Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
#2
COTM Editor (Retired)
Thread Starter
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
You Camaro guys run into similar issues with sellers passing off RSs and SCs as “IROCs” I’m sure.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Posts: 609
Received 147 Likes
on
106 Posts
Car: 1991 GTA T-Top / 2014 Mustang GT
Engine: 5L TPI
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
Few things more frustrating than these situations. Older guy took a 91 Firebird Vert and put an 80's GTA front end on it including emblems, but also fender vents, and horrible Walmart chrome strips along the wheel well and kept trying to tell me it's a "super rare grand touring edition".
Any pics of the car you're referring to?
Any pics of the car you're referring to?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,637
Received 751 Likes
on
577 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
So what was he seeing in his build sheet that made him think it was a Formula?
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
It’s not a Formula. Not from anything in pics.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
Don't count the engine against it, my Formula (and I have the numbers to prove it) came with the base LO3 V8 but no that is not a Formula unless someone added/changed all the cosmetics for whatever reason.
#11
COTM Editor (Retired)
Thread Starter
#12
COTM Editor (Retired)
Thread Starter
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
But...more like definitely, given the totality of the circumstances.
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
I see this with Camaros quite a bit too. 92 Iroc.....82 Iroc....and everything in between. But I'll be honest, buying a 30 year old car....the responsibility is really on the buyer. If you just want a rolling chassis for a race car who cares, BUT....if you really want a Formula...or an Iroc....it's really on you to know what to look for. Obviously HERE....on TGO...most of us know what we're looking at. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't make misrepresenting a car the right thing to do, but, half the time I think the sellers really have no idea, and then get defensive when they realize they don't even know what kind of car they have. When you start getting into the higher dollar cars, that's when you start to see the nasty come out in people and really have to watch out. This guy though....bah.....just an honest moron probably, lol.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,692
Received 746 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
Seller, I ran the VIN and its a formula and the DMV says its a formula too.
I See this all the time, people just don't know.
I See this all the time, people just don't know.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,419
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
Then you get mixed breeds like mine after 30 yrs, Camaro rear end, Trans -Am wheels,ground effects + emblems, GTA tail lights, Formula hood,etc... I just list it as a Pontiac even though its actually a Formula. lol. I do hate to see a car mis represented as its for sale but us that know these cars we know.
#16
COTM Editor (Retired)
Thread Starter
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
Just FWIW, I give the guy the benefit of the doubt as far as "misrepresenting" the car. I mean, the thing is probably so far gone that it scarcely matters if its a Formula or not, price-wise. What I found humorous and notable (note: this is meant to be a somewhat humorous thread) is the confidence and the...dismissiveness...with which he told me to "tell it to the build sheet in his bird". I found this pretty damned funny for the following reasons:
1) The car is obviously a base Firebird, as we can all see without question.
2) He indicates that he has a "build sheet" for the car in his possession. There is just no f-ing way.
2a) The car obviously is and most likely always has been...a beater. It has not been extensively modified, and therefore there can be no "build sheet" for any extensive modifications.
2b) The car obviously is and most likely always has been...a beater. Given the car's overall condition and the life that it can be reasonably deduced that it has had, I think it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the original build sheet from the factory or dealer window sticker are items that are still with this car.
1) The car is obviously a base Firebird, as we can all see without question.
2) He indicates that he has a "build sheet" for the car in his possession. There is just no f-ing way.
2a) The car obviously is and most likely always has been...a beater. It has not been extensively modified, and therefore there can be no "build sheet" for any extensive modifications.
2b) The car obviously is and most likely always has been...a beater. Given the car's overall condition and the life that it can be reasonably deduced that it has had, I think it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the original build sheet from the factory or dealer window sticker are items that are still with this car.
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
He actually argued it really didn't matter...his fake totaled IROC was absolutely worth $8000.00.
About a week later, I bought an L98 '88 IROC.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,419
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
I had an 87 T/A I bought and thought it was a GTA for the longest. Had the right badges, steering wheel, map pocket, TPI engine, digital dash, etc. The fender vents gave it away but I didn't know it when I bought it. That was my fault, if I had been on these boards back then I would have known. That's the great thing about TGO, knowledge. Ive learned so much here and can just read up on these builds all day and never get tired of it.
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North East GA
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
40 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: Dude...it’s NOT a Formula.
yea that would be a base car, or possibly a formula that was wrecked and put back together with base parts... But it looks pretty clean for what it is.
My 89 formula has the L03, with WS6, but not the 1LE, Had 16" wheels... but it has the power bulge hood and the wrap around spoiler. And it had all the 80's graphics you could fit on it before it was repainted telling everyone the ws6 and formula status
Could you not get the 92 formula with the L03?
Though according to this http://www.3rdgenformula.com/92/92options.htm
W66 -- Formula Option for Base Firebird
(Includes LG4, QDZ, N96, WS6, U21)
LG4 - ENGINE, GAS, 8 CYL, 5.0L, 4BBL
QDZ - TIRE ALL, 245/50VR16
N96 - WHEEL, 16X8, ALUMINUM
WS6 - PERFORMANCE PACKAGE, SPECIAL
U21 - CLUSTER, INSTRUMENTS, OIL, COOL TEMP, VOLTS, TACHOMETER
So it doesn't seem to require the aero W62 or the formula value package-- though I've never seen a formula without it.
The only thing in that list that would be hard to change out would be the cluster... get a picture of that does it have the trip odometer?
It would have to have WX1 which deletes the two tone.
Any chance he sent you a picture of the build sheet or the RPO sticker in the console?
My 89 formula has the L03, with WS6, but not the 1LE, Had 16" wheels... but it has the power bulge hood and the wrap around spoiler. And it had all the 80's graphics you could fit on it before it was repainted telling everyone the ws6 and formula status
Could you not get the 92 formula with the L03?
Though according to this http://www.3rdgenformula.com/92/92options.htm
W66 -- Formula Option for Base Firebird
(Includes LG4, QDZ, N96, WS6, U21)
LG4 - ENGINE, GAS, 8 CYL, 5.0L, 4BBL
QDZ - TIRE ALL, 245/50VR16
N96 - WHEEL, 16X8, ALUMINUM
WS6 - PERFORMANCE PACKAGE, SPECIAL
U21 - CLUSTER, INSTRUMENTS, OIL, COOL TEMP, VOLTS, TACHOMETER
So it doesn't seem to require the aero W62 or the formula value package-- though I've never seen a formula without it.
The only thing in that list that would be hard to change out would be the cluster... get a picture of that does it have the trip odometer?
It would have to have WX1 which deletes the two tone.
Any chance he sent you a picture of the build sheet or the RPO sticker in the console?
Last edited by Aviator857; 11-09-2018 at 02:06 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbird_400
Auto Detailing and Appearance
3
11-06-2001 10:49 PM