Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Twin setup with a tubular k member?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 03:10 PM
  #1  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
Twin setup with a tubular k member?

Call it thinking out loud if you will, but has anyone given much thought about the advantages and disadvantages to running a tubular k member and mounting the turbo's lower?

Is it even possible?

The reason i say this is because my goal with the car is to keep the stock functionality -

however, i want to dabble in the turbo world - and low mounting the turbo's would seem to make more sense...

Any comments suggestions on who may have already done something like this?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
4thGens mount their twins low like that. I dont see why you coudlnt fab up a kit to do it like that with a tubular k member at all.

The thought has corssed my mind when I was gona do twins with a Lt1 motor and my tubular k member.

check out this site Im sure you will find all the pic's you need.
trubomustangs.com this link is the LT1/SBC etc forum

http://www.turbomustangs.com/forums/...?s=&forumid=20
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #3  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
thanks - cool stuff over there... was not aware they had a large gm spot like they did... not much on 3rdgens, BUT, the space between the motors and the frames can't be any different right?

hell even turbolocities LT1 turbo headers hay work?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 04:47 PM
  #4  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
ya maybe. Im doing a single turbo setup myslef. If I was still gona do Twins I would Prob get the PT setup.

Dont forget to look at the Junkyard build forum also.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #5  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
yeah i have been sneakin around for the last 45 min or so heheh

i have been lookin for ways to pull weight out of the car anyways, so i may just go buy a k member and then once its all together strart checkin things out...
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #6  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
If your not in a hurry, id wait till the Sphon crossmember is done to check out. See if its any better then the others. Personally I have a PRO FAB one. Same as a PA RACING. 90% of them are all gona be the same. Its just a matter of who has beter craftmanship and welding skills.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #7  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
yeah it will be a bit... i'm lookin for lat winter early spring as a start the project type date...

still not sure on what to do for manifolds/headers... any bright ideas?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #8  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Got a set of twin 60-1's with a pro fab tubular k-member in the 83z I built for my partner. Made a huge difference when it came time to route the exhaust. It also helped that we switched to rack and pinion at the same time
Attached Thumbnails Twin setup with a tubular k member?-im001586.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 05:28 AM
  #9  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
well what im thinking is doing more of an install along the lines of how the tt kits are done on the vette - next to the block between the framrails... the tubular k member makes for more room to run piping...
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 05:52 AM
  #10  
transporter's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, In (Louisville, Ky)
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI, Edelbrock headers, 3in Flowmaster exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Has anyone here read or seen this article in PHR about the rear mounted turbo? I'm interested in this., www.ststurbo.com . I saw an article were they mounted it on an LS1 camaro.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #11  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Originally posted by fb305svs
well what im thinking is doing more of an install along the lines of how the tt kits are done on the vette - next to the block between the framrails... the tubular k member makes for more room to run piping...
Look into the PTK pictures then for twin LT1 setups.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #12  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
thanks will do... i'm gonna go out on a leg here, but don't the lt1 and the gen 1 heads have the same exhaust port config? ie could i buy a set of those manifolds/headers and they fit...

i'm not looking forward to the immense amount of time its going to take to make a set...

out of curiosity - is that a twin or a single kit? can't tell with the pic being low res, but it doesnt look like the headers have the flnages on themfor a turbo...

Last edited by fb305svs; Nov 18, 2004 at 02:38 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #13  
Dan W's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Brevard Florida
Bottledbird, do you have any more pictures of that car?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 02:07 AM
  #14  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Originally posted by Dan W
Bottledbird, do you have any more pictures of that car?
I have plenty, and what I don't have I can take. It's sitting in my shop so I see it everyday What would you like to see?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 02:09 AM
  #15  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Originally posted by fb305svs
well what im thinking is doing more of an install along the lines of how the tt kits are done on the vette - next to the block between the framrails... the tubular k member makes for more room to run piping...
It definitely would give you more room. The only issue with mounting the turbo's low is that you need a pump to return the oil to the pan. Most of the time they are mounted high and gravity takes care of that for you. Food for thought... And yes, the LT1's have the same flange as the gen1's do on the exhaust ports.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 06:18 AM
  #16  
fb305svs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
thanks for the info on the lt1 flanges... thought so, just didnt find anything that said they were or werent...

and yeah - i am aware of having to use a pump... besides the cost, i don't really see the disadvantage of it, just another thing on the list to buy.

been investigating, anybody have a suggestion on the brand and one to use? all i have run across is ones that i dont think will hold up to the temp...

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2004 | 12:35 AM
  #17  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Originally posted by fb305svs
and yeah - i am aware of having to use a pump... besides the cost, i don't really see the disadvantage of it, just another thing on the list to buy.

Steve
The only other disadvantage I see is it's one more thing to break. And trust me, oil is critical to the life of a turbo... But, that being said, people do it day in and day out with success so if you do decide to go that route, I wish you the best of luck. I never looked into pumps because we always planned on mounting them high. Any other questions though, feel free to ask away...
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2004 | 11:39 AM
  #18  
Dan W's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Brevard Florida
Some better views of how the turbos are mounted and some pictures of the downpipe routing. Does it have brackets that support the turbos or are the header tubes alone supporting them?

Originally posted by bottledbird68
I have plenty, and what I don't have I can take. It's sitting in my shop so I see it everyday What would you like to see?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2004 | 01:09 AM
  #19  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Originally posted by Dan W
Some better views of how the turbos are mounted and some pictures of the downpipe routing. Does it have brackets that support the turbos or are the header tubes alone supporting them?
Sorry, no real good pics after I started running the downpipes. If I remember I'll snap a couple tommorow, you'll have to excuse them though, the turbo's are out getting the hot side coated. You'll still get a good idea of how I routed the pipes though. The only decent pic I have doesn't even have the wastegates on yet. I was a little lacking in the picture taking dept. when I did this one as I only had two weeks to get it done, (long story...). I keep meaning to put in a bracket to brace them off the motor but I haven't had the time to yet. They haven't cracked or unusually eaten gaskets but I most likely will still fab something up before we ship them off for coating.

Here's the best I've got for you right now, and in case anyone's wondering those are Master Power 60-1's:
Attached Thumbnails Twin setup with a tubular k member?-im001552.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #20  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42
Originally posted by Dan W
Some better views of how the turbos are mounted and some pictures of the downpipe routing. Does it have brackets that support the turbos or are the header tubes alone supporting them?
I have a few on my other computer, I will try and post them tonight for ya
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #21  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42





There are a few tight spots but for the most part it has alot of room, which is hard to do especially on these cars...with all that piping
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 01:33 AM
  #22  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Thanks Chris, saved me the trouble. That and I was lazy over the holidays. If you want anything more detailed let me know and I'll get them for you.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:43 AM
  #23  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by bottledbird68
Sorry, no real good pics after I started running the downpipes. If I remember I'll snap a couple tommorow, you'll have to excuse them though, the turbo's are out getting the hot side coated. You'll still get a good idea of how I routed the pipes though. The only decent pic I have doesn't even have the wastegates on yet. I was a little lacking in the picture taking dept. when I did this one as I only had two weeks to get it done, (long story...). I keep meaning to put in a bracket to brace them off the motor but I haven't had the time to yet. They haven't cracked or unusually eaten gaskets but I most likely will still fab something up before we ship them off for coating.

Here's the best I've got for you right now, and in case anyone's wondering those are Master Power 60-1's:

That picture in your sig, the bottom one, that at NED ?

-- Joe
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #24  
bottledbird68's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Rutland MA
Car: 1 68 bird, 2 87 birds, a 92 bird...
Engine: carb'ed 305 in the 87, yuck...
Transmission: 700R4, for now....
Originally posted by anesthes
That picture in your sig, the bottom one, that at NED ?

-- Joe
No, that was taken outside my shop in worcester MA. We were at NED a LOT last year with the camaro, only it was in naturally aspirated form then. The turbo's were this years project
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:01 AM
  #25  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
im headed to work but somewhere in this folder is pics of my K-member installed with no engine:

http://www.outlawperformance.com/ima...tuff/progress/
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:16 AM
  #26  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by bottledbird68
No, that was taken outside my shop in worcester MA. We were at NED a LOT last year with the camaro, only it was in naturally aspirated form then. The turbo's were this years project
Same here, more in sept anc oct. Traction this year was nothing to write home about.

Folks, how much do those k-members cost and can you bolt a rack to them?

-- Joe
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:17 AM
  #27  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by bottledbird68
Got a set of twin 60-1's with a pro fab tubular k-member in the 83z I built for my partner. Made a huge difference when it came time to route the exhaust. It also helped that we switched to rack and pinion at the same time
Didnt notice this post before my last one.

Where can I look up pricing and such for the k-member and the rack ?

-- Joe
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:29 AM
  #28  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
They are available HERE
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
Jul 6, 2024 08:32 PM
86Firebird86
Power Adders
36
Dec 26, 2015 07:21 AM
plm99
Southern California Area
5
Nov 16, 2015 05:21 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
26
Sep 21, 2015 01:08 PM
buckshot63
Camaros for Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 09:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.