1.6 rr fit under stock valve covers?
1.6 rr fit under stock valve covers?
Will 1.6 rr, most likely comp cams pro magnum, fit under the stock valve covers? Also, anyone who has done this, what gains did you see from going from the stock non roller 1.5 ratio to 1.6 roller rockers?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 400
Likes: 15
From: NW/burbs Chicago
Car: 92 CAMARO RALLY SPORT
Engine: 383 sbc w/250 shot of nitrous
Transmission: AMERICAN POWERTRAIN- EXTREME TKX
Axle/Gears: STRANGE ENG. 12 BOLT 3:90 SPOOL
I have crane golds they fit perfect under stock valve covers as far as performance the went on with other mods so I can't say..:hail:
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 400
Likes: 15
From: NW/burbs Chicago
Car: 92 CAMARO RALLY SPORT
Engine: 383 sbc w/250 shot of nitrous
Transmission: AMERICAN POWERTRAIN- EXTREME TKX
Axle/Gears: STRANGE ENG. 12 BOLT 3:90 SPOOL
I am using aftermarket springs,valves cam you name it they where installed in 99 never had any probs everthing fits just fine :hail:
Junior Member

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: TPiS 383 (440hp/561tq)
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.73 12 Bolt
Did you have to cut the drip trays out of the valve covers? How about pushrod clearance with the 1.6?
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
IIRC people said they work w/o problems. If not cutting up the stock valve cover is simple enough.
Junior Member

