TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

May have goofed here...Edelbrock intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 02:31 AM
  #1  
bloyurdoorsoff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
May have goofed here...Edelbrock intake

I just got some parts in that I ordered and had asked for an Edelbrock vortec intake to go along with the vortec heads that I also ordered.The intake that I got is part #3704 Performer TBI.Upon further review it looks as if this is a direct oem replacement and not a big upgrade.Will this intake even fit these heads?Would it be worth keeping? As I look at the Jegs website it lists a "vortec" Performer AND a "vortec performer RPM.It says they both are for 4 barrel carbs...how would this work for TBI?Like i said...I have the vortec heads and a new spring kit to be able to run the Comp 276HR-14, Comp Controlled, Hyd Roller, 276/290-220/230-.510/.510-114.I'm also getting headers and a good exhaust to go with it.I had planned on keeping my ultimate modded tbi so I really don't know which intake is right.Am I on the right track here?

92 305 rs tbi
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #2  
bloyurdoorsoff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
ok...so I'm a little slow..lol...I've come to conclusion the tbi performer won't work with the vortec heads after physically mating them together.I guess I need at least the Performer RPM Vortec.My next question if anyone knows is...Will I be able to close my stock hood using the vortec intake with a tbi adapter plate?Where could I get one?Thanks

92 rs 350 tbi
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
I doubt it. I have a '71 Camaro with the Vortec heads and a Performer intake, and I have to use a 1.5" air cleaner to close the hood.

The RPM is gonna be a little taller. Not saying it can't be done, but it'll be tight.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #4  
r90camarors's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 1
From: Morris, IL
Car: '91 t-top RS; '91 hrdtp Z28
Engine: LO3;383tpi
Transmission: 700r4;very nice 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 zt posi, 3.70 auburn
Is that going on a 305? I think that cam will be way to big. I run it in my 383, an it pulls to the max ecm rpm of 6,400rpm, that is with a 2" 2bbl tbi. Also, I may be wrong, but you may need to do more work than just springs to make those heads capable of handling that lift.

This is just my suggestion, but if you plan on keeping the 305 and using the heads and cam:
Have the heads milled to 58cc to keep compression
Look into a single plane manifold
Consider a holley 670tbi with 65pph injectors

I run the performer rpm airgap, and like it. It did wonders over the performer I had on there, and I consider the performer rpm intakes to be the best dual planes for the vortecs. But I really think single plane is the way to go for high rpm engines. Also, with the adapter plate, my stock hood would not clear.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #5  
seanof30306's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by r90camarors
Is that going on a 305? I think that cam will be way to big. I run it in my 383, an it pulls to the max ecm rpm of 6,400rpm, that is with a 2" 2bbl tbi. Also, I may be wrong, but you may need to do more work than just springs to make those heads capable of handling that lift.

This is just my suggestion, but if you plan on keeping the 305 and using the heads and cam:
Have the heads milled to 58cc to keep compression
Look into a single plane manifold
Consider a holley 670tbi with 65pph injectors

I run the performer rpm airgap, and like it. It did wonders over the performer I had on there, and I consider the performer rpm intakes to be the best dual planes for the vortecs. But I really think single plane is the way to go for high rpm engines. Also, with the adapter plate, my stock hood would not clear.
on milling the heads .....

i don't think we've ever gotten a definitive answer on how much you have to mill a set of vortecs to get from 64cc to 58cc. has anyone actually done this and ccd the heads afterwards? when this comes up, people will often state their opinion, or the opinion of a machinist they've talked to, but i don't think i've seen anyone saying they've actually done it.

also, when you mill vortecs to 58 ccs, won't that greate valvetrain geometry issues?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #6  
PhilM's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: KCMO
Car: Accepting applications...
there is a Vortec TBI manifold, by the way, but it isn't an Edelbrock, it's made by GM. goes for $309.99. probably better and cheaper with the RPM, but just thought I'd throw that out there....
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #7  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I installed the Vortec's on mine without any milling....

A big increase in power. I doubt that you could tell any diff with a little more compression after milling.

My 2cents.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 07:59 AM
  #8  
r90camarors's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 1
From: Morris, IL
Car: '91 t-top RS; '91 hrdtp Z28
Engine: LO3;383tpi
Transmission: 700r4;very nice 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 zt posi, 3.70 auburn
Milling the heads to 58cc keeps the compression at 9.3:1 given you use a stock thickness head gasket. I'm not too sure what leaving them at 64cc lowers the compression to, but using a thinner head gasket will bring the compression back up a little.
Milling the heads should not create an issue.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #9  
bloyurdoorsoff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Hi Dm91rs

Originally posted by DM91RS
I installed the Vortec's on mine without any milling....

A big increase in power. I doubt that you could tell any diff with a little more compression after milling.

