Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Got great help on front...now the rear

Old 04-07-2018, 07:48 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
pmmboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: At Present, Massachusetts but moving to Florida
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 2.8 v6
Got great help on front...now the rear

Got some great help to my questions when I was doing a steering rebuild.
Now I want to rebuild the rear suspension. I have an 1988 Camaro, 2.8 v6.
I plan to buy Moog springs 5665. But, what I just noticed is that my rear passenger side wheel is at least 3/4 inch out from the fender that the drivers side.
I think I should get Founders LCAs and Panhard Bar but my first question is do I need to get adjustable as I am not lowering the car. Will an adjustable panhard bar be needed to adjust the wheel to the fender?
Any and all advice is very much appreciated......Paul.....
Old 04-07-2018, 09:56 PM
  #2  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,882
Likes: 0
Received 1,849 Likes on 1,265 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

The length of the panhard bar determines the position of the axle side to side. If you want to move the position of the axle then you need a panhard bar with adjustable length.

Single adjustable means you will have to remove it from the car every time you want to adjust it. Kind of counterproductive to what you're trying to accomplish. Double adjustable can be adjusted while still mounted to the vehicle. Smart money always buys the double adjustable panhard bar.
Old 04-08-2018, 08:15 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,022
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,261 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

Don't use the fender as your reference.

It is not The Car. It is just a piece of trim stuck on somewhere out in space.

If you were levelling your house after it settled, would you use the levelness of the curtain rods as your reference for jacking its foundation? I don't think so. Same deal here.

The Car is where the control arms bolt to the "frame". THAT is what's supposed to be equal spacing.

Then if the fender thing bothers you, fix the body work.

I also suggest not using the tires as that part of the reference, either. A flat plate of some sort across the axle flange would make more sense. Wheels and tires can have variation, especially if not stock, or if they've been swapped. IROC and a bunch of the Firebird wheel variants have different offsets on the fronts & rears for example. If you have any of those, you may well have a front on one side and a rear on the other.
Old 04-08-2018, 01:05 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
pmmboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: At Present, Massachusetts but moving to Florida
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 2.8 v6
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

OK...Got it.

I'll check the measurements again using those references.

I'll also be buying a double adjustable panhard bar too.

Thanks. You guys know these vehicles....

Is it wise to buy adjustable rear control arms?

Paul
Boston
Old 04-08-2018, 01:42 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,022
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,261 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

Is it wise to buy adjustable rear control arms?
Kinda depends on what you consider "wise"...

On the one hand, if the price is not too much different, it wouldn't make sense not too. On the other, about 99% of the time they'll end up at the stock length anyway. Soooo,,, ....

I have fixed ones on mine; the real simple poly/poly Lakewood ones. There's several that are very similar to them. A cheap and dependable design.
Old 04-08-2018, 04:31 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

Sofa is correct.

Many members on this website, even members with high post counts, on many occassions have simply advised to drop a string from each fender and center the tires with the strings. If you care mainly about the car from a visual standpoint than this method should be sufficient. Doing that method, at best your rear end could be perfectly centered and at worst it could be off by something like 1.5". 1.5" over the length of the driveshaft is not that big of a deal as the U joints in the driveshaft should easily take up that angle.

I used to center my rear end this way until a few months ago I did a very thorough job on my car of setting up and aligning the entire drivetrain on my Camaro. I learned that at least on my application with the tires centered between the rear fenders the rearend was off center by 5/8" from the chassis centerline.

Here is where my writeup begins of aligning the drivetrain on my Camaro:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/memb...ml#post6162571
Old 04-08-2018, 06:37 PM
  #7  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,882
Likes: 0
Received 1,849 Likes on 1,265 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

If you're interested in great handling then you might as well drop plumb-bob from the chassis pivot points and see if the car is reasonably in square in the first place. A car that doesn't start out being square is a lost cause if you want to be competitive.

It was years ago that I checked my car and I can't remember the acceptable limits but you can find it in suspension building books. I'm not a competitive driver but my car does very predictable things and that keeps me safer on the street when I'm being a bit rowdy.
Old 04-08-2018, 07:15 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Desert
Posts: 5,025
Received 76 Likes on 66 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Got great help on front...now the rear

Originally Posted by QwkTrip
If you're interested in great handling then you might as well drop plumb-bob from the chassis pivot points and see if the car is reasonably in square in the first place. A car that doesn't start out being square is a lost cause if you want to be competitive.
The link I posted was to the portion of my build thread where I did just that! I also posted the factory illustrations of the chassis measuring points and the respective lengths with their allowable variances.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoldenRhino
Cooling
3
08-10-2019 01:47 PM
ZZ4 86 Z28
Auto Detailing and Appearance
11
03-21-2007 09:47 PM
82 Iron Duke
Classified Ads Feedback Board
3
05-02-2006 02:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Got great help on front...now the rear



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.