Thinking about taking it to the next level
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Thinking about taking it to the next level
As some of you have probably already read, I finally got some tuning done and was able to put down 262 RWHP and 365 RWTQ with my 350 TBI. Well, I'm already looking for the next thing to do. The car is complete on everything else (eg, suspension, interior, tranny, rear, etc).
I would prefer to go to some form of forced induction, but I know that our computers are not exactly hi-tech for that sort of thing. If you know of a way, either turbo or SC, and something that doesn't require me hacking my car to death, then I would be interested in hearing it.
After that though, it leaves nitrous which I'm open to something like a 75 shot. Of course I would go with a wet system, but then we run into another slew of problems . . . my throttle body bores are 2" along with my intake manifold bores, but I would imagine the plates are for standard 5.7L sized bores. I also have the chip in it with a ton of timing added throughout the band. I'm aware of some devices out there that would retard timing at certain times, but haven't yet found what they're talking about.
I really want to get this thing above 400hp. Any advice would be appreciated. I'm also seriously considering going to TPI simply so I can have reasonable and reliable forced induction choices.
I would prefer to go to some form of forced induction, but I know that our computers are not exactly hi-tech for that sort of thing. If you know of a way, either turbo or SC, and something that doesn't require me hacking my car to death, then I would be interested in hearing it.
After that though, it leaves nitrous which I'm open to something like a 75 shot. Of course I would go with a wet system, but then we run into another slew of problems . . . my throttle body bores are 2" along with my intake manifold bores, but I would imagine the plates are for standard 5.7L sized bores. I also have the chip in it with a ton of timing added throughout the band. I'm aware of some devices out there that would retard timing at certain times, but haven't yet found what they're talking about.
I really want to get this thing above 400hp. Any advice would be appreciated. I'm also seriously considering going to TPI simply so I can have reasonable and reliable forced induction choices.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by TBI92Camaro
go carb 

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Gunny, refresh my memory on you cam specs. IIRC, they are fairly small. To get to 300+ RWHP without a power adder, you need more cam. In order to run more cam, you need bigger injectors. In order to make everything run togather, I recomend the EBL (are you using one currently?).
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by Fast355
Gunny, refresh my memory on you cam specs. IIRC, they are fairly small. To get to 300+ RWHP without a power adder, you need more cam. In order to run more cam, you need bigger injectors. In order to make everything run togather, I recomend the EBL (are you using one currently?).
EBL?
204/214 .429/.452 116 + 1.6 RR's.
I went with it for ease of tuning and phat torque.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by EthanH
You just told me the other day it was already tpi..Do you do this for attention?
Trending Topics
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
EBL?
204/214 .429/.452 116 + 1.6 RR's.
I went with it for ease of tuning and phat torque.
204/214 .429/.452 116 + 1.6 RR's.
I went with it for ease of tuning and phat torque.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by Fast355
It is an easy cam to tune, but what is easy to tune generally sacrifices power in my experience. Torque will be great, but HP will be down.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
EBL?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by Fast355
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
In English? And what kind of $$$ are we talking about here?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by Fast355
PM RBob for a price. I do not know what the release version is going for. Mine has been well worth the price paid.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
What capablity does it give me? I read that part of that 7 page thread, but as mentioned numerous times on here, I do not understand any of that computer/PROM/ECM/C++/code stuff. It makes me literally want to blow my brains out. I pay people like you to do that stuff for me. 

Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by BronYrAur
Well DynamicEFI that is RBob's new website, it gives a bit more concise information on the EBL setup than that long thread. Basically it allows you to datalog at an incredibly faster rate, it allows the use of a 2-bar MAP sensor (for forced induction) and has RBobs Ultimate TBI code on it. It's very good believe me. Worth every penny I spent on it. In your case I would not even think about putting nitrous on that motor until you run it on a dyno with a Wideband O2 sensor hooked up to make sure you aren't lean at all up top. That would be catastrophic if you were lean up top, and I"m sure not worth it to you to get nitrous on there right away and risk blowing that nice engine to pieces. The EBL really does open up that once-closed (or at least difficult to open) window for forced induction.

