TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

can I convert my lo3 to a rev monster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2003, 02:47 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
S!MON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
can I convert my lo3 to a rev monster?

I really like 1/4 mile runs, but racing on a cicuit is the real thing. so I think I don't need hundreds of horsepower (ok, a few of them would be nice ) and much more torque!
so what's to do, to make this engine ready for, hmmm, let me say 7000rpm??

what kind of cam do I need (is a LT1 even with chip tuning to small)? what can I do against unbalance, do I need special heads (afr should always be good) , what is a good manifold for that, aftermarket tbi etc.etc.

I'm looking forward for your replies.
greetz

S!MON

Last edited by S!MON; 09-17-2003 at 02:52 PM.
S!MON is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 02:49 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
why are you planning on spinngin to 7k?

just gear accordingly based on your HP peaks, and it will get around a road course just fine. do the normal buildups for power.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 03:00 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
 
S!MON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
mhh, I just like the idea!

and I also know a guy with a third gen bird. he's got a mean 435 in it and has the rev limiter anywhere at 7500! on a meeting in switzerland he has blown a big block gto and cars like that (on the mile), and he says that's just because he can rev that much. when the others had to shift he was able to pull away...

that's his page: www.trans-am.de

so what do you think? when I do a "normal" build up, what is a "normal" rpm then? anywhere at 6k?

S!MON
S!MON is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 03:03 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
Mark305TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '00 Chevrolet Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
The 305 doesn't make the best rev motor with it's long stroke and small bore.
Mark305TBI is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
kevm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Nope. I would recommend a 400 block with a 350 crank. Big bore, short stroke. That's a 377.5 including 0.030" over on the block.
kevm14 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:53 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
kevm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Whoops, double post...
kevm14 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:57 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
leaving out the entire "305s are poorly designed for making power"


you would have to take apart the entire motor and have it balanced. THEN you would have to bring the valvetrain upto snuff to take it... and install a cam that can breath there.. and that would mean either major work on thoes heads, or new heads....



so, you would have to rebuild teh entire engine to make it rev that high and have it make power.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:57 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
brings up a small point...

if you totally rebuild and modify a l03, is it still a l03?
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 11:05 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
kevm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RI
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
If you MUST have a high revving 5 liter, then make it a 302. 4x3 bore and stroke. Doing this or using my short stroke 377.5 idea, is fine - but a 305 really isn't up to the challenge. Like someone suggested, you will need to have everything balanced to pretty high standards and you might even have to use special light weight components. And in the end, you have an engine that makes the same HP at 7500rpm that a 350 (or even a 377.5) could make at, say, 6000rpm.
kevm14 is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 11:13 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
brodyscamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CC, TX
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by MrDude_1
brings up a small point...

if you totally rebuild and modify a l03, is it still a l03?
Nope, makes it a 305 with TBI
brodyscamaro is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 12:24 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Z28GEN3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buckeye AZ
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 is supposedly a better block. but why would you want to rev that high in a 5 liter? like one guy said reving at 7500rpms your still making the same power that a 5.7 liter makes at 6000rpms at least with a 350ci you can gain more power but a 400ci is better. Iknow a fella who has a 700HP+ 3rdgen who pulls 10's with a 400ci block. hell i have 1969SS 327ci engine thats got a max RPM range of 5000 and makes well over 400HP and TQ long before it ever gets to 5000rpm's.
Z28GEN3 is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 12:35 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
Mark305TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '00 Chevrolet Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by AZCamaroPhreak
302 is supposedly a better block. but why would you want to rev that high in a 5 liter? like one guy said reving at 7500rpms your still making the same power that a 5.7 liter makes at 6000rpms at least with a 350ci you can gain more power but a 400ci is better. Iknow a fella who has a 700HP+ 3rdgen who pulls 10's with a 400ci block. hell i have 1969SS 327ci engine thats got a max RPM range of 5000 and makes well over 400HP and TQ long before it ever gets to 5000rpm's.
It's alot easier on parts having big cubes and low revs, too. A 7000 rpm sbc would have to have a stout *** bottom end.
Mark305TBI is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 01:02 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
kfoley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Palestine, IN (Just East of Indy)
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T5, 3.23 posi
If you want to rev a motor high that means you'll need to invest in good parts. All forged bottom end, Callais light weight billet crank, Manley 4340 I beam rods (to recuce reciprocating weight) and some good SRP/JE lightweight pistons. The whole assembly needs to be balanced as close as possible. Valvetrain will also need to be top notch. You'll need a solid cam, 4130 steel pushrods, shaft rockers are reccomended, large springs to keep the valves under control at 7.5k. The heads will need to flow like mad to make lots of power up high. You'll need to run a large cam to be making max power at 7k, so don't plan on it having a stock idle or having great street manners. If you want to run to 7500, you're going to have to spend some money on high quality parts if you want it to stay together. Personally I don't know why you would want ot rev it that high unless you were a serious racer (like professional, sponsored). You could spend a whole lot less money and only take it up to 6k, plus you would have plenty of low end which is what makes the SBC great. Of course you don't have to have all the parts listed above to have a motor that revs to 7500, but that's the way to make it last if you plan on revving it that high more than a few times.
kfoley is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 01:29 AM
  #14  
Member

