Before and After Pics
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 842
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Originally posted by MdFormula350
wow! excellent job, i never knew a tubular k-member was that small in size, so much room down there now, also must be easy to change engine mounts now.
wow! excellent job, i never knew a tubular k-member was that small in size, so much room down there now, also must be easy to change engine mounts now.
That is sweet man: both the engine and the car. (Interesting that there is a 6 out there you can get some alluminum heads for.) With both parts out of the car how much wieght did you figure you took off the front? And anyone suppose it is stiff enough to not use a strut tower brace?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by (BR)G-Machine
That is sweet man: both the engine and the car. (Interesting that there is a 6 out there you can get some alluminum heads for.) With both parts out of the car how much wieght did you figure you took off the front? And anyone suppose it is stiff enough to not use a strut tower brace?
That is sweet man: both the engine and the car. (Interesting that there is a 6 out there you can get some alluminum heads for.) With both parts out of the car how much wieght did you figure you took off the front? And anyone suppose it is stiff enough to not use a strut tower brace?
There are quite a few 6's around with avail alum heads, if you do enough research you can easily get them even on our 2.8 / 3.1 cars.
Motor looks sick man, but you need some new steering linkage.
Originally posted by (BR)G-Machine
That is sweet man: both the engine and the car. (Interesting that there is a 6 out there you can get some alluminum heads for.) With both parts out of the car how much wieght did you figure you took off the front? And anyone suppose it is stiff enough to not use a strut tower brace?
That is sweet man: both the engine and the car. (Interesting that there is a 6 out there you can get some alluminum heads for.) With both parts out of the car how much wieght did you figure you took off the front? And anyone suppose it is stiff enough to not use a strut tower brace?
Car went 11.20s with mid 1.5 60fts with the stock motor and and a few bolt ons. It doesn't have subframe connectors or a cage, but will get them soon.
Its a street car, I want to be able to drive this thing everywhere so nothing to crazy that will kill the ride

btw thats the PA racing K-memember with PA Control Arms and Coil over kit.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Wow; thanks for the pics! Nice to see this thing actually installed instead of talked about!
(laughs) Yeah, that linkage looks nasty now... especially the poor tie rod sleeves!
(laughs) Yeah, that linkage looks nasty now... especially the poor tie rod sleeves!
Friend of mine put 8K miles on his car last year with that K-member. It better work on the street, Racecars suck. I plan to put 8-10K miles on my car this year. Drag Racing, Auto Xing and Road Racing.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Deer Park, N.Y.
Car: 1983 z-28/SFC/bilsteins/adj.arms
Engine: 355sbc/Demon650dp/hedmanheaders/
Transmission: t-5, alum DS
Axle/Gears: 3.42 torsen posi, baer discs
looks great mike. who made the k-member? besides weight and space...do you notice any other improvement? i also like to auto cross and race and want any edge possible. did your front suspension specs change greatly? does it re-locate the a-arms for more caster?
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by MikeTTA89
Drag Racing, Auto Xing and Road Racing.
Drag Racing, Auto Xing and Road Racing.
AutoX and roadracing however are a different story. Do you realize the flex and geometry change that will be taking place under hard cornering with that unit? Its flimsy and in no way lateraly as strong as the stock unit- no it most likely wont break but again it will flex severely enough to be less effective in corners.
If that weren't the case, I would have bought one already long ago.
Motor looks great- Lots of Grand National goodies
Originally posted by NJITIROC
which part is a tubular k member? and what does it do?
which part is a tubular k member? and what does it do?

http://www.thunderracing.com/index.c...ategoryid=1141
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Roadtechs prototype was much better/strong design.(I say "was" because he sold the business and went into a corporate position somewhere else before this design was ever produced). Note the use of massive gussets to strenghten and elimate flex entirely.
I am not even going to get into the debate about which one is better stronger etc. I think there was already a flame thread about that 
The car is going to primarily be drag raced but I would like to go to an Auto X 2 or 3 times a year. I haven't tried road racing but would love too
We'll see how it goes. I just wanna have fun with it on the street mostly and hit the drags once a week. Its not going to be a serious racecar, just a fun street car that I hope does everything well 
I can't tell you how it drives, I still have lots to do.
Ordered the FAST unit a few days ago and need to choose injectors I still need to order a 12 Bolt and have a driveshaft made as well as pick a convertor.. bleh still lots to do.

I need to ditch my LS1 while I am at it. :lala: :lala: :lala:

The car is going to primarily be drag raced but I would like to go to an Auto X 2 or 3 times a year. I haven't tried road racing but would love too
We'll see how it goes. I just wanna have fun with it on the street mostly and hit the drags once a week. Its not going to be a serious racecar, just a fun street car that I hope does everything well 
I can't tell you how it drives, I still have lots to do.
Ordered the FAST unit a few days ago and need to choose injectors I still need to order a 12 Bolt and have a driveshaft made as well as pick a convertor.. bleh still lots to do.

