differences in RS and IROC
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
differences in RS and IROC
i was just wonderin what are all the differences in thev6 and v8 RS and IROC body styles? i know that the front grill is different with the iroc havin the fog lights and all. and the ride height seems a littel differnt. but the rs seems a littel higher the v6 one anyways and the wheels seem not was wide. are there any other differences? also is the stock kit the same on the two cars?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
What year in particular? The 89-90 RS and 85-90 IROC bodies are the same. 91-92 RS have different gfx. IROC wheels are typically (but not in all cases) 16". 89-90 RS wheels are typically (but not always) 15". In 91-92, the RS could be ordered with the 16" Z28 wheels. I'm sure there are numerous exceptions, its hard to generalize about these cars.
Last edited by RSFreak; Sep 27, 2004 at 01:06 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 718
Likes: 1
From: Hliðskjálf / Pensacola, FL
Car: Camaro
Engine: 3800
Transmission: T5
tail lights (grid or nongrid)
grille
hood (louvre action on the IROC)
badging/decals
headlight bucket color (body color vs black)
wheels (size, style)
grille
hood (louvre action on the IROC)
badging/decals
headlight bucket color (body color vs black)
wheels (size, style)
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Originally posted by DJP87Z28
Drive a IROC-Z and you will know the differences.
Drive a IROC-Z and you will know the differences.
if u didnt read the post i was asking about the difference in LOOKS. not performance or how it drives.
Originally posted by kevo2k6
if u didnt read the post i was asking about the difference in LOOKS. not performance or how it drives.
if u didnt read the post i was asking about the difference in LOOKS. not performance or how it drives.
Last edited by DJP87Z28; Apr 17, 2006 at 01:29 PM.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Chilliwack, BC
Car: 87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-Speed
In reality there is very little difference in appearance between the IROC & the RS.
Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')
The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.
88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')
The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.
88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by CDNMARO
In reality there is very little difference in appearance between the IROC & the RS.
Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')
The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.
88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
In reality there is very little difference in appearance between the IROC & the RS.
Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')
The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.
88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
i may be wrong
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by AmorgetRS
Nope, the RS got the grids, IIRC
Nope, the RS got the grids, IIRC
When I looked through the readers rides (just a minute ago) about half the tail light shots I saw of 89 RS's where the grid style, other other half where the black stripe down the middle.
Last edited by AmorgetRS; Nov 21, 2004 at 08:09 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by AmorgetRS
When I looked through the readers rides (just a minute ago) about half the tail light shots I saw of 89 RS's where the grid style, other other half where the black stripe down the middle.
When I looked through the readers rides (just a minute ago) about half the tail light shots I saw of 89 RS's where the grid style, other other half where the black stripe down the middle.
i know its a popular switch to perform and an easy one .....
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
just did some searching here on the board here :
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
states in the camaro history part
RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
states in the camaro history part
RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.
The 87-90 RS had the old Z28 style taillights. The 91-92 were the only ones with the grid from the factory. The IROC-Z appeared to sit lower because of the 16" wheels. The overall height of both models was the same. 87-90 RSs received 15" rims only. The tires for the IROC-Z were 245 series and the RS was 215 series. The IROC-Z also had black painted headlight pockets, while the RS was body colored.
The interior was similar, but the steering wheel was different for the RS. There were obvious performance differences that you already mentioned weren't what you were looking for.
The last thing, most IROC-Zs in 1990 had the stripes and door decals, but they were available without. The RS had no stripes.
The interior was similar, but the steering wheel was different for the RS. There were obvious performance differences that you already mentioned weren't what you were looking for.
The last thing, most IROC-Zs in 1990 had the stripes and door decals, but they were available without. The RS had no stripes.
Originally posted by THEGENERAL
just did some searching here on the board here :
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
states in the camaro history part
RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.
just did some searching here on the board here :
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
states in the camaro history part
RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.
This information relates to 1991, not 1990
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by scottmoyer
This information relates to 1991, not 1990
This information relates to 1991, not 1990
i had forgot to put the year it was quoted from in the previous post
Re: differences in RS and IROC
Originally posted by kevo2k6
i was just wonderin what are all the differences in thev6 and v8 RS and IROC body styles? i know that the front grill is different with the iroc havin the fog lights and all. and the ride height seems a littel differnt. but the rs seems a littel higher the v6 one anyways and the wheels seem not was wide. are there any other differences? also is the stock kit the same on the two cars?
i was just wonderin what are all the differences in thev6 and v8 RS and IROC body styles? i know that the front grill is different with the iroc havin the fog lights and all. and the ride height seems a littel differnt. but the rs seems a littel higher the v6 one anyways and the wheels seem not was wide. are there any other differences? also is the stock kit the same on the two cars?
IROC-Z base is $14,555 without options. So the BIG difference is MONEY and what you got for it when the car was brand spanking new.
Buying used is the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM








