Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: In the woods.
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Chevy 353 (5.7 350 bored .020)
Transmission: Turbo 400
Axle/Gears: Not sure yet. Looking at a 3.42
Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Hello, I am new here. Have been looking about the site for a while now. I have a 1989 Camaro RS. I've been wondering about weight reductions on third gens while keeping looks, strength, and functionality. I don't have the money for expensive aftermarket fiberglass body parts, like hoods and hatches, so I was wondering if there was things I could take off? All I'm doing is adding weight to the car with a bigger transmission, motor, and chassis reinforcement parts and it's driving me nuts! I'm fat enough and I don't want my car to be fat either! Every 10-15 pounds dropped will help, so if anyone knows anything post here. Thanks, Rob-DEATHS-HEAD.
Last edited by DEATHS-HEAD; Mar 22, 2010 at 10:48 PM.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Quite simply put, remove any option you're not using
3rd gens can be leaned out quite a bit and still retain DD function
To tell you how much I dropped, most LSx swaps raise the front about 1". Mine came up 3"

Hitting the gym wouldnt hurt either...
3rd gens can be leaned out quite a bit and still retain DD function
To tell you how much I dropped, most LSx swaps raise the front about 1". Mine came up 3"

Hitting the gym wouldnt hurt either...
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ocoee, FL
Car: 84 z-28/2002 S10
Transmission: BW T-5
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Here's a list for you, I don't know where your located so you may not be able to remove all of this. I'll use bullet point.
-Backseat
-A/C
-Heat( all of it under the dash out to the water pump
-cpu(only if carb'd, you lose quite a bit of wiring)
-emissions (not so much on weight, but a lot of space)
-spare tire
-reinforcements behind the bumpers
It sounds like I'm being a smartazz, but all of this is gone on mine. Added a glass hood for giggles and I will say it all made that 305 feel a little stronger.
-Backseat
-A/C
-Heat( all of it under the dash out to the water pump
-cpu(only if carb'd, you lose quite a bit of wiring)
-emissions (not so much on weight, but a lot of space)
-spare tire
-reinforcements behind the bumpers
It sounds like I'm being a smartazz, but all of this is gone on mine. Added a glass hood for giggles and I will say it all made that 305 feel a little stronger.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,789
Likes: 94
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Here's a list for you, I don't know where your located so you may not be able to remove all of this. I'll use bullet point.
-Backseat
-A/C
-Heat( all of it under the dash out to the water pump
-cpu(only if carb'd, you lose quite a bit of wiring)
-emissions (not so much on weight, but a lot of space)
-spare tire
-reinforcements behind the bumpers
It sounds like I'm being a smartazz, but all of this is gone on mine. Added a glass hood for giggles and I will say it all made that 305 feel a little stronger.
-Backseat
-A/C
-Heat( all of it under the dash out to the water pump
-cpu(only if carb'd, you lose quite a bit of wiring)
-emissions (not so much on weight, but a lot of space)
-spare tire
-reinforcements behind the bumpers
It sounds like I'm being a smartazz, but all of this is gone on mine. Added a glass hood for giggles and I will say it all made that 305 feel a little stronger.
however, if you can find the aluminum bumpers, thats a decent weight reduction right there
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: milton ont.
Car: Blue 84 z28/Cyber 2010ss/rs
Engine: Dart headed, 12:1 355- 510/530 cam
Transmission: TKO 600 Lakewood Bell
Axle/Gears: Richmond 410 Spooled
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
battery relocation for better wight distribution
shorter gears make quicker out of the hole
shorter gears make quicker out of the hole
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ocoee, FL
Car: 84 z-28/2002 S10
Transmission: BW T-5
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Didn't say they were great ideas, on a 26 year old car you get a lot of help with some of those already half missing. And agreed, in most states emissions and probably heat are needed. Just throwing some ez ones out there, don't mean to be misunderstood or mislead anyone.
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Didn't say they were great ideas, on a 26 year old car you get a lot of help with some of those already half missing. And agreed, in most states emissions and probably heat are needed. Just throwing some ez ones out there, don't mean to be misunderstood or mislead anyone.
Regardless of State laws & emissions requirements....The emissions stuff if FEDERALLY required & can't be taken off legally on ANY car. Just because a state doesn't do emissions testing, that doesn't make it legal to remove the Federally mandated emissions parts.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: In the woods.