Thread Starter
 
S!MON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
that's what I also thougt! a lot of high quality parts...

hmm, as you said, a traditional build up with 6k in the end should also work. I think that's a good compromise!
I also think, that the big cam would be the biggest problem for a daily driver.
ok, let's see what I will do.

first of all, I will start this winter with the good ol' hot rodding: in words-full exhaust!
greetz

S!MON
S!MON is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 01:43 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
 
kfoley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Palestine, IN (Just East of Indy)
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: WC T5, 3.23 posi
Full exhaust will help a bunch...
kfoley is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 02:15 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
Mark305TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '00 Chevrolet Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by kfoley
Full exhaust will help a bunch...
I agree. Headers & cat-back, and/or posi & 3.73s (3.42's at least) will make your car feel totally different. Well worth the money. Then later on, when you've got the money, build yourself a new motor with big cubes.
Mark305TBI is offline  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:43 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
M1tch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z
Engine: 496 BBC
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Originally posted by MrDude_1
leaving out the entire "305s are poorly designed for making power"
not true, read some articles where you can have 324 horsepower for $1500. Its somewhere in here.

They took heads, cam, and intake and created 324 horsepower from a 305 tbi.
M1tch is offline  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:55 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I am also leaving out the whole 305-350 debate for this one. But I can say that I turn my 312 to 6,500 rpm @ WOT 1-2 upshifts. That is where it shifts with my foot on the floor. It takes a Very PRECISELY balanced bottem end, 4 bolt mains, (Studed mains and rods would be a good idea), forged crank, X-rods, Forged pistons (mine had everything but the Forged Pistons), good valve springs, hardened pushrods, guideplates, light weight valvetrain components, throw out the exhaust valve rotator, lighter valves, heavily ported 305 TPI or carb castings, a good cam with healthy lift, a 454 TBI, and the least restrictive intake and exhaust setup you can find. It can be done and has been done. Peak RWHP on my setup is at 5,500 RPM, but the engine is still pulling HARD at 6,500. 6,400 is about as high as you can accurately control the injector as the TBI injector firings become way to closely paired. It takes a BIG injector to spin the engine to high RPMs. Think 68 lb/hr @ 32 PSI big.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:50 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by M1tch
not true, read some articles where you can have 324 horsepower for $1500. Its somewhere in here.

They took heads, cam, and intake and created 324 horsepower from a 305 tbi.
thank you for bringing up a 3 year old thread just to quote some incorrect info where, once more, someone mistakes a destroked 4" bore 305 for a production 305.

and even if it is a production 305, with the amount of work you have to do to get there, its unimpressive and foolish.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 11:33 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
If its the article I am thinking of they used a STOCK LG4 305 with bolt-ons to achieve 325 FWHP. All they did was stab in a comp xtreme energy 262, mill down some vortecs, and use a single plane intake for vortec heads, and headers.

Building the same engine, I would port the milled vortecs some, use a Comp Extreme energy 268 or 274 cam, and use a dual plane manifold such as the RPM for Vortec heads. That would give you more HP and more torque.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-20-2005, 01:44 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BronYrAur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Why are all these old-*** thread getting brought up to say some comment like this:

not true, read some articles where you can have 324 horsepower for $1500. Its somewhere in here.
Please don't do that, don't bring back a 3 year old thread to say something like that. He probably read either a stroker site or that stupid "goingfaster" site. Anybody that tells you 305's are built for making power is either lying to you or he's a fool. Simple as that. Rebuilding a 305 is possibly the worst idea of anyone working on SBCs when you can build a larger bore motor for probably less money, including the purchase of a block.

