Bigger TBI Unit
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Bigger TBI Unit
Any 305 people replaced their stock TBI with the 670 cfm TBI Unit from Holley? It says it's for a truck. 2" throttle bores instead of the 1 11/16". Summit description also says it's for '87 to '89 GM, and I'm a '90, so I don't know if it will work with my computer, or if that just means need chip reprogrammed, or what? Also I assume one would need a new intake.
Any pros or cons on this as a possibility for my '90 LO3?
Any pros or cons on this as a possibility for my '90 LO3?
Moderator
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, AZ
Car: 92 RS, 02 Tacoma, 2 73 Porsche 914s
con is - its overkill. your 305 will not need that much flow until you can, if you can, get it to 330 horse.
this is the consensus anyway that ive read over the past couple years. i had one on my 305, it doesnt do much. i now have a radiused small block tbi on it and its better than having the 454 tbi on it. stock 305 btw.
this is the consensus anyway that ive read over the past couple years. i had one on my 305, it doesnt do much. i now have a radiused small block tbi on it and its better than having the 454 tbi on it. stock 305 btw.
I dont think its overkill. Unless you think 475 cfm is overkill. The injectors are overkill of course youd just want to put your stock pod on there.
Granted, It would be pointless unless you allready have full exhaust and a carb intake manifold
Granted, It would be pointless unless you allready have full exhaust and a carb intake manifold
Moderator
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, AZ
Car: 92 RS, 02 Tacoma, 2 73 Porsche 914s
right with other mods. a lot of them, its a good idea. a stock 305. forget doing it. not going to gain much. i had fuel pressure boosted a bit, and the 454 tbi on my stock 305, even tried tuning some chip stuff. and still ran lean with hesitation off throttle. driving it was fine, but acceleration suffered because i couldnt get the pumpshot right. This also i beleive caused my ecm to retard timing and caused my car to ACTUALLY BE SLOWER overall.
SO. without the right tuning after doing it, and the right mods to NEED it, i would spend your money elsewhere. make it one of the last things you do.
475 pablo? i missed that. but, ya, not the worst thing you could do, but surely not the best either
SO. without the right tuning after doing it, and the right mods to NEED it, i would spend your money elsewhere. make it one of the last things you do.
475 pablo? i missed that. but, ya, not the worst thing you could do, but surely not the best either
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
I agree with it being a "last mod" - I was just trying to think ahead. My thought process:
Need new mo better heads - got a set of #416 heads to play with, not the best, but can port them on my own, and they'll be decent. BUT .... while porting the heads, I need to match port to the intake, so I kinda need a plan on an intake now before I go playing with the heads. BUT .... to decide the intake, I kinda need to know what's going on top, so thinking about the TBI.
As The Fix sang it in the 80's, "One thing leads to another."
So, the larger parts of my plan are:
TES Headers (stuck with emissions)
3" exhaust, Hi-flow cat
#416 ported heads
new intake
LT4 cam with 1.6
So i was trying to make the intake plans now (hoping to have the cash for it from Xmas) so that I could do my head work over the cold rainy months and be ready to bolt my goodies on in the spring.
All this considered, will I have a need for the larger TBI unit?
And can anyone recommend a decent EGR intake (on a budget)?
(for either the larger TBI unit or the stock unit, whichever consensus is reached) - and fit under stock hood - I'd like to keep my "sleeper" mode.
Need new mo better heads - got a set of #416 heads to play with, not the best, but can port them on my own, and they'll be decent. BUT .... while porting the heads, I need to match port to the intake, so I kinda need a plan on an intake now before I go playing with the heads. BUT .... to decide the intake, I kinda need to know what's going on top, so thinking about the TBI.
As The Fix sang it in the 80's, "One thing leads to another."
So, the larger parts of my plan are:
TES Headers (stuck with emissions)
3" exhaust, Hi-flow cat
#416 ported heads
new intake
LT4 cam with 1.6
So i was trying to make the intake plans now (hoping to have the cash for it from Xmas) so that I could do my head work over the cold rainy months and be ready to bolt my goodies on in the spring.
All this considered, will I have a need for the larger TBI unit?
And can anyone recommend a decent EGR intake (on a budget)?
(for either the larger TBI unit or the stock unit, whichever consensus is reached) - and fit under stock hood - I'd like to keep my "sleeper" mode.
Last edited by camaronewbie; Nov 26, 2002 at 05:39 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Huntsville, AL
Car: '00 Chevrolet Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by snflupigus
475 pablo? i missed that.
475 pablo? i missed that.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
I'm in Raleigh. Wake, Durham, Guilford, Forsyth, Cabarras, Gaston, Mecklenburg, Orange and Union counties all are currently emissions counties in NC.
Effective July 1st, 2003 ..... Catawba, Cumberland, Davidson, Iredell, Johnston and Rowan get added to the list
Effective Jan 1st, 2004 ..... Alamance, Chatham, Franklin, Lee, Lincoln, Moore, Randolph and Stanly get added
Effective Jan 1st, 2005 ..... Edgecombe, Lenoir, Nash, Pitt, Robeson, Wayne and Wilson get added
Effective July 1st, 2005 ..... Burke, Caldwell, Haywood, Henderson, Rutherford, Stokes, Surry and Wilkes get added
Effective Jan 1st, 2005 ..... Brunswick, Carteret, Craven, New Hanover and Onslow get added
check the NC DMV website at:
http://www.dmv.dot.state.nc.us/enfor...s/current.html
Effective July 1st, 2003 ..... Catawba, Cumberland, Davidson, Iredell, Johnston and Rowan get added to the list
Effective Jan 1st, 2004 ..... Alamance, Chatham, Franklin, Lee, Lincoln, Moore, Randolph and Stanly get added
Effective Jan 1st, 2005 ..... Edgecombe, Lenoir, Nash, Pitt, Robeson, Wayne and Wilson get added
Effective July 1st, 2005 ..... Burke, Caldwell, Haywood, Henderson, Rutherford, Stokes, Surry and Wilkes get added
Effective Jan 1st, 2005 ..... Brunswick, Carteret, Craven, New Hanover and Onslow get added
check the NC DMV website at:
http://www.dmv.dot.state.nc.us/enfor...s/current.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Glowsock
Tech / General Engine
0
Sep 5, 2015 07:48 PM





