stock 3.1 v6 VS. 5.0 TBI.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, OH
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Auto.
stock 3.1 v6 VS. 5.0 TBI.
stock 3.1 v6 VS. 5.0 TBI.
I know some one with a stock 3.1 92 camaro and i have a stock 5.0 tbi and we were also arguing over whos is faster so we raced and I dusted him and i have 175,000 miles and he only has 75,000.
I know some one with a stock 3.1 92 camaro and i have a stock 5.0 tbi and we were also arguing over whos is faster so we raced and I dusted him and i have 175,000 miles and he only has 75,000.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,758
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by cmro92_rs305
Doward says a 3.1 v6 is faster than an L03 V8 stock versus stock, that true?
Doward says a 3.1 v6 is faster than an L03 V8 stock versus stock, that true?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, OH
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Auto.
i Know there's a post called "Doward says a 3.1 v6 is faster than an L03 V8 stock versus stock, that true?" And i read it and they say the v6 is faster like I say a "v6 is a wet match in a dark cave compared to the v8's"
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: Moreno Valley, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: 700R4 (MD8)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open (GU2)
Umm my friend has a 91 RS with the V6 and I have a 90 RS with the L03.
Not an ice cube's chance in hell the V6 is faster. His car almost feels like my Friend's 4-cyl Mustang. I'm not saying they are pathetic with slight mods, but stock, nothing to brag about and there is no way he could ever beat me unless I had two broken feet and no arms.
The L03 isn't a performance revolution and it wasn't meant to be, but it IS faster than a V6.
Not an ice cube's chance in hell the V6 is faster. His car almost feels like my Friend's 4-cyl Mustang. I'm not saying they are pathetic with slight mods, but stock, nothing to brag about and there is no way he could ever beat me unless I had two broken feet and no arms.
The L03 isn't a performance revolution and it wasn't meant to be, but it IS faster than a V6.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 2
Car: camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi and 350 on stand
Transmission: 4spd auto
A few minor modifications to the L03 and you have an engine that is doing around 300ftlbs of torque. The V6 would need a lot of work to do that. That being said, maybe the guy in the L03 was dumb and didn't let his tire(s) get any traction. I know when i lay on my car in winter my one leg spins like there's no tomorrow, even when i'm moving.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Barstow, CA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by cmro92_rs305
Doward says a 3.1 v6 is faster than an L03 V8 stock versus stock, that true?
Doward says a 3.1 v6 is faster than an L03 V8 stock versus stock, that true?
I've heard stories about 5 speed 3.1's beating auto LO3's. Remember a stock auto LO3's comes with 2.73 gears, while 5 speed 3.1's come stock with 3.42 gears.
Now if you put 3.42's in your LO3, the 3.1 doesn't stand a chance in hell.
Last edited by johnjm22; Dec 20, 2004 at 01:39 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Why is this thread still alive? This is the stupidest topic I've heard in a long time and it's come up not once but twice! Please just let it die and don't reply.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
my modded 3.1 runs equally as fast as my 305tbi, it is possible for a v6 to take the 305, just depends on the car
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland Ohio
Car: Formula, a big red brick.
Engine: A Ford 351 Windsor... ?
Transmission: Dodge 727
Originally posted by Pillsbry10
my modded 3.1 runs equally as fast as my 305tbi, it is possible for a v6 to take the 305, just depends on the car
my modded 3.1 runs equally as fast as my 305tbi, it is possible for a v6 to take the 305, just depends on the car
Stock for Stock, Mod for Mod, Driver for Driver.... the lo3 is the nicer peice of **** out of the two.
Sure it's possible, just as possible as a 3 cyl Ford Festiva to kill your v6.... but that would still just be another peice of crap.
Besides, the LO3 car has a greater potential for a lot less money.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,758
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
I don't want this to turn into a flame war. In this day and age anything can happen. A 3cly geo could beat a vette if the proper circumstances are met. That doesn't prove anything though. Same with the LO3 and V6 debate. If both cars rolled off the showroom today the L03 would win every race. Age, mileage and poor maintenance allows v6 victories over the LO3.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Billy Decker
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Sep 4, 2015 03:46 PM






