When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
(Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Organized Drag Racing and AutocrossDrag racing and autocross discussions and questions. Techniques, tips, suggestions, and "what will I run?" questions.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
Definitly cool! Felt like you were dropping into a half pipe, or starting down a ski hill. Unfortunately it sounds like the last season for the track, the property is being sold.
I didn't mention that it's a little risky though. One guy somehow broke the bead on one tire and went flat, and another hit the wall with is kit exo frame racer after getting out of shape in the slalom...
I'm trying out my first actual road course in a couple of weeks! I was nervous about it, but after this event ay Rockford Speedway, it doesnt seem any worse...
I look forward to your video at Rockford, It's been a dream of mine to get my car on the road course at Mid Ohio, it's probably not gonna happen this year, I'm hoping next year.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
First road course in the camaro was officially put on the books last Saturday afternoon at Autobah racing club in Joliet IL. It was pretty amazing and I was able to drive the car home which is a huge plus! I was initially a bit nervous about getting on a proper track, but it ended up not being bad at all. The event ensured 8 runs, four in two separate run sessions. Then at the end of that they opened up the track for more fun runs. I ended up totalling 13 runs in the time I was there! Not bad for a $95 entry fee!
Biggest challanges:
- Determining breaking points and turn in points is a whole different game, especially when youre actually getting some speed, made it up to almost 89 mph. I started at the first brake marker if the turn had them, then kept pushing it farther and farther till I got very close or touched the far curb on turn exit.
-Had to time my turn to hut the apex curb at the right spot, and actually touch it.
-unfortionately i found out at the end of the day there was one turn people were only lifting on, and not braking, so i lost some time there...
Vehicle findings:
-We were asked not to get out of our cars in the pit lane where we qued up for our next run, so we had to plan accordingly. I was told to expect 4-5 psi of tire press rise during the 4 run sessions. I've got the actually number in my notes I'll update later.
- It did seem like this type of higher speed track racing does build more temp in the tires and brakes, and probubly consumes them a bit more than autox. Luckily I had no issues with brake fade or overheating of my crappie 360 tread ware summer tires, that I could notice.
- possibly my BIGGEST TAKEAWAY was that on heavy breaking I was locking up my rears. I've always been able to feel the rear get loose on hard braking, but a friend told me I was actually smoking them... This means the spring I swapped out in my brake valve is too tight. I'll have to do some calculations and either shorten the spring slightly, or just get a proper manual perportioning valve.
- Amazingly with the accelerometer on my phone through the track addict app, it told me I was achieving a peak lateral g's of 1.16! Does this make sense with substantial suspension upgrades, or is it bogus? Looking on the web a viper acr only gets lile 1.18 or something...
- My best 0-60 was 5.6 sec, so I guess thats decent?
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
This means the spring I swapped out in my brake valve is too tight. I'll have to do some calculations and either shorten the spring slightly, or just get a proper manual perportioning valve.
I was considering doing the spring mod, I decided to go all in and put in a adjustable proportional valve
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Awesome looks like a lot of fun, I had one lemon car we sponsored a few years back , that crew put the brake bias valve in the interior, they adjusted it as it ran lower on fuel, so less ballast, less rear brake, Shortening the spring wont reduce the rate , actually I think it will increase it - I`d do the adjustable
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
So far with my track sprint event, I don't think It would make enough of a difference burning through fuel to need to compensate for brake bias mid event... interesting idea though!
Originally Posted by BBU.COM
Shortening the spring wont reduce the rate , actually I think it will increase it - I`d do the adjustable
I agree with you, partially. All variables being the same, cutting coils off a spring does increase the spring rate, but it also reduces the free length so after reinstallation, its starting condition will be under less compression length, so the initial force will be lower than the as manufactured spring. Im pretty sure that while the spring rate will be slightly higher, the actual force will never exceed that of an un-modified spring for a given length of compression.