Seems like a lot of "I read somewheres" going on here lately. I dont care much for magazine buildups and how much power they made, I don't put any stock in them which is why I don't read them.
BronYrAur is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:32 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
M1tch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z
Engine: 496 BBC
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 4.11
I never said 305s are for making power. BUT they can just like any other engine.
M1tch is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:42 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by BronYrAur
Anybody that tells you 305's are built for making power is either lying to you or he's a fool. Simple as that. Rebuilding a 305 is possibly the worst idea of anyone working on SBCs when you can build a larger bore motor for probably less money, including the purchase of a block.
A 1.8 Honda doesn't make any power stock, but I have seen one make 325 RWHP on the dyno naturally aspirated at 10,000 rpm. Took alot of money but it was done. I have seen one put out over 650 RWHP on the dyno with a turbo.

I have also seen a 305 put out over 400 RWHP Naturally aspirated on the dyno with "stock"(undercover acid ported) 601 head castings, flat-tappet cam, Brezenski preped GM Q-Jet manifold and an 800 Q-Jet.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:03 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BronYrAur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
That's just great, but its never the "smart" thing to do, to build a 305 up. I never said you can't make power with one, obviously you can, its an engine with bad heads and cam stock, of course you can make more power with different parts. Personally, I think trying to make that kind of power out of a Honda is even dumber, which explains my dislike for r!cers.

My point was not that it could be done, but most people on this forum are on budgets. If you want the most power possible for the least amount of money, a larger bore motor is the best way to go.
BronYrAur is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:13 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by BronYrAur
My point was not that it could be done, but most people on this forum are on budgets. If you want the most power possible for the least amount of money, a larger bore motor is the best way to go.
My point is that GM 350 engines don't grow on trees and almost every TBI thirdgen I can think of came with a 305 from the General. I find it cheaper to build what you have then to pay $400.00 for a 350 core. Then you factor in that it will cost you ALOT more fuel over the life of the engine. I think the key to making power in a 305 is to make the heads flow, a good cam, and then spin the snoot out of it.

That being said, I know you can only go so far with a 305. I am stuck at 15.45 @ 94.08 and a 2.15 second 60 foot, with mine right now. I have a bigger bore, much longer stroke engine going togather on my engine stand built to swallow some juice. Think 450 FWHP 396 smallblock with a 150 shot. Hopefully 13s N/A and 12s on the Juice. I would use the nitrous on the current 305, but I think the 700r4 would blow to pieces. I am swapping to a piggy back PCM run 4L80E when the 396 goes into place. Still going to be TBI.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:22 PM
  #26  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by Fast355
My point is that GM 350 engines don't grow on trees and almost every TBI thirdgen I can think of came with a 305 from the General. I find it cheaper to build what you have then to pay $400.00 for a 350 core.
350s might not grow on trees, but that doesn't matter, they're more common than dirt. For $400 do they at least use vaseline? I don't know where you're buying your 350 cores, but I've had entire running used 350 engines for $250 CDN. I just bought two good used short blocks not long ago for $50 CDN each.

If price is your major concern, then there's nothing wrong with building what you've got, as long as all the parts you have are reusable. When you start replacing rotating assembly parts it quickly becomes comparable to the cost of building a 350. If you're more worried about power, don't even bother with a 305, and get your hands on the biggest displacement block you can find.
Apeiron is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:30 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Double

Last edited by Fast355; 12-20-2005 at 07:37 PM.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 02:11 AM
  #28  
Member

Thread Starter
 
S!MON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro Z28
Engine: fully loaded 350
Transmission: T5-World Class
btw as thread starter:

It was a long way from this thread to the actual engine.

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=315210

way better now good for low 13s so far maybe less with more tuning and a better exhaust.

greetings

Simon
S!MON is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:13 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by M1tch
I never said 305s are for making power. BUT they can just like any other engine.
no. they cant.

the damn bore is too small.. its a huge disadvantage.

take a 302 (4" bore, shorter stroke), a 327 (still 4" bore), a 350(4") or even a 377/383....

they all flow ALOT more air then 305s.

the aftermarket heads that flow even more air, fit on them.

305s are at a distinct disadvantage. their tiny bore.

Originally posted by Fast355

I have also seen a 305 put out over 400 RWHP Naturally aspirated on the dyno with "stock"(undercover acid ported) 601 head castings, flat-tappet cam, Brezenski preped GM Q-Jet manifold and an 800 Q-Jet.
thank you.
you're either telling me you're full of ****, or that you're naive and easily mislead.

Originally posted by Fast355
My point is that GM 350 engines don't grow on trees and almost every TBI thirdgen I can think of came with a 305 from the General.
but 350 cores are VERY plentiful... they made SEVERAL MILLION of them, and they're still making them.
every TBI thirdgen came with a 305 POS motor. every part of that motor must be replaced to have something resembling performance.

