New P.B....
New P.B....
Well, after finally installing my 42# injectors and Accel DFI and ditching the FMU, i took the car in and had it tuned (318 rwhp - 345rwtq), i went to the track this morning and ran
reaction - .797
60' - 1.761
330' - 5.166
1/8 ET - 8.062
1/8 mph - N/A
1000' et - 10.578
1/4 et - 12.696
1/4 mph - 106.33
later
larry
reaction - .797
60' - 1.761
330' - 5.166
1/8 ET - 8.062
1/8 mph - N/A
1000' et - 10.578
1/4 et - 12.696
1/4 mph - 106.33
later
larry
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
About time you got in the 12's 
What type of tire were ya using?

What type of tire were ya using?
Last edited by Tony89GTA; Jun 5, 2004 at 08:38 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Can you scan and post the dyno results. I would really like to see how your power band turned out since your car and mine have about the same mods in it and I have no access to any chassis dyno.
Last edited by Tony89GTA; Jun 8, 2004 at 01:19 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member



Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
Originally posted by maniacc
no...i made 318 rwhp on 9#'s boost, (belt was slipping)...this was on a mustang dyno FWIW.
What's the problem???
no...i made 318 rwhp on 9#'s boost, (belt was slipping)...this was on a mustang dyno FWIW.
What's the problem???
Im just surprised the numbers are so low; even my dead bone stock 350 L98 with 5 PSI of boost made more horsepower than that with a roots blower and a carb. my 355 with heads/cam/intake and 5psi made nearly 420RWHP with the horrably inefficient roots blower.
I too am interested in the dyno sheet; 9 PSI is alot for any V8, especially a nearly stock one. Im impressed, dont get me wrong, but Im just confused
from what i am told, the mustang dyno's usually read lower than the dyno-jet's...this will be verified soon by the place that dyno'ed my car, they are in the process of hooking up their dyno-jet. so only time will tell..
as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...
when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)
later
larry
as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...
when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)
later
larry
Supreme Member



Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
Originally posted by maniacc
from what i am told, the mustang dyno's usually read lower than the dyno-jet's...this will be verified soon by the place that dyno'ed my car, they are in the process of hooking up their dyno-jet. so only time will tell..
as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...
when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)
later
larry
from what i am told, the mustang dyno's usually read lower than the dyno-jet's...this will be verified soon by the place that dyno'ed my car, they are in the process of hooking up their dyno-jet. so only time will tell..
as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...
when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)
later
larry
It makes sense now; thanks for clearing it up. good job!



