Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

New P.B....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #1  
maniacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 672
Likes: 4
From: westland, mi
New P.B....

Well, after finally installing my 42# injectors and Accel DFI and ditching the FMU, i took the car in and had it tuned (318 rwhp - 345rwtq), i went to the track this morning and ran

reaction - .797
60' - 1.761
330' - 5.166
1/8 ET - 8.062
1/8 mph - N/A
1000' et - 10.578
1/4 et - 12.696
1/4 mph - 106.33

later
larry
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #2  
Tony89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
About time you got in the 12's

What type of tire were ya using?

Last edited by Tony89GTA; Jun 5, 2004 at 08:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #3  
maniacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 672
Likes: 4
From: westland, mi
BF Goodrich drag radial @ 15 psi

I was alittle discouraged after my first run which netted me a 13.009...i thought 12's were gonna elude me again...

later
larry
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
very nice :hail:
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
Kingtal0n's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
wait you made 350horsepower on 10# of boost? im lost.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #6  
maniacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 672
Likes: 4
From: westland, mi
no...i made 318 rwhp on 9#'s boost, (belt was slipping)...this was on a mustang dyno FWIW.

What's the problem???
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Tony89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Can you scan and post the dyno results. I would really like to see how your power band turned out since your car and mine have about the same mods in it and I have no access to any chassis dyno.

Last edited by Tony89GTA; Jun 8, 2004 at 01:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
maniacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 672
Likes: 4
From: westland, mi
I'll see what i can do....i don't have a scanner, so it ma take a couple of days.

later
larry
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #9  
Kingtal0n's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
Originally posted by maniacc
no...i made 318 rwhp on 9#'s boost, (belt was slipping)...this was on a mustang dyno FWIW.

What's the problem???
are mustang dynos the ones that read lower or higher than traditional chassis dynos?

Im just surprised the numbers are so low; even my dead bone stock 350 L98 with 5 PSI of boost made more horsepower than that with a roots blower and a carb. my 355 with heads/cam/intake and 5psi made nearly 420RWHP with the horrably inefficient roots blower.

I too am interested in the dyno sheet; 9 PSI is alot for any V8, especially a nearly stock one. Im impressed, dont get me wrong, but Im just confused
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #10  
maniacc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 672
Likes: 4
From: westland, mi
from what i am told, the mustang dyno's usually read lower than the dyno-jet's...this will be verified soon by the place that dyno'ed my car, they are in the process of hooking up their dyno-jet. so only time will tell..

as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...

when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)

later
larry
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #11  
Kingtal0n's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
Originally posted by maniacc
from what i am told, the mustang dyno's usually read lower than the dyno-jet's...this will be verified soon by the place that dyno'ed my car, they are in the process of hooking up their dyno-jet. so only time will tell..

as soon as i can get the prints scanned i will post them...

when the guy tuned my DFI, he tuned it very conservative (10.8 air/fuel ratio at the topend...)

later
larry

It makes sense now; thanks for clearing it up. good job!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.