Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

Hello,

I was putting on my del-a-lum a-arm bushings and remembered that there were two different part numbers for our cars.. One is for 1982-mid 83 cars and the other is for mid 83-92 cars..

I sent them an email:

Noticed you have two part numbers for 82-92 f-body del-a-lum bushings.

Part# 1021 ( fits 1982 to mid 83) $156.20 per car
Part# 1022 (fits mid 1983-92) $156.20 per car
I have already purchased part 1021 from you for my 1982 trans am a while back, but for the sake of compatibility between years, what is the difference between these two part numbers?

Thank you,


This was Global West's response:

There is a size difference in diameter

I thought this was useful information to share for us 82-83 folks.. I had not heard of the differences before. Anyone else heard of this? I did a fair bit of searching and never saw this mentioned.. I am not sure how much of a difference there is since I know poly bushing are marketed for 82-92 with no differentiation between the years, anyone know how big of a difference?

Ok, so some more information to add to the bank, not sure if it is important, but figured it worth sharing.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #2  
87 formy's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 395
Likes: 2
Car: 87 formula
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

That's the first I've ever heard that. How do you like the bushings? I haven't heard too much about them.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #3  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

I like their construction alot, I won't be able to tell too much until the snow is gone

Yep it is a weird difference, 82-83 had a few little oddball things different..
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #4  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

uh oh. I'm about to do my A-arm bushings this weekend hopefully. I just bought an ES poly kit, '82-92. I sure hope it fits!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #5  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

It should as I have a universal kit on my car now.. for some reason the del-a-lum bushings are specific and the poly or polygraphite kits are not..

I am wondering if we damage our 82-83 arms when putting in something that is not quite the right size.

family commitments are keeping me from taking my bushings out right now..take a pic or two of the old bushings and the new ones and post them would you? Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

I'll see if I can. I imagine i'll destroy the old bushings when I remove
them... we'll see!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #7  
RWB____s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Mo.
Car: Z/28
Engine: 355
Transmission: Turbo 400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

I have run the del alum bushings in my car for over 15 years and for most of those years autocrossed it extensively. recently I removed the A-arms for inspection when I had the engine out for some work. They showed zero wear, with no binding anywhere thru out arm travel. I just gave them some fresh grease re-installed the arms and ALL is good! Worth every penny spent. I would put these in every performance car I own if they were offered for it.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
tom camaro's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Bedford, VA
Car: 83 Camaro
Engine: LT1 SD Mode 30lb/hr
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 1982 to mid 83 a-arm differences

Originally Posted by J's T/A
It should as I have a universal kit on my car now.. for some reason the del-a-lum bushings are specific and the poly or polygraphite kits are not..

I am wondering if we damage our 82-83 arms when putting in something that is not quite the right size.

family commitments are keeping me from taking my bushings out right now..take a pic or two of the old bushings and the new ones and post them would you? Thanks!
To bring this back from the dead and add a little information.

I am also curious as how they can have a universal polyurethane kits for our cars.

According to Global west

Kit 1021 82-83 mid year has a bushing of 1 5/8 inches OD
Kit 1022 83-92 Has a bushing of 1.915 inches OD

Unless they started selling hole shrink with the universal kits someone is going to have a problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PestilenceIV
North East Region
4
Sep 11, 2016 12:53 AM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Sep 12, 2015 08:57 PM
J.C. Denton
Body
0
Sep 8, 2015 05:35 PM
dmtz956
LSX and LTX Parts
1
Sep 7, 2015 10:16 PM
greenyone
TPI
3
Sep 2, 2015 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.