Shortening one of the springs I have is free and I have a couple extras if I go too far. The brake bias adjuster is a couple hundred bucks, so I'll give the spring a try or two, then if im not happy, I'll get the aftermarket valve...
I am trying to figure out how the brakes should function. I read somewhere you want the rear brakes to lock just slightly before the fronts, but how do you figure put when that happens? Have a friend take video? It was only at the event last weekend that people told me they saw the tire smoke... I guess now that it is doing it I can feel the rear end get loose, so maybe I do it by feel?
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
I just ran the actual calculations on shortening my 1NCR5 spring in my brake bias valve. As expected, as you cut coils off the spring rate increases, but the free length decreases as well, so the total force at a given compressed length decreases. I just arbitrarily ran my calculations at 0.5" of compression. I do not know if this is actually the level of compression in the bias valve, but since it is consistent for all springs, the results shown are proportional... Since I still have 4 more of the spare springs, I may give my first try at -0.5 coils and see how it feels. If it's too much I can always cut less off a fresh one, or keep cutting if I'm still locking up the rears first... My numbers weren't dead on with the advertised specs but they were close enough for me to think I got the calculations right, but they are not using the exact same material constants as I found online... I therefore when back and determined an optimized constant for each material type so my numbers matched the advertised ones. (I'm also assuming the factory spring is music wire)
I'm trying to remember; do I need to bleed my brakes after swapping the spring out???
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
I read somewhere you want the rear brakes to lock just slightly before the fronts, but how do you figure put when that happens?
Fronts should lock first. Car can swap ends if the rears lock first.
For quick test, you can drive fast around a curve and hit the brakes and see if the rear slides first. This is an inherently stupid thing to do so be careful. But it'll let you know.
If you do straight line braking on the street then you'll probably end up dialing in too much rear brake and lock it up at the road track. The street just doesn't get the fronts hot enough. When you go to the track the fronts will fade more and then the rears will lock up.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
I got the new torque converter installed! It's a pretty significant difference. Still very streetable, everything just happens at a bit higher RPM. I also swapped to the next lighter weight in my shift governor while the trans was out, and now I'm getting ~5400 rpm WOT shifts, which I would say is about where I want it for now.
Video of even Sunday with the new converter and governor tuning. Definitely seemed to keep the RPM's up more and in the power band better, even with the slower corners!
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Now that my second season of racing has come to an end, and I was left to twiddle my thumbs for the cold months here in the Midwest, I decided to do something about it...
I'm building a Sim Rig for iRacing! Hopefully this helps me continue thinking about the fundamentals, looking farther ahead, trail braking, and other topics that hopefully will carry over in some small way. If nothing more, it's fun! Challenging... but fun!
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Man, this is tough! I decided to go with iRacing, which is a true and brutal racing simulator, definitely not a game like Grand Turismo, and other video games.
I also decided to get some decent mid grade gear from Fanatec, which had great black Friday deals, but their order processing was just atrocious! My order placed on Nov 28, was just shipped from Cali today... Hope to have it the 26th. Lot of customers furious about Christmas gifts that aren't going to make it in time...
I ended up grabbing an open box Logitech setup to use while I've been waiting. I do expect the Fanatec stuff will be a large upgrade!
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Got all my mid level direct frive stuff from Fanatec a couple days ago! Load cell brake is way better than the potentiometer style. The 8 n-m of torque is no joke, makes it legit challenging. Alcantara wheel and feel of the shifter paddles are really nice too, way better!
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
Now that my second season of racing has come to an end, and I was left to twiddle my thumbs for the cold months here in the Midwest, I decided to do something about it...
I'm building a Sim Rig for iRacing! Hopefully this helps me continue thinking about the fundamentals, looking farther ahead, trail braking, and other topics that hopefully will carry over in some small way. If nothing more, it's fun! Challenging... but fun!
More to come!
My Iracing sim is a big help between races.
I can practice and maintain my left foot braking sensitivity at home.
Also a few tracks I race on are on Iracing.