Originally posted by Fast355
I find it cheaper to build what you have then to pay $400.00 for a 350 core.
really? because by the time you do all of the extra work required to make your 305 as fast as a basic 350, you will have spent FAR MORE then $400

Originally posted by Fast355
Then you factor in that it will cost you ALOT more fuel over the life of the engine.
fuel is used when you make power. yes, if you make more power, you'll use more fuel.
this is probly the stupidest argument ive ever heard... if you want to get into fuel consumed per unit of power output... well, you're on the losing end with that motor... the same bottlenecks and inefficiency's that make it a crappy performance motor, also make it have a low BSFC.....



Originally posted by Fast355
I think the key to making power in a 305 is to make the heads flow, a good cam, and then spin the snoot out of it.
nice thoughts, but lets recap what you just said.
heads flow.. well they're going to suck on the bore, and you cant swap most of the cheap aftermarket heads on it... but lets pretend you have magic ported heads that fit.
cam.. well, they're all the same price, doesnt matter if its a mild grind or extreme.. only real cost diff is roller or non roller.

spin the snot out of it?! HA!!!
you need new rods, crank, and of course a good valvetrain... in other words, you'll have to rebuild the entire shortblock....
you have just lost your cost savings of building the 305 over the 4" bore block.


Originally posted by Fast355

That being said, I know you can only go so far with a 305. I am stuck at 15.45 @ 94.08 and a 2.15 second 60 foot, with mine right now. I have a bigger bore, much longer stroke engine going together on my engine stand built to swallow some juice. Think 450 FWHP 396 smallblock with a 150 shot. Hopefully 13s N/A and 12s on the Juice. I would use the nitrous on the current 305, but I think the 700r4 would blow to pieces. I am swapping to a piggy back PCM run 4L80E when the 396 goes into place. Still going to be TBI.
so even you know that the 305 is a POS and you're going to replace it... why argue about its "performance aspects" ?!
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:33 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
91ChevyRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1998 Volvo S70
Engine: B5254S Engine
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: It's a volvo?
Originally posted by MrDude_1
no. they cant.

the damn bore is too small.. its a huge disadvantage.

take a 302 (4" bore, shorter stroke), a 327 (still 4" bore), a 350(4") or even a 377/383....

they all flow ALOT more air then 305s.

the aftermarket heads that flow even more air, fit on them.

305s are at a distinct disadvantage. their tiny bore.


thank you.
you're either telling me you're full of ****, or that you're naive and easily mislead.



but 350 cores are VERY plentiful... they made SEVERAL MILLION of them, and they're still making them.
every TBI thirdgen came with a 305 POS motor. every part of that motor must be replaced to have something resembling performance.



really? because by the time you do all of the extra work required to make your 305 as fast as a basic 350, you will have spent FAR MORE then $400



fuel is used when you make power. yes, if you make more power, you'll use more fuel.
this is probly the stupidest argument ive ever heard... if you want to get into fuel consumed per unit of power output... well, you're on the losing end with that motor... the same bottlenecks and inefficiency's that make it a crappy performance motor, also make it have a low BSFC.....





nice thoughts, but lets recap what you just said.
heads flow.. well they're going to suck on the bore, and you cant swap most of the cheap aftermarket heads on it... but lets pretend you have magic ported heads that fit.
cam.. well, they're all the same price, doesnt matter if its a mild grind or extreme.. only real cost diff is roller or non roller.

spin the snot out of it?! HA!!!
you need new rods, crank, and of course a good valvetrain... in other words, you'll have to rebuild the entire shortblock....
you have just lost your cost savings of building the 305 over the 4" bore block.




so even you know that the 305 is a POS and you're going to replace it... why argue about its "performance aspects" ?!
I don't think you have any right to say that a 305 motor is a POS...just because you have a damn LS1 powered horsepower hog doesn't mean you can be a wise *** and start snooting around and talk down to 305s. Yeah ok, you proved your point, without spending the moolah you won't get any real power out of the 305, but the engine is rock solid and you can still get some decent gains from minor mods...


All I have to say is wow....the ignorance of some people

EDIT: And I for one have to say that, I am not gonna be looking at the 305 as a 300hp goal kinda thing...I wanna set my standards low for this car, if I can achieve 200-230rwhp then I'll be a solid guy. If I wanted anything more I'll go buy myself an LT1 car and already stock I am faster than a 305. But again, before you start talking down and spitting on people with those that have 305s...and do NOT have the 4-5k dollars for an LS1 engine, why don't you take a look on the TBI boards and see what some of those guys are running with their built cars....some of these guys are running low to mid 14s all day long with just a mild cam, intake and full exhaust...that's it.