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Chevy 353 (5.7 350 bored .020)
Transmission: Turbo 400
Axle/Gears: Not sure yet. Looking at a 3.42
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
I live in Kentucky. I have taken the A/C, heat, and even the wiper stuff out. Yeah I know, stupid, but it's never going to be a daily driver. Not with 11:2:1 compression!!! Compression is to much even for a Saturday driver with a .016 gasket, so I now I have to buy new ones with a thicker .05? To lower it to 10:2:1. Still to high. Anways, I was going to put the battery in the back. Don't know how that would handle with two Sony Xplod 10" subs, but I will find out. Maybe after I get the car mostly done I can get some fiberglass parts. I'm 15 years old and live in the woods, time to go pick some tobacco haha. Thanks for the help. Now I gotta figure out what to do with the wiring.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
another thing you can do is pull the headliner out and spray it with rhino seal i did that and i actually like the way it looks better and im working on making a fiberglass dash pad this weekend. a great place for the battery is build a battery box into were the spare is located. and of course you can take the back seat out i didnt because i have ppl that ride with me on occasion of course the headliner doesnt weigh much but every little bit helps dont it?
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
another thing you can do is pull the headliner out and spray it with rhino seal i did that and i actually like the way it looks better and im working on making a fiberglass dash pad this weekend. a great place for the battery is build a battery box into were the spare is located. and of course you can take the back seat out i didnt because i have ppl that ride with me on occasion of course the headliner doesnt weigh much but every little bit helps dont it?
The factory headliner is pretty dang light, so your spray on stuff would hafta be pretty light too, to be of any benefit (other than that it can sag or droop later).
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
let me ask you, how much did it cost to get a engine like that? it looks amazing
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Currently about $2300, but I had to bargain shop for over 9 months and a good chunk was DIY
Double that or more for most swaps
Double that or more for most swaps
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Ok i am just going to throw this out thereabout 80% of what these people are saying is garbage. If you want to cut weight delete your heater and get electric defrost. Change to an electric water pump. buying new interior will help to all of the build up of mold and dirt buried into the interior is going to add weight. Rhino lining is a shity thing to put inside your car unless it is a hunting truck. If you have electric window convert them to manual. If you can mount the bumper covers with out the honey comb do it that **** is only going to resist minor impact damage. look at any pic of a wrecked camaro front of rear that **** never survives. Ditch the A/C that **** puts a 20% drag on the engine (when on) as it is. It will free up horse power and remove weight. Swap to a mini alternator this will also save weight. Some of this stuff it petty weight to most people but just remember every ounce counts. It all adds up in the end.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 5.7
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
another thing you can do is pull the headliner out and spray it with rhino seal i did that and i actually like the way it looks better and im working on making a fiberglass dash pad this weekend. a great place for the battery is build a battery box into were the spare is located. and of course you can take the back seat out i didnt because i have ppl that ride with me on occasion of course the headliner doesnt weigh much but every little bit helps dont it?
Do you have a picture?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 1
From: Santa Rosa, Cali
Car: 1988 IROC 5.7 Money Pit
Engine: (being built; modified TPI ZZ4
Transmission: 2200 stall/ stage 3 700R4
Axle/Gears: freshened 3.27 in 9.bolt/
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
The best place to start is at the truck weigh scales with a full tank of fuel. So you have a great reference point. The topic site that seems to cover this the best is in the "Dragracing Section"; where they take the rule of thumb that loosing 100 pounds frees up approx 10 horsepower.
I dragrace. The shop I sometimes use built a a 4th generation transam and was able to ditch over 800 pounds of crap since the little hot rod was going to be trailered to the track every week.... Nitro-Nicky
I dragrace. The shop I sometimes use built a a 4th generation transam and was able to ditch over 800 pounds of crap since the little hot rod was going to be trailered to the track every week.... Nitro-Nicky
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
On earlier thirdgen's, they had aluminum front impact bumpers instead of steel. That's a nice bit of weight off of the nose and will help with weight transfer.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,902
Likes: 239
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 12
From: Minnesota
Car: 84 camaro, 88 trans am, 98 camaro
Engine: Modded , stock, LSX modded
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, t-56
Axle/Gears: 327, 308, 373
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
There are so many peaces and places on these cars to strip to make them lighter its ridiculous. theres quite a few threads on the borads relating. iv done more then most. i even thoght about dimple die the front and rear bumper but that would be a bit over kill, i still have yet to put on the set of aluminum heads i have, another 50lbs gone off the front. . .
