E/T times
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: BAKERSFIELD
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: TH-700R4 w/Shift kit
E/T times
what are everyones e/t times in the 1/4. if someone had a auto with 2.73 that would help im just wondering what kinda times my car would get
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
well i have hte same mods as you
but a 5-speed and 3.08s
i ran 16.1 @ 89MPH (yeah you read that right)
so if you can get traction, you whould be upper 15's
but a 5-speed and 3.08s
i ran 16.1 @ 89MPH (yeah you read that right)
so if you can get traction, you whould be upper 15's
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Randleman,nc
Car: 87 BUICK GN
Engine: 3.8 TURBO
Transmission: 200R4
hey dude
hey
the last time out i ran a 10.51 @ 67 mph with a 2.32 60 ft thats a 1/8 mile
car is basically stock except for free mods auto with 2.73 gears.
k/n air cleaner mods gutted cat soon to get a cat- back exhaust and a chip burnt
the last time out i ran a 10.51 @ 67 mph with a 2.32 60 ft thats a 1/8 mile
car is basically stock except for free mods auto with 2.73 gears.
k/n air cleaner mods gutted cat soon to get a cat- back exhaust and a chip burnt
Last edited by SC2camaro; Jun 14, 2003 at 08:52 AM.
Trending Topics
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
tbi, 5-speed, 3.08, no ac, no power windows, no power lock, no power at all *lol*
mods:
accel 300+ wires
aluminium driveshaft
10x2 open element
filled it up with 100octane gas (shell v-power)
I ran a 16.1@82.87
I woul say it's a good time for a nearly stock lo3 with heavy steel rims!
greetz
S!MON
mods:
accel 300+ wires
aluminium driveshaft
10x2 open element
filled it up with 100octane gas (shell v-power)
I ran a 16.1@82.87
I woul say it's a good time for a nearly stock lo3 with heavy steel rims!
greetz
S!MON
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
my totally stock lo3 with 2.73 and an auto ran 18.4, though there's a LOT of reasons to doubt it, some of them being I was running on low air un-even bald tires, with a ton of extra weight in the car(stuff not people), and it was my first time out there. And thats just SOME of it, so i really wouldn't go by my time, i intend to go back out there and clear my name!
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
see sig for time.
Mods:
Hooker 3" cat-back
Cat delete
Open Element
Accel 8.8mm wires
Accel Cap/Rotor
+2* timing
Tires:
215/65/15 Potenza RE92's
(rears @ 24lbs)
the 15.8 ET was on a 2.456 60ft(at a bad traction track).
Car has the pegleg 2.73 non-posi rear-end. Car is definately capable of a 2.2 60ft. Guarantee when I run at a better track and advance timing to ~8* it'll come down and the car will be mid 15's.
Motor has 207,000kms
Mods:
Hooker 3" cat-back
Cat delete
Open Element
Accel 8.8mm wires
Accel Cap/Rotor
+2* timing
Tires:
215/65/15 Potenza RE92's
(rears @ 24lbs)
the 15.8 ET was on a 2.456 60ft(at a bad traction track).
Car has the pegleg 2.73 non-posi rear-end. Car is definately capable of a 2.2 60ft. Guarantee when I run at a better track and advance timing to ~8* it'll come down and the car will be mid 15's.
Motor has 207,000kms
Last edited by RegaPlanet; Jun 11, 2003 at 02:42 PM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 62
From: Plano IL
Car: 92 Firebird,74 Nova
Engine: Stock tbi,Vortec 350
Transmission: T56, th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 LSD, 2.73 open
on the g-tech i ran a 15.8 before any mods and less than a 1/4 tread left which was also dry rotted. i havent tried it yet on my new tires and with my headers with full cat back.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
oh hey s!mon, i didn't see this until just now, but you should try going out to the track on a lower octane, try 91 or 89 or even 87, ill bet you you'll run better times.
100 octane is overkill unless you have a high, high compression cast-iron headed engine with a high degree advance.
100 octane is overkill unless you have a high, high compression cast-iron headed engine with a high degree advance.
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
hmmm. I felt the differnce (positive) after I filled my tank with this stuff! but I won't do it anymore: 1.23€/liter! that's definatley too much for me! now I fill in 95 or 98octane gas, because I will set the timing a little bit higher.
but thx and greetz
S!MON
but thx and greetz
S!MON
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Selinsgrove, Pa, USA
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 94 p/u motor
Transmission: 700R4 With TCI kit
Originally posted by Dewey316
well i have hte same mods as you
but a 5-speed and 3.08s
i ran 16.1 @ 89MPH (yeah you read that right)
so if you can get traction, you whould be upper 15's
well i have hte same mods as you
but a 5-speed and 3.08s
i ran 16.1 @ 89MPH (yeah you read that right)
so if you can get traction, you whould be upper 15's
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Selinsgrove, Pa, USA
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 94 p/u motor
Transmission: 700R4 With TCI kit
Re: hey dude
Originally posted by SC2camaro
hey
the last time out i ran a 10.51 @ 67 mph with a 2.32 60 ft
car is basically stock except for free mods auto with 2.73 gears.
k/n air cleaner mods gutted cat soon to get a cat- back exhaust and a chip burnt
hey
the last time out i ran a 10.51 @ 67 mph with a 2.32 60 ft
car is basically stock except for free mods auto with 2.73 gears.
k/n air cleaner mods gutted cat soon to get a cat- back exhaust and a chip burnt
Anyone else see something wrong with this!!!!!??????!!!!!!
Time is WAYYY OFFF MPH IS WAYYYY OFF. but at least the 60' seems reasonable. LOL
Either bad type-o or this guy is
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




