Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

global west control arms... no panhard rod?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #1  
gregsz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 2
From: Western WA
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
global west control arms... no panhard rod?

"Global West's Super Duty rear lower control arms are designed to be factory replacement units. They are intended for applications that require the utmost in control. Drag racing, road racing, autocross, and street performance cars will benefit by using these Super Duty rear control arms. These control arms use spherical aircraft bearings and Del-a-lum bushings to control rear-end lateral movement, as well as fore and aft location. They allow for full rear-end articulation without bind and eliminate the need for a panhard rod."

I copied this from http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku , Is it true that these eliminate the need of a panhard rod? Or, is this only for off road applications? my car is my daily driver...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #2  
89ROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 370 LSX, LS3 Top End
Transmission: Built T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" Aluminum Center 3.89's
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

No way, whats going to keep your rear from going side to side in cornering? Without the panhard i think the rear will just fall out of the car lol.

Maybe im wrong but i wouldnt even back my car out of the shed without it.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:11 PM
  #3  
gregsz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 2
From: Western WA
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

i agree, that's why i questioned it. It also seems like it would put a lot of stress on the control arm mounting points. It must only be made to go 1/4 mile at a time.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
UNCLE TOM's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4
From: ms. gulf coast
Car: 91 R/S , 89 dodge p/u
Engine: L31 GM crate re-cammed , 318
Transmission: T-5 , 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42 , ?
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

i may be wrong but i just don't understand how they can replace the panhard bar . has anybody tried them ?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #5  
paul_huryk's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 10
From: Ahead of you...
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

I have those GW control arms in my car....

You still need a panhard rod - they are probably referring to not neding an aftermarket rod with their arms.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #6  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,807
Likes: 108
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

its a typo or a line of bs

you need a panhard bar, end of story.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #7  
hotpart's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Paso Robles, CA
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

You can eliminate the panhard rod with their control arms because of the bushing design. They put massive load on the chassis mounts and create an unbelievable amount of bind in the rear suspension because of the Delrin bushing on the chassis side. It is also that Delrin bushing which would eliminate side to side movement and therefore allowing the removal of the panhard rod. You can still use a panhard rod as long as you are using a panhard rod with soft rubber bushings. If you switched to a panhard rod with rod ends your suspension would probably lock up or tear some mounts.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #8  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,807
Likes: 108
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

it doesnt sound like a good idea, whats to keep the control arm mounts from tearing with all that extra lateral load?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #9  
Fords88Bird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 13
From: SO CAL
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

There's no way I would eliminate the panhard bar, how would you center the axle. Later.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 12:54 AM
  #10  
racing geek's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?


I can't believe that claim... If they were cheaper and I had an extra car, I wouldn't mind testing them out just for ***** and giggles.


Mike
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #11  
Darkshot's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: global west control arms... no panhard rod?

I smell a law suit
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
J-money
Suspension and Chassis
15
Jan 4, 2019 09:45 AM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.