How does the Edlebrock Performer TBI Intake improve Performance?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Barstow, CA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
How does the Edlebrock Performer TBI Intake improve Performance?
I was planning on getting the Edlebrock TBI performer Intake Manifold for my lo3. But then I relized that the bores are exactly the same size as stock.
So what's the point? If the bores are the same size how could it possibly improve performance?
So what's the point? If the bores are the same size how could it possibly improve performance?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,752
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Well the plenum size is larger and so are the ports. it is really a good intake minus the size of the inlet bores. I have bored mine to 2" to remedy that though. Check out the sticky at the top for links. I am a big fan of this intake.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
would their be a problem with purchasing the 2.0" bored version and installing the 1 and 11/16" inch bored TBI on it?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
Originally posted by TraviZ
would their be a problem with purchasing the 2.0" bored version and installing the 1 and 11/16" inch bored TBI on it?
would their be a problem with purchasing the 2.0" bored version and installing the 1 and 11/16" inch bored TBI on it?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,752
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by TraviZ
would their be a problem with purchasing the 2.0" bored version and installing the 1 and 11/16" inch bored TBI on it?
would their be a problem with purchasing the 2.0" bored version and installing the 1 and 11/16" inch bored TBI on it?
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,752
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by TraviZ
so i should stick with the 1 11/16" for now, and when i get a 454, then i can just bore it to 2"?
so i should stick with the 1 11/16" for now, and when i get a 454, then i can just bore it to 2"?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
well thats what i was originally asking, would it be ok to have a 2" bored intake with only the 1, 11/16" TBI on it?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,752
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by TraviZ
well thats what i was originally asking, would it be ok to have a 2" bored intake with only the 1, 11/16" TBI on it?
well thats what i was originally asking, would it be ok to have a 2" bored intake with only the 1, 11/16" TBI on it?
Originally posted by BaLleRz68
ill actually be installing my edelbrock performer tbi intake tuesday and bringing it the track on wednesday. Ill let you guys know i do.
ill actually be installing my edelbrock performer tbi intake tuesday and bringing it the track on wednesday. Ill let you guys know i do.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
i could feel a slight different and it definately has better throttle response but i think i am running lean now. I recently had to get smogged and my CO readings were 0.00% which means im probably running alittle lean and that was with 2* timing advance and 87 octane, now im running 6* of timing and 91 octane and have no problems with knock. I have a tbichips stage 1 chip in there now and i might put in my stage 2 chip with 0* timing and see how it runs. This weekend im going to get my laptop setup with WinALDL, then get one of those ebay ALDL cables and start dagalogging hopefully within the next 2 weeks.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
removing and replacing the intake is the eazy part, the part that took me the longest was removing the old intake gasket/sealant from the heads.
I did not run any better times, i had terrible traction (probably because of the addition of the 2400 stall converter) and when i was halfway home my car starting running like crap and i found out that the MAP vacuum hose was melting on the intake EGR base, so im sure my MAP readings were also way off during my quarter mile runs. My 60' times were about 4 tenths slower than normal and i was running about 8 tenths slower in the quarter. Ill try to get new track times memorial day weekend. This weekend i plan on checking out my pinion angle and setting it to about -1*. Since replacing the tranny i havent checked the angle and believe that it might be off. Also it is time to lube my LCAs and panhard rod, as well as the torque arm bushing. I also plan on installing that Stage II chip. Ill try to keep you guys updated.
I did not run any better times, i had terrible traction (probably because of the addition of the 2400 stall converter) and when i was halfway home my car starting running like crap and i found out that the MAP vacuum hose was melting on the intake EGR base, so im sure my MAP readings were also way off during my quarter mile runs. My 60' times were about 4 tenths slower than normal and i was running about 8 tenths slower in the quarter. Ill try to get new track times memorial day weekend. This weekend i plan on checking out my pinion angle and setting it to about -1*. Since replacing the tranny i havent checked the angle and believe that it might be off. Also it is time to lube my LCAs and panhard rod, as well as the torque arm bushing. I also plan on installing that Stage II chip. Ill try to keep you guys updated.
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Texas
Car: 2001 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I have heard that there are some issues with the Holley bolting up, but the Edelbrock is a DIRECT replacement.
Last edited by DSLDUDE2001; May 5, 2004 at 12:24 PM.
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 22
From: Monroe,NC
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
I've noticed many people giving this intake a bad rap in the past due to the 1 11/16" bores. The one I have has the torque tubes that you drop into the tubes to improve low to midrange torque. These measured the OE 1 11/16" which leads me to think that the bores in my intake are almost 2" if not that. I've also noticed that the version produced today does not have these tubes and is the OE 1 11/16" diameter bore. Don't know why Edelbrock dropped this feature as you could tell a difference between when the tubes were in and out. I am running without the tubes which seems to allow better performance in the midrange for my car.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by vjo90RS8
This weekend im going to get my laptop setup with WinALDL, then get one of those ebay ALDL cables and start dagalogging hopefully within the next 2 weeks.
This weekend im going to get my laptop setup with WinALDL, then get one of those ebay ALDL cables and start dagalogging hopefully within the next 2 weeks.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,752
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by DSLDUDE2001
I have heard that there are some issues with the Holley bolting up, but the Edelbrock is a DIRECT replacement.
I have heard that there are some issues with the Holley bolting up, but the Edelbrock is a DIRECT replacement.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I had this intake back in my TBI days. It was ok. I think the holley one is much better thought. Bigger, beefier, and has 2'' bores already. I hear you have to run a spacer to be able to use a EGR valve but I don't think thats a big deal. But I noticed alittle more topend with that intake over stock.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
1989formula5.7l
DFI and ECM
1
Aug 15, 2015 11:35 AM
1116, beteen, bore, car, diffference, experience, improve, intak, intake, iroc, performance, performer, stock, tbi







