Is the 2.8L an interference engine?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, VA
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Is the 2.8L an interference engine?
Very quick and easy question. Are our 2.8L V6 engines an interference engine? So if the timing chain were to break for any reason would the pistons be able to slap the valves?
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
unless you have an ultra high lift cam and heads that have been shaved to bare minimum, there is no possible way for the pistons to contact the valves on a 660 motor. There is too much clearance to be an issue. Ask me how I know...lol.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
not even with a broken timing chain like he said? like, if a piston comes to TDC and a valve is open (obviously at the wrong time because of a broken timing chain), they won't contact each other?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
no, if you take the timing chain off and roll the crank over (i have done that) nothing touches anywhere, it spins free, well till you hit a combustion stroke, lol.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Nope, that's exactly how I know. I was driving one day, got on it hard, shifted into 3rd and the chain snapped right around 4000 rpm. Tore the front apart, slapped in a new chain and gears, started and has been fine since. Over 25K miles now on this chain.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
ok, that seems a little surprising to me but if you all have done that stuff...guess you're right!
However, I'd be scarred to try that with my cam!
However, I'd be scarred to try that with my cam!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I think the only 2.8's that were interference engines are the Gen II motors (FWD, aluminum head, splayed valves, heart-shaped combustion chambers)...
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Now, I don't know what kind of valvetrain you have, but I think you'd have to be running special valve springs and have over .750" of valve lift.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I've got domed pistons in it, too. with everything "in line", i've got over .125" clearance between the valves and pistons but I don't imagine I'd have that if something out of the ordinary happened.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





