Fabrication Custom fabrication ideas and concepts ranging from body kits, interior work, driveline tech, and much more.

Never seen this before!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 02:55 AM
  #1  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Never seen this before!

Okay here we go...

Basically, I don't really care for the front end of our wonderful third gen camaro's. The car has beautiful lines and styling but the front end just doesn't do it for me. I've searched far and wide for good front end modifications but have come up empty handed...

I saw a drawing online (I don't know who the artist is) and discovered that the drawing is of a modified 1st gen camaro. I saw the drawing and thought to myself "hmm... that looks a lot like the body lines of a 3rd gen camaro." So after a few hours of photoshop modifications the drawn '68 Camaro became this...

Camaro Comparison

I know a bit about fiberglassing, I used to do it in high school in my engineering class where we were building a full-scale airplane. We used to use foam block(s) that we'd mold by sanding, cutting with razor knives, etc and then covering with fiberglass and then using some sort of acetone (if I remember correctly) to burn out the foam, leaving just the fiberglass shell behind. Would this be the best method to use to make this front clip OR is there some other method that would best suit this purpose?

If you have some input or know someone with experience doing this, please reply and let me know! Obviously this would be a huge project but I am willing and able to attempt this but feel free to give any input you folks may have about this project

Thanks!
-Kyle-

Last edited by UCF1Slider; Sep 27, 2005 at 02:59 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 03:37 AM
  #2  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
It looks like a cross between an AMC and a mopar… but I like it. It needs something more significant on the back end, maybe some sort of spoiler that comes off the deck or something.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 03:49 AM
  #3  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Like a high-rise spoiler from a '92 or a nascar style lip?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 09:21 AM
  #4  
KAOSRacing's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
It looks like a cross between an AMC and a mopar… but I like it.
The front end looks a lot like a 71-74 AMC Javelin.

If you wanted to do something like this out of fiberglass it might be easier to start with an fiberglass front end for a 3rd gen. Or maybe a 71-74 Javelin front end (if you can find one).
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #5  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by UCF1Slider
Like a high-rise spoiler from a '92 or a nascar style lip?
not sure, somethign to give it some weight back there, I was originally thinking something liek a bigger, firebird wing, which is sorta like the high rise but not as angluar, but maybe a nascar style lip...

really, in my case half the problem would be fixed with some rake to the body and bigger back tires
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
I like the idea, but both concepts look a lot like the Javelin and a 1st gen Camaro. If I was going to go through the hard work of fiberglassing, I would take this retro idea and give it a more modern twist...The way it is now, it would look like you stuck a 1st gen front on a 3rd gen...take it a little further and I think you'll really have something awesome!
Attached Thumbnails Never seen this before!-concepts.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #7  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
maybe something based on this artist's ideas? I love how he keeps the round headlights but modernizes them by using it as a case for 2 HID style bulbs and the turn signals.
Attached Thumbnails Never seen this before!-concepts2.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #8  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Quick and dirty attempt at what I mean:
Attached Thumbnails Never seen this before!-concept3.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #9  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Now if someone can easily do that with photoshop, why can't GM do that to a real car and make a Camaro/Firebird look like the 67-69 versions like Ford did to the Mustang. If they stopped overpricing the cars with all the luxuries and make them more affordable, they could sell more cars.

I remember seeing the concept version of the new GTO. You could look at it and say it was a GTO. The final production version looks nothing like a GTO.

Personally I like the look of the 69 but the 68 is close enough. If a kit was available like in the above pics, I would probably buy one. I'm pretty sure I've seen that already done to a car in a magazine. Put a notchback on the third gen with that front end and it would look even closer to a first gen.

In the second gens I like the 70/71 front end with the large grill opening and split bumpers.

How soon before a kit is available? The nose is already off my car because it's easier to work on the engine.

Last edited by AlkyIROC; Sep 27, 2005 at 07:43 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #10  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
LOL, I dunno about making a kit... I haven't even tried to make my own front end yet! I do appreciate all the interest though! I'm going to take some time on Thursday/Friday to come up with an original design for the front end based off that picture that I photoshopped to make it more modernized like ChevyMetal305 said... I want something totally original and I think a 3rd gen has huge potential for a project of such a large scale. As soon as I come up with a design I'll photoshop it and post it on here for you guys to take a look at it. By the way it only took me a few hours to photoshop that picture so you'd think that GM would have taken the time to spend a few months developing something to keep the camaro alive like Stephen 87 IROC said.