After 400 laps on the sim when I get to the real track my first session feels like its my 3rd session.
Sim is a big help.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by Fords88Bird
I do want to try some auto x racing in the future.
If you want to try it, just do it. In the spring sign up for an event, you can usually pay for a weekend membership so you're not investing a lot of money. Let them know you're a novice, and everyone will help you out. Just use masking tape for numbers and give it a shot with whatever state your car is in. You'll either find you love, it which I think you will if you're on this board, or you'll find it's not for you... which I doubt...
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by Passmenow
My Iracing sim is a big help between races.
I can practice and maintain my left foot braking sensitivity at home.
Also a few tracks I race on are on Iracing.
After 400 laps on the sim when I get to the real track my first session feels like its my 3rd session.
Sim is a big help.
That's awesome to hear! Very nice looking setup. I wonder have you been running flat triple monitors all along, or did you switch from another configuration. I happen to have the spare TV but I wonder how much of a difference the scree setup makes... I have raced at Sim Racing Chicago a couple of times, and all their setups have curved triples, gives a very immersive feel. They also have articulation for the rig, and but kickers and everything else you can think of! Very awesome, but actually made me motion sick the first time. Luckily, I do not have that problem with my rig at home...
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
That's awesome to hear! Very nice looking setup. I wonder have you been running flat triple monitors all along, or did you switch from another configuration. I happen to have the spare TV but I wonder how much of a difference the scree setup makes... ..
When I got the sim 10 years ago flat screens were more common.
I do have VR goggles but can't get my prescription glasses under the goggles, sometimes the VR can give me motion sickness too.
Have the butt kicker and the cars and tracks are awesome on Iracing.
Not sure about using a TV screen but try it might work well till you choose something else.
A single curved screen or triple curved screens sound cool like to try those someday.
Lucky I have an IT friend that keeps my sim tuned and running well.
When I have friends driving the sim I hide the keyboard so no one can accidently corrupt my set up.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by raptere
If you want to try it, just do it. In the spring sign up for an event, you can usually pay for a weekend membership so you're not investing a lot of money. Let them know you're a novice, and everyone will help you out. Just use masking tape for numbers and give it a shot with whatever state your car is in. You'll either find you love, it which I think you will if you're on this board, or you'll find it's not for you... which I doubt...
^What he said^....except that he's in SOCAL, so they might be racing right now.
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Happy spring everyone! I was supposed to go to my first event this weekend, but out of the blue, my car has decided to become completely undrivable. Litterally it surges and stumbles constantly, even at idle, and if I try to give any throttle it just shudders, shakes and gets worse. Afraid to even back it out of the garage for fear it won't make it back up the driveway...
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Previous gremlins have been all exercised for a couple of months now. Just completed only my second auto x of the year yesterday. See my video racing with the Windy City Miata Club below.
It was also my second event since I swapped out my brake bias spring to the WD Jones #278 spring, which I calculated as a small amount softer than the previous one I had in there. It definitely changes the balance of the brakes, giving more front in proportion to the rear, previously if I hit the brakes too hard, the backs would lock up significantly before the fronts and it would actually give me more rotation, which I didn't mind, but it must have been giving up over all braking capability since the fronts were not braking to their potential. With the new spring, when I accidentally lock up, the car just continues on in whatever direction it happens to be moving, not the direction it is pointed. This made me think I was much closer to balanced. I was just told yesterday though that people watching me run saw that my rears were still smoking and locking up before my fronts, so it seems I either need to go down to another yet softer spring, or I just need to give up on the silly springs and get the Wilwood adjustable bias valve... I've never done work with bending and flaring brake line, so I was trying to avoid this, but maybe it is time to just learn and do it right... Part of me wants to swap my factory bias spring back in in the interim, to see how it balances. I wonder if my balance went rearward significantly just because of going from the factor single piston calipers to the 4 piston Brembo's, while leaving the factory style single piston rears?