You have also got to understand the 305 came out of the factory RESTRICTIVE, so stupid minor mods like an open element, full exhaust will make an enormous difference in power and acceleration. It's not unheard of....I plan on making my car a very low 14 1/4 mile car, if I can't do that well it sucks for me, atleast i still have a 15 second car and while thats not all that fast its still decent enough...and oh yes one more thing you literally responded to everything Fast355 said about his engine and what not. Look at what he's driving there fellow, its not a thirdgen car its a 4000lbs Chevrolet G20 van, thats right a van...he built his engine to make it to a 15.4, 1/4 mile, and his rear wheel horsepower is 272hp...what did he start out with? A POS 305 as you so eloquently put it, just imagine if he had that built 305 in a thirdgen Camaro or Firebird, yeah that thing is definitely a 14 second car, maybe high 13s...

Last edited by 91ChevyRS; 12-21-2005 at 10:48 AM.
91ChevyRS is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 10:55 AM
  #31  
Member
 
mrpopo573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1974 Chevrolet Pro Street Pickup
Engine: Built 454
Transmission: T-400
Axle/Gears: 4.10 soon to be 3.08
Originally posted by 91ChevyRS
I don't think you have any right to say that a 305 motor is a POS...just because you have a damn LS1 powered horsepower hog doesn't mean you can be a wise *** and start snooting around and talk down to 305s. Yeah ok, you proved your point, without spending the moolah you won't get any real power out of the 305, but the engine is rock solid and you can still get some decent gains from minor mods...


All I have to say is wow....the ignorance of some people

EDIT: And I for one have to say that, I am not gonna be looking at the 305 as a 300hp goal kinda thing...I wanna set my standards low for this car, if I can achieve 200-230rwhp then I'll be a solid guy. If I wanted anything more I'll go buy myself an LT1 car and already stock I am faster than a 305. But again, before you start talking down and spitting on people with those that have 305s...and do NOT have the 4-5k dollars for an LS1 engine, why don't you take a look on the TBI boards and see what some of those guys are running with their built cars....some of these guys are running low to mid 14s all day long with just a mild cam, intake and full exhaust...that's it.

You have also got to understand the 305 came out of the factory RESTRICTIVE, so stupid minor mods like an open element, full exhaust will make an enormous difference in power and acceleration. It's not unheard of....I plan on making my car a very low 14 1/4 mile car, if I can't do that well it sucks for me, atleast i still have a 15 second car and while thats not all that fast its still decent enough...and oh yes one more thing you literally responded to everything Fast355 said about his engine and what not. Look at what he's driving there fellow, its not a thirdgen car its a 4000lbs Chevrolet G20 van, thats right a van...he built his engine to make it to a 15.4, 1/4 mile, and his rear wheel horsepower is 272hp...what did he start out with? A POS 305 as you so eloquently put it, just imagine if he had that built 305 in a thirdgen Camaro or Firebird, yeah that thing is definitely a 14 second car, maybe high 13s...
Perfectly Said.
mrpopo573 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 12:37 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 91ChevyRS
I don't think you have any right to say that a 305 motor is a POS...just because you have a damn LS1 powered horsepower hog doesn't mean you can be a wise *** and start snooting around and talk down to 305s. Yeah ok, you proved your point, without spending the moolah you won't get any real power out of the 305, but the engine is rock solid and you can still get some decent gains from minor mods...


All I have to say is wow....the ignorance of some people

EDIT: And I for one have to say that, I am not gonna be looking at the 305 as a 300hp goal kinda thing...I wanna set my standards low for this car, if I can achieve 200-230rwhp then I'll be a solid guy. If I wanted anything more I'll go buy myself an LT1 car and already stock I am faster than a 305. But again, before you start talking down and spitting on people with those that have 305s...and do NOT have the 4-5k dollars for an LS1 engine, why don't you take a look on the TBI boards and see what some of those guys are running with their built cars....some of these guys are running low to mid 14s all day long with just a mild cam, intake and full exhaust...that's it.

