History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

92RS vs. 92Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #1  
chomp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 V8
92RS vs. 92Z28

Besides the spoiler and hood (i think) are there any aesthetical differences between these cars?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 02:53 AM
  #2  
RU-QWIK's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 1
From: Central Coast Calif.
Car: 91' Camaro
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt / 3:70
The badges are differant...

The speedo cluster is differant and the power steering has a sensor on an RS and not the Z... I don't remember what it was for though. The engine/ intake is an obvious change too...


Jason
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #3  
camaro05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maryland
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
no T tops for the 350
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 05:51 PM
  #4  
meridius's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Allensville, PA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI (Now HSR)
Transmission: 700R4 by Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:27 9 Bolt Posi W/ Discs
the sensor in the power steering line was for the PCM to detect when the line pressure went up to determine if it needed to bring the RPMS up to deal with the extra load of the pump. Back to the origional question at hand, I dont think the RSs had the foglamp option either and the grilles may have been different.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
AJT86's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Sicklerville,NJ
Car: 87 Buick Grand National
Engine: 3.8 SFI Intercooled Turbo
Transmission: 200R4 3000 Stall
z28 had a foglight package and grill- RS had a slotted black grill- Z28 had different rims, badges, hood, spoiler, and i beleive the Z had black headlight pockets while the RS is body colored- or is that only the earlier IROCs
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #6  
Axoid's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5 manual
In 92 15" wheels were standard on the RS, but 16" Z-28 wheels were avalible as an option. This option also caused a upgrade in the steering box, springs and sway bars.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
painted headlight buckets.

the list goes on and on....
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #8  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
the engines are diff...

the rs came with a V6 or a 305 tbi


Z28 came with a 305 tpi auto, 305 tpi 5 speed or a L98
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #9  
Red92TA's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Eagle, WI
Car: 92 TA, 91 RS, 98 Tahoe, 95 S10
Engine: 305 TPI, 350 Vortec TBI, 350 Vortec, 4.3 Z
Transmission: 4L60, T-5, 4L60E, T5
Originally posted by Axoid
In 92 15" wheels were standard on the RS, but 16" Z-28 wheels were avalible as an option. This option also caused a upgrade in the steering box, springs and sway bars.
I have yet to see a 91-92 RS with 15" wheels. My 91 had the wide 5 spoke wheels...which were 16's. I believe the last time they used the 15's was in 87. Actualy I think the RS always had the 16" wheels, it was the base model camaro that had the 15" 5 spokes.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 02:03 AM
  #10  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
plenty of 91-92 rs had 15's. look at the production numbers. 16's were a luxury back in the day. i searched through all of my thirdgen pictures and couldn't find one although i don't have many rs pictures as it is. look a little and you'll see though, most were color coded.



Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #11  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Originally posted by Axoid
In 92 15" wheels were standard on the RS, but 16" Z-28 wheels were avalible as an option. This option also caused a upgrade in the steering box, springs and sway bars.
Yep. What he said. 'twas called RPO F41.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 08:07 AM
  #12  
a mack6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
My RS has the 16 inch rims...but then again its got the heritage edition package.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #13  
Red92TA's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Eagle, WI
Car: 92 TA, 91 RS, 98 Tahoe, 95 S10
Engine: 305 TPI, 350 Vortec TBI, 350 Vortec, 4.3 Z
Transmission: 4L60, T-5, 4L60E, T5
Ok, I stand corrected. I just have never seen a 91 or 92 without 16's.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #14  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Red92TA
Ok, I stand corrected. I just have never seen a 91 or 92 without 16's.
Most all v8 rs cars had 16" wheels. I have only seen two that had the 15's on it. Every v6 car I have seen had 15" wheels.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #15  
camaro05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maryland
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I just looked at a 91 bird the other day with 305, T5 and 15" rims
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #16  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by camaro05
I just looked at a 91 bird the other day with 305, T5 and 15" rims
We are talking about the 91/92 RS Camaro here...
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #17  
91B2L's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH700
wasn't the high rise spoiler and hood blisters an option on the 91'-92' RS?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #18  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
wasn't the high rise spoiler and hood blisters an option on the 91'-92' RS?
No
And for the record, there is a 91-92 RS near my house with 15" wheels, I heard it drive by once, it sounded exactly like my 305 too..
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #19  
1992rs/ss's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 2
From: Munster IN
Car: 92 RS, 05 GTO (sold), 10 TL AWD
Engine: 383 HSR w/DSC1
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Strange S60/3.73
Yep. What he said. 'twas called RPO F41.
well my car got this option so your saying that I have the z28 sway bars and quick ratio steering box? any thing else come with this code.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #20  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
i was always under the impression that there were only two sets of sway bar sizing, 3 if you count the 1-le. by that statement then there would be 4?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #21  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Since I own a 91 RS here's what I've gathered over the years;
Only difference between 91 and 92's was the badge on the dash, some wiring harness differences, and a Heritage edition.
Now to speak of the differences between the 91 RS and 92 Z28. Z got 16" wheels standard, RS it was an option. Mine had the L03 TBI (v8) with 15" wheels.
Appearance differences were limited to the front grill, badges, rear spoiler. Now there are a LOT of differences with the powertrain options and the interiors were slightly different. The RS never came with a 145mph speedo, only 110 .
Kandy, the RS's COULD get black headlight pockets!
Also, the suspension were different, same with rear, driveshaft option etc. The B4C option gave the RS model everything the Z had but with an RS "shell" so I recant on that no RS's with a 145mph speedo because those had em.