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
ive been looking into some of these thnigs also, we just need to get someone to make carbon fiber doors for third gens!!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,902
Likes: 239
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
The doors are a structural part of a thirdgen. If a CF door was made right, it could act as a structural piece but its likely that any CF doors made wouldn't be strong enough as they would likely be simple door skins with barebasic frames.
You can get fiberglass doors, however most require non-roll down lexan windows and don't have provisions for a moving window.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
No real weight can be lost by switching to a CF door. For safety, the impact bar must be retained which is the majority of the weight. The rest comes from the inner workings which will also have to be transferred over
For a drag car, a fiberglass or CF door skin is acceptable because the insides are almost always removed, window fixed and safety components removed in favor of the cage. They will never experience a side impact
VFN makes fiberglass doors for 3rd gens already. They're not for a street car. Read up on AlkyIroc's glass door install thread and see why
For a drag car, a fiberglass or CF door skin is acceptable because the insides are almost always removed, window fixed and safety components removed in favor of the cage. They will never experience a side impact
VFN makes fiberglass doors for 3rd gens already. They're not for a street car. Read up on AlkyIroc's glass door install thread and see why
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: West-Central
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
The front 1LE brakes performance package is around 9 lbs lighter.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Mini Starter - that's a good weight drop - 1/2 the weight, 1/2 the size (header clearance), twice the power, same cost!
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: phx,az
Car: 84 firebird, 85 transam
Engine: 350 SBC Or 7.07 Tonys,305stock
Transmission: Big Ugly, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear disk 3.42 lsd,9 bolt
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Remove carpet padding get a putty knife And remove extra seam sealer and under coating.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
- remove the radio and all speakers (those of you with subs...
)
- swap to 4th gen seat belts (only 1 belt retractor)
- remove back seats
- remove visors
- remove power hatch motor and go manual
- manual windows
- manual mirrors
- manual locks
- remove overhead counsel if you have one
- remove center counsel
- gut/remove dash
- delrin shift **** instead of stock leather ****
- install aftermarket carpet (from what I've read they are thinner due to lack of quality)
- lightweight aftermarket front seat(s) with MANUAL seat tracks (or no seat track)
- aluminum suspension parts
- tubular K-member
- a new rear end with an aluminum center section
- lexan rear hatch
- lexan rear spoiler
- fiberglass front fenders
- spare tire removal
- hood insulation removal
- glass/carbon hood
- aluminum front bumper
- remove ground effects
- AC removal
- remove cruise control
- lighter battery
- wheels and tires only as big/wide as needed and no more
- aluminum brake drums
- two-piece brake rotors
- adjustable brake proportioning valve
- remove brake power booster
- aluminum water pump
- aluminum driveshaft
- aluminum heads
- aluminum block
- swap to manual transmission
- trim all unneeded stuff from wiring harness
- don't buy a convertible
- make passengers walk
- eat less junk food
Do a search and you'll find more.
)- swap to 4th gen seat belts (only 1 belt retractor)
- remove back seats
- remove visors
- remove power hatch motor and go manual
- manual windows
- manual mirrors
- manual locks
- remove overhead counsel if you have one
- remove center counsel
- gut/remove dash
- delrin shift **** instead of stock leather ****
- install aftermarket carpet (from what I've read they are thinner due to lack of quality)
- lightweight aftermarket front seat(s) with MANUAL seat tracks (or no seat track)
- aluminum suspension parts
- tubular K-member
- a new rear end with an aluminum center section
- lexan rear hatch
- lexan rear spoiler
- fiberglass front fenders
- spare tire removal
- hood insulation removal
- glass/carbon hood
- aluminum front bumper
- remove ground effects
- AC removal
- remove cruise control
- lighter battery
- wheels and tires only as big/wide as needed and no more
- aluminum brake drums
- two-piece brake rotors
- adjustable brake proportioning valve
- remove brake power booster
- aluminum water pump
- aluminum driveshaft
- aluminum heads
- aluminum block
- swap to manual transmission
- trim all unneeded stuff from wiring harness
- don't buy a convertible
- make passengers walk
- eat less junk food
Do a search and you'll find more.
Re: Simple weight reductions while keeping looks and functionality?
Fuel cell would probably make a big difference, but only if you went with a smaller size than the stock tank. Most of the weight savings is likely to come from the volume of gas in the tank, rather than material. I'm sure a plastic 4th gen tank is lighter than a steel third gen tank, but the difference is probably not a considerable amount when you consider the whole weight of the vehicle. Still every bit helps I suppose.
Mathius
Mathius
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









