Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Eibach vs Stock Springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 03:01 PM
  #1  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Eibach vs Stock Springs

ok, so i fitted eibach springs on my 87 a few years ago, i also removed the stock rubber isolators and replaced them with some thin rubber to get it sitting down a bit more. The car crashes over bumps in the road and rattles around quite a bit on shoddy roads.

now, ive also got an 84 project car which ive fitted new shocks too but its still on stock springs, i drove it up and down the road today as it hadnt moved for a while and it rides pretty smooth, baring in mind on this same road ive driven my other car and it rattles over the bumps.

do the eibach springs make the car a lot stiffer but rattle more or is this because the stock rubber isolators are gone ? maybe theres not enough padding between the spring and the chassis now so its rattling a lot more ?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 03:36 PM
  #2  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

The Eibachs being stiffer will ride harsher and could induce more vibrations and crashing noises. There are too many variables to make a real comparison here though as to the Eibachs being the cause of your issue. The Eibachs don't make the car stiffer (that would be the act of subframe connectors, strut tower brace, beefed up suspension bars and brackets) they will make the car ride harsher over bumps.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

So basically eibachs are **** for regular road use then. Pretty much what I suspected lol

it' making me not enjoy driving the car to be honest. Once I get on a smooth road it' fine but going round town and our crappy roads it's pretty harsh. Sounds like something is totally loose at the rear of the car sometimes the way it rattles around.

so I might have to pull the eibach springs then. What' the best stock replacement spring for comfort. MOOG ?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Yeah, MOOG is a great stock spec spring for road use. There are a few different spring ratings a camaro came with, I don't recall the part numbers but if you search you can easily find them. I have been using a set of MOOG with a coil cut for Autocross for the last few years. I'm no pro driver but I've been pleased with them.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 05:28 PM
  #5  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Sounds good man. I just want a nice smooth ride and thats it. I went with the eibachs as my car had huge wheel arch gaps and looked terrible. That was with the ws6 springs with it being a GTA and I went down to 15" wheels.

it was a bit rattly with those springs too but I don' think it was as bad as it is now
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Im also wondering if I take the eibach springs out and put in some thicker rubber to simulate the isolators would it absorb these rattles somewhat? Maybe the rubber stuff I used was too thin so that's what the extra rattling is about ??

it was pretty thin rubbery foam stuff I stuck to the top of the springs before installing them
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 05:45 PM
  #7  
Jorlain's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 667
Likes: 16
From: Brainerd, MN
Car: '84 Trans Am
Engine: 357 SBC
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.73, Torsen Diff
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Just to clarify, is it the front, rear, or everywhere that you're hearing the rattling? After reading through everything I'm starting to suspect that there's *something* rattling and the stiffer ride is just amplifying it (you mentioned you heard the rattling with the stock springs too).
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 05:47 PM
  #8  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Seems to crash at all 4 corners. The rear seems louder though but I don't know if that's just because the rear of the car is all open so you can hear it more inside the car.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

What are you running for shocks and struts? If you're running some Gaybriels or Monroes, or KYBs, you probably don't have enough shock/strut to control the abuse of the springs.

Did you or someone else, remove all the sound deadening? How's the foam rubber between the tank straps and tank/body and tank? Spare tire snugged tight in it's cubby? Rubber isolator between the lug wrench and body? Rubber dong-ring on the extension? Stock suspension bits in back? Poly bushings? How secure are the interior panels? Are all the plastic push-in keepers, and threaded inserts, etc tight? Or hanging on by just a thread? How's the NVH foam between the door skins and impact bar? Roof skin and structure? Running a nice thick factory headliner or one of those thin ABS monstrosities?

I'm just throwing these things out there, because there can be a million reasons for a harsh noisy ride. Probably the #1 cause on our car is running bargain bin "one size fits none" shocks and struts. They might be great on the family truckster minivan, but they're going to have problems with WS6 springs, much less lowering springs. Foams and rubber, and NVH adhesives can dry out and decay with age. When the rubber gets hard, or cracks away, or dries up and blows away in the wind, it won't be able to soften the impacts of a rough road.