Last edited by JPrevost; Apr 28, 2005 at 09:16 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #22  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Originally posted by JPrevost

Kandy, the RS's COULD get black headlight pockets!
Only with the Heritage Package. All other RSs were body colored.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #23  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by scottmoyer
Only with the Heritage Package. All other RSs were body colored.
Right, but the Heritage Package wasn't limited to Z's so RS's could have black headlight pockets.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #24  
vejatabul's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: garland,tx
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
since 1989 the rs was the base model camaro. they discontinued the sport coupe after 1988.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #25  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Originally posted by JPrevost
Right, but the Heritage Package wasn't limited to Z's so RS's could have black headlight pockets.
lol.. thanks for clearing THAT up. some dealerships also painted stock v6 headlight buckets black too so i guess you could count that in as well if you wanted to be technical however there weren't production numbers to follow that aspect. a z28 to rs all original aside, gm did not paint them black. special editons and otherwise are obviously different.

Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #26  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by vejatabul
since 1989 the rs was the base model camaro. they discontinued the sport coupe after 1988.
Nope, SC had it's last year in 86, 87 was the LT and 88 was the RS till 92.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #27  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
QUOTE]Nope, SC had it's last year in 86, 87 was the LT and 88 was the RS till 92.[/QUOTE]
Sport coups last year was 88, not all 87s were LTs and Rs was only available in CA, Florida, and Texas in 88 and as only a V6 model.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #28  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Gr89RS
QUOTE]Nope, SC had it's last year in 86, 87 was the LT and 88 was the RS till 92.

Sport coups last year was 88, not all 87s were LTs and Rs was only available in CA, Florida, and Texas in 88 and as only a V6 model.
[/QUOTE]
I read that in the tech data but have yet to find any actual information (owners of cars) that comply with those findings. Example; NJ buddy of mine has an 88 RS with the L03, he's not the only one. So explain to me how the only RS's those years were found in 3 states and only v6 option. I've also never seen any 87 or 88 SC models, none, and I've seen a lot of thirdgens in the junkyards and over the years.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #29  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
I read that in the tech data but have yet to find any actual information (owners of cars) that comply with those findings. Example; NJ buddy of mine has an 88 RS with the L03, he's not the only one. So explain to me how the only RS's those years were found in 3 states and only v6 option. I've also never seen any 87 or 88 SC models, none, and I've seen a lot of thirdgens in the junkyards and over the years.
Its all here
I dont know what else to believe
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 06:51 AM
  #30  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Originally posted by JPrevost
Right, but the Heritage Package wasn't limited to Z's so RS's could have black headlight pockets.
Who said anything about the Heritage Edition being only a Z option? In response to the statement above mine, "Kandy, the RSs could get the black headlight pockets!" I responded, "Only with the Heritage Package. All other RSs were body colored. " Nowhere did I mention the Z.

