To all you guys with no back seats: READ
To all you guys with no back seats: READ
After I pulled out my rear seats this weekend, i noticed that the factory rear seatbelt bolts that sit right above the rear passengers head, would make a darn good spot for a chassis reinforcment bar. So, i pulled off the seat belts and exposed the threads on either side. I then went to Lowe's and purchased a 1" x 1" 6ft long galvinized steel girder. I made the measurements and hacksawed away. Then, the drill came out to make holes for the bolt-on. I used a dremel to cut away some metal so the thread would be long enough. I then went to my local hardware store and got some smaller diameter nuts to fit in the brace (stock nuts were too big). Then i bolted it to the thread, cleaned it up alittle and tada...finished. If your F-body is for the track, and you decide to cut weight for the track...but still want some added rigidity, look no farther. It cost no more than $14 totol, looks super trick and grealty improves the flexy rear. Just thought i would let you know...
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Car: '87 Z
Engine: 355 in the works
Transmission: 700R4
Sounds intertesting, get some pics and keep us informed. Did you notice a difference in rigidity? Maybe you should write up a tech article on it...
After some neighborhood testing, I have concluded that the rear brace does in fact help stiffen the rear. The difference is very noticable at higher speeds and less at slower speeds. All my buddies agree that it looks trick and for $13 it cant be beat. Ill post pics ASAP.
Trending Topics
you really cant do it without removing the backseats, because you need acess to the seatbelt bolts and the whole mechanism and plastic has to be romoved...let me see if i can write a tech article on it....
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Ya know, I had thought of putting some kind of upper shock brace back there, but decided it wouldn't help handling... I never thought to brace the actual frame! That's cool!
You mean the shoulder belt bolts? I have an '86, and there were no shoulder belts back then. Also, for the guys that want to keep their seats- could a hole be drilled in the regular plastic, a few inches away from the retractors, to acheive the same effect? I have no problems drilling a neat little hole in the back plastic!
Originally posted by Treview1
i noticed that the factory rear seatbelt bolts that sit right above the rear passengers head
i noticed that the factory rear seatbelt bolts that sit right above the rear passengers head
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
No kidding! I was talking about drilling a hole in the plastic to get to the metal behind it! I thought that was obvious? I guess not.
Originally posted by TomP
You mean the shoulder belt bolts? I have an '86, and there were no shoulder belts back then. Also, for the guys that want to keep their seats- could a hole be drilled in the regular plastic, a few inches away from the retractors, to acheive the same effect? I have no problems drilling a neat little hole in the back plastic!
You mean the shoulder belt bolts? I have an '86, and there were no shoulder belts back then. Also, for the guys that want to keep their seats- could a hole be drilled in the regular plastic, a few inches away from the retractors, to acheive the same effect? I have no problems drilling a neat little hole in the back plastic!
Thanx for pointing that out, I guess i overlooked the lack of rear shoulder belts from the earlier models. But i dont see why the same affect couldn't be duplicated by drilling through the plastic to the metal, it might just be a little more involved.
Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...Tech article...
Alright Guys...I sent in the Tech Article, so if they decide to post it, it should be up soon. It is not terribly in depth, simply due to how easy this mod is. And at the same time, I have no pics yet...no word on when i can get them. But If you have any questions about how it works or are unclear on the directions..drop me an email at Treview1@hotmail.com
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Car: 86' Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Well, i got ansy today to do something to the car so i decided to try this and figure it out as i go
being that i don't have rear shoulder belts i decided on using the bolt holes where the hatch struts connect to the body (this also retains the use of the back seat). i went out and got a 5 foot tube, and some 1/4" thick metal plates and went at it. I just finished welding the first bracket to the bar, so far so good... I'm taking lots of pics along the way so in the next day or so i'll show everyone how I did it....
Eric
being that i don't have rear shoulder belts i decided on using the bolt holes where the hatch struts connect to the body (this also retains the use of the back seat). i went out and got a 5 foot tube, and some 1/4" thick metal plates and went at it. I just finished welding the first bracket to the bar, so far so good... I'm taking lots of pics along the way so in the next day or so i'll show everyone how I did it....Eric
Treview1:- Did you ever get around to posting pics anywhere of your set-up. Sounds like a killer modification; I just wouldn't want to lose the rear seats.
Has anyone looked into Tom P's idea for doing it whilst retaining the rear seats?
Has anyone looked into Tom P's idea for doing it whilst retaining the rear seats?
Here is the tech article:
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/t...amebrace.shtml
I don't think you will be hearing from Treview though, he hasn't posted on thirdgen for a year now
You might try emailing him and see if you get a response.
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/t...amebrace.shtml
I don't think you will be hearing from Treview though, he hasn't posted on thirdgen for a year now
You might try emailing him and see if you get a response. Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: NJ fo0
Car: 1986/88 Frankenstein Trans Am
Engine: carbed L98
Transmission: T-5
what about going from the rear seat bolts to the front seat bolts? cant that be done?
Last edited by Trans_AM_88; Jul 6, 2003 at 01:58 PM.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
I'm not buying the Idea, sorry. Flex up top is not going to help/hurt suspension geometry or grip. As long as the suspension section of the car is not flexing, the who cares about the upper body. All you are doing is adding more upper roll weight.
Your crucial rear points are the front LCA mounts which are strengthened by SFC's (not Alston types-thats why I say they are not good for roadrace setups), and the panhard rod frame bracket & PHR Brace. Strengthen them and them only and you are in great shape. Personally I haven't done anything to mine- don't feel its necessary to bother with yet unless I put some racing rubber on the car. Its good and strong back there stock even with my good street tires and g-loading. Most of your tires will give and slip LONG before your chassis will flex hard enough to matter.
Your crucial rear points are the front LCA mounts which are strengthened by SFC's (not Alston types-thats why I say they are not good for roadrace setups), and the panhard rod frame bracket & PHR Brace. Strengthen them and them only and you are in great shape. Personally I haven't done anything to mine- don't feel its necessary to bother with yet unless I put some racing rubber on the car. Its good and strong back there stock even with my good street tires and g-loading. Most of your tires will give and slip LONG before your chassis will flex hard enough to matter.
Last edited by AGood2.8; Oct 8, 2003 at 02:57 AM.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by SLP IROC-Z
hmm, could it reduce squeeks and stuff from the hatch and stuff wiggling, or is that unavoidable.
hmm, could it reduce squeeks and stuff from the hatch and stuff wiggling, or is that unavoidable.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Cool idea, CheezX. I wonder, if after all these years, the rear bumper nuts might've worked loose. If they're the only thing tying the rear together to make it sturdy... I'll have to climb under the back of my car "when I get some free time"
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
well that answers why mine squeeks back there then, my rear impact beam was rotted in half
so replacing it with a good one should solve it?
so replacing it with a good one should solve it? Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
ok it's been a year or two. i know somone else has done this, post some pics, e-mail them to me if they are to big and i will post them on my car domain site and post them here. anything. the tony requires a picture before cutting things. ugg...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
Jul 5, 2024 11:18 PM