-Kyle-
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #11  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
This concept was designed by Kris Horton, and was originally brought to the worlds attention by popularhotrodding.com. You may be able to find additional images by going to images.google.com, and searching for "Kris Horton" or "concept, camaro" or "2007 camaro". Below are links to the original articles and images. Just click on the image thumbnails to view larger.

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...aro/index.html

http://popularhotrodding.com/feature...ifth_Reloaded/

This link shows some other concepts by various artists:
http://www.uberchad.net/gallery2/mai...f5936a2aaa224a
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #12  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Just goto his website

http://www.carsbykris.com/

He also hangs out and posts on this site.

http://www.pro-touring.com/forum_main.htm
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #13  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Yuke! The 5th gen version looks ugly. It looks more tuner car than it does Camaro. The grill doesn't suit the car. The tall rims with narrow sidewall tires may be good as an aftermarket add on but don't look good as production rims.

The styling on the orange car looks much better.

Somehow I think if they every did produce that, GM would make it front wheel drive.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #14  
bigdog 717's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: clermont fl
Car: 1989 camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: t 5
love it

where can i but it
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #15  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
You can't. So far it's just a photoshop rendering but it at least shows what's possible to anyone who can do customizing.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #16  
redbird_400's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Car: 89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 - Demon 525
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Never seen this before!

Originally posted by UCF1Slider


I know a bit about fiberglassing, I used to do it in high school in my engineering class where we were building a full-scale airplane. We used to use foam block(s)

What kind of foam blocks or glass was that? The problem I would have with the bondo brand glassing is that it might eat up the foam. It seems to eat holes through stuff. Other then that, thats a damn good idea and makes me want to start glassing up some stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #17  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
With the front nose off my car right now and looking at the above pictures, one thing I would do would be to shorten the nose. I'm sure there would be problems with bumpers etc behind the shortened nose but I think it would look a lot better. Not really sure how well it would work an a street legal car but the only thing forward of my rad is the fuel cell so I have lots of room. I'd still go with the front end of a 69 though.

That longer nose has the car starting to look like an E-type Jag.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 12:24 AM
  #18  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Not sure what type of foam it was... all I know is that you could cut it clean with a razor knife, sand it smooth with sandpaper and you could glue blocks of it together to add more surface to shape... very versatile stuff and cheap I'm sure cuz it was a high school project. The glass was in strips and cloth, the stuff had to be put on with a resin and hardener and paintbrushes and didnt eat the foam until you used acetone or whatever to eat the foam out from the inside.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #19  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Anyone else have any comments/suggestions/ideas? I'd really like to get an opinion from more people to see what you all think! I am currently doing some drawing to design a completely custom front end too, I'll try to get that done by tomorrow and post it on here
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 07:07 PM
  #20  
hmmurdock_00's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 349
Likes: 1
From: Earth, USA, Ga, Thomson
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: 305 5.0 LG4
Transmission: 700-R4 Auto
I had an idea similar to this for a long time now. Mine is a little more boxy, but similar.

Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 02:36 AM
  #21  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Pic didn't show up, I'd like to see if you can fix the link.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #22  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Go directly to his site to see hmmurdock_00's concept:

www26.brinkster.com/howlingmadinc/concept.jpg

(Something about Brinkster.com doesn't allow remote linking)

Last edited by ChevyMetal305; Oct 12, 2005 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #23  
UCF1Slider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: '89 RS Vert
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
I just don't like the way the lights look on the front of our cars... the grill is fine and the shape of the front end is nice but the lights just look...... boring.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 07:26 AM
  #24  
P0WDER's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Z-28
Engine: 305
Transmission: t-5
I was playing with this idea for a while and made a quick photochop GIF to see if it would work. It may take a min to load.


Mark
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #25  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
This last one looks like you rounded off the body lines too much. Although i do like how you shortened the front end a little.

hmmurdock_00

Ehh... not really a fan of that one either, although the drawings not bad for a sketch and the hood and nascar lip look good

What i dont really like about the front end is: (keep in mind i dont Hate it but i think these areas could use a little work)
1. the length
2. the small grille openings
3. the depressed headlights

Some one on here has clear headlight covers that look really good. (i dont like the smoked ones b/c it makes the headlights useless)
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #26  
89TPI350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Maine
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700-R4
I really like that, it reminds me of the 05' mustang
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #27  
ChevyMetal305's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Car: 1985 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 305 4 Barrel LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Just for fun I modified my earlier attempt and used the lights from an SSR...
Attached Thumbnails Never seen this before!-ssrlights.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 02:32 AM
  #28  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
The hawks nascar lip would be a nice touch on the back...