I talked previously about how I put in a 9.5" 2600 rpm stall converter last fall. I had to install an additional cooler, which has brought the temperatures back into control engine and trans sit right at about 180 f most of the time. The new converter definitely keeps me more in my power range during my runs and allows me to get into my power band right after exiting turns, without having to wait for the engine to rev up.
Side note, I have found I'm so busy during the summer with my family and working on my real car and racing that it made sense to let my IRacing sim racing subscription lapse... I plan to renew it when it goes back on sale around black Friday... then sim race all winter long. I did find though that after putting my sim racing on hold for a couple weeks, that my shoulder that was bothering me got better. Turns out an 8 NM direct drive wheel is enough to hurt your shoulders. It was only one, so I'm not sure why that was, but this fall I may have to turn things down a little...
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
I had been noticing some strange wear marks on my rear tires. It was on the outside shoulder and at first, I just assumed it was from all the lateral loading of AutoX, but then looking at where it was and how it seemed there were chunks of rubber missing, I realized the tire must be coming into contact with the fender lip... Remember the car is lowered I think it is 1.5" in the back. I suspect it is more a result of the lousy roads in my area, and not actually occurring during autox. I went onto the good old Amazon, and found this fender lip rolling tool, for what appeared to be a bargain. ($48) https://a.co/d/8rQVqGq When it showed up, I did clean all the Styrofoam out of it, greased the main screw, and since the retaining nut kept falling off the back, it was nyloc that wasn't doing much locking... I just added some red Loctite to the threads, and it seems to be staying put now.
At first, I lifted the car from the rear axle and tried to start rolling, but the arm wouldn't get short enough. Next, I lifted the car up to get the stands under the rear frame, then lowered the jack with the axle down until the tool ended up at logical height where I could adjust it fully to get the angles I wanted. I had watched a few videos on YouTube, and the main thing I got from them was to use a heat gun and make sure the area stayed hot the whole time you are working it, just hotter than you can keep your hand on, so somewhere between maybe 150 and 200 F. While I tried to do this, my paint from 1991 that already had rust working its way in, mostly just cracked off... I started first with the roller facing more vertically, to get the roll started, then once I got the roll started, the screw a few turns out, I changed the angle to get the material to fold back up into the fender area above. I just kept going back and forth a few times, then backing the screw out a half turn, then back and forth a few times. It actually seems to have worked out pretty well. Now it is a nice smooth curve. The fender lip is now basically a U shape with about a 3/8" gap in between, where it started out as an L with the sharp edge of the sheet metal pointing horizontally towards the center of the car, prime position to be cutting up my tires! Hard to test the clearance now without removing the springs, which I do not feel like doing, but I think at the least, if there is any contact now. It will be with a smooth curved sheet metal surface and not a sharp edge.
I will say a lot of the videos mad it look even easier on other cars like Miatas, where the metal seemed thinner. On our cars, it is actually two sheets of metal sandwiched together and each is relatively thick. I think the key is heat, and just going slowly. As I said, only a half turn at a time, maybe less near the end. Tire Damage Tire Damage
End result! Rust was alredy there, but most paint came off of the insided folded lip portion. Maybe with newer paint or more heat it would have stayed in tact?
Last edited by raptere; Sep 17, 2024 at 01:18 PM.
Reason: Pictures!
Re: (Not So) Bare Minimum to Give Autox or Track Racing a Shot?
Originally Posted by QwkTrip
Looks like that tool made a pretty nice fold.
Those are one of those things I've always wanted but never had the guts to try.
It's clearly a knock off of the nicer Eastwood tool, but it's so simple with just one or two uses, I don't think I will notice the quality difference.
i think it is because my cars paint is fine from a far, but up close is far from good, im a little less concerned of the risks associated with rolling the fenders... you will have to decide given your car. From the look of it many people use enough heat and can roll brand new car fenders with no cracking or chipping of the paint at all...
For me it's definitly better than cutting a tire and getting a flat, especially when I get my Falken RT660's next spring! Time to get competitive!