LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

6.0 intake questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #1  
techrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: lq4
Transmission: t-56
6.0 intake questions

anyone have any comparison of an otherwise stock lq4 with the ls1 or ls6 intake. i am planning out my swap, and i want to know if the ls6 will actually gain enough on this engine to be worth approximately double the price. any input? thanks in advance guys,

nick
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: 6.0 intake questions

From another thread here

Ken Duttweiler tested intakes on a Modified LQ9. Going from the truck intake to the LS6 piece gained 10 horses. From LS6 to LS2 lost 10 horses. From LS2 to FAST gained 20 horses. $900 for the FAST versus $300 for the LS6. I'm not paying $600 for only 10 horses.
Now the other question is, do you also want to spend money on a cowl hood so it will clear? It will need to be at least a 4" cowl.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #3  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: 39.84N 105.11W
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: 6.0 intake questions

Originally Posted by Klortho
It will need to be at least a 4" cowl.
For the truck intake?? No, until recently I had a truck intake manifold, & there's NO WAY that it's that tall. You'd need a scoop or an aftermarket hood, sure, but a RA-I or RA-II should clear it...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 06:41 PM
  #4  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: 6.0 intake questions

that's what someone had posted up in another thread they had to go with to clear it *shrug*
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #5  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: 39.84N 105.11W
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: 6.0 intake questions

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, I'm fairly sure that a simple 2" or 2.5" cowl would clear it...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #6  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: 6.0 intake questions

I remember someone posting pictures up and it looked like it stuck really high in the front but dunno, I know the LS6 intake is better for the HP
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #7  
NemeSS-TyranT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Car: 02 SS
Engine: 408 TT (1108rw-93/m1)6700rpm
Transmission: TH400(slipping)
Axle/Gears: 12bolt/3.42(whines😠)
Re: 6.0 intake questions

ls6 flows better and will make more power.
there is a tuck manifold that flows just as well as a ls6, but uses 90mm tb
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #8  
techrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: lq4
Transmission: t-56
Re: 6.0 intake questions

i know the ls6 flows better than the ls1, but i want to know how much actual performance it would gain over the ls1 intake. i'm putting a car intake on a lq4, i'm just trying to decide if i want the ls1 or ls6. will i feel much difference for the extra $150? if they're the same in low end, just 5-10 more horses up top with the ls6, then i'd be cool with the ls1 and save some cash. if the ls6 gives me 15 ft-lbs, then i want it for sure.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #9  
NemeSS-TyranT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Car: 02 SS
Engine: 408 TT (1108rw-93/m1)6700rpm
Transmission: TH400(slipping)
Axle/Gears: 12bolt/3.42(whines😠)
Re: 6.0 intake questions

a c5 ls1 flows a tad better than the fbody ls1, it will be enuff for a stock or bolt ons lq4, u wont really need a ls6 unles u plan on aggressive cam, etc. a ls1 intake will be plenty for up to 450bhp. i ran my camaro for yrs. with a stock fbody intake making 385rwhp with just bolt ons and a tune.
the c5 ls1 intake does flow somewhat better than fbody, and looks just like a ls6. and ther pretty cheep too.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #10  
techrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: lq4
Transmission: t-56
Re: 6.0 intake questions

sweet, thats what i needed to know. thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #11  
HDon22s's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Pa.
Car: 88 iroc
Engine: lq4
Transmission: 700r4 till it dies.
Re: 6.0 intake questions

If you are using the truck acc. I think this biggest problem is the alt. being up top not so much the intake itself. The position of the alt. can be changed easily though. A 4" cowl is needed for a carb setup.

Last edited by HDon22s; Mar 19, 2009 at 06:01 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
kyle5647
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 15, 2015 11:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.