Also, the last year for the SC was 1988. It was available with the shorty spoiler. The RS debuted in Ca in 1987 as a V6 and was available in only a couple colors. In 1988 it became available in TX and FL. It was available to the masses from 1989 to 1992. Since this was originally questioned about the difference of a 92Z and a 92 RS, I don't see where that info is relevant.
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #31  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
have to agree with you scott.

Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #32  
Bandit400's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 1
Car: 1992 RS, F41
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Apparently the 16inch wheels triggered the F41 suspension (or vice versa)which also required the V8. However, the V8 was available without F41 and 16inch wheels. I saw at least one new and several stock when only a few years old. But, it seems V8 91/92 RS are far more common with the 16s than with the 15s. What's hard to tell are the Pre-91 V8 RS cars when you see one drive by ..unless you are close enough to hear
Of course, these things are getting old now and can have anything changed.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 01:36 AM
  #33  
vejatabul's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: garland,tx
Car: 1988 gta
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: turbo 350
Originally posted by Red92TA
I have yet to see a 91-92 RS with 15" wheels. My 91 had the wide 5 spoke wheels...which were 16's. I believe the last time they used the 15's was in 87. Actualy I think the RS always had the 16" wheels, it was the base model camaro that had the 15" 5 spokes.
he siad there was a base model and an rs. that was the signifigance of the sc and rs debate.
my first 3rd gen was an 88 sc with an lo3.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #34  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Not to keep getting off the subject, but I just wanted to confirm the 88 Sport Coupes existing. My best friend has one, where the RS badges would be on the GFX, it had an emblem that said CAMARO instead, and the same on the bumper too. And it had the short wing spoiler that looks kinda like a miniture of my 91 z28's wing. This car also had an L03 from the factory with the auto, and the 15" aluminum wheels, and the slotted grille like the 91-92 RS. The car was a solid color when he got it, but we believe that the GFX were silver from the factory. Hope this helps
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #35  
AaronIROCZ's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
25 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 6
From: Tomball Texas
I just got a 91 RS Convertible with the 305 tbi v8. It to has the 16 inch wheels, I am about to switch the steering box from my 89 IROC to the RS. My question is should my RS already have it???
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 04:17 PM
  #36  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
have a steering box? yes

performance geared like the iroc or upgraded z28's? no
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 02:59 AM
  #37  
Dizturbed One's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 992
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, California
Car: 92 RS
Engine: a slow one
Transmission: a crunchy one
Axle/Gears: a whiny one
Originally posted by ES87iroc
Most all v8 rs cars had 16" wheels. I have only seen two that had the 15's on it. Every v6 car I have seen had 15" wheels.
you can make that 3 now...

the one sitting in my driveway has 15" wheels



and uhhhh... i've actually RARELY seen an RS with 16" wheels...
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #38  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Dizturbed One
you can make that 3 now...

the one sitting in my driveway has 15" wheels



and uhhhh... i've actually RARELY seen an RS with 16" wheels...



Re-read the post and try again.
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #39  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by ES87iroc


Re-read the post and try again.
I re-read your post and also am suprised at what you've seen. My 91 RS had the 15" wheel's and the 305 TBI. Make that 4?
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #40  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by JPrevost
I re-read your post and also am suprised at what you've seen. My 91 RS had the 15" wheel's and the 305 TBI. Make that 4?
And your point is? Disturbed felt it nessicary to post that his car has 15" wheels, however his car is a v6 so the point is moot.

As I posted, most all v8 rs cars I have seen had 16" wheels originally. Did I say all? No, no I did not.
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #41  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by ES87iroc
And your point is? Disturbed felt it nessicary to post that his car has 15" wheels, however his car is a v6 so the point is moot.

