Steel vs. Chrome Moly
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Steel vs. Chrome Moly
I wanted to know if I should pay for the chrome moly or would I be ok with the steel. Is chrome moly lighter? Is that the only advantage? Looking to get adjustable LCA's and adjustable torque arm from hawks. Looking to use spohn cause I have the spohn subframes and love em! Is BMR better?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly
Moly will only be lighter if they used less material ie:thinner wall tubing. Same volume of steel and chromoly = same weight.
I dont know that any of them weld the material properly, even though they state otherwise, so I'll say the steel will give you less chance of failure.
Chromoly is stronger, in some respects. Thats why you can get away with thinner tubing, if its all put together correctly. They may not reach it (and I havent seen it in failed parts yet) but too thin and the tubing will fail regardless of it being stronger.
I dont know that any of them weld the material properly, even though they state otherwise, so I'll say the steel will give you less chance of failure.
Chromoly is stronger, in some respects. Thats why you can get away with thinner tubing, if its all put together correctly. They may not reach it (and I havent seen it in failed parts yet) but too thin and the tubing will fail regardless of it being stronger.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly
So should I go with Chrome Moly, or with the steel? Is it worth another $125 for a chrome moly torque arm compared to a steel torque arm?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Car: GM
Engine: v8
Transmission: slushboxes
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly
Bingo! That's the answer I was looking for. Thanks. I know Spohn makes good stuff but I don't think it is worth the weight savings either. Any other opinions.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Western Mass
Car: 1985 Camaro/89 Merkur XR4Ti
Engine: 5.0 305 LG4/2.3 Turbo (180hp/205tq)
Transmission: TH700R4 with Shift Improver Kit/T-9
Axle/Gears: 3.42LT1 Rear/3.64
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly
Ive heard that Chrome Moly takes stress differently than steel. Like Chrome Moly when damaged once, will completely break if it gets damaged again, where as steel would bend. Not sure on the validity on this though. I believe there maybe a post about it on here somewhere,
Trending Topics
Re: Steel vs. Chrome Moly
Please keep us in mind as well, we over a variety of products for the 3rd generation car including the torque arm. I think you will like our prices as well 
www.umiperformance.com
Chrome Moly like mentioned has a higher tensile and yield strength than mild steel. This allows us as manufacturers to use thinner wall tubing to reduce weight but still maintain strength. The price increase of Chrome Moly is the material itself along with the fabrication time it takes when using it. Chrome Moly must be TIG welded due to heat and can not be MIG welded like mild steel... this increases time in building the item. Also it requires preheating before welding where mild steel does not.
If I can help anymore please ask. Thank you!
Ryan

www.umiperformance.com
Chrome Moly like mentioned has a higher tensile and yield strength than mild steel. This allows us as manufacturers to use thinner wall tubing to reduce weight but still maintain strength. The price increase of Chrome Moly is the material itself along with the fabrication time it takes when using it. Chrome Moly must be TIG welded due to heat and can not be MIG welded like mild steel... this increases time in building the item. Also it requires preheating before welding where mild steel does not.
If I can help anymore please ask. Thank you!
Ryan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM