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: TPiS 383 (440hp/561tq)
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.73 12 Bolt
Whose IIRC? I'm not worried about the valve covers, worried about grinding pushrod openings.....
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Solomons Island Maryland
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4 bbl 305
Transmission: 700R4
you can order a 100 dollar set of 1.6 ratio 3/8 stud rocker arms and put them on stock LO3 cars and make a honest 10-20 horsepower gain
centerbolt rocker arms ARE THE EXACT SAME as the old style heads rocker arms
centerbolt rocker arms ARE THE EXACT SAME as the old style heads rocker arms
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
centerbolt rocker arms ARE THE EXACT SAME as the old style heads rocker arms
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 400
Likes: 15
From: NW/burbs Chicago
Car: 92 CAMARO RALLY SPORT
Engine: 383 sbc w/250 shot of nitrous
Transmission: AMERICAN POWERTRAIN- EXTREME TKX
Axle/Gears: STRANGE ENG. 12 BOLT 3:90 SPOOL
I am running a rather small cam 453 intake 488 exhaust lift, erson spings, locks & retainers no cutting was needed
For the 87 and up roller lifter engine you will need to use the self-aligning rockers
For the 87 and up roller lifter engine you will need to use the self-aligning rockers
lets say i still had the stock cam, stock valve springs, and stock pushrods. Would I be able to use the 1.6 comp cams pro magnum rr still using everything stock? Would I have problems with using the stock pushrods? Thanks.
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: phoenix,AZ
Car: camaro
Engine: mighty 305
Transmission: mighty 700r
we need experts on this one.. it has been discussed in the past.. but when you match the 1.6 rr with lt1 cam it will not work.. so its one or the other with stock heads... IIRC
been thinking baout doing this until i put my lt1 cam in.. can i do anything to use lt1 cam and 1.6RR help me out experts..
Shawn
been thinking baout doing this until i put my lt1 cam in.. can i do anything to use lt1 cam and 1.6RR help me out experts..
Shawn
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Solomons Island Maryland
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4 bbl 305
Transmission: 700R4
yes what i was trying to say the jegs and summit books list rocker arms for centerbolt heads you can get self aligning rocker arms for any year small block chevy
bigREd, you only have to make sure your clearances are where there supposed to be or you could have coil bind in your valve springs. I don't think you have to be concerned about hitting a piston or anything.
25THRSS, you may have more of a valve spring problem running into valve float if you turn your engine too tight, the push rods will be fine.
Steve
25THRSS, you may have more of a valve spring problem running into valve float if you turn your engine too tight, the push rods will be fine.
Steve
Last edited by steve8586iroc; May 1, 2003 at 09:29 PM.
I think 5500rpm would be safe if the springs are new and you have never floated your valves before( valve float weakens your springs and will foat the valves at a lower rpm the next time it happens ). As far a coil bind is concerned you have to know what the min. compressed spring height is and the installed spring height is to find out if the combo of cam lift and rocker ratio will cause the spring to bind ie. cause the coils in the spring to come into contact with each other.
Steve
Steve
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by steve8586iroc
I think 5500rpm would be safe if the springs are new and you have never floated your valves before( valve float weakens your springs and will foat the valves at a lower rpm the next time it happens ). As far a coil bind is concerned you have to know what the min. compressed spring height is and the installed spring height is to find out if the combo of cam lift and rocker ratio will cause the spring to bind ie. cause the coils in the spring to come into contact with each other.
Steve
I think 5500rpm would be safe if the springs are new and you have never floated your valves before( valve float weakens your springs and will foat the valves at a lower rpm the next time it happens ). As far a coil bind is concerned you have to know what the min. compressed spring height is and the installed spring height is to find out if the combo of cam lift and rocker ratio will cause the spring to bind ie. cause the coils in the spring to come into contact with each other.
Steve
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl / Ne.Philly
Car: 96 SS, 88 IROC
Engine: Lt1, TPI
Transmission: m6,a4
Axle/Gears: 3.90. 3.73
Yea guys i would like to know the same thing also, except my engine only has 75k on it. Would I gain anything from adding 1.6 rr to a stock cam engine, i do got an intake and headers/full exhaust
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
from reading other posts i hear you can gain between 10-15HP with 1.6 rockers on a stock 305. I would probably recommend a cam swap if you only have 75K miles. The only reason i am doing 1.6 rockers is because i want alittle more performance before i swap in a 350. I just want to make sure im not going to break anything but when i think about it im only adding .023/.026 lift so it should not be a problem even with stock springs and 152K miles.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
i am almost sure that im going to install some Sealed Power Long Slot 1.6 rocker arms over memorial day weekend. I have one more question, could i reuse the ball and nut that are already on there, or should i invest is some new ones. Ill probably only put another 10-12K (152K right now) on the engine before i get a new 350.
Was doing a little more researching on this and came across this tool on comp cams' website. It gives some good info too. Could this be done with the heads still on the car though?
http://www.compcams.com/catalog/346.html
http://www.compcams.com/catalog/346.html
Alright now I am really confused big time! Comp Cams says it can't be done, but several people have said they installed 1.6 rr with stock heads and cam. Who is right?????!!!!!!!
You will need to multiply the lobe lift of your cam by 1.6 to find the actual lift at the valve (roughly .030 more lift than with 1.5 rockers). I have found that .450 lift(yes some will take more) with 1.5 rockers is safe on factory stock sbc heads without any clearance problems.When using 1.6 rockers the pushrod moves closer to the centerline of the head and may require that you enlarge the pushrod hole for clearance.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I cannot see any reason why we would have any problems, many other people have done this mod and non of them mentions having to enlarge the pushrod holes. Even NJSPEEDER said that is it a direct swap and didnt mention anything about any problems in his post concerning 1.6 rockers and stock cams.
I was just making sure. When I do this I do not want to run into any problems at all and I am just covering all my bases. Thanks For all your help! If anyone has anything to add to this you are more than welcome! Comp Cams kind of confused me by saying that when you switch to 1.6 rockers on stock sbc heads you have to drill for clearance. This made me think that no matter what, you had to do this because of the generalized statement they made. So with the dinky stock L03 cam 1.6 rr will be fine everyone says right? There will be no clearance issuses whatsoever? I sure hope not!
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Bentonville, Ar
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: auto
Okay.. we have established that a stock top end will take 1.6 rr. My question being... I am going to install a set of 081 casting heads, an LT1 cam ( with a 450/460 lift) is there going to be a problem, I done the math to figure the total lift, however I'm not sure what the max is or where to find it.
Scoty
Scoty
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
vjo90RS8,
I noticed you said you're going with an LO5 engine next summer. I have a set of those heads I've been toying with for my '83 C10.
I have a .443"/.465" cam with 214*/224* duration @ .050" and 112 LSA. I checked the valve retainer-to-valve seal clearance and it's RIGHT AT .050" (the minimum clearance recommended).
My heads have had a valve job done, so the valves are sunk into the head a little more than stock. That could be what's contributing to the clearance I do have. I dunno for sure.
I would imagine the stock LO3 heads have similar clearance. If the heads haven't been touched (i.e. stock) then there may be a problem. Get a dial indicator and check.
But you still have to watch for coil bind to. I haven't done that yet.
Sorry.
I noticed you said you're going with an LO5 engine next summer. I have a set of those heads I've been toying with for my '83 C10.
I have a .443"/.465" cam with 214*/224* duration @ .050" and 112 LSA. I checked the valve retainer-to-valve seal clearance and it's RIGHT AT .050" (the minimum clearance recommended).
My heads have had a valve job done, so the valves are sunk into the head a little more than stock. That could be what's contributing to the clearance I do have. I dunno for sure.
I would imagine the stock LO3 heads have similar clearance. If the heads haven't been touched (i.e. stock) then there may be a problem. Get a dial indicator and check.
But you still have to watch for coil bind to. I haven't done that yet.
Sorry. Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
Street Lethal
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 12, 2015 11:33 AM





Where will all the metal shavings go?