As I posted, most all v8 rs cars I have seen had 16" wheels originally. Did I say all? No, no I did not.
My point is that the v8 15" wheel RS wasn't uncommon. Infact, of all the 305 TBI RS's that I've run into (and that's a lot) I'd say it was 50/50. This is just 91-92's.
Now I didn't check those cars RPO codes but when it's got 15" stock wheels it's not often that they originally came with 16's!
Did I say you said all? No, no I did not.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #42  
AaronIROCZ's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
25 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 6
From: Tomball Texas
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kandied91z
have a steering box? yes

Well I think that I have figured that out already since somehow when I turn my steering wheel my front wheels turn. SO it looks like I will have to change the box. Thanks for your help.
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #43  
MurcoRS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: ZZ4 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73
Originally posted by Colin91Z
Not to keep getting off the subject, but I just wanted to confirm the 88 Sport Coupes existing. My best friend has one, where the RS badges would be on the GFX, it had an emblem that said CAMARO instead, and the same on the bumper too. And it had the short wing spoiler that looks kinda like a miniture of my 91 z28's wing. This car also had an L03 from the factory with the auto, and the 15" aluminum wheels, and the slotted grille like the 91-92 RS. The car was a solid color when he got it, but we believe that the GFX were silver from the factory. Hope this helps
Right! 1988 was the only year for that oddball spoiler and the "Camaro" GFX and bumper emblems. I remember seeing my first 1987 RS in Barstow California when it was new. It was all black with 15" black rims and I had to have one! I bought my black RS 2 years later when they were available nationally. Of course, I later changed the wheels to '85-'87 IROC's!! lol
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #44  
halflife52's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Originally posted by camaro05
no T tops for the 350
wrong. my friend's '87 IROC 5.7L has t-tops.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #45  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
you guys realize the topic is about 1992 correct?

Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #46  
dj's B4C's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Car: 1992 B4C/1LE/L98///1992 Z28/Heritage Edition?/L98 white with Black stripes///1992 Z28 Convertible Heritage Edition, L03 with RMT, white w/Red Stripes///1992 RS, Heritage Edition, white with red stripes
Engine: L98 x 2, L03, V6
Transmission: 4L60 x 2, 5 Speed x 2
Originally posted by Red92TA
I have yet to see a 91-92 RS with 15" wheels. My 91 had the wide 5 spoke wheels...which were 16's. I believe the last time they used the 15's was in 87. Actualy I think the RS always had the 16" wheels, it was the base model camaro that had the 15" 5 spokes.
Here's another 92 RS V6 (Heritage) with factory 15" wheels.

Also noticed that my two 92 Z28's have the hood blisters on them, my two RS's do not.
Attached Thumbnails 92RS vs. 92Z28-92-rs.jpg  

Last edited by dj's B4C; Jun 19, 2005 at 12:52 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #47  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
that's factory original? i've never seen someone spring for the 25th appearance package and not get the wheels two as i thought that was a given with the whole package.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 11:21 AM
  #48  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
wrong. my friend's '87 IROC 5.7L has t-tops

In 1987, which was the first year for the 350 L98 (option) you COULD get t-tops....because from 1987-1989, the L98 produced less torque. Starting in 1990, you COULD NOT get an L98 equipped IROC (90), Z28 (91-92) because they produced more torque and would twist the bodies.

Hope I cleared that up for ya
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #49  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by 84customZ28
In 1987, which was the first year for the 350 L98 (option) you COULD get t-tops....because from 1987-1989, the L98 produced less torque. Starting in 1990, you COULD NOT get an L98 equipped IROC (90), Z28 (91-92) because they produced more torque and would twist the bodies.

Hope I cleared that up for ya

shawn you are right. But in 87 the had 330lb of tq and in 92 the L98 had 345lbs of tq.. Not much of a diff at all.. But they learned from there mistakes from 87-89 that ppl that abused the L98 with ttops had lot of body issues... So then they stopped in 1990
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 03:58 AM
  #50  
gottfuel's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: desert
Car: only GM,88 camaro, 91r/s camaro, 91
Engine: Clean oil, looks fresh, no leaks
Transmission: Bright Red, never burnt, no leaks
Axle/Gears: currently whining
My two cents!

yea i have an 88 sc camaro. its the 2.8 it is factory red with grey gfx, now this spoiler you guys are talkin bout, i dont know what was up but something was of on most of there like it did not line up in the back .. almost like it was not aligned correctly realy a poor job ,,,im not sure its cause of the power setup that closed yer hatch tight, but sumthing was wrong.. i did like that wing though it was better then the one on my 91 r/s .. i dont like my thrid break light being in the rear window like that.. looks weird
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.