1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
As the title states, I picked up a super cheap roller last week. It came up on Marketplace for $300 and I saw an uncracked dash and good tail lights, figured it'd be well worth picking up as a part out car. Fast forward an hour, I get it home and start to dig... There's zero rust anywhere, it's a T top car (genuinely didn't notice when winching it onto the trailer), 3.73 posi disc rear, brand new OEM gas tank in the back seat, interior is in pristine condition and I hooked up a battery, all the lights work. Was originally an L69 5 speed car, drivetrain is gone but the car is complete otherwise. Paint is rough, but it's all black and gold. Clear Illinois title.
My question is, where would you guys go from here? My current plan is a mild 350/T56, buffing the original paint and driving the car. To do this, I'll have to sell my fairly rusty/rough '91 Trans Am convertible with an immaculate interior and digital dash swap.
My question is, where would you guys go from here? My current plan is a mild 350/T56, buffing the original paint and driving the car. To do this, I'll have to sell my fairly rusty/rough '91 Trans Am convertible with an immaculate interior and digital dash swap.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
nice score! besides the obvious, it looks like it's only missing a few things - radiator, shroud & fan, and the front air deflectors.
deep clean the interior, install a tranny & crate motor and start driving that sucker.
deep clean the interior, install a tranny & crate motor and start driving that sucker.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Do thirdgens ever buff out? Pretty sure if the paint looks bad now, there's not much cleaning it up. If it's base coat/clear coat, it'll probably shed the clear before it cleans up. Point being, plan on needing paint.
Aside from the pain of labor to install a drivetrain that is less than ideal, you could look around for a junkyard V8 with a roller cam and a used T5. Do it cheap and end up with an enjoyable car. Then you could stack em up like the rest of us, because be honest, no one stops at just one.
Aside from the pain of labor to install a drivetrain that is less than ideal, you could look around for a junkyard V8 with a roller cam and a used T5. Do it cheap and end up with an enjoyable car. Then you could stack em up like the rest of us, because be honest, no one stops at just one.
The following 2 users liked this post by Drew:
86blackiroc (02-27-2022), CKone (11-21-2019)
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Maybe autocross someday, for right now a fun daily and occasional track toy.
Do thirdgens ever buff out? Pretty sure if the paint looks bad now, there's not much cleaning it up. If it's base coat/clear coat, it'll probably shed the clear before it cleans up. Point being, plan on needing paint.
Aside from the pain of labor to install a drivetrain that is less than ideal, you could look around for a junkyard V8 with a roller cam and a used T5. Do it cheap and end up with an enjoyable car. Then you could stack em up like the rest of us, because be honest, no one stops at just one.
Aside from the pain of labor to install a drivetrain that is less than ideal, you could look around for a junkyard V8 with a roller cam and a used T5. Do it cheap and end up with an enjoyable car. Then you could stack em up like the rest of us, because be honest, no one stops at just one.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Wouldn't an 84 HO have a single electric fan? Shouldn't be hard to come up with, it's the same setup they used up through 92 on the 6cyl.
I wouldn't bother trying to make it original. It's arguable if an 84 305 anything will ever be worth more as a stock HO vs a mild 350 with a 4bbl and headers that fits under the hood. Potentially I could see the car being worth more with a more realistic drivetrain. There's a lot to be gained by simply going to a 87-up 305 to get the roller cam and 1pc seals. A TBI or Vortec 350 truck engine with a cam swap would be a nice upgrade, as would a World Class T5. I'm not suggesting to just throw together some junk, but there's a huge margin between picking up the latest wonder LS(?) crate engine, and a 10-speed manual trans, with Death Stars and "My 900hp...", etc and having a roller rotting out back.
I wouldn't 'rebuild' or 'freshen up' or whatever euphemism, a 305, or even an older 350, but I could see dropping a healthy used engine in a roller to make it a complete car. But maybe that's just because I have a... uh... Well, it'd be a roller if I put the suspension back under it... Sitting in the garage going on 4 years now... I don't think I'd want to recommend someone sell a car they enjoy, that drives, to fund rebuilding a car that doesn't drive and won't drive any time soon, without a good reason. IF that makes sense.
I wouldn't bother trying to make it original. It's arguable if an 84 305 anything will ever be worth more as a stock HO vs a mild 350 with a 4bbl and headers that fits under the hood. Potentially I could see the car being worth more with a more realistic drivetrain. There's a lot to be gained by simply going to a 87-up 305 to get the roller cam and 1pc seals. A TBI or Vortec 350 truck engine with a cam swap would be a nice upgrade, as would a World Class T5. I'm not suggesting to just throw together some junk, but there's a huge margin between picking up the latest wonder LS(?) crate engine, and a 10-speed manual trans, with Death Stars and "My 900hp...", etc and having a roller rotting out back.
I wouldn't 'rebuild' or 'freshen up' or whatever euphemism, a 305, or even an older 350, but I could see dropping a healthy used engine in a roller to make it a complete car. But maybe that's just because I have a... uh... Well, it'd be a roller if I put the suspension back under it... Sitting in the garage going on 4 years now... I don't think I'd want to recommend someone sell a car they enjoy, that drives, to fund rebuilding a car that doesn't drive and won't drive any time soon, without a good reason. IF that makes sense.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Nice score! I've spent more on a round of drinks!
The following users liked this post:
George Klass (04-08-2020)
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Wouldn't an 84 HO have a single electric fan? Shouldn't be hard to come up with, it's the same setup they used up through 92 on the 6cyl.
