Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Wheel alignment question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 07:49 AM
  #1  
RMK's Avatar
RMK
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 2
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: modded LB9
Transmission: Pro Built 700R4
Wheel alignment question

Went to get my wheels aligned today and there were about 7 settings for thirdgen Camaros. However, only one was for IROCS and it was for 85-86 IROCS. Mine is an 87, should I just go with he 85-86 setting? I can't see what the difference would be.

I found specs posted on here a while back:

Total toe in 3/32 (in) - The guy asked me to find out what this was in degrees, which is what he needs.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks

Robert
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 07:59 AM
  #2  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
According to the '85 shop manual the toe in spec is +15 degrees +/- .05 degrees.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #3  
mrr23's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
here are the specs from my hunter alignment machine

http://www.fl-thirdgen.org/alignmentspecs.html

but personally i would use -.5* camber both sides. caster as positive as it will go on the right side. then .5* less on the left. set toe to a total of .06*
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2003 | 08:03 PM
  #4  
RMK's Avatar
RMK
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 2
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: modded LB9
Transmission: Pro Built 700R4
Thanks for the help. I'll pop over tomorrow and let them see what you've posted and see what they say. As long as I'm not getting wear on the outer edge of my drivers side and that annoying shake of the steering wheel at high speeds I'll be happy.

RMK
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #5  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
So:

Cam.
L/R -.5*

Cas.
As postive as it will go on the right side, then .5* less on the left?? Is there just a recommendation other than as far as it will go?? I'm thinking of going L: 3.5 R: 4.0.

T.
.06

Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; Jun 4, 2003 at 04:03 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #6  
jrg77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: Gary, In USA
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
Is this a drag race setup? My alignment guy disagreed with the camber. I explained to him that I was looking more for a setup towards autocrossing/roadracing.

I suppose that's what he did asthe highway merge ramp was very confidence inspiring, but the parking lot is causing the tire to rub/scrub somewhere underneath.

Jason
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
iroc-si's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Car: 1985 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350ci from 79camaro
Transmission: 5 speed manual on lsd
RMK,

You want to go the opposite way from whats being suggested for castor because we drive on the left over here. The 0.5* difference is for the crown of the road, so for the uk you should have 0.5* more on the left than the right. having more castor is better for high speed stability, and even going as high as 5degree isn't gonna hurt.

Also I think that Jfreeman meant 0.15degrees, which equates to about the 3/32" total toe in.

Camber is best somewhere between 0.5 and 1degree.

Um, who dug up and old thread......

Si. :lala:

Last edited by iroc-si; Jun 15, 2004 at 08:33 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:05 AM
  #8  
jrg77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: Gary, In USA
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
I did. I was using the search engine. Next time I'll just be a newbie and post the question?!?!? :lala: :lala:
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
iroc-si's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Car: 1985 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350ci from 79camaro
Transmission: 5 speed manual on lsd
T'is okay. Just confused me...... okay so thats easy done!

Anyhew, For road racing I would think that you would want almost as much negative? camber as possible. What you're aiming for is that when you turn a corner, the car will roll to the outside, and if the camber is spot on then the car will roll putting the outside tyre (which does most of the work) back flat on the road.

What did you end up with as a spec?

Si.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
jrg77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: Gary, In USA
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
I should have gotten them from him, but it started raining like crazy I that took the thought away.

It must be pretty aggressive as I can't turn too tightly anymore.

Jason,
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Amillionoh7
Suspension and Chassis
24
May 24, 2020 08:01 AM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
383backinblack
Transmissions and Drivetrain
8
Aug 15, 2015 06:36 PM
johanlindgren
Wheels and Tires
5
Aug 6, 2015 03:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.