You have also got to understand the 305 came out of the factory RESTRICTIVE, so stupid minor mods like an open element, full exhaust will make an enormous difference in power and acceleration. It's not unheard of....I plan on making my car a very low 14 1/4 mile car, if I can't do that well it sucks for me, atleast i still have a 15 second car and while thats not all that fast its still decent enough...and oh yes one more thing you literally responded to everything Fast355 said about his engine and what not. Look at what he's driving there fellow, its not a thirdgen car its a 4000lbs Chevrolet G20 van, thats right a van...he built his engine to make it to a 15.4, 1/4 mile, and his rear wheel horsepower is 272hp...what did he start out with? A POS 305 as you so eloquently put it, just imagine if he had that built 305 in a thirdgen Camaro or Firebird, yeah that thing is definitely a 14 second car, maybe high 13s...


psst.

what do you think was in my RS for years before i finally saved up enough to change motors?

i have every right to state any opinion i want about the motor, having done more with them then the far majority of other people on this site.
i didnt go as far as a few other specific people, but i think low 15s was damn good for a car with a 2.0 sixty....

that said..
the motor is still a boat anchor that is better off scrapped then rebuilt, when it comes time to rebuild....


edit:
dont take it as a personal insult just because you have one. i hated the POS when i had it in my car as well... just because you own it doesnt make it any better, step back and look at it from the full outside perspective.
sure, you probably cant afford to replace it. i sure as hell couldnt afford to break anything on my car for the first few years i owned it.. i bearly had enough money for the open element.. lol.
that doesnt mean its any better then when you have all the cash in the world to replace it.
just because i saved for a year (driving a fuggin TERCEL at that to save money) to buy a better motor, doesnt mean im "above you" and it doesnt mean i lost the knowledge i gained while owning the 305.

Last edited by MrDude_1; 12-21-2005 at 12:41 PM.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 12:46 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Exactly. There is "Faster than it was stock" . . . Then there is "Fast".

You are never going to be fast with a 305. With the deluge of 500hp cars coming out of the factory's, a 305 just won't cut it. For the small fortune you could spend trying to get a 305 into the 12's NA, you could be solidly in the 11's or 10's with a 4" bore motor.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:18 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
91ChevyRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1998 Volvo S70
Engine: B5254S Engine
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: It's a volvo?
Originally posted by Dewey316
Exactly. There is "Faster than it was stock" . . . Then there is "Fast".

You are never going to be fast with a 305. With the deluge of 500hp cars coming out of the factory's, a 305 just won't cut it. For the small fortune you could spend trying to get a 305 into the 12's NA, you could be solidly in the 11's or 10's with a 4" bore motor.
Again, I am not trying to see if my car is going to make it to 500hp...and although I considered it awhile back, I am not one of those people who will throw away a perfectly good motor to replace it with another...

I mean if my motor is crapping out and exploding on sight then yeah ok, I'll get a 350 or slap in an LT1 but its not doing any of that stuff. My car has been through alot, and hearing the past adventures of it makes me love the engine even more.

I figured if I am gonna get an LT1, I am gonna get a car that was made for the LT1, i.e. 4th gen Z28s/Trans Ams

I am saving a few of my dollars for one, but in the same process am doing some modifications to my car.
91ChevyRS is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:27 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
Dewey316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
91ChevyRS

Funny how the guys who plan to do stuff, stick up for the 305's.

The guys who you quote as running low-mid 14's all day. Are the guys telling people to go with a big-bore motor. Those of us who have put in the effort, who are making the numbers you talk about, are the first to tell you to go with a 350. You don't even want to think about the number of hours I have put into this motor, in sheer effort, trying to make it run right, and get the numbers out of it.
Dewey316 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:29 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 91ChevyRS

I mean if my motor is crapping out and exploding on sight then yeah ok, I'll get a 350 or slap in an LT1 but its not doing any of that stuff. My car has been through alot, and hearing the past adventures of it makes me love the engine even more.

ah, so what you're saying is you have a illogical emotional attachment to your motor, and thats why you're all offended when something insulting about it comes along.
that somewhat makes sense.


btw, if you're considering later model motor swaps, you should really look at the LS1 setups... the price is about the same as LT1s were a couple years ago.. and you'll be able to expand into the modern performance era... not to say that the LT1 isnt a great upgrade, but theres not as many vendors backing it anymore.. its going to become the oddball motor between gen I and genIII+
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 02:52 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
you know what just occured to me?

look at my first post in this thread:
"305s are poorly designed for making power"

mmk, that was posted in 2003.

in 2003, i had the L03 still in my car... and that was right around its "peak" time where it was running its fastest.
yet i still just stuck to the facts back then.... so i dont see how me owning a better motor now makes my opinion any less valuable.
atleast ive DONE it. you're still at the "planning" stage, and you're telling me...... lol.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 02:58 PM
  #38  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by MrDude_1
you know what just occured to me?