Plenty of fuel left up top too.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
That would be like starting over though. I thought about it, but then I started reading up on it, and then I would have to get a different pickup, run different fuel lines and get all of my computer stuff to work still . . . then go through the whole process of tuning it again. I thought it was nothing more than a manifold, carb and distributor deal, but apparently not. 

first I yanked ALL the unneccesary wiring...pretty much most of thepass. side wiring harness. put a intake and carb on the motor and a HEI dist. I yanked from a 77 chevy pickup w/vac. advance. Went ahead and replaced the module so less headaches. Put a Mallory AFPR on the strut tower base. Ran some transmission line rubber hose from the stock fuel rails over to the dual feedl ine on the carb.
Thats the main stuff. It was seriously worth it, engine bay looked MUCH cleaner. Sadly, I never got to run it. Didnt have a tranny and then I started building my Mustang.
Trust me, its not that hard. I know how hard it is to find a utner for the TBI/TPI platform. I know a few tuners for my 5.0 EFI platform and hell, theres a few readily available programs osld for this car that owuld allow me to do some laptop tuning.
And yet, when I put my stroker motor in the Stang, Ill STILL be going carb...its no daily driver but a well-tuned carb can run just fine in most any driving application.
In any case, good luck man!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally Posted by Gunny Highway
It was ran on the dyno with a wide band and tuned 3 days later. Picked up 13 RWHP at peak , which is actually now a plateau from 4700-5700 RPMs. Not to mention I picked up 15-20 RWHP across the entire band. The new numbers are 262 RWHP and 365 RWTQ. Now can I have my nitrous or forced induction? 
Plenty of fuel left up top too.

Plenty of fuel left up top too.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by BronYrAur
Cool, I must have missed that, that you went back and got it run with a WB. If you're cool all the way up as far as AFR, go for it man. The EBL is really nice though. It'd make the engine run quite a bit smoother almost right away just after importing your fuel tables that you have now. It will allow the ECM to sense boost and offers timing controls while boosted. It also has nitrous controls, I haven't looked into them much at all, but I believe it's something along the lines of a window switch integrated into the ECM. Sounds like you've got it runnings pretty well now though? That's good to hear, and I wouldn't even consider carbing your motor at this point. You've got enough fuel and enough air right now so you aren't going to pick up any power, you just may lose some driveability, MPG, and throttle response.
Well that brings in more questions though:
1.) People keep saying that it's worth every penny, but noone has mentioned a price on it yet.
I looked at the website, but saw no price listed.
2.) If I wanted to go with a plate style wet kit, we still run into the bore problem. My throttle body bores and my intake manifold bores are 2". I would imagine that the 5.7L kit is for standard size bores. Maybe somehow talk to the companies and see if they can send me a 454 kit plate????
3.) If I wanted to go with a Procharger kit, I read on the "power adder" forum that in the TBI applications they simply don't put out the 10-12 psi necessary to make the kit worth the money. . . usually hovering around the 6 psi level and have a tendancy to be more of a PIA than they're worth. Any kind of turbo applications out there?????
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Gunny, I'll PM the cost details when I get home tonight. It is the same for everyone (with the exception of the beta testers), just so everyone understands I'm not changing the pricing around. Web site is fairly new and I am still working on it.
As for the EBL and boost: it supports a 2-bar MAP sensor along with a boost retard table (3D: boost vs. RPM), and a boost fuel multiplier table (3D: boost vs. RPM).
N2O control: N2O out active has several qualifiers: arming input, minimum MPH, minimum RPM, maximum RPM, then a set SA retard value.
The arming input can be wired to the same switch that provides power to the soleniods. Then need to be above the min MPH, above the min RPM, and below the max RPM. The output will go active and reduce the timing.
{edit: there is another qualifier, the TPS%. There is a minimum required TPS% value before the N2O is enabled. Which does make sense.}
The output will require a relay to drive the soleniods.
RBob.
As for the EBL and boost: it supports a 2-bar MAP sensor along with a boost retard table (3D: boost vs. RPM), and a boost fuel multiplier table (3D: boost vs. RPM).
N2O control: N2O out active has several qualifiers: arming input, minimum MPH, minimum RPM, maximum RPM, then a set SA retard value.
The arming input can be wired to the same switch that provides power to the soleniods. Then need to be above the min MPH, above the min RPM, and below the max RPM. The output will go active and reduce the timing.
{edit: there is another qualifier, the TPS%. There is a minimum required TPS% value before the N2O is enabled. Which does make sense.}
The output will require a relay to drive the soleniods.
RBob.
Last edited by RBob; May 9, 2006 at 04:50 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