I need to ditch my LS1 while I am at it. :lala: :lala: :lala:
blah blah blah....would shoulda coulda road tech
If you call up jason or vernon i believe that they were offering (at least when i bought mine a while ago) that they could build in some extra bracing for people who wanted to go X-racing and it was a problem
If you call up jason or vernon i believe that they were offering (at least when i bought mine a while ago) that they could build in some extra bracing for people who wanted to go X-racing and it was a problem
I've decided to stick with the stock Cross-Member and make my own extra bracing. Very nice TTA!!! One of the nicest ones I've seen ... ever!
Last edited by CrazyHawaiian; May 15, 2003 at 02:52 AM.
The strength issue isnt that bad Imho. What you are fighting is camber loss in turns, and I dont think that you lose a whole lot through the Lca flexing, because it would have to pulled out in turns as upposed to pushed in where the flex is. PLUS your gonna lose so much more camber though the lose fenders at the strut mount, and you can make bracing for it all if you wanted to.
I think also alot to be said for lightening up the front, although the TTA is extremely light with the alluminum headed 6. Tube are much higher strength to wieght, which is the point of the K-member.
Plus it is too damn trick
I think also alot to be said for lightening up the front, although the TTA is extremely light with the alluminum headed 6. Tube are much higher strength to wieght, which is the point of the K-member.
Plus it is too damn trick
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Originally posted by MikeTTA89
I don't know, maybe 100lbs or so? The biggest advantage is the space that it clears up.
Car went 11.20s with mid 1.5 60fts with the stock motor and and a few bolt ons. It doesn't have subframe connectors or a cage, but will get them soon.
Its a street car, I want to be able to drive this thing everywhere so nothing to crazy that will kill the ride
btw thats the PA racing K-memember with PA Control Arms and Coil over kit.
I don't know, maybe 100lbs or so? The biggest advantage is the space that it clears up.
Car went 11.20s with mid 1.5 60fts with the stock motor and and a few bolt ons. It doesn't have subframe connectors or a cage, but will get them soon.
Its a street car, I want to be able to drive this thing everywhere so nothing to crazy that will kill the ride

btw thats the PA racing K-memember with PA Control Arms and Coil over kit.
i noticed your car has t-tops...how are the body lines
i cant beleive you havent put in a set of SFC's
my buddy had an 89 t-top car....i told him many times to get a set and he ended up popin both his tops on a launch and effectivly twisted his car to the point were both doors wouldnt open and the hatch holddown blew apart...
you say you plan to but it should of been the first $250 you spent bud...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
If you aggressively Auto-X or Road Race with that crossmember then you'll destroy your car. That crossmember is not strong enough for those types of forces. Launching vertically is totally different than the lateral forces of Road Racing. It might not happen the first or second time. But, it will only be a matter of time ... especially with the increase in aggressiveness once you are comfortable with road racing. I'm just mentioning this because I'd hate to see you wreck that TTA.
Tim
Tim
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
Originally posted by TRAXION
If you aggressively Auto-X or Road Race with that crossmember then you'll destroy your car. That crossmember is not strong enough for those types of forces. Launching vertically is totally different than the lateral forces of Road Racing. It might not happen the first or second time. But, it will only be a matter of time ... especially with the increase in aggressiveness once you are comfortable with road racing. I'm just mentioning this because I'd hate to see you wreck that TTA.
Tim
If you aggressively Auto-X or Road Race with that crossmember then you'll destroy your car. That crossmember is not strong enough for those types of forces. Launching vertically is totally different than the lateral forces of Road Racing. It might not happen the first or second time. But, it will only be a matter of time ... especially with the increase in aggressiveness once you are comfortable with road racing. I'm just mentioning this because I'd hate to see you wreck that TTA.
Tim
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by SLP IROC-Z
so in other words the tubular K members arent really strong enough for street driving (I like to carve corners and stuff, there are pot holes and bumps around here to) would i have trouble with it?
so in other words the tubular K members arent really strong enough for street driving (I like to carve corners and stuff, there are pot holes and bumps around here to) would i have trouble with it?
FWIW - the only thing holding those a-arms to the PA crossmember is 4 tabs. I could go on about the design but I won't. PA makes great products. It's the application that is in question here. I'd use if for Drag Racing and the Street. But, RR'ing is a different beast entirely. Want proof? How come they offer extra reinforcement for those that WANT to use their stuff for RR'ing? Also ask yourself the question as to how many of their people RR as compared to Drag Race.
Tim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






