Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: O'hare
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112
Hope this helps others, got this direct from ES after contacting them about their website being wrong...as are many companies selling these parts.I have multiple emails and conversations with ES, and he assures me the diagram is correct info, and can be found in a PDF on their website...But item info/details are wrong in their listing...and after looking around, so are some 3rd party sellers!....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: O'hare
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112
just coming back here to confirm this is the proper info for all of us 3rd gens...DO NOT rely on any info out there, as I have even corrected ES original website to correct the info..I am going to check their site now as an update.....this is almost a year later!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: O'hare
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Enhanced 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Posi
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112
ES website is correct now!...3.1111.....or 3.1112.....See diagram.above.
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Torque Arm Bushings...Energy Suspension 3.1111 vs 3.1112
I actually got bit by this error two years ago, but I just found out this week when I went to install the part
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
breathment
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
4
Aug 9, 2002 11:51 PM