Of course it's also worth mentioning that these cars, especially the factory 16" wheel/245/50 versions all ride a little rough.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

I fitter Gabriel struts up front a few years ago. Kyb gas adjust shocks the same time I done the springs. No idea what the tank straps etc are like I've never had to pull the tank. I took the spare wheel etc out of the car to rule that out. Couple of clips missing on the interior plastics but not enough to make clattering noises like that.

it' got hotchkis tubular panhard bar and UMI tubular control arms at the back.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2018 | 08:47 PM
  #11  
obeymybird's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 58
From: PA
Car: 92 camaro RS
Engine: LSA
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: TNT 8.8 wavetrac 3.31
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Sounds odd to me my old formula I had was a ruff ride stock I put in a pro kit and it rode very smooth and handled like poo with them but also lowering springs will make short work of cheap shocks and struts think mine were shot in a few months.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2018 | 04:26 AM
  #12  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Hmmm. Not sure what to do then.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2018 | 10:08 AM
  #13  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Get some Koni or Bilsteins up front. For starters.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2018 | 12:10 PM
  #14  
Junglebill's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: New York
Car: Camaro
Engine: 350 Tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Originally Posted by Drew
Get some Koni or Bilsteins up front. For starters.
I agree. Buddy of mine lowered his Z28 with the prokit and kyb's. Was vary disappointed in how rough the ride felt and just recently upgraded to koni's and could not be happier. Good set of shocks and struts DO make a world of difference
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2018 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

More money..... not sure exactly how much they would be front and back but sounds expensive. I think I would rather just go back to stock springs like Moog or something
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2018 | 07:47 PM
  #16  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Oh it's only about $700-ish US to do all four corners. The catch is that anything stiffer than a V6 or FE1 suspension is going to require a quality shock absorber. You could start by putting the rubber isolators back in, but really the expense of quality absorbers is just a necessary evil for these cars.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2018 | 12:31 PM
  #17  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

When I replaced my OEM spring with pro kits. The ride quality was actually better.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2018 | 12:37 PM
  #18  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Originally Posted by IROCThe5.7L
When I replaced my OEM spring with pro kits. The ride quality was actually better.
crazy. Did you keep the stock rubber isolators ?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

Originally Posted by gta_knight
crazy. Did you keep the stock rubber isolators ?
Yes I did. The stock springs at the time I removed them had about 70,000 miles on them.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2018 | 04:16 PM
  #20  
gta_knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Likes: 5
From: England
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

I think I will get some new isolators then and try that. I know I didn't keep the old ones. Damn.

I've had a look on rock auto but they only seem to have thin type things ? The standard ones were big chunky things
Reply
Old May 8, 2025 | 07:50 PM
  #21  
GMDrummer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Car: I have an 89 Firebird GTA w/T Top
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: Unknown
Re: Eibach vs Stock Springs

I just put a 89 GTA back on the road. I had to replace the fuel tank, pickup assembly, and fuel pump so I figured I may as well fix a dragging front brake and upgrade the suspension while I had it apart.

I installed the Eibach sportline springs front and rear, the rear shocks were in good shape but the front struts were suspect so I replaced them with KYB damping adjustable units. I put the factory rubber isolators on the tops of the Eibach springs. New sway bar end links are on as well as well a one piece adjustable tubular adjustable panhard bar.

It lowers the car about an inch or a tad more and looks bad ***. The car rides a bit more stiff/harsh than factory. However it also corners DEAD flat. It's like it's on rails. I didn't note any more rattling or noise than any other Gen 3 GTA I've been in. I handles similar to the 85 C4 Corvette I used to have with the Z51 suspension. What is all the more impressive about this is, the Z51 Corvette suspension is a Dana independent rear end, and forged aluminum indy car style front suspension. It was the first American car to ever hit 1G on the skidpad test. I think the GTA is heavier and has less tire footprint so not sure it'll do 1G but it will be pretty close.

If you are concerned about comfort, stick with the factory springs. I mean, the factory Firebird suspension was pretty good for all around driving and the WS6 suspension is already REALLY great handling. If you are willing to sacrifice a bit on comfort for a lower stance and even better handling in corners, the Eibachs and quality shocks/struts will do it for you. Just remember to put the factory rubber isolators on the top of the new springs when you install them, and also, clock the front springs correctly with one of the two inbourd holes in the lower a-arm covered and the other open.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fastbird
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
1
Jun 24, 2003 07:54 PM
llvll4l2c91350
Auto Detailing and Appearance
5
Mar 16, 2003 07:06 PM
Steve89GTA
Suspension and Chassis
6
Sep 20, 2002 11:57 AM
Fastbird
Suspension and Chassis
3
Jun 25, 2001 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.