3.1 firebird

Last year, with low compression in #5 cylinder, I did a 16.09 at 83, and 16.18 at 85.6 with 2.21 and 2.24 60 foots.

This year I get 2.26 60 foots and go 16.3 at 82. I fixed the compression problem, and had the guy chop of .020 for a slight compression raise, so whats the deal, is my peg legger 3.73 and street tires keeping my monster of a car from hitting 15's?

SlowCamaro88SC

be glad man, most of us v6 boys aren't even into the 16's, muchless the low 16's.

------------------
1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
2.8 V6, TCI 3200 Stall TC, B&M Transkit, 80 Series Flowmaster w/ Catback, '85 Firebird SE 3.73 Rear (soon)
'83 CFI Z/28 Hood, '87 16" IROC Wheels on Kumho Ecsta Supra 712's, '92 Z/28 Bowtie Grille
IROC Gauges, IROC Taillights, IROC Foglamps w/ retrofitted 9005 hi-beam headlight bulbs

1985 Firebird SE
2.5 I4, T-5, 3.73 rear (going to the sport coupe)
Beat to a pulp.

new87

I could only make a friends 2000 V-6 run 15.6. Thats a 3.8 V-6.

Ovrclck350

Your friend's 2000 isn't being driven right or isn't broken in yet then. My 230lb friend ran a 15.2 in his bone stock 96 Camaro with the 3.8. His slowest run of the night was a 15.5

new87

Is that bone stock? 96 V-6 should also be a 3.4 if I'm not mistaken. The car had 2.2 60' and 87 mph with a A4 trans. Not alot to mess up.

[This message has been edited by new87 (edited May 01, 2001).]

Crusader

iTrader: (1)

The 3.8 was available before the LS1 was. 96 or 97 I think was the first year.