edelbrock cam vs. LT1 cam
edelbrock cam vs. LT1 cam
Do the Edelbrock PerformancePlus cam for the 305 TBI, http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/cams_chevy.html
have a 0/0 valve lash. I can't tell...I'm a newbie
Is the LT1 cam (.050" tappet lift intake/exhaust is 205/207; and maximum lift with 1.5:1 rocker ratio intake/exhaust is .447/.459. Valve lash is zero/zero and lobe centerline is 116 degrees) more aggressive than the Edelbrock cam...again I'm not sure...I'm a newbie
.
I've been told to get a cam with Edelbrock PerformancePlus specs (194/214) instead of the LT1 specs (205/207).
Akshay
have a 0/0 valve lash. I can't tell...I'm a newbie
Is the LT1 cam (.050" tappet lift intake/exhaust is 205/207; and maximum lift with 1.5:1 rocker ratio intake/exhaust is .447/.459. Valve lash is zero/zero and lobe centerline is 116 degrees) more aggressive than the Edelbrock cam...again I'm not sure...I'm a newbie
. I've been told to get a cam with Edelbrock PerformancePlus specs (194/214) instead of the LT1 specs (205/207).
Akshay
Last edited by Akshay; May 4, 2003 at 02:58 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 1
From: Morris, IL
Car: '91 t-top RS; '91 hrdtp Z28
Engine: LO3;383tpi
Transmission: 700r4;very nice 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 zt posi, 3.70 auburn
Dude, in my opinion, the edelbrock power package for tbi as a whole is a joke. Mainly because of the cam that come with it, which is the one i'm assuming you are talking about( the link you posted didn't work). Anyways, the LT1 cam works great with 305s and will cost a fraction of the price.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: Alburnett,Iowa,USA
Car: 92RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: 700R4
Re: edelbrock cam vs. LT1 cam
Originally posted by Akshay
I've been told to get a cam with Edelbrock PerformancePlus specs (194/214) instead of the LT1 specs (205/207).
Akshay
I've been told to get a cam with Edelbrock PerformancePlus specs (194/214) instead of the LT1 specs (205/207).
Akshay
The cam specs on my daily driver are 208/221 and.474/.510 lift
The specs I have on the LT1 are 201/208 dur.
I assume that the reason you are considering changing cams is you would like a little more power. That Edelbrock cam is a waste of time and money.
If you are considering a cam change IMO the LT1 cam is the minimum daily requirement for a LO3. Besides, you can pick up a used one cheap. ($35-$50)
Dont know what your other mods are, but you need headers and a free flowing exhaust if you are going to get any power out of your L03.
Originally posted by fly89gta
I have a bigger cam than that going into my 3.8
Just curiou, what are the specs on a stock LO3 cam
I have a bigger cam than that going into my 3.8
Just curiou, what are the specs on a stock LO3 cam Akshay
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: Alburnett,Iowa,USA
Car: 92RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: 700R4
Not yet, got some more things to experiment with yet and fine tune before I get some times(wanna make it count). Then next year I want to throw everything on a 350 short block.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
your really comapiring apples and oranges there. the edelbrock cam in question is a flat tappet while the other is a rolelr cam. The flat tappet cam wont work with the stock roller lifters. I have an edelbrock flat tappet cam in my 350 and with a near stock setup its a very good match. Although it doesnt have much top end power, it has excelent mid range torque. The only roller cam listed there, if im reading it correctly, is the performer rpm HR. I assure you that this will be WAY too much cam for your setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





