Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

What options to for Spohn Torque Arm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #1  
wgripp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98(5.7 L TPI)
Transmission: 700r4(A4)
Axle/Gears: G80 RPO, 3:23s, Auburn Racer's Diff
What options to for Spohn Torque Arm?

I'm interested in purchasing a Spohn Torque Arm, but there are so many options that I'm a little confused.

---

I have an automatic transmission in my 1991 GTA, so I assume I have a 700r4.

My guess is to NOT get the trans mounted torque arm that is available.

That leaves me with the "Adjustable Torque Arm - 700R4/T-5 Trans"

http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1300

---

First question: Polyurethane Bushing vs. Chromoly Spherical Rod End

My guess is the Spherical Rod End

---

Second question: Driveshaft loop

I don't think I need this

---

Third question: Mild Steel vs 4130 Chrome Moly

I know the Chrome Moly is lighter than the steel. But, does that mean the Chrome Moly is weaker than the steel?

Saving weight is great, as long as I don't sacrifice strength.

---

Thanks for your help!
Bill
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
get a poly bushing if you drive on the street, spherical are noisy
chromoly is lighter and stronger that mild steel, but it tends to fatigue faster. but unless you beat the living hell out of it i think a chromoly one will work find for you, if you dont mind the xtra money
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #3  
bitchin85camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: buffalo
Car: 85 camaro
Engine: 327
Transmission: 350, 6200 stall, w/ brake
Axle/Gears: soon to be strange 5.14
spherical rod end. more rigid, and helps for some more adjustment. bushings are soft, quiet if its a daily driver. if you will be drag racing often, you will want the drive shaft loop, as it is will be required once you break certain times (dont know off the top of my head but the loop is one of the first things techs will go after you for at the track. chromoly is much much stronger than steel, but unless your making tons of power it might not be necessary for your application (save you a few bucks also) this is a great piece. i had severe wheel hop issues with stock suspension this completely emliminated it.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #4  
wgripp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98(5.7 L TPI)
Transmission: 700r4(A4)
Axle/Gears: G80 RPO, 3:23s, Auburn Racer's Diff
There are a few different drive shaft loop options. Which should I get? Also, it says not to get them if I lower the car. I am considering doing so. Would this cause a problem?

Also, what times do I need to break in order to require the drive shaft loop?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #5  
wgripp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98(5.7 L TPI)
Transmission: 700r4(A4)
Axle/Gears: G80 RPO, 3:23s, Auburn Racer's Diff
Do the tracks require front loops only or front and rear loops? Also... any ideas on the problem of lowering the car? Maybe I'm better off getting the loop seperately?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
WheelsUp84z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
From: currently Jacksonville NC
Car: 91 z28
Engine: 383 sbc, 88mm turbo a2w IC, CSU 750
Transmission: th-400 PTC 4000 stall
Axle/Gears: ford 9" 3.55 gear
if you get the crossmember with the loop on it already you shouldnt have any problems with your car being lowered, tracks usually require them when you run slicks, and past a certain time (not sure on the exact times but i think its 13.0 and above doesnt need them) dual loops is more for all out racing. For a daily driven car, go with poly bushings so it will abosorb more of the vibration , and mild steel unit as it will probably take the abuse better.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #7  
jaykar's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Prescott Valley AZ
Car: 87 Iroc Showcar - Saturday Nite Hun
Engine: 383 4-Bolt Truck Hyd Roller MiniRam
Transmission: B&M 700R4 - Edge 3200
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt-TA Cover & Stud Kit - 3.2
Loop


I'm running the complete Spohn suspension setup and
the front driveshaft loop on the crossmember. My car has
been lowered about 1 1/4 rear,Eibach springs and no
problem at all with the loop. Pretty much centered.

If had gone with the rear loop, think would have had a
problem. Am also running poly and hiem joint split on the
rest of the arms and bars. Poly to the chassis side to avoid
noise.
Come to think about it probably could'nt have heard anything anyway over the exhaust.

Later

Last edited by jaykar; Mar 6, 2007 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #8  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Spohn TQ rod end here, car lowered 1.75".

There was bolt in the trans tunnel I had to remove that went to a bracket. Seemed I was the only one with this problem.

In the rear, the axle mount under FULL travel would hit the underside of the car. A BFH and a few wacks, that was fixed. It was even worse when I shaved my bumpstops.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
Kat's Avatar
Kat
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
From: Upland Pa
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Originally Posted by Dale
Spohn TQ rod end here, car lowered 1.75".

There was bolt in the trans tunnel I had to remove that went to a bracket. Seemed I was the only one with this problem.

In the rear, the axle mount under FULL travel would hit the underside of the car. A BFH and a few wacks, that was fixed. It was even worse when I shaved my bumpstops.
Nahh, I had to do this to a friends car also. Something about cars that have rear disc brakes from the factory have that problem..

Personally Get the front loop, Mild Steel and a poly bushing. If you feel that you want to try the rod end eventually you can always buy one from Steve for a few bucks.

Chrome Moly is stronger, which means you can use thinner wall tubing to make the same part, hence the weight savings. (.120 MS vs. .095 4130)
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #10  
The Project's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 8
From: West of Toronto
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Bill,

I agree with kat. For everyday use get the mild steel and poly. Sperical is noisy and a harder ride. Moly is stronger but cost more. You probably don't need a loop. My 2cc. Have fun.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally Posted by Kat
Nahh, I had to do this to a friends car also. Something about cars that have rear disc brakes from the factory have that problem..

I dont have rear disk, and the car never had it. Bare bones as you can get. I searched on here and could not find anyone who had the bolt problem. The hitting the bottom of the car, several people did.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've never heard of chromoly having a fatigue issue, I think most of the problems result from improper welds. And like Kat said, its not lighter. Chromoly parts are only lighter when less material is used (like thinner tubing). Its additional strength allows less material to be used.

I'd use the mild steel and poly end for my car.

Last edited by madmax; Mar 7, 2007 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
scottmoyer
Camaros for Sale
3
Sep 7, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.