History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

tech data question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #1  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
tech data question

I was reading the tech data on the 90 birds and it said that T tops were no longer available with the 5.7tpi.Then I looked at the 90 camaro and it didn't say anything about it.Did they also stop putting 5.7 and t tops together?Or did I miss somthing?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 08:41 AM
  #2  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: tech data question

Yes they did. Now with the new safety standards of air bags, the weight of the cars with TTops didn't meet CAFE mileage requirements and would have required the "Gas Guzzler Tax". By removing the TTops on the 350 cars, the weight was down enough to not have to pay. The weight issue was also the reason GM tried using the Acrylic TTops themselves.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 04:29 PM
  #3  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
Re: tech data question

the coment was made about torque and unibody strenth.Your saying it was a political and economic resson more than stucture.How much heavyer is a ttop 350 than a hard top?I wouldnt think 10 lbs.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #4  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: tech data question

I don't know the answer to your last question. I can say that it wasn't the structural integrity of the car as many people here have added 5 speeds to their 350 cars and have had the engines built up on TTop cars and the car can handle it just fine. It was political.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 11:34 PM
  #5  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
Re: tech data question

Wieght info should be on the title.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #6  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: tech data question

T-Tops were said to be a 30 Lb. addition plus whatever the case was, maybe a pound or two.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #7  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: tech data question

Originally Posted by Bobby Suth
Wieght info should be on the title.
What are you saying? Every car has a different weight based on the options. What did GM use to determine the build requirements? Did they take a car and load it up with all available options, weigh the car and decide that no car will be overweight because the potential is there? I don't know.

The TTops weigh 34# according to GM. They also mark the IROC-Z with the LB9/5 speed at 3319#. I show the L98 at 159# more and the Auto trans at 91#. Those are the different weights over the LB9/5 speed. So, just adding TTops, 350 and auto, you have a little over 3600#.

I don't know how GM comes up with these values because I have a fully loaded 87 with 350, TTops, Bose, leather, power everything, 4Wheel Disc, etc and the build sheet states my shipping weight at 3478#.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #8  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,012
Likes: 2,492
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: tech data question

Did they take a car and load it up with all available options, weigh the car and decide that no car will be overweight because the potential is there?
That's probably a fair guess; being a mfg engr myself at times, that's the sort of mental discipline you have to use in that field.

Since the Firebirds were generally heavier than Camaros, all else being equal, this would have been more likely to occur with them.

May also have had to do with crash testing... if it was possible for the car to exceed some specific weight value with all options, and put it into some other "class" for this purpose, that would have pretty much automatically nixed the availability as well.

May even have been something as simple as, crash testing costs BIG $$$$; and sales projections for that combo may not have met the threshold for profitability of paying for the testing.

There are alot of regulatory things like this that are near impossible to decode, this long after the fact. Emissions, CAFE, crash safety, testing and certification costs, etc. are all factors we have little visibility into out here in customer land.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 07:00 PM
  #9  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: tech data question

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
I don't know how GM comes up with these values because I have a fully loaded 87 with 350, TTops, Bose, leather, power everything, 4Wheel Disc, etc and the build sheet states my shipping weight at 3478#.
A review in 87 listed the base weight of a 305 TPI 5-Speed IROC-Z at 3,250 Lbs. and a 350 TPI Auto IROC-Z at 3,341 Lbs. Supposedly, that is unoptioned because both cars weighed more as tested. Our cars are the same except I have no leather, Bose, or any of the trunk trim like carpet, deep well cover, or the cargo cover. It has everything else though and its' shipping weight was 3,461 Lbs. That seems correct with those few extras you have.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 08:42 PM
  #10  
JT's Avatar
JT
Community Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 292
Re: tech data question

It's true that our tech data, atleast back to 2001, had stated 1990 L98 cars with T-Tops was no longer available due to structural integrity concerns. However, since information indicates otherwise, I edited that statement.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:47 PM
  #11  
FormerL69's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 519
Likes: 3
From: Denver, CO
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: tech data question

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
Yes they did. Now with the new safety standards of air bags, the weight of the cars with TTops didn't meet CAFE mileage requirements and would have required the "Gas Guzzler Tax". By removing the TTops on the 350 cars, the weight was down enough to not have to pay. The weight issue was also the reason GM tried using the Acrylic TTops themselves.
Was it '90 when GM tried the Lexan t-tops? I know they didn't use them very long because they cracked, but it would make sense that they tried the new material to cut down on the weight of the tops themselves.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:48 PM
  #12  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
Re: tech data question

the part about the wieght being on the title was a question.I should have put a ? mark not a . .Sorry.Alot of good reading here though.I was just wondering.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 12:02 PM
  #13  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Re: tech data question

Originally Posted by FormerL69
Was it '90 when GM tried the Lexan t-tops? I know they didn't use them very long because they cracked, but it would make sense that they tried the new material to cut down on the weight of the tops themselves.
They started them sometime around 89 and used them one and off until the end of Thirdgen production.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2012 | 11:22 PM
  #14  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
Re: tech data question

I've got a guy telling me he knows of a 90 t top Iroc with a 5.7 engine thats said to be original.said it's a 50,000$ car.I didn't know that a third gen could be worth that much first off.Secondly I'd have to see it myself.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 07:37 AM
  #15  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: tech data question

To prove that car is legit, you need to see the SPID label. Verify that the VIN on the label matches the car. If they match and the car has L98 and CC1, then he has a 350 with ttops. I'm doubting that he has this combination. The car is probably a 305 with factory T's or it's a 350 with aftermarket C&C tops.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #16  
xcalibur's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Car: '95 Impala SS
Engine: 350/LT1
Transmission: (Sold my '89 Formula 350)
Re: tech data question

[quote=sofakingdom;5136684]
"Since the Firebirds were generally heavier than Camaros..."

My '89 Formula 350 weighed only 3262 lbs, but that's the way I ordered it.
It had A/C, and radio, but no power windows/locks/seats, or T-tops.
They threatened that it wouldn't come w/carpet mats, but when it was finally delivered, all four were there.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 05:32 PM
  #17  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,012
Likes: 2,492
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: tech data question

Key word: "generally".

Some Firebirds are quite light, and Camaros are heavier than some Firebirds; but in general the Firebird product line weighs more than the Camaro one.

said it's a 50,000$ car
Well if somebody pays him $50,000 for it, it's a $50,000 car. OTOH if the asking price is $50,000 but nobody pays it, then .... it's not. Sounds like in this case though, somebody is most likely in fantasy land; got an extra 0 in there somewhere.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 11:22 PM
  #18  
Bobby Suth's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 989
Likes: 9
From: tn.
Car: 1990 firebird,1989 Iroc z,1986 fire
Engine: 3.1lt,5.7tpi,3.1mpfi
Transmission: auto,auto
Axle/Gears: 273?277
Re: tech data question

I'm with ya on that one
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cleotiz
Electronics
7
Jan 6, 2018 08:56 PM
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Sep 1, 2015 04:32 PM
ZZ42Fast
TPI
3
Aug 30, 2015 02:39 PM
CORV3TT3
DIY PROM
6
Aug 23, 2015 11:26 AM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.