Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2016, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
zero13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: O'hare
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

Name:  35de9bb8-3f96-4b1c-a120-4c18ef3c678c.png
Views: 171
Size:  37.6 KB
Old 04-26-2016, 06:05 PM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
zero13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: O'hare
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

Hope this helps others, got this direct from ES after contacting them about their website being wrong...as are many companies selling these parts.I have multiple emails and conversations with ES, and he assures me the diagram is correct info, and can be found in a PDF on their website...But item info/details are wrong in their listing...and after looking around, so are some 3rd party sellers!....
Old 04-14-2017, 06:14 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
zero13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: O'hare
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

just coming back here to confirm this is the proper info for all of us 3rd gens...DO NOT rely on any info out there, as I have even corrected ES original website to correct the info..I am going to check their site now as an update.....this is almost a year later!
Old 04-14-2017, 06:17 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
zero13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: O'hare
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

ES website is correct now!...3.1111.....or 3.1112.....See diagram.above.
Old 04-18-2017, 09:11 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
scooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,345
Received 298 Likes on 234 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

I actually got bit by this error two years ago, but I just found out this week when I went to install the part
Old 03-31-2018, 01:45 PM
  #6  
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
SirReveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 477
Received 40 Likes on 31 Posts
Car: '89 'ROC
Engine: 5.7L
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112

My car is offsite: any general guidance on which one per model/model year?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StealthElephant
Electronics
4
12-11-2003 10:44 PM
TallWhiteGuy
Engine Swap
2
12-06-2003 07:50 PM
89transam
DIY PROM
1
07-28-2003 03:53 PM
bluegoose
Electronics
1
07-07-2003 07:41 PM
breathment
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
4
08-09-2002 11:51 PM



Quick Reply: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.