Heads without headers?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Heads without headers?
Would putting 113 (aluminum L98) heads on my engine (after possible 350 replacement or 305 rebuild) without headers and full exhaust be worth doing?
I want to do a LT1 cam (already have the cam) swap at the same time, but I am VERY limited on cash.
I want to get out of the 16s. Last I ran at Thunder Valley was a 16.5. Since then I've done open element w/K&N, 3.23 posi (vs previous 2.73s open). Not alot, but it should get me something more than the 16.5. Would the cam and the heads w/tune see me into the 15s without the headers and exhaust?
I want to do a LT1 cam (already have the cam) swap at the same time, but I am VERY limited on cash.
I want to get out of the 16s. Last I ran at Thunder Valley was a 16.5. Since then I've done open element w/K&N, 3.23 posi (vs previous 2.73s open). Not alot, but it should get me something more than the 16.5. Would the cam and the heads w/tune see me into the 15s without the headers and exhaust?
Last edited by 91_5.7_TPI; May 10, 2006 at 10:27 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Ditch the exhaust from the engine to the rear. Thats probably one of the first steps to speeding up the car.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I want to keep the car street legal, so I can't ditch the exhaust.
I would get the full exhaust, but I won't have the money. I just want to know if the heads, cam, and tune would drop my ET into the 15s
I would get the full exhaust, but I won't have the money. I just want to know if the heads, cam, and tune would drop my ET into the 15s
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I don't know as of yet. I'm trying to get all the parts together first. Who would you recommend.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
The heads are not the choke-point of a stock or near stock L03. The exhaust, the air cleaner, followed by the puny cam are. Given the gain possible with a full exhaust and 1.6:1 roller rockers only heads are not worth the swap with the stock pre-cat exhaust.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
So, I would be better off to go with a full exhaust and the LT1 cam and a good tune than I would heads, cam, and tune?
I'm already running a 13x4 open element behind the functional SS ram air hood. Would a TB spacer to get the element higher and get rid of the plastic breather spacer be a good mod?
I'm already running a 13x4 open element behind the functional SS ram air hood. Would a TB spacer to get the element higher and get rid of the plastic breather spacer be a good mod?
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
IIRC, Dewey ran into the mid 14s with only a single plane carb intake (a Holley Projection intake would be better), ultimate TBI mods, cam swap, full exhaust, gears, and tuning.
There are alot of mixed emotions on the TBI spacer. I have used the 1" tall open center spacers with good power increases, especially over 3,500 RPM and above.
You will have to do some work to get the geometry on the throttle, cruise, and TV cables right.
The more you can unshroud the TBI bores from the top, the better the TBI will breathe.
There are alot of mixed emotions on the TBI spacer. I have used the 1" tall open center spacers with good power increases, especially over 3,500 RPM and above.
You will have to do some work to get the geometry on the throttle, cruise, and TV cables right.
The more you can unshroud the TBI bores from the top, the better the TBI will breathe.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
By gears, would my 3.23s suffice? I don't want to run anything higher, so I think another swap is out.
I know where I can get a 3/4 (I think) inch spacer. I might try that.
You mean like clear some area around the injectors to let more air into the TB bores? The same guy has a 1/4 injector spacer, as well.
Will the Holley Projection intake fit the stock (Ulitmate Modded, of course) TB? They look like they should.
I know where I can get a 3/4 (I think) inch spacer. I might try that.
You mean like clear some area around the injectors to let more air into the TB bores? The same guy has a 1/4 injector spacer, as well.
Will the Holley Projection intake fit the stock (Ulitmate Modded, of course) TB? They look like they should.
Last edited by 91_5.7_TPI; May 11, 2006 at 08:15 PM.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
3.23s would be fine for a 700r4. If you do the T-56 swap you are dreaming of, go with 4.10s! The T-56 has a tall 2.66 first gear as well as a tall .5:1 OD ratio. The 700r4 is comfortable taking off with its 3.06 first gear and cruises well with 3.23s due to its .7:1 OD.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Yea, the car is my daily, so the 3.42s would be too stiff for that (IMO). If I get the T56, it is getting the 4.10s or 3.73s.
I want the LCAs, I am gonna try to get them sometime this summer.
What about the Holley intake? Would the factory TBI mount to it?
I want the LCAs, I am gonna try to get them sometime this summer.
What about the Holley intake? Would the factory TBI mount to it?
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
I've owned my camaro for 3 years, and only recently come to realize that it's got a 3.42 in the back, I hadn't known before.
the reason I say that, is because the difference in driveability and gas mileage are almost completely unnoticable, in fact the only real difference(and in fact, the reason why I ended up figuring this out) was the fact that my car sits at 2300rpms at 70mph.
but the way gas mileage works can be tricky, a lower rpm doesn't always mean better gas mileage, I average 18 with a cai/rai setup, 2200 stall converter, and 3.42 gears...the car spends much of its time around 3k-3500, and it currently doesn't have a working o2, egr, or esc(recently discovered the ground wires to the o2 and the esc were cut, causing them to overvolt), the point of all this being that gas mileage isn't 100% about driving around town at 1k rpms, it's about efficiency, and getting your car up to cruising speeds quickly so you don't have to hold the throttle at more than 15%.
----------
btw the reason why I mentioned the bad sensors is that I should be getting horrendous gas mileage without those sensors, but I'm getting pretty good gas mileage, even with the mods done to it and not having those sensors.
the reason I say that, is because the difference in driveability and gas mileage are almost completely unnoticable, in fact the only real difference(and in fact, the reason why I ended up figuring this out) was the fact that my car sits at 2300rpms at 70mph.
but the way gas mileage works can be tricky, a lower rpm doesn't always mean better gas mileage, I average 18 with a cai/rai setup, 2200 stall converter, and 3.42 gears...the car spends much of its time around 3k-3500, and it currently doesn't have a working o2, egr, or esc(recently discovered the ground wires to the o2 and the esc were cut, causing them to overvolt), the point of all this being that gas mileage isn't 100% about driving around town at 1k rpms, it's about efficiency, and getting your car up to cruising speeds quickly so you don't have to hold the throttle at more than 15%.
----------
btw the reason why I mentioned the bad sensors is that I should be getting horrendous gas mileage without those sensors, but I'm getting pretty good gas mileage, even with the mods done to it and not having those sensors.
Last edited by FreeLoader; May 14, 2006 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally Posted by 91_5.7_TPI
What about the Holley intake? Would the factory TBI mount to it?
I think that BronYrAur has had the stock and a 670 Holley tb unit on his Holley intake.
And I agree.........exhaust and intake first. And check out the thread at the top of the stickies for tuning which will make a differance.
HTH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evilstuie
Exhaust
24
Feb 28, 2016 03:33 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM









