Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Tubular front end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
Daniel U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: SLO County, CA.
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9 bolt w/3.27 lim. slip
Tubular front end

I saw a brief message about a tubular K member by PA that was criticized harshly. Spohn seems to be a reputable company though. Has anyone heard of other "good" companies that might have a similar product? I'm looking to lighten the load up front. Thanks Daniel GN3 FBDY
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:16 PM
  #2  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
i'm running an AJE racing setup.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #3  
Mkos1980's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
BMR, But I am waiting for spohns. Should be out soon. (I hope)
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:17 AM
  #4  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
I recently found out that you might not save as much weight as you think. I dont remember exactly where but I read on some website selling the stuff for our car that a tubular front end will drop between 50-75 pounds off the front. When we had a thread on these forums with factual information on stock k-member versus the aftermarket tubular stuff, there was not a significant weight difference. Not enough in my own personal opinion to justify the cost of the aftermarket stuff. Definately no 50-75 pounds. I would recommend you search for that thread and see the actual weights before dropping your $$.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:08 AM
  #5  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
i think it's worth it for the ability to drop the oil pan without pulling the motor and header clearance alone.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #6  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
I agree and I'm not trying to take anything away from them except that some people might be under the impression there is a huge weight saving (like I was). It would suck to drop all that $$ to drop weight and then find out the weight savings are minimal when you get the product in your hand.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 04:09 AM
  #7  
iansane's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by xpndbl3
i think it's worth it for the ability to drop the oil pan without pulling the motor and header clearance alone.
I think I rememebr seeing pictures of the AJE unit and it looked better than any of the other out on the market. Do you have pictures of yours you can post?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #8  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
there are a bunch of pictures on the AJE racing website if you'd like to check them out. My car is in storage until spring and won't be able to get any shots of it until then.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #9  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I don't yet have the tubular k-member, but I am waiting on Spohn's. I am getting it and the tubular a-arms for two reasons.

One is it will help me run the AC on the LT1 (which I plan to have in soon...) with out modding anything.
Two is, with the full tubular front, I will cut a respectable amount of weight (in addition to the aluminum heads) for the front, which I hope helps with the car's cornering.

The Spohn should be our soon, from what I hear.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 02:12 AM
  #10  
iansane's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by xpndbl3
there are a bunch of pictures on the AJE racing website if you'd like to check them out. My car is in storage until spring and won't be able to get any shots of it until then.
I've never found any. I'm probably blind though. I saw one of the fourthgen and that was it.

http://www.ajeracing.com/camaro.htm
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 07:35 AM
  #11  
HorseflyDF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Queens NY
Car: 86 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 sbc goodwrench
Transmission: T-5 in the works
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42 open
XPNDBL3

Hey why does your f body look so fat.
Mean that in a good way..
Looks like an fbody on on steroids.
If you put some louvers on it would look even fatter




Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #12  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Re: Tubular front end

Originally posted by Daniel U
I saw a brief message about a tubular K member by PA that was criticized harshly. Spohn seems to be a reputable company though. Has anyone heard of other "good" companies that might have a similar product? I'm looking to lighten the load up front. Thanks Daniel GN3 FBDY
do it for space, not weight.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 05:51 PM
  #13  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
do it for space, not weight.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #14  
zrotten's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
weight only counts if.....

You will lose a lot of weight if you go the whole way and switch to a rack and pinion steering. If you look at the whole picture:
k-member
stock coils
stock arms
steering gearbox
all steering linkage(tie rods ,centerlink., pitman..)
all brackets and bracing
stock spindles.

I installed a PROFAB setup with QA1 coil overs with lakewood 90/10 struts and light weight spindles.

I lost 160 pounds. If you drag racing and thats the reason for weight and you have the money-DO IT , if not the only reason I would do it to my street car is for header cleareance and oil pan removal.
Later
Rotten
Attached Thumbnails Tubular front end-steering1a.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #15  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Re: Re: Tubular front end

Originally posted by Kandied91z
do it for space, not weight.
i was going to say the same thing.

the stock Kmember is not that heavy.

the tubular A arms together dont save one lb compared to the stock ones.