My 2cents.
I'm very interested in your setup since its very similar to mine.Are you running the stock hood?What kind of adapter plate did you use for your TBi?I was thinking of this one,http://www.painlessperformance.com/catalogframe.htm.Its torward the bottom of the page.I was hoping it was thin enough to allow the use of the stock hood.What kind of tuning issues did you run into?Did you buy a chip of have it burned?It would be great to have a heads up on some of the pitfalls.Does anyone else think the Comp 276HR-14 is way too much for this setup.I bought it on recommendation of a local speed shop who said it has alot of lope(which I want) but could still work with the stock converter.They said I might have to have some vacuum assistance but that wouldn't be a major hurdle.Any thoughts on this?

92 305 rs tbi
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 11:35 AM
  #10  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
bloyurdoorsoff

I made an adapter plate on a mill and it on top of the RPM intake with a taller LO5 breather just does miss the top of the hood with no liner on it.

I burn my own chips. I am not one to give advice on that as I'm still a beginner in tuning but the chip programming and burning part is eazy.

This is just my advice but I would go with a mild cam to begin with.

Last edited by DM91RS; Oct 7, 2006 at 05:51 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #11  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
bloyurdoorsoff

I made an adapter plate on a mill and it on top of the RPM intake with a taller LO5 breather just does miss the top of the hood with no liner on it.

I burn my own chips and it will some tuning. I am not one to give advice on that as I'm still a beginner in tuning but the chip programming and burning part is eazy.

This is just my advice but I would go with a mild cam to begin with.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #12  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
howell engineering has one that is 1/2 inch thick....
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #13  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by AJ_92RS
I doubt it. I have a '71 Camaro with the Vortec heads and a Performer intake, and I have to use a 1.5" air cleaner to close the hood.

The RPM is gonna be a little taller. Not saying it can't be done, but it'll be tight.
It is tight but can be done. My buddy runs the vortecs and a performer vorec intake with an adapter plate. His open elemet is snug under the hood but it fits.

Originally posted by seanof30306

i don't think we've ever gotten a definitive answer on how much you have to mill a set of vortecs to get from 64cc to 58cc.
I am pretty sure it is .020". I may be off a bit but that is what my buddy did that I just metnioned in the above quote. he combined that with a thinner head gasket and everything works great.

Originally posted by PhilM

there is a Vortec TBI manifold, by the way, but it isn't an Edelbrock, it's made by GM. goes for $309.99. probably better and cheaper with the RPM, but just thought I'd throw that out there....
This is correct but it doesn't seem like it is worth it since a better intake and a adapeter is far superior to it.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #14  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
what is the issue with GM vortec intake? is it a truck application?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 11:28 AM
  #15  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
It's very expensive.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #16  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ronny
what is the issue with GM vortec intake? is it a truck application?
Well they are made to fit anything that has vortec style heads. It was origoanlly desinged for those truck guys who wanted to keepo their TBI set-up but benifit from the better and new vortec style heads. Like all GM perofrmace intakes, they are better than stock but not as good as the rest of the aftermarket.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #17  
The Greek's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Richmond ,Virginia
Car: 70 Nova SS
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
as far as the intake goes I am running Edelbrock Performer Carb manifold with the holley TBI adaptor plate with a 2.75 open element. I ripped out all of that liner stuff too. Its a tight fight but it closes.

Hope this might help
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 06:26 AM
  #18  
Pablo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Originally posted by DM91RS
I installed the Vortec's on mine without any milling....

A big increase in power. I doubt that you could tell any diff with a little more compression after milling.

My 2cents.

I pulled my heads (heavily home ported 416s) to have some guide work done and at the same time I had them milled and went from 8.8:1 cr to about 10.

The difference in mid range torque was insane and dropped my et by a little over a tenth on average, not adjusting for traction problems... maybe almost 2 tenths on a 13.6 car thats alot more of a difference than a tenth in a 15s car

Ill bet if you milled your heads youd really like the gain. Compression is great.

Last edited by Pablo; Feb 13, 2004 at 06:28 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #19  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Pablo
I pulled my heads (heavily home ported 416s) to have some guide work done and at the same time I had them milled and went from 8.8:1 cr to about 10.

The difference in mid range torque was insane and dropped my et by a little over a tenth on average, not adjusting for traction problems... maybe almost 2 tenths on a 13.6 car thats alot more of a difference than a tenth in a 15s car

Ill bet if you milled your heads youd really like the gain. Compression is great.
Thanks for the info.....

The Vortec's are coming off the 305 to go on a 350 I'm building. I will be replacing the Vortec's with a set of 081's that I've ported and just have to mill down the guides, install new springs and seals and maybe install new valves. The 305 still runs strong but I'm just going to use it until the 350's ready and then the 305 will get freshened up and installed in my S10.

Later.....

Darrell
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
85 Jimmy
TPI
3
Sep 30, 2015 07:56 AM
jerflash
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Sep 24, 2015 03:11 PM
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 10, 2015 07:31 AM
e3pres
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 9, 2015 01:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 PM.