?s on back half
?s on back half
im wantin to know should i keed torque arm or buy a ladder bar kit. i dont want a 4-link i know it is a better link setup but im not building a 700 or 800 hp car. tire im gonna run is a 29.5/10.5w/15. stock whith rear end what offset wheel would i need to clear outter fender. inner is cut out right past the spring bucket. with a tube. no matter what i do i gotta run coil over some rear frame mods for support. the tubes r not in yet. it was setup with a 29/10/15 tire with a 5in offset wheel had to trim a lil. got a cage subframe con. and 90/10 drag struts but it fit. 456 gears any feedback would help. ran 11.86 with what i had..
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Madison, SD
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: ?s on back half
I sure do like the adjustability of a 4 link...but, it also makes it possible to dial you chassis right out of the race!!!!
I've built a half dozen or so back halfed cars with ladder bars and coilovers, couple of them still running Super Gas, and my "brand X" 9 flat car, so they do hook up!!!!
Big thing on a ladder bar car is to run a quality, adjustable coilover.. I switched mine over the the new AFCO double adjustable's (spendy but great), and took a few more hundredths off the 60' time as compared to the Koni's that were on there. However, in defense of the Koni's they did have a couple hundred passes on them but the new AFCO's are just super quality shocks IMO!!!!
I've built a half dozen or so back halfed cars with ladder bars and coilovers, couple of them still running Super Gas, and my "brand X" 9 flat car, so they do hook up!!!!
Big thing on a ladder bar car is to run a quality, adjustable coilover.. I switched mine over the the new AFCO double adjustable's (spendy but great), and took a few more hundredths off the 60' time as compared to the Koni's that were on there. However, in defense of the Koni's they did have a couple hundred passes on them but the new AFCO's are just super quality shocks IMO!!!!
Moderator

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: ?s on back half
Problem with the 4-link is that there can be hundreds of different settings but only a small handful of settings will actually work. I played with different settings for 2 years. I haven't changed my settings now since last summer.
With ladder bars, you have very limited settings. The IC stays the same distance from the diff and you can only raise or lower the IC the number of holes in the chassis mount. With a 4-link, you can position the IC below the ground level if required. You can also position it inside the car.
With ladder bars, you have very limited settings. The IC stays the same distance from the diff and you can only raise or lower the IC the number of holes in the chassis mount. With a 4-link, you can position the IC below the ground level if required. You can also position it inside the car.
Re: ?s on back half
yea thats true i just didnt want to cut the hole rear out i can do it but its alot of work and more money...but end the end i now its worth it...do ya know of any off sets for wheels with stock rear end i think i may go with a 10inch wide and 6.5 offset i dont have the money right now for axles and gettin it narrowed i got a 9 inch but its stock i got 600 in a 10 bolt and it holds up to the power... ill probly tube it for a big tire tho so i wont have to redo the sheetmetal these cars hook good from the factory i just want to run a bigger tire..
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 2
From: Orlando
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 357, Canfield heads, solid roller,
Transmission: Upgraded 03 Cobra T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.50 gears and Detroit Locker
Re: ?s on back half
You can do a 10 inch wide wheel without tubbing.
Trending Topics
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,803
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: ?s on back half
Did that already... ten inch tire w/ ten inch wheel w/ five inch bs. Its damn close to tha link bar. A 10.5w mt tire is wider than a 10 in tire. W series tires are alot wider. Look it up on mt's website. Even with custom made link bars w/ heim joints in factory location it would hit. So here i am w/ options... i could go ahead and 4 link it and run whatever tire i wanted with certain rearend, or buy all the tubing and heim joints for torque arm, panhard bar, and link bars which is pretty high. I want to keep the rearend i got if i can buy wheels that will tuck. I dont want to redo any sheetmetal work. So what do yall think? Does anybody know what wheels i need to tuck 29.5/10.5w/15 with a factory rearend? If i cant then i will just have to wait and get a 9inch narrowed.
Moderator

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: ?s on back half
I squeezed a 29 x 10.5 ET Drag tire between the fenders with only some minor inner fender modifications. The tall tire cause more clearance issues than the width did.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
Jul 5, 2024 11:18 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM









