History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

differences in RS and IROC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #1  
kevo2k6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
differences in RS and IROC

i was just wonderin what are all the differences in thev6 and v8 RS and IROC body styles? i know that the front grill is different with the iroc havin the fog lights and all. and the ride height seems a littel differnt. but the rs seems a littel higher the v6 one anyways and the wheels seem not was wide. are there any other differences? also is the stock kit the same on the two cars?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #2  
RSFreak's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
What year in particular? The 89-90 RS and 85-90 IROC bodies are the same. 91-92 RS have different gfx. IROC wheels are typically (but not in all cases) 16". 89-90 RS wheels are typically (but not always) 15". In 91-92, the RS could be ordered with the 16" Z28 wheels. I'm sure there are numerous exceptions, its hard to generalize about these cars.

Last edited by RSFreak; Sep 27, 2004 at 01:06 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 02:35 PM
  #3  
kevo2k6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
well mine is a 90 rs v6. so what would be different from the 90 IROC?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 03:11 PM
  #4  
DJP87Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Originally posted by kevo2k6
well mine is a 90 rs v6. so what would be different from the 90 IROC?
Drive a IROC-Z and you will know the differences.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
67 Camaro 88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 718
Likes: 1
From: Hliðskjálf / Pensacola, FL
Car: Camaro
Engine: 3800
Transmission: T5
tail lights (grid or nongrid)
grille
hood (louvre action on the IROC)
badging/decals
headlight bucket color (body color vs black)
wheels (size, style)
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #6  
kevo2k6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L v6
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Originally posted by DJP87Z28
Drive a IROC-Z and you will know the differences.

if u didnt read the post i was asking about the difference in LOOKS. not performance or how it drives.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #7  
DJP87Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Originally posted by kevo2k6
if u didnt read the post i was asking about the difference in LOOKS. not performance or how it drives.

Last edited by DJP87Z28; Apr 17, 2006 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #8  
RAV3N's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Is the '91 RS shorter in length than the '88 Iroc Z28?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #9  
CaysE's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 7
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally posted by RAV3N
Is the '91 RS shorter in length than the '88 Iroc Z28?
No, why do you think that?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
CDNMARO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Chilliwack, BC
Car: 87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-Speed
In reality there is very little difference in appearance between the IROC & the RS.

Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')

The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.

88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #11  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by CDNMARO
In reality there is very little difference in appearance between the IROC & the RS.

Keep in mind the 2 cars were only available together for 2 years, 89 & 90. Even then the 90 Production run was a short one. (not including the target market 88 RS')

The only differences off the top of my head are wheels, badging, hood and grille. Both models used the same GFX & 3 piece "duck tail" spoiler.

88 Sport coupes were the last models with 2-tone body/GFX & the one year only low rise spoiler. The IROC was dropped after '90, but both the 91-92 Z28 & RS used the same GFX... differences again were badging, hood, wheels & grille, as well as the new spoiler for the "Z". Even then, the RS had the option of the Z's 16" wheels

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's it
werent the tail lights on the 89-90 rs and iroc different .....non grid and grid style??

i may be wrong
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #12  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Nope, the RS got the grids, IIRC
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by AmorgetRS
Nope, the RS got the grids, IIRC
i know they did in 91 and 92 but what about earlier years?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #14  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
When I looked through the readers rides (just a minute ago) about half the tail light shots I saw of 89 RS's where the grid style, other other half where the black stripe down the middle.

Last edited by AmorgetRS; Nov 21, 2004 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #15  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by AmorgetRS
When I looked through the readers rides (just a minute ago) about half the tail light shots I saw of 89 RS's where the grid style, other other half where the black stripe down the middle.
i wonder which is original??

i know its a popular switch to perform and an easy one .....
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #16  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Agreed
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #17  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
just did some searching here on the board here :
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml

states in the camaro history part

RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #18  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
The 87-90 RS had the old Z28 style taillights. The 91-92 were the only ones with the grid from the factory. The IROC-Z appeared to sit lower because of the 16" wheels. The overall height of both models was the same. 87-90 RSs received 15" rims only. The tires for the IROC-Z were 245 series and the RS was 215 series. The IROC-Z also had black painted headlight pockets, while the RS was body colored.

The interior was similar, but the steering wheel was different for the RS. There were obvious performance differences that you already mentioned weren't what you were looking for.

The last thing, most IROC-Zs in 1990 had the stripes and door decals, but they were available without. The RS had no stripes.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #19  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Originally posted by THEGENERAL
just did some searching here on the board here :
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml

states in the camaro history part

RS was available for the first time with 16 inch wheels. Tires for the 16 inch wheels on the RS and RS convertible were P235/55R-16. RS also got the grid taillights like the Z28. The CHMSL was moved from the spoiler to the inside top edge of the hatchback glass. The slightly smaller non-CHMSL spoiler from 1982-1986 replaced the CHMSL spoiler on the RS.

This information relates to 1991, not 1990
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 08:53 PM
  #20  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by scottmoyer
This information relates to 1991, not 1990
yeah i know i was trying to say that the 89 had the regular tail lights not the grid in a post above..and when i read that about the 91 it stated that they recieved the grid tail lights on the rs which i believe was the first year.

i had forgot to put the year it was quoted from in the previous post

Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #21  
DJP87Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: differences in RS and IROC

Originally posted by kevo2k6
i was just wonderin what are all the differences in thev6 and v8 RS and IROC body styles? i know that the front grill is different with the iroc havin the fog lights and all. and the ride height seems a littel differnt. but the rs seems a littel higher the v6 one anyways and the wheels seem not was wide. are there any other differences? also is the stock kit the same on the two cars?
Well if you waded though all the Posts with there facts and fiction, the real difference between a RS and IROC-Z Camaro is get ready . PRICE.... thats the Big and only difference. For example: 1990 RS base is $10,995 without options and the 1990
IROC-Z base is $14,555 without options. So the BIG difference is MONEY and what you got for it when the car was brand spanking new.

Buying used is the same.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chazman
TPI
0
Aug 22, 2015 02:01 PM
StevenB L98/LS1
History / Originality
9
Aug 22, 2015 09:03 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
14
Aug 12, 2015 06:39 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM
jpearcy1
Wheels and Tires
5
Aug 9, 2015 10:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.