000, and its much stronger everyplace, including the welds as it was a brand new clean steel axle housing.......i see where your coming from with the stress argument, but i dont see it breaking........its possible you could bend one of the lift bars if you hit a big enough hole, but i try to avoid those in the first place
Old 02-16-2004, 09:24 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Kontrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moving to non emission state
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
it is a nice kit and you do notice a big difference, im glad yours is working for you. i just had a bad experience with it. be cautious around thoese monster pot holes, alright?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ccop
Convertibles
6
09-14-2015 04:13 PM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
09-10-2015 08:36 PM
Ironhead38
Cooling
2
09-07-2015 02:26 PM
Chevy86 IROC-Z
V6
2
09-07-2015 01:13 AM



Quick Reply: Info on subframe connectors



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.