LT1. Canister?
LT1. Canister?
What are you all doing with your old canister or are you all puting in 4th gen canister? Or are you going with none? I have the line just going directly to the vent line then to the tank...and i read somewhere i'm not supposed to do that.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by Coach Hawk
I tossed mine, but only because I wanted to put my air filter over in that corner.
I tossed mine, but only because I wanted to put my air filter over in that corner.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
If u run without a canister purge setup and seal the lines off I higly recommend getting a vented cap.
I actually recommend running evap controls where the car is equipped or supports it. Deleting cause a loss in mileage. Its sole purpose is to catch vapors from the gasoline and re inject them into the motor rather than to atmosphere. Good for the planet and good for you at 2.25 for even regular gas lately.
I vote keep it intact :-)
If you delete it, block the lines off and run vented gas cap at a minimum and make sure your fuel tank vent valve is functioning properly.
later
Jeremy
I actually recommend running evap controls where the car is equipped or supports it. Deleting cause a loss in mileage. Its sole purpose is to catch vapors from the gasoline and re inject them into the motor rather than to atmosphere. Good for the planet and good for you at 2.25 for even regular gas lately.
I vote keep it intact :-)
If you delete it, block the lines off and run vented gas cap at a minimum and make sure your fuel tank vent valve is functioning properly.
later
Jeremy
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Deleting cause a loss in mileage.
Deleting cause a loss in mileage.
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 1
From: Evansville, Wisconsin
Car: 91' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
It shouldn't affect milage on way or the other. The solinoid is only open for a few seconds at startup anyway, just long enough to draw the vapors out.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Letting any gas escape in a vapor form is wasting it.
U would be more efficient running it.
I never said u would get bad mileage, you will just get better mileage with it intact.
And its open a lot more than just after u start it.
Datalog some cars and you will see what I'm talking about.
later
Jeremy
U would be more efficient running it.
I never said u would get bad mileage, you will just get better mileage with it intact.
And its open a lot more than just after u start it.
Datalog some cars and you will see what I'm talking about.
later
Jeremy
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
The LT1 canisters are mounted in the rear wheelwell next to the gas nozzle, I still say dump it and program it out of the PCM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
I'm getting the same milage as a bone stock LT1 with no mods without it, there is a vent attached under the car, so vapors are going out anyway. The main reason is to purge vapors into the fuel system so it makes the car easier to start.
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 527
Likes: 5
From: Albany NY
Car: 84 Trans AM (sold), 87 IROC, 09 C6
Engine: Lt1 in IROC
Transmission: 5 speeds
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt tru tracker 3.42
I replaced the 87 IROC canister with a new one designed for an 84. It is more of an "in and out" , but without the electronic control. I ran a vacuum hose from the right side of the Lt-1 engine over to the canister to purge out the gas vapors. The vacuum is controled by the Lt-1 engine's computer. The gas tank needs to be vented one way or another, or it would collapse with enough vacuum. The canister works so well at removing the smell of gas for our cars, why not just use it? I also wanted everything under the hood to "look " right for when it gets inspected.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
There is no vent at the rear of any of our cars that lets gas/vapors out.
It is called a fuel tank vent valve. Name is misleading. It acts as a one way valve to let air "in" to the tank to displace the gas used so it doesnt start a vacuum and suck itself in, which they will do if they go bad.
later
Jeremy
It is called a fuel tank vent valve. Name is misleading. It acts as a one way valve to let air "in" to the tank to displace the gas used so it doesnt start a vacuum and suck itself in, which they will do if they go bad.
later
Jeremy
Originally Posted by hotrodln
I replaced the 87 IROC canister with a new one designed for an 84. It is more of an "in and out" , but without the electronic control. I ran a vacuum hose from the right side of the Lt-1 engine over to the canister to purge out the gas vapors. The vacuum is controled by the Lt-1 engine's computer. The gas tank needs to be vented one way or another, or it would collapse with enough vacuum. The canister works so well at removing the smell of gas for our cars, why not just use it? I also wanted everything under the hood to "look " right for when it gets inspected.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





