TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Horrible dyno graph!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:15 AM
  #1  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Horrible dyno graph!!!!!!!

anyone seen any kind of issues like this with your TBI projects?
Attached Thumbnails Horrible dyno graph!!!!!!!-drtybird.jpg  
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 12:18 AM
  #2  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
its a 355 with Flat tops, 72CC heads, LT1 cam, edelbrock intake, Holley TBI. Motor is fairly fresh with about 10,000 miles on it.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 01:15 AM
  #3  
Brent's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: PA
If the Air Fuel Ratio graph is accurate, that engine is running too lean. The dips in the graph might be the ECM pulling timing out.

I wouldn't take it to WOT again before more fuel is added or you may risk engine damage.

I'll even go as far to say, that dyno run should have been aborted by 3800 rpm.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 01:24 AM
  #4  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
What kind of 72cc heads? The lack of flow in the upper RPM's will shock the power band like that. I also agree that the engine is running a little lean. Did you play with fuel pressure at all?
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #5  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
You are running extremely lean. Do you have the stock fuel pump? What kinda of chip burning did you do? I would start with those problems. You dyno chart looks like a bolt on LO3 should.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #6  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
so a 355 with a LT1 cam should not look that way correct?
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #7  
vjo90RS8's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
you are running way too lean, at WOT i believe you should have around a 12:1 A/F ratio. And you are very very lean in the lower RPM areas.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #8  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Mr.Crackhead
so a 355 with a LT1 cam should not look that way correct?
Correct. Most stock LO3's will produce a graph like that. You should be making at least 220 to 240 at the wheels (those heads you have are not the best for top end). You need fuel bad. I mean really bad. Your AF ratio is not safe at all for your motor. What size injectors and fuel pump are you running?
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #9  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
He's not that lean. It only gets kinda bad in the beginning and high rpms, but if you look at the AF graph and compare it to the graph, it doesn't match up. You definitely need to work on getting more fuel, but that's not your only problem.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #10  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Well thx guys, was just hoping someone had a clue what would have caused it, raised fuel up, I will try to log it this week i guess.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 09:50 AM
  #11  
Fast305's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: DFW,TX
Car: 1983 G20 Van
Engine: 305 4bbl
Transmission: Possesed 700r4
Hes only about 13.8:1 @ WOT in the mid range. He needs to get that number to 12.5 or so. I would worry about it if he was going to put a constant heavy load on it(WOT racing).

Does this car still have the 305 injectors on it? If it does it seriously needs 350 or 350 9C1 cop car injectors and maybe an AFPR.

Depending on what LT1 cam he has that looks about right for the LT1 cam in a TBI motor. If he has a B-body cam those are all about low-mid range torque. Even some of the early F-bodies use the B-body cam.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #12  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
what size holley injectors? what fuel pressure? data logging will tell you nothing about WOT( IMO). you may need to datalog to get the "underlying" fuel tables in line(datalog) and then back to dyno for conformation of subsequent WOT improvement. i would record the beginning datalogs, make your changes and then back to dyno to see if the WOT is improved(enrichened). the next dyno run can tell you if you are moving in correct direction.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 09:48 PM
  #13  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Logged car today, I have raised fuel pressure, made some timing adjustments, will redyno next week and see what happens.
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 01:31 AM
  #14  
trans_am_ta_84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Car: 89 trans am
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
i put a 355 in my car also.. had a 305 LO3 stock.. what kind of a fuel pump would you guys reccomend? i have the 350 injectors. mine seems to have alot more power then my LO3 had.

i've got and lt1 cam also
305 tpi heads (58cc)
edelbrock performer tbi intake
federal mogul pistons.. the guy said they have a little dome but not totally flat
decked block

thinkin about getting 350 tpi heads for over winter project in the moths ahead.
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #15  
Brent's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally posted by Mr.Crackhead
Logged car today, I have raised fuel pressure, made some timing adjustments, will redyno next week and see what happens.
Before you spend money on more dyno time it would be a good idea to make sure that your fuel pump is maintaining the new fuel pressure setting at WOT. If the pressure falls at WOT, dyno time will be a waste.

Another thought, if you make changes to the timing and fuel simultaneously how will you know which one gave you an improvement? Or worse, how will you know which one caused you to lose power?
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #16  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by trans_am_ta_84
what kind of a fuel pump would you guys reccomend?
Walbo 190 or 255 unit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #17  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
what is advantage of walbro over GM TPI OR LT1?
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #18  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ronny
what is advantage of walbro over GM TPI OR LT1?
Reliability. TPI pumps will work but you can't use an LT1 pump. Some aftermarket pumps can be used in both generations though. Anyways, GM pumps are junk and crap out unexpectedly with little to no wear on them.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #19  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
I know this topic is over a week old, but look where his peak HP and torque is, ~3700 RPM for HP and ~2800 for TQ. Is the reason for this the cam or the poor tuning or the heads? His numbers are shifted waaaay in the lower range and just dies after 4K rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #20  
Mr.Crackhead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: LaFollette, Tn.
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
well it would seem that the timing and fuel both played parts. they was not changed at the same time however. The fuel problem was do to the fact that one of my Holley injectors took a crap on me, it went out completey on th eway to FG8 this weekend. Changed that injector and man you talk about a difference in a car. and as far as teh dyno time, its nice to have one at my access and disposal
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 02:25 PM
  #21  
Dewey316's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
my guess is that it is a combination of factors.

1) that cam is pretty small in a 350.
2) Fueling/tuning is def. an issue.
3) I dont' know what his comp. ration works out to, with flat tops i assume he is in the right range for the compresion ration. that doesn't however mean there isn't a mismatch in heads/intake/cam combo i may have missed it, but i did not see exactly what heads he had.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
Nervous2
Firebirds for Sale
2
Oct 8, 2015 10:53 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM
cstrobel65
Exhaust
7
Sep 16, 2015 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.