shorter endlinks when lowering?
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
shorter endlinks when lowering?
ive heard this a few times... that when u lower a vehicle down the amount of the drop needs to be subtracted from the endlinks to keep it level? is that true? i have brand new endlinks all around id hate to have to cut them up and ****. can anyone shed light on this?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i dont think you would have to. think about some of the other cars that are lowered. the sway bar end links they have are only a couple inches long to begin with. you would have to completely delete them. i lowered mine, didnt shorten them and have had no problems at all. i wouldnt worry about it IMO.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
To keep geometery of the suspension, you should.
However, if you make them to short, they will bind up.
You can keep them the same length, and they will work fine. If you were going to go buy new ones, I would suggest shorter, but since they are already new, I would run what you have.
However, if you make them to short, they will bind up.
You can keep them the same length, and they will work fine. If you were going to go buy new ones, I would suggest shorter, but since they are already new, I would run what you have.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,758
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Just leave them be. You will not be able to tell the difference by re-posistioning them. The main thing to worry about when lowering is destroying your stock shocks, relocation brackets, and an adjustable panhard rod.
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 151
From: Cincinnati,Ohio
Car: 1991 BandittII Firebird
Engine: 5.7 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Just leave them be.
Just leave them be.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
you can just raise and lower your car with the wheels hanging and as long as the swaybar isn't binding through the suspensions full extension you're probably fine. Of course this only checks jounce.
Trending Topics
Levelling the endlinks only consists of shortening the sleeve that seperates the top and bottom sets of bushings. You can tell how much by taking off the endlinks, loading the suspension (evenly), and then holding up the sway bar at a level position.
All you're really doing by keeping the stock endlink length is making it point up rather than level. It will still work the way it is designed to.
All you're really doing by keeping the stock endlink length is making it point up rather than level. It will still work the way it is designed to.
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Ithaca, NY - 10 sq mi surrounded by reality - I'm SOL!
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI in stock trim
Transmission: T-5 w/ Hurst B/P shifter
Maybe you read my little blurb about this in another thread - if you did, I didn't mean to confuse things. I still agree that this is something that really may not need to be done. It only makes sense from maintaining original sway bar geometry.
K
K
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 22
From: Monroe,NC
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
I shortened my end links after snapping two sway bar brackets and bending a 36mm WS6 front sway bar while driving and I have the Sportlines from Eibach. You'll want to shorten them just enough to keep the sway bar positioned similar to the way it was before lowering.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