look at my first post in this thread:
"305s are poorly designed for making power"

atleast ive DONE it. you're still at the "planning" stage, and you're telling me...... lol.
I have built one and you still tell me off.
A damn 6.0 Vortec Express with a 4L65E and 3.73s, granted it is a little heavier is over a full second behind me in the 1/4 mile.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:02 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Fast355
I have built one and you still tell me off.
A damn 6.0 Vortec Express with a 4L65E and 3.73s, granted it is a little heavier is over a full second behind me in the 1/4 mile.
yea well, you said alot of things i dont agree with. lol
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:20 PM
  #40  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by MrDude_1
yea well, you said alot of things i dont agree with. lol
Because you couldn't get 275 RWHP from a 305 TBI?

BTW, My G20 is closer to 5,500 lbs with me in it.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:32 PM
  #41  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Fast355
Because you couldn't get 275 RWHP from a 305 TBI?

BTW, My G20 is closer to 5,500 lbs with me in it.
no.
because you think its worth the effort to get 275hp from a 305.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:36 PM
  #42  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Well lets just say that with a 350 you should have 315 HP to the wheels.

Getting 275 RWHP out of the 305 wasn't that tough!

What I don't understand is why you think the LS1 is a worthwhile swap! I am building a 450 FWHP 396 small block that will surely cost less than your LS1 swap and surely alot less headaches.

Oh, and I honestly don't think an LS1 would fit!

Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:43 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Fast355
[B]
What I don't understand is why you think the LS1 is a worthwhile swap! I am building a 450 FWHP 396 small block that will surely cost less than your LS1 swap and surely alot less headaches.

Oh, and I honestly don't think an LS1 would fit!
then you honestly need to do ALOT more research.

btw, the LS1 is smaller then the SBC.....


and i only have ~3k in my entire swap... thats about the same full cost as a very basic SBC rebuild.


but whatever, you obviously arnt informed about it, and you obviously arnt going to try to learn from me, so go do your thing, i'll do mine...
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:54 PM
  #44  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by MrDude_1
then you honestly need to do ALOT more research.

btw, the LS1 is smaller then the SBC.....


and i only have ~3k in my entire swap... thats about the same full cost as a very basic SBC rebuild.


but whatever, you obviously arnt informed about it, and you obviously arnt going to try to learn from me, so go do your thing, i'll do mine...
Lets see factory LS1 vs. Built 396. With the 450 HP I stated, it will be around 550 ft/lbs! Built to swallow a 150 shot or a blower at that. What else is there to learn.

A very basic SBC rebuild is much less that 3K. I can go buy a GM goodwrench 250 HP 350 for about $1,600, swap to vortecs, upgrade the cam, buy an intake, sell the factory stuff on Ebay, and will be 350-400 FWHP for $2,000.

I have about $900.00 into a FULL rebuild on my 305.

The top-end of a LS1 is WIDER than a standard small block, I have done research. It required hacking on the heater-A/C box to get one in a friends Monte Carlo SS. I would be hacking on the frame and dog house area=NOT GOOD. The LS1 is as wide if not wider than a Big Block up top. Look up the measurements, I am sure they are on the net somewhere. Then lets not even get into the Fact the A/C would be smacking the Cross Member.

Last edited by Fast355; 12-21-2005 at 03:58 PM.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 03:59 PM
  #45  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Fast355
Lets see factory LS1 vs. Built 396. With the 450 HP I stated, it will be around 550 ft/lbs! Built to swallow a 150 shot or a blower at that. What else is there to learn.

A very basic SBC rebuild is much less that 3K. I can go buy a GM goodwrench 250 HP 350 for about $1,600, swap to vortecs, upgrade the cam, buy an intake, sell the factory stuff on Ebay, and will be 350-400 FWHP for $2,000.

I have about $900.00 into a FULL rebuild on my 305.

The top-end of a LS1 is WIDER than a standard small block, I have done research. It required hacking on the heater-A/C box to get one in a friends Monte Carlo SS. I would be hacking on the frame and dog house area=NOT GOOD. The LS1 is as wide if not wider than a Big Block up top. Look up the measurements, I am sure they are on the net somewhere.
its wider until you relocate the coil packs, or put truck coils on, then its the same...
as for the rest... ok. sure.

then i'll stab a cam in mine with basic bolt ons, have the same HP and torque, and snag 30mpg highway.

but quick question.

have you DONE it yet? no.
go finish yours.
i'll finish mine.
PM me when you're done.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 04:08 PM
  #46  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by MrDude_1
its wider until you relocate the coil packs, or put truck coils on, then its the same...
as for the rest... ok. sure.