Its a move in the right direction, but the front still doesnt look right.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 02:33 AM
  #29  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
maybe rectangular flush mount headlights... and a bigger grille?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #30  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
You could always just get rid of the wasted 11" in the front and 6" in the rear, and change the character of the car. With just a little urethane rework, the car doesn't look like such an oversized slob. The nose borrows a look from some of the current Mopars, which stole the look from the '67 Aston and Rolls. I always thought they had too much overhang at the front anyway.



Thanks for donating the subject vehicles (whoever they belong to).
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #31  
PhAnToMs's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: you aint stealing my car..
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Auto w/ shift kit
Originally posted by Vader
You could always just get rid of the wasted 11" in the front and 6" in the rear, and change the character of the car. With just a little urethane rework, the car doesn't look like such an oversized slob. The nose borrows a look from some of the current Mopars, which stole the look from the '67 Aston and Rolls. I always thought they had too much overhang at the front anyway.



Thanks for donating the subject vehicles (whoever they belong to).
hmm looks like a monte carlo front kinda
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 10:12 PM
  #32  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
That side profile kind of resembles the new mustangs
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 05:18 AM
  #33  
Crayz9000's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Car: '86 IROC, '87 Volvo 240, '09 Malibu
Engine: LB9 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
It's the rarely-seen "Pug" option for the Camaro :P

Seriously, the side profile looks good, but the front view... eeek! I'd be horrified to drive a car that looked like that from the front. The styling of the '69 nose fits that profile much better.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #34  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
Originally posted by rocluvr0013
That side profile kind of resembles the new mustangs
That's the factory sheet metal. Just clipped off the plastic. It all makes me wonder why no one has offered aftermarket plastic for ThirdGens, like Stillen. Or have I just not seen them?


Put another grille opening between the headlights and you've got a Dodge Charger.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 02:44 AM
  #35  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Well, playing that game, I could kinda see where you were going with the top one (bottom one is hideous, it really needs the grille opening at the top like the first gens had), I played with the side view and refined it somewhat. This is again, with the factory sheet metal, but would look better with a first gen, peaked center hood:
Attached Thumbnails Never seen this before!-camaro_mod.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #36  
Poncho Villa's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Car: Badass 1991 Firebird
Engine: Screamin' 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.42's waiting to go in!
Some nice ideas, and I've seen similar chops for the Firebird, snubbing the nose and taking off the back bumper (looks very Ferrari). You could do the 1st gen grill, kind of like the Dukeboys Charger.

Personally, I like the stock look, and the danger of customizing is that you can end up with something that looks like hell, like some of the imports I've seen with other cars' noses and tails grafted on--like an Acura with Vette tail lights, ugh. IMHO a thirdgen Camaro with nice paint looks great--I like black headlight buckets and SS stripes. If you want to be different you can do the blackout headlight covers, or one piece headlights, but once you start cutting you are on your own...

Anyway, agreed with above comments, you couldn't just change the nose without altering the rest of the car to match. I say put the time and money where it counts, in the motor, unless you are prepared to spend a lot of time and money for it to maybe come out allright. My .02.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #37  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
A 700 hp "new" 69 styled Camaro can now be yours for $427,000 but it's not being made by GM. If you have the money, it will also take a year to hand build your new car.

http://money.cnn.com/2005/11/09/Auto...ex.htm?cnn=yes
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #38  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
http://www.lateral-g.net/baldwin-motion/
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #39  
86birdHT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington Delaware
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: IRS 3.46
Originally posted by Vader
You could always just get rid of the wasted 11" in the front and 6" in the rear, and change the character of the car. With just a little urethane rework, the car doesn't look like such an oversized slob. The nose borrows a look from some of the current Mopars, which stole the look from the '67 Aston and Rolls. I always thought they had too much overhang at the front anyway.



Thanks for donating the subject vehicles (whoever they belong to).
Man, that black one looks familiar.

Haha, nice. :P
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.