I wouldn't bother trying to make it original. It's arguable if an 84 305 anything will ever be worth more as a stock HO vs a mild 350 with a 4bbl and headers that fits under the hood. Potentially I could see the car being worth more with a more realistic drivetrain. There's a lot to be gained by simply going to a 87-up 305 to get the roller cam and 1pc seals. A TBI or Vortec 350 truck engine with a cam swap would be a nice upgrade, as would a World Class T5. I'm not suggesting to just throw together some junk, but there's a huge margin between picking up the latest wonder LS(?) crate engine, and a 10-speed manual trans, with Death Stars and "My 900hp...", etc and having a roller rotting out back.
I wouldn't 'rebuild' or 'freshen up' or whatever euphemism, a 305, or even an older 350, but I could see dropping a healthy used engine in a roller to make it a complete car. But maybe that's just because I have a... uh... Well, it'd be a roller if I put the suspension back under it... Sitting in the garage going on 4 years now... I don't think I'd want to recommend someone sell a car they enjoy, that drives, to fund rebuilding a car that doesn't drive and won't drive any time soon, without a good reason. IF that makes sense.
I wouldn't bother trying to make it original. It's arguable if an 84 305 anything will ever be worth more as a stock HO vs a mild 350 with a 4bbl and headers that fits under the hood. Potentially I could see the car being worth more with a more realistic drivetrain. There's a lot to be gained by simply going to a 87-up 305 to get the roller cam and 1pc seals. A TBI or Vortec 350 truck engine with a cam swap would be a nice upgrade, as would a World Class T5. I'm not suggesting to just throw together some junk, but there's a huge margin between picking up the latest wonder LS(?) crate engine, and a 10-speed manual trans, with Death Stars and "My 900hp...", etc and having a roller rotting out back.
I wouldn't 'rebuild' or 'freshen up' or whatever euphemism, a 305, or even an older 350, but I could see dropping a healthy used engine in a roller to make it a complete car. But maybe that's just because I have a... uh... Well, it'd be a roller if I put the suspension back under it... Sitting in the garage going on 4 years now... I don't think I'd want to recommend someone sell a car they enjoy, that drives, to fund rebuilding a car that doesn't drive and won't drive any time soon, without a good reason. IF that makes sense.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
A T56 for a good price is nearly impossible to find, and way overkill for 350hp. Go with a T5, you'll be fine if you stay on street tires and don't powershift it daily.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
I'll be going T56 in case I go further eventually. I see no reason to go T5 if there's a good chance I'll need a beefier trans later on. That, and the lower cruising RPM would be nice. I put 12,000 miles on my '91 this year, the MPG adds up. As for swapping an LT1, especially if I use a 4th gen radiator, I don't really see much of an issue. I'll be running a distributor so I won't have Optispark woes, either. The particular LT1 I have is out of a '93 Corvette, so I don't even have to make room for the AC compressor.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
GM used to offer a special intake manifold to run a carb and dizzy on an LT1, but I thought it was discontinued, I could be wrong. That's why I was saying it could be a challenge.
EDIT: Looks like I was wrong.
https://www.jegs.com/i/GM+Performanc...4aAot3EALw_wcB
EDIT: Looks like I was wrong.
https://www.jegs.com/i/GM+Performanc...4aAot3EALw_wcB
The following users liked this post:
George Klass (04-08-2020)
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Received 212 Likes
on
178 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Are you sure that's an 84'? It has the 82'-83' lower body spoilers in front of each wheel and the open grilles in the front bumper. The 84' Trans ams had ground effects and closed panels for the front bumper grilles.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Are you sure that's an 84'? It has the 82'-83' lower body spoilers in front of each wheel and the open grilles in the front bumper. The 84' Trans ams had ground effects and closed panels for the front bumper grilles.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
#16
Supreme Member
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
I love that car, wish I had it for myself. I'd do an L98 with mild period correct mods (maybe dyno don headers and SLP runners if you can find them, maybe a cam or heads, but make sure it looks stock-ish), a T56, lower it about an inch, put on the 17" Hawks GTA wheels (tough call between black and gold here... I'd want the gold to match the car). Add a momo steering wheel, maybe search for some 80's recaros or C4 seats, and drive it!
#17
Junior Member
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Nice find for sure. I think I’m more impressed that it’s a t-top car and the floors aren’t rusted through more than anything. Enjoy it!
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Wound up getting it running, the '91 is still up for sale. Went with a 406 and a V6 T5 in the black car to get it running, still hunting a T56.
The following 2 users liked this post by Paintchips97:
DynoDave43 (01-07-2021), nothingssafe (02-10-2022)
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: attleboro, ma
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 14 Charger RT rwd dd
Engine: 5.7L Hemi
Transmission: auto
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
I currently have 2 84 black/gold w62 Trans Am's.
both vin H 305
1 ttop auto, tan interior, pwr wind/locks
1 hardtop 5spd Dark charcoal interior, manual wind/locks
both vin H 305
1 ttop auto, tan interior, pwr wind/locks
1 hardtop 5spd Dark charcoal interior, manual wind/locks
#22
Member
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Are you sure that's an 84'? It has the 82'-83' lower body spoilers in front of each wheel and the open grilles in the front bumper. The 84' Trans ams had ground effects and closed panels for the front bumper grilles.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
If it is an 83' that had an L69, that would be somewhat rare since they didn't make very many. Still, it wouldn't be worth trying to put it all back to stock. Build it the way you want it. Seems like a solid starting point.
#23
Member
Re: 1984 Trans Am L69/T5 roller, a few questions.
Nice 84. I’m partial to the 19/55 color combo. It’s interesting though, it’s a non-W62 84, with L69 and MM5, CC1, 17C, but with AS9. Very interesting!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post