if the goal is weightloss, your money is better spent elsewhere.
if the goal is space underhood, then its something to consider.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
Mkos1980's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Since I just rebuilt my A arms 2 years ago with poly bushings, poly stops and new Moog joints. I will be reusing those with the spohn K member. Plus If I need to I can place a jack under the a arm too.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #17  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Mkos1980
Since I just rebuilt my A arms 2 years ago with poly bushings, poly stops and new Moog joints. I will be reusing those with the spohn K member. Plus If I need to I can place a jack under the a arm too.

not a bad idea since the two other Kmember and A arm companies (profab and PAracing) sometimes do stupid things... like make the A arms diffrent lengths by accident... or have the mounting tabs in the wrong area/position for the A arms... it'll all go together since thats teh way the jig is, but it wont work correctly.........



plus with either of them, you HAVE to use tubular a arms... you cant run the stockers.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #18  
Mkos1980's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Say u run tubed K and arms, how do you go about jacking i tup like we used to by placing the jack under the old k member? Will the new k member have a provision for this, will it be strong enough? If I have my car on jacks under the subframe. how the hell would I get the car off If i can place a jack anywhere up front anymore>?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #19  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Mkos1980
Say u run tubed K and arms, how do you go about jacking i tup like we used to by placing the jack under the old k member? Will the new k member have a provision for this, will it be strong enough? If I have my car on jacks under the subframe. how the hell would I get the car off If i can place a jack anywhere up front anymore>?
not once in my life have i jacked my camaro off the front Kmember..... its always been too low, and the jack would be too far in..

i always use the "convertible bracing" on my car.... same location as good SFCs if you have them.... otherwise, the jack has to go on the "frame rails" near the transmission next to the front tires.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #20  
heavy_chevy29's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: boonton, NJ
Car: 84 camaro Z28
Engine: 434sbc
Transmission: powerglide
Axle/Gears: moser 9" with 411 posi
i run a pa crossmember and im not very impressed. very poor quality. my one tie rod is rubbing the crossmember. im waiting for spohn to release his and ill get his. i have his A-arms and they are top notch quality. very nice product.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #21  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
i've been waiting since i joined this site, got tired of waiting and haven't looked back. i have considered changing to spring perches again for the sake of offset space for the wheels but i'll have to wait and see.

as far as jacking the car up it can be a headache because of this yes. i've jacked the car up once using the tubular k member in an emergency and haven't done it again for fear of issues. who knows though..
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #22  
zrotten's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Use the K-member to jack the car up is ok if you FAB up a half round piece of plastic(thick and hard) or what I use is a half of a polyurethane bushing mounted to a piece that sits in the top of my cup (Craftsman Jack) Nothing special.
Later
Rotten
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #23  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
The jack I use is my Dad's Napa. It is NICE. Has a padded handle to avoid body damage. And the lift point is a very thick plastic pad attached to where the metal cup usually is.
I plan to get the Spohn K-member for one reason. The LT1 clearance. I don't want to have to change the AC or modify the stock K-member. The K-member would be nice.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #24  
zz4z28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sandy, UT
I have the pro fab with rack and pinion, and I lift it off the k-member all the time, the hard part is getting it centered so it doesn't lean one way or the other, but I have never had any problems with it.

It is for sale to if you are interested!
mwrighttt@aol.com
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:54 PM
  #25  
zz4z28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sandy, UT
I have the pro fab with rack and pinion, and I lift it off the k-member all the time, the hard part is getting it centered so it doesn't lean one way or the other, but I have never had any problems with it.

It is for sale to if you are interested!
mwrighttt@aol.com
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #26  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
another thing for the weight savings(k member or otherwise) Chris Alston's list the "Vari-shock" front struts for our cars. Aluminum bodied, even available threaded for coil-overs. - Not huge weight, but I'm going for broke. 4161 lbs....SUCKS!!!! byebye uni-body structure, hello 2x3 frame and coil-overs....
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #27  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
4161? What weighs that much?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #28  
Daniel U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: SLO County, CA.
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9 bolt w/3.27 lim. slip
Your GTA wiegs more than 4klbs???GN3 FBDY
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #29  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I was thinking 3200-3400
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #30  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
me(162 lbs at the time) huge stereo, roll-bar, in floor frame, a/c, and all GTA options w/ the rag top + a little under 1/2 tank = 4161...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
Aug 15, 2021 10:16 PM
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
Amillionoh7
Suspension and Chassis
24
May 24, 2020 08:01 AM
sweet_87_iroc
Camaros for Sale
5
Sep 25, 2015 10:01 PM
bellez77
Body
14
Sep 5, 2015 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.