then i'll stab a cam in mine with basic bolt ons, have the same HP and torque, and snag 30mpg highway.

but quick question.

have you DONE it yet? no.
go finish yours.
i'll finish mine.
PM me when you're done.
I am still working on it, the main thing stopping me is the 4L80E swap and the wiring/PCM to run it. The 700r4 would shatter behind the torque. I could have the engine built in a couple of weeks, if I wanted to. I am still working out the cam specs. I am actually building this engine very similar to a LT1 that a friend built, tuned, and ran on the dyno. It made 485 FWHP @ 5,800 and 560 ft/lbs @ 4,500. I am using better flowing heads, with a slightly smaller port, and a slightly smaller cam (really just a tighter lobe seperation angle for a wider powerband), and about 1 point less compression.

I would love to see you pull 550 ft/lbs of torque at 4,000 rpm from only basic bolt-ons and a cam, I seriously DOUBT it will happen. I can see you getting 450 FWHP and I can buy 30 MPG. I am shooting for 18 MPG in a Van, I will probably get it because the 396 will have alot more torque and keep the converter locked and the transmission in OD vs. the 305.

Like I said my goal is low 13s NA and mid 12s with the 150 shot. In a fullsize van. LOL.

Last edited by Fast355; 12-21-2005 at 04:10 PM.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 04:19 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by MrDude_1

thank you.
you're either telling me you're full of ****, or that you're naive and easily mislead.

Are you telling me I wasn't standing there while we were TUNING this 305 SPEC DIRT TRACK car with a 8,000 RPM 310 that made over 400 RWHP. 437 @ 7,300 RPM to be exact




so even you know that the 305 is a POS and you're going to replace it... why argue about its "performance aspects" ?!
I never said the 305 was a piece, I just want to beat sports cars in a VAN and that takes more cubes and lots more torque!

The 305 is going into a car or on my engine stand, NOT the JUNK pile.

FWIW, my 305 was cammed and setup for a peak torque of around 3,500 and peak hp around 5,500. It actually made peak torque at 3,350 and peak HP at 5,500. It wasn't a super high RPM build, but the head flow and cam kept the HP strong all the way to the REV LIMITER @ 6,500 RPM (I was afraid the valves would float). Not to mention the H-rated tires were spinning at almost 150 MPH in 3rd gear and were beginning to ballon out. Also nobody has driven a van fast enough to know where the critical driveshaft speed is???

Last edited by Fast355; 12-21-2005 at 04:40 PM.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 04:56 PM
  #48  
Supreme Member

 
DM91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Fast355
Originally posted by MrDude_1

Are you telling me I wasn't standing there while we were TUNING this 305 SPEC DIRT TRACK car with a 8,000 RPM 310 that made over 400 RWHP. 437 @ 7,300 RPM to be exact

This does not translate into anything worthwhile for anyone to do for their street car which is what I thought was the subject at hand.
DM91RS is offline  
Old 12-21-2005, 05:04 PM
  #49  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 9,986
Received 386 Likes on 329 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by DM91RS
This does not translate into anything worthwhile for anyone to do for their street car which is what I thought was the subject at hand.
It does however relate to his saying that a 305 has NO potential. It CAN run.
Fast355 is online now  
Old 12-21-2005, 05:51 PM
  #50  
Senior Member

 
swerve-driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -RIPHST
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 383TBI Fastburns and 2"TB
Transmission: T56 held up by Spohnstuff
Originally posted by S!MON
btw as thread starter:

It was a long way from this thread to the actual engine.

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=315210

way better now good for low 13s so far maybe less with more tuning and a better exhaust.

greetings

Simon
S!imon: See all this arguing you started here? You should be ashamed of yourself! Kidding--

I checked out your engine- it looks awesome.

I don't know if they make a muffler short enough to fit between the real muffler and the tips (outlet) of the pipes? Like two small mufflers where the tails currently are? jUst a thought. Otherwise, I can only think to stash one in where the cat. conv. used to be.

Looks great-
S-D
swerve-driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gta892000
TPI
13
08-11-2019 11:16 AM
64Chief
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-12-2015 08:05 AM
Stroopwafel
Tech / General Engine
7
09-11-2015 06:38 AM
89fast5oh
Exhaust
2
09-08-2015 09:55 AM
GouldyGTR
Transmissions and Drivetrain
5
09-07-2015 09:05 PM



Quick Reply: can I convert my lo3 to a